[QUOTE=MadderMax;4660855]Please post the website, so I know where NOT to go. Thanks.[/QUOTE][URL]Eukgirl.com[/URL] and sweetgem.live
Printable View
[QUOTE=MadderMax;4660855]Please post the website, so I know where NOT to go. Thanks.[/QUOTE][URL]Eukgirl.com[/URL] and sweetgem.live
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4660870]Let me know. If you guys think I am a white knight then it's time for me to retire LOL.
I want good girls to thrive but I also don't want to disappoint you guys.[/QUOTE]Not you Mr. Boner. You have deep pockets and good intel.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4660870]Let me know. If you guys think I am a white knight then it's time for me to retire LOL.
I want good girls to thrive but I also don't want to disappoint you guys.[/QUOTE]You provide great intel that's always appreciated even though we may not always acknowledge it.
[QUOTE=BoneRanger22;4660074]Anyone have info for the booker for the Los Angeles area. I can't find on HX and they don't return messages with number on website. I've had good sucesss with the OC booker. I like this agency. Want to try a few LA ones.[/QUOTE]If you are good with the OC bookers, ask them for the LA Bookers number. It's a better number than the one on their website and letting J know that you were referred by the OC booker will make your vetting quicker and easier.
Has anyone seen her? I wonder if her photos are real.
Any info will be awesome.
[QUOTE=Jack926;4661773]Has anyone seen her? I wonder if her photos are real.
Any info will be awesome.[/QUOTE]Her picture looks familiar. I think she was with J not too long ago. I forget under which name though.
So I decided to go on the lookout for something new; got to the wilshire location and met up with julia. Julia looks to be around 30 to mid 30's GND she speaks very little English just the basic phrases and yes she is bb but for a little extra. In terms of body julia isn't skinny but isn't fat either I'd say somewhere in between with a little pooch. By the way her description on the site lies; she is not near 103 pounds probably like 130 on the brink of being fat but not quite. Got a little preview in the shower for things to come, and overall she looked relatively enthusiastic to start the session got into a variety of positions and finished in doggy her pussy was pretty tight and she could definitely take a pounding she's got a nice ass to grab and a natural c cup rack. I left pretty happy overall but if spinners are more your thing I would skip.
L: 6. 5/10.
S: 9/10.
Repeat: I don't think so, I rarely repeat. Was also put off in the beginning by her counting the money. She also has a couple of tattoos, 1 of a musical note on her left hand, another manuscript style tattoo on her back, and another one on her left shoulder blade.
[QUOTE=ILoveKGirls;4660034]The board is to keep the bookers honest and share intel on these hoes. These White knights do stand out.[/QUOTE]I think I'm a black knight since I only post negative and bad review of girls. Rarely post atf. Good stuff hit my pm box. .
[QUOTE=AsianBaller1;4662111]I think I'm a black knight since I only post negative and bad review of girls. Rarely post atf. Good stuff hit my pm box. .[/QUOTE]I guess I would have to put myself in the WK category. If I have a good time with a gal even though she's not DDG, I'll write a positive but honest review. If the session is really crap because of the gal's attitude, I'll report that too. The one thing I have learned in my many years in this hobby is that beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder. I have looked at some websites where a hobbyist is extolling a extra large BBW and I have to say that I couldn't get it up no matter what her skills. Yet, for that individual she's a 10 in looks. The bottom line is that reviews are subjective and that one needs to find reviewers whose likes are similar to yours. And yeah, I know that's not easy.
[QUOTE=AsianBaller1;4662111]I think I'm a black knight since I only post negative and bad review of girls. Rarely post atf. Good stuff hit my pm box. .[/QUOTE]I don't see where esle we can get honest reviews. With how things are going for awhile now, the only place to get any "recent" reviews are on the monkey which are filled with questionable reviews. TER was dead and full of shills. I have posted in the past about how before FOSTA, too many k-girls were 8-10 when in reality alot were jut 6-7 with a few 8's. Once in awhile, a 9 would appear but that was pretty rare. At the price point we pay, we won't get top shelf. I for one, welcome negative reviews. The scene needs to be more honest. I am just tired of too many bookers who can't give you any decent intel on the services / experiences because it goes against them trying to get you to book. To add, they usually lie so any info from them is probably not reliable. You text, get a list of girls with their stats and sometimes with a list of services they may or may not provide. Photoshopped pictures are all the norm, so the girl is rarely what is seen. I equate today's current climate in the scene as in being in a minefield. Sometimes you won't step on it (better than expected or good enough) to a dud (the mine).
[QUOTE=TheAbc;4662195]I don't see where esle we can get honest reviews. With how things are going for awhile now, the only place to get any "recent" reviews are on the monkey which are filled with questionable reviews. TER was dead and full of shills. I have posted in the past about how before FOSTA, too many k-girls were 8-10 when in reality alot were jut 6-7 with a few 8's. Once in awhile, a 9 would appear but that was pretty rare. At the price point we pay, we won't get top shelf. I for one, welcome negative reviews. The scene needs to be more honest. I am just tired of too many bookers who can't give you any decent intel on the services / experiences because it goes against them trying to get you to book. To add, they usually lie so any info from them is probably not reliable. You text, get a list of girls with their stats and sometimes with a list of services they may or may not provide. Photoshopped pictures are all the norm, so the girl is rarely what is seen. I equate today's current climate in the scene as in being in a minefield. Sometimes you won't step on it (better than expected or good enough) to a dud (the mine).[/QUOTE]
Yes!!! The TER days, everyone was "9" or "10" model material and what a Joke that thing was! We have more honest reviews here and I rather golf than fuck a girl that is a "5" or "4" and that is when the room is totally dark! Of course, there are couple shills here and there but I guess those reviewers are everywhere.
I also welcome a GOOD, HONEST reviews.
[QUOTE=Veni1;4662181]I guess I would have to put myself in the WK category. If I have a good time with a gal even though she's not DDG, I'll write a positive but honest review. If the session is really crap because of the gal's attitude, I'll report that too. The one thing I have learned in my many years in this hobby is that beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder. I have looked at some websites where a hobbyist is extolling a extra large BBW and I have to say that I couldn't get it up no matter what her skills. Yet, for that individual she's a 10 in looks. The bottom line is that reviews are subjective and that one needs to find reviewers whose likes are similar to yours. And yeah, I know that's not easy.[/QUOTE]I agree with you brother! That's why I need REAL pictures and not "representative" since other types might not be the same as mine. This is why I stopped with the Asian agencies and try the young college type Asians in the hx crews. At least the hx crew Asians show real pics of themselves without showing their face.
I haven't seen her because she is at the bottom of my to do. She changed names and agencies a few times but I remember she was Soo at SAG.
[URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26373-Korean-Agency-BB&p=4357201&viewfull=1#post4357201]First review[/URL]
[URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26373-Korean-Agency-BB&p=4359143&viewfull=1#post4359143]Second review[/URL]
Then she left for the Bay and back to OC and now LA.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/raina-escort-los-angeles-532833[/URL]
[QUOTE=Jack926;4661773]Has anyone seen her? I wonder if her photos are real.
Any info will be awesome.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Veni1;4662181]I guess I would have to put myself in the WK category. If I have a good time with a gal even though she's not DDG, I'll write a positive but honest review. If the session is really crap because of the gal's attitude, I'll report that too. The one thing I have learned in my many years in this hobby is that beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder. I have looked at some websites where a hobbyist is extolling a extra large BBW and I have to say that I couldn't get it up no matter what her skills. Yet, for that individual she's a 10 in looks. The bottom line is that reviews are subjective and that one needs to find reviewers whose likes are similar to yours. And yeah, I know that's not easy.[/QUOTE]YMMV. It's all subjective. One mongers trash is another mongers treasure. White, Black, Shill, or Blind, in the end, I appreciate all your information, some more than others. Hell, I even welcome Bookers to post shit too, at least it's more intel. Like it or not, we're all on the same team. But you Lurkers out there. Yeah I'm talkin to you! Stop freeloading and help us out. You know who you are. Bros before Hoes, as they say.
[QUOTE=TidyChemist;4661936]So I decided to go on the lookout for something new; got to the wilshire location and met up with julia. Julia looks to be around 30 to mid 30's GND she speaks very little English just the basic phrases and yes she is bb but for a little extra. In terms of body julia isn't skinny but isn't fat either I'd say somewhere in between with a little pooch. By the way her description on the site lies; she is not near 103 pounds probably like 130 on the brink of being fat but not quite. Got a little preview in the shower for things to come, and overall she looked relatively enthusiastic to start the session got into a variety of positions and finished in doggy her pussy was pretty tight and she could definitely take a pounding she's got a nice ass to grab and a natural c cup rack. I left pretty happy overall but if spinners are more your thing I would skip.
L: 6. 5/10.
S: 9/10.
Repeat: I don't think so, I rarely repeat. Was also put off in the beginning by her counting the money. She also has a couple of tattoos, 1 of a musical note on her left hand, another manuscript style tattoo on her back, and another one on her left shoulder blade.[/QUOTE]Tidy beat me to it. Booker said Julia's pics are real, and they are, 30 lbs & 10 years ago. Pretty face still, lots of booty to grab, needs to lose weight but some like it Thicc, DeepThroat, RIM, BBFSCIP, nice girl. Shoulder tat is a figure kneeling praying. Checking money is done to know what type service; covered or bare. Some girls are smart trying to avoid the No-Tip Bears, mongers want bare but then stiff them after. You can't blame her for counting.