Here's the second group of pics as promised.
Stay safe, and happy hunting.
Printable View
Here's the second group of pics as promised.
Stay safe, and happy hunting.
[QUOTE=Ski Boz; 1395652]Ok. Imagine there's a bullet speeding directly at your chest, now imagine me diving in front of it (slow motion, Kevin Costner Bodyguard style with Whitney singing in the background). Key music & insert music note here ". If I should stay, I would only be in your way. So I'll go, but I know I'll think of you ev'ry step of the way."
Phew. I took a bullet for you buddy.
Don't do it!
Ok now imagine Jabba the Hutt licking that little rat looking animal chained to his bed. One guess who played the part of Jabba in my visit to that wretched woman.
P. S. The bullet hit me in the penis. Which was about the same effect she had on me.[/QUOTE]Ski,
I've read good posts on this board before, but yours was award-winning. Too bad ther isn't a Crotch Cup award for entertaining performances that protect our junk. You'd have my vote.
[QUOTE=Ski Boz; 1395652]Ok. Imagine there's a bullet speeding directly at your chest, now imagine me diving in front of it (slow motion, Kevin Costner Bodyguard style with Whitney singing in the background). Key music & insert music note here ". If I should stay, I would only be in your way. So I'll go, but I know I'll think of you ev'ry step of the way."
Phew. I took a bullet for you buddy.
Don't do it!
Ok now imagine Jabba the Hutt licking that little rat looking animal chained to his bed. One guess who played the part of Jabba in my visit to that wretched woman.
P. S. The bullet hit me in the penis. Which was about the same effect she had on me.[/QUOTE]So your saying she is a mix of jabba and whitney?
And a straight shooter.
[QUOTE=Ink6919; 1395908]So your saying she is a mix of jabba and whitney?
And a straight shooter.[/QUOTE]The pictures are not her, she is more like late 40's early 50's, extremely unattractive. And (trust me I love me some MILF!) not worth anywhere near her rate. If you can imagine Barbara Bush in a string bikini sitting on the bed next to this woman and you gave me a choice between the two- I'd pick Babs and them have Secret Service beat down the other one.
I know I'm coming on a bit strong here, but I saw this lady a couple of years ago and to date I still feel she was by far the worst experience I've ever had.
[url]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/busty-girl-next-door-26/19569831[/url]
[url]http://twitter.com/[/url]/ccchanelcc702.
So as with the changing times, this hobby is changing, I have always just called a provider and made an appt, no questions asked for the most part.
But the powers that be have been out like sharks this past year and this is the 2nd girl (meaning CC) That will not see me because I'm not a another site member.
I have called up 5 providers I have seen in the past and asked if they will vouch for me, and they all said they would.
Problem is the 5 providers I have seen do not have another site reviews example.
[url]http://newhampshire.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sweet-sensual-sexy-jennie-is-back-as-hot-as-ever-30/2784184[/url]
I seen jennie and she was one of the best I have seen, called her up and asked if she would vouch for me, she said no problem, well when "CC chanell looked.
Her up on another site, she said jennie has no another site reviews, and she is not verified, I know there is alot of talk on here about married guys not wanting to give out.
Personal info, so I'm confused doesn't another site require a credit card and personal info?
I don't see this trend changing seems like the legit providers have strict rules now, sucks for guys like me that is not a trouble maker, this is the 2nd time.
A girl has declined me , before cc aa girl that does greek visiting from new jersey denied me as well. Can not think of her name but she is hot!
[QUOTE=Asket; 1395997][url]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/busty-girl-next-door-26/19569831[/url]
[url]http://twitter.com/ccchanelcc702[/url]
So as with the changing times, this hobby is changing, I have always just called a provider and made an appt, no questions asked for the most part.
But the powers that be have been out like sharks this past year and this is the 2nd girl (meaning CC) That will not see me because I'm not a another site member.
I have called up 5 providers I have seen in the past and asked if they will vouch for me, and they all said they would.
Problem is the 5 providers I have seen do not have another site reviews example.
[url]http://newhampshire.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sweet-sensual-sexy-jennie-is-back-as-hot-as-ever-30/2784184[/url]
I seen jennie and she was one of the best I have seen, called her up and asked if she would vouch for me, she said no problem, well when "CC chanell looked.
Her up on another site, she said jennie has no another site reviews, and she is not verified, I know there is alot of talk on here about married guys not wanting to give out.
Personal info, so I'm confused doesn't another site require a credit card and personal info?
I don't see this trend changing seems like the legit providers have strict rules now, sucks for guys like me that is not a trouble maker, this is the 2nd time.
A girl has declined me, before cc aa girl that does greek visiting from new jersey denied me as well. Can not think of her name but she is hot![/QUOTE]The problem is that people (ie Uncle Leo) are trying to fake their way through provider screening now. Uncle Leo will call up to make an appointment with Provider Annie. Provider Annie asks Uncle Leo for references, he gives her names and numbers. But these names and numbers are really Auntie Leo, who just happens to also have ads posted to catch poor innocent mongers. Auntie Leo of course wouldn't have any reviews though, so that is the flaw in their plan. They've also been known to use names and numbers of providers they've recently arrested for a reference as well, and then have Auntie Leo answer if you call. Which is why multiple references are required by most providers. It's also the reason why some providers don't take same day appointments from new clients.
The days of being anonymous are coming to an end.
Xoxo Kat oxox
[QUOTE=Kit Kat; 1396091]The problem is that people (ie Uncle Leo) are trying to fake their way through provider screening now. Uncle Leo will call up to make an appointment with Provider Annie. Provider Annie asks Uncle Leo for references, he gives her names and numbers. But these names and numbers are really Auntie Leo, who just happens to also have ads posted to catch poor innocent mongers. Auntie Leo of course wouldn't have any reviews though, so that is the flaw in their plan. They've also been known to use names and numbers of providers they've recently arrested for a reference as well, and then have Auntie Leo answer if you call. Which is why multiple references are required by most providers. It's also the reason why some providers don't take same day appointments from new clients.
The days of being anonymous are coming to an end.
Xoxo Kat oxox[/QUOTE]Kat you rock really mean that, I come from greece were brothels are legal and real cheap. The girls are clean and 90 percent of them are Russian,
Its just sad that our country has these stupid laws, any ways we will meet one day, I went out of my way trying to prove to cc chanell that I have seen many girls.
But she did not want to see me for whatever reason, take care and look forward to meeting you one day.
[QUOTE=Kit Kat;1396091]The days of being anonymous are coming to an end.[/QUOTE]I doubt that. Many of us will never give out our personal information; anyone who does is engaging in extremely high risk behavior on the level of BBFS. Especially with the new human trafficking laws enacted in Massachusetts. If all providers were to require verifiable personal information, I don't think there would be enough business left to go around and the requirement would be dropped again.
I do understand the mutual goals of protecting both client and provider, and though I would not give out my personal information, I'd be willing to otherwise go a long way with an agency like yours (judging both by your professionalism and from the hot pictures of you and your girls!) for such mutual protection. We need to come up with some better methods. As you explain quite well, if it's too easy for Uncle Leo, it's worthless as a form of protection. As you also correctly point out, we also take a risk when contacting new providers, though of course with a well reviewed agency like yours, the risk is extremely low and almost all on your side. I do understand and appreciate that. If you didn't protect yourself, you wouldn't be in business very long.
I think the references by reviewed providers are an example of a reasonable compromise. As you imply, not easy for Uncle Leo to fake these kinds of references. Perhaps if we think about it enough we can come up with other systems that work well. We all know the basics of how Uncle Leo works most of the time.
[QUOTE=Kowabunga; 1397102]I doubt that. Many of us will never give out our personal information; anyone who does is engaging in extremely high risk behavior on the level of BBFS. Especially with the new human trafficking laws enacted in Massachusetts. If all providers were to require verifiable personal information, I don't think there would be enough business left to go around and the requirement would be dropped again.
I do understand the mutual goals of protecting both client and provider, and though I would not give out my personal information, I'd be willing to otherwise go a long way with an agency like yours (judging both by your professionalism and from the hot pictures of you and your girls!) for such mutual protection. We need to come up with some better methods. As you explain quite well, if it's too easy for Uncle Leo, it's worthless as a form of protection. As you also correctly point out, we also take a risk when contacting new providers, though of course with a well reviewed agency like yours, the risk is extremely low and almost all on your side. I do understand and appreciate that. If you didn't protect yourself, you wouldn't be in business very long.
I think the references by reviewed providers are an example of a reasonable compromise. As you imply, not easy for Uncle Leo to fake these kinds of references. Perhaps if we think about it enough we can come up with other systems that work well. We all know the basics of how Uncle Leo works most of the time.[/QUOTE]If reputable providers / agencies won't see anyone without references from other reputable providers / agencies, then how can you get any acceptable references? The only alternative I can see is to provide sufficient personal information to be properly screened. Even that has it's risks, since while it may provide reasonable assurance that you aren't really Uncle Leo, it doesn't prove that you aren't a psychotic serial killer. Which is where an agency is safer for providers since it insures that someone else will know where they are, and who they're with. Keep in mind that if you get caught, it's a misdemeanor charge, that will most likely be dismissed upon payment of court fees (assuming first offense). If I (or any other agency, or even an independent's driver) gets caught, it's a felony with a minimum mandatory two year sentence. Both may obviously face other consequences because of an arrest. We turn down on average at least two to three times as many appointments per day as we actually accept. I would much rather lose money, than risk losing my freedom (or that of my girl's. I wouldn't send anyone else to an appointment I wouldn't do myself).
Obviously, if someone can come up with a better way of screening that would not increase my risks, I'm more than happy to consider it. But even if you say nothing illegal over the phone, in your ads, or through email, once Uncle Leo is standing in front of you, he will arrest you. They'll let the court figure out if there is sufficient evidence for the charge. Once they make an arrest, they can make what's known as a "search incident to an arrest" (which does not require a warrant). Any condoms, cell phones, money, or computers, will be seized as evidence, and used against you in court. They'd rather make the arrest and hope they gather enough evidence to convict since most providers will attempt to plead out. Conviction or not, Uncle Leo gets credit for the arrest, which can then be used to justify a budget increase. So the only sure way to avoid this, is to never make an appointment with Uncle Leo at all. Thus the reason for adequate screening.
I can certainly understand your concerns about revealing personal information, it's obviously a big risk (especially considering the unstable mental state of some providers). Not to be rude, but honestly my safety and freedom mean more to me than your concerns (or money). Personally, I feel that third party screening services (ie Date-Check and Preferred411) are a reasonable compromise. They do require extensive personal information, but providers do not have access to it directly. I'm pretty sure just about every provider / agency accepts Date-Check and Preferred411. They certainly make things much easier, and quicker, for both parties involved.
Xoxo Kat oxox
[QUOTE=Asket; 1396133]Kat you rock really mean that, I come from greece were brothels are legal and real cheap. The girls are clean and 90 percent of them are Russian,
Its just sad that our country has these stupid laws, any ways we will meet one day, I went out of my way trying to prove to cc chanell that I have seen many girls.
But she did not want to see me for whatever reason, take care and look forward to meeting you one day.[/QUOTE]Thank you for the kind words. To paraphrase Professor Bernard De La Paz, I try to do my best in an imperfect world. Many independent providers don't want to take the time to screen someone who doesn't have perfect references. Especially since they're typically having to also book their own appointments, check references, and somehow make time to actually see clients. An agency has an advantage in that one person isn't having to do everything. My partner, Jack, is a whiz with computers. He'll take the time to actually screen your references to make sure they're legit providers even if they don't have any reviews on that other site. It can be a time consuming process, and I can understand why an independent wouldn't want to take the time to do it.
Xoxo Kat oxox
Asking here, because I had the another site people complain I was not a VIP when I asked there and would not answer. At least here people can see I have posted reviews / etc (in RI section).
The frequency of reviews on Bree Banks is VERY thin (7 reviews in 3 years!). Way fewer reviews than anyone who is normally in this hobby. I am overly careful and this is suspicious.
Then you have the following pics:
EROS profile: [url]http://www.eros-boston.com/files/254315.htm[/url]
Top pic is from the same shoot as the following:
[url]http://sflchronicle.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/600full-571.jpg[/url]
Which is of Ashlynn Brooke.
Same thing for the white bra / panty set.
Both of those can be seen here: [url]http://www.ashlynnbrooke.com/tour1/photos.html[/url]
Sooo. Either she is using fake pics. Or she IS actually Ashlynn Brooke. However [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashlynn_Brooke[/url] Stats she lives in Oaklahama. Which is sure not New England.
So. That pretty much proves Bree Banks is using someone else's picks IMO (I would love to be wrong!).
Minimal reviews (could even be faked?) and stolen pics. Not good. But my weakness for spinner blondes gets the best of me (first serious gf was one. You guys know the feeling!)
However, at least one another site reviewer stated the pics were accurate. I would still like to see her. But I don't TOFTT (sorry guys!). So I was hoping some of the nice gentlemen (or girls. Kat?) here would confirm if she was legit or not?
Yes legit but not same girl in pics. Close but not same girl.
Face not as cute, bigger thighs and ass, breasts bigger too.
Okay visit, but from reviews she might be YMMV.
[QUOTE=Flamebird; 1398276]Asking here, because I had the another site people complain I was not a VIP when I asked there and would not answer. At least here people can see I have posted reviews / etc (in RI section).
The frequency of reviews on Bree Banks is VERY thin (7 reviews in 3 years!). Way fewer reviews than anyone who is normally in this hobby. I am overly careful and this is suspicious.
Then you have the following pics:
EROS profile:
[url]http://www.eros-boston.com/files/254315.htm[/url]
Top pic is from the same shoot as the following:
[url]http://sflchronicle.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/600full-571.jpg[/url]
Which is of Ashlynn Brooke.
Same thing for the white bra / panty set.
Both of those can be seen here:
[url]http://www.ashlynnbrooke.com/tour1/photos.html[/url]
Sooo. Either she is using fake pics. Or she IS actually Ashlynn Brooke. However.
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashlynn_Brooke[/url]
Stats she lives in Oaklahama. Which is sure not New England.
So. That pretty much proves Bree Banks is using someone else's picks IMO (I would love to be wrong!).
Minimal reviews (could even be faked?) and stolen pics. Not good. But my weakness for spinner blondes gets the best of me (first serious gf was one. You guys know the feeling!)
However, at least one another site reviewer stated the pics were accurate. I would still like to see her. But I don't TOFTT (sorry guys!). So I was hoping some of the nice gentlemen (or girls. Kat?) here would confirm if she was legit or not?[/QUOTE]
Does any one know a phone or website for Brazilian girls? Will be going to Boston this Friday and looking for some Brazilian ladies.
[QUOTE=Brguy1981;1398352]Does any one know a phone or website for Brazilian girls? Will be going to Boston this Friday and looking for some Brazilian ladies.[/QUOTE]This phone number should help out as they are very accommodating:
617. 343. 4200.
And try this link as well:
[url]http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=RTFF[/url]
Scroll to definition two.
Oh yeah, welcome to Boston!
There are three different ladies advertising on Backpage Tewksbury, one is a 2 for 150 or 100 if a single.