Printable View
"Cup of tea"? I enjoy tea. I just don't put lard in it.
[QUOTE=Willow1535;1280927]I have seen Jade twice and have found her to be clean, attractive, adventurous and highly skilled. To each his own, but comparing her to a greasy piece of meat is derogatory, disrespectful and way off base. She may not be your "cup of tea", but she obviously does not have a problem attracting repeat visitors.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Cincyjim;1283172]"Cup of tea"? I enjoy tea. I just don't put lard in it.[/QUOTE]I don't post on here often but feel like I should chime in by saying that is exceptionally rude. She adverts as a larger woman, some of us, myself included are fans of full figured women. They provide a service to us, which is much appreciated. The least we can do avoid attacks on the physique of women who have been very well reviewed.
[QUOTE=Cincyjim;1283172]"Cup of tea"? I enjoy tea. I just don't put lard in it.[/QUOTE]No need to be disrespectful.
Just think of the GUYS that some of these ladies have to put up with.
Not exactly fit and trim middle aged handsome guys.
[QUOTE=Nday Guy; 1283381]No need to be disrespectful.
Just think of the GUYS that some of these ladies have to put up with.
Not exactly fit and trim middle aged handsome guys.[/QUOTE]I liked she did every thing I wanted.
Those of you who have read my posts will know that I am very picky. There are basically two types of hobbyists: those who prioritize youth and looks (this is me) and those who want a more rambunctious version of a middle-aged wife. (This is *not* me.)
Nevertheless, I draw the line at making personal attacks on providers who seem to be courteous and honestly presenting themselves (even if they are not my "cup of tea"). We need to remember that the providers are also human beings, and many of them frequent this board.
If a provider is a rip-off artist, etc, then by all means call her out on the carpet. Wanton, unprovoked cruelty that serves no constructive purpose is another matter.
There is nothing wrong with expressing a general preference for a certain body type, etc, but comparing a provider by name to a piece of lard / meat etc, is beneath the dignity of the board.
[QUOTE=Todd Cincy; 1283465]Those of you who have read my posts will know that I am very picky. There are basically two types of hobbyists: those who prioritize youth and looks (this is me) and those who want a more rambunctious version of a middle-aged wife. (This is *not* me.)
Nevertheless, I draw the line at making personal attacks on providers who seem to be courteous and honestly presenting themselves (even if they are not my "cup of tea"). We need to remember that the providers are also human beings, and many of them frequent this board.
If a provider is a rip-off artist, etc, then by all means call her out on the carpet. Wanton, unprovoked cruelty that serves no constructive purpose is another matter.
There is nothing wrong with expressing a general preference for a certain body type, etc, but comparing a provider by name to a piece of lard / meat etc, is beneath the dignity of the board.[/QUOTE]Well said. You can't put a price on honesty. And it should respected.
[QUOTE=Todd Cincy;1283465]Nevertheless, I draw the line at making personal attacks on providers who seem to be courteous and honestly presenting themselves (even if they are not my "cup of tea"). We need to remember that the providers are also human beings, and many of them frequent this board. If a provider is a rip-off artist, etc, then by all means call her out on the carpet. Wanton, unprovoked cruelty that serves no constructive purpose is another matter.[/QUOTE]This just proves, no matter if a person has disposable income or not, you cannot buy class.
There is only ONE reason to slam a provider; DISHONESTY. If she's dishonest about her looks, her rates, her services, the length of time you get for what you pay, or her safety habits, then she should be called out.
However, any provider that represents herself and what she's offering truthfully, she should be nurtured and protected.
Class is about dealing with people on the up and up, and of having manners, and of treating people like your grandma was watching you.
Personally jade is top notch at the right price point.
Not interested in buying class, just renting a piece of ass. By the way does your grandma watch you when your mongering? I'm inclined to hide such activity from my grandma, but if you prefer to actually let or pretend that granny is watching, more power to you.
[QUOTE=D Nut; 1283525]This just proves, no matter if a person has disposable income or not, you cannot buy class.
There is only ONE reason to slam a provider; DISHONESTY. If she's dishonest about her looks, her rates, her services, the length of time you get for what you pay, or her safety habits, then she should be called out.
However, any provider that represents herself and what she's offering truthfully, she should be nurtured and protected.
Class is about dealing with people on the up and up, and of having manners, and of treating people like your grandma was watching you.[/QUOTE]
I'd like to point out I did not start the "meat" reference. Someone else compared the provider to "prime rib". I just expressed a different opinion continuing the meat analogy. The lard reference is in the same thread. Are the terms fat or obese any less offensive? To me they aren't.
I didn't write my response to be hurtful or disrespectful, but to express a contrary opinion that a provider was in the "prime rib" category. Characterizing that provider as "prime rib," in my opinion, is not an accurate review. So I expressed my view using a different meat analogy. If your offended by a provider being viewed as meat, you failed to chime in when the prime rib reference was made. I tend to respond to people who use an analogy with one that is similar if I have contrary opinion. So if your are going to be the "meat" reference police. Add prime rib to your post and throw some stones at the person who initially referred to her as meat. I can't wait for the objection to the stoning analogy.
[QUOTE=Todd Cincy;1283465]There is nothing wrong with expressing a general preference for a certain body type, etc, but comparing a provider by name to a piece of lard / meat etc, is beneath the dignity of the board.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Cincyjim;1283965]Not interested in buying class, just renting a piece of ass. By the way does your grandma watch you when your mongering? I'm inclined to hide such activity from my grandma, but if you prefer to actually let or pretend that granny is watching, more power to you.[/QUOTE]I wasn't talking about Jade having class. I was talking about the GUY needing some class. Guys who blast women they have never met as beneath them just because the women don't fit their mental mold of what an attractive woman is, those guys need some class. If you were such an awesome individual, you wouldn't need to be paying for sex. Jade and all the women who put themselves "out there" need a little consideration because they are doing what they can to survive and pay their bills just like the rest of us.
I'm not going to argue what you do with your money so you can rent a piece of ass, buy the whole cow, donate it to charity, or just use it to order a mail order bride. Your money, you earned it, so you can do whatever you want. But if a woman isn't your type, and you have never seen her or will see her, there is no need to try to make yourself feel superior by blasting her. Just STFU and go find someone who is your type.
Who blasted someone that they never met? In fact, show me where I, or anyone blasted Jade. I was under the impression that original reviewer who started the "meat" reference by using the term prime rib had seen her. I expressed my opinion that "prime rib" was not an accurate description. I then used another "meat" analogy in to correct what I consider an inaccurate review. While that post didn't expressly state that I had met Jade, I'll make it clear now. I have met her. And I am astonished that someone that has met her would call her "prime rib." The term "prime rib" implies that the provider is top notch in all aspects, which would include being physically fit and attractive. She is not.
I don't know what being an "awesome individual" has to do with paying a provider. Many men pay prostitutes so they can do things that other women may not be willing to do. Also some men pay for sex so the woman "goes home" or leaves them alone afterwards. Awesomeness and class really have nothing to do with it. And again, it really isn't the the sort of activity that most Grandmas would approve.
My post didn't give me any feeling of superiority, nor was that its purpose. I only posted my comment to correct what I thought was a inaccurate description of the her that was posted in the member's discussion section. My comment was not directed to her. In fact, I don't know if she reads the forum, nor do I care. If it blasted anyone, it was the person who posted the "prime rib" analogy. If you knew how to read and could comprehend the flow of the conversation you would know that was to whom my comment was directed. Again, please point out where I or anyone blasted her?
This forum is for discussing and relaying information regarding providers. It is not for making provider's feel good about themselves or protecting their feelings. So you, using your phrase, if a monger buys the whole cow, puts up a post and claiming that the cow is Aphrodite, I would expect anyone who knows that the cow really is Artemis to post a response stating so. Since you seem to be part of the sensitivity police, I'd be careful using the phrase "whole cow." "Meat" references seem to upset some people on this forum.
[QUOTE=D Nut; 1284292]I wasn't talking about Jade having class. I was talking about the GUY needing some class. Guys who blast women they have never met as beneath them just because the women don't fit their mental mold of what an attractive woman is, those guys need some class. If you were such an awesome individual, you wouldn't need to be paying for sex. Jade and all the women who put themselves "out there" need a little consideration because they are doing what they can to survive and pay their bills just like the rest of us.
I'm not going to argue what you do with your money so you can rent a piece of ass, buy the whole cow, donate it to charity, or just use it to order a mail order bride. Your money, you earned it, so you can do whatever you want. But if a woman isn't your type, and you have never seen her or will see her, there is no need to try to make yourself feel superior by blasting her. Just STFU and go find someone who is your type.[/QUOTE]
Take it to PM's. I swear some people just want drama!
[QUOTE=Cincyjim;1285185]I have met her. And I am astonished that someone that has met her would call her "prime rib." The term "prime rib" implies that the provider is top notch in all aspects, which would include being physically fit and attractive. She is not.[/QUOTE]First, I apologize for creating a minor shit storm here. These will be my final comments on the matter.
Second, I have personally apologized to the young lady for comparing her to a piece of meat, however delicious it (and she) might be. I guess lines like that are why I could never pick up girls at bars.
However, I'll agree to disagree with Jim that my comparison somehow implied the young lady must be a size 4. Her photos and advertising (IMO) do not mislead one about her size. Anyone interested in her services can see that. So if they like what they see, my opinion is that as a provider she IS top notch. And I, for one, do find her attractive.
Any info on her?
I had her cell # but seem to have lost it.