Asian Agency Booker Review
[QUOTE=DonniesLo;6122442]Thanks for the review. Sorry to hear that you're encounter with Jessie did not go so well. Her reviews on Ter from Las Vegas was what got me to go over there early this morning. I had an absolutely phenomenal time with her and will definitely book her again. You are correct about her tiny little butt, it is super cute.
Thanks again for contributing.[/QUOTE]DonniesLo, you're new here, so welcome. I obviously was not clear enough in my comments about the FEC which is counter to what you found. I've been an FEC client for many years. My time with Jessie is not what was advertised on TER or by the booker. Bluntly put, the booker flat out lied to me about age and authenticity of the pics. I still gave Jessie high marks for her toned and fit body. Just so it is clear and you don't read anything into what I post. FEC SD has a shitty booker telling you lies just to get you in the door and the pics are fake. Both are low standards and the other two SD agencies will post real pics and give honest answers.
Honest Answers: SDAG - 10, Sandra99 - 10, Diamonds88 - 8, FEC-1.
Real Pics: SDAG - 10, Sandra99 - 9, Diamonds88 - 8.
Location: SDAG / Sandra99/ Diamonds88 - 10. Note: These 3 agencies have almost the same addresses. FEC - 0.
Ease to work with Booker (s): SDAG / Sandra99/ Diamonds88 - 8, FEC - 1.
Overall rating: SDAG - 10, Sandra99 - 9, Diamonds88 - 8, FEC - 2.
It now appears that the agencies have created accounts here and attempting to push their girls. Same thing happened on MyRedbook and other sites, most notably TER. That's always been the game. I think the mongers that have been around long enough can see which accounts are real and which are the shills / bookers. So just my two cents on the bookers we now have in SD.
"If I didn't write it, don't assume".