Not so sure about consolidation
The year before FOSTA, I booked a girl in OC but the OC booker didn't ask for references because she said she already knew me in LA. She books some of the same girls as the Kbunny group now. What you observed as consolidation, I saw as fewer new girls and fewer customers. But yes, being referred to other bookers is not a bad thing.
If anything, the lack of intel and FOSTA just made it seems like there are more different bookers when they may just work for a single group. It's like when we want to sale more we need to have more salesmen. Guys will feel the pain when these bookers book the same girls with different names and pics. I know a little so I can avoid girls like that.
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4632287]I'm just transplanting a topic from the pleaser thread I found interesting to here for more exposure. Being bounced between bookers isn't necessarily a bad thing. A prime example is J in LA who works with M and K in OC. They work in reciprocal fashion to maximize exposure and business for their girls. For mongers, this translates to seamless access to a new segment of kgirls without jumping through the verification hurdles.
I posted previously that there might be consolidating, collaboration, whatever you want to call it going on with the bookers in LA / OC. This is a good thing. The situation could progress from our current fragmented mess to become one with a few centralized sites that could encompass the vast majority of kgirls in LA and OC. While it won't be CV in it's heyday, it's much better than going through 10's of individual sites to look for availability, new girls, or other changes. In addition, anyone who has been in this hobby long enough can attest to getting cold calls (texts in this instance) from up and coming bookers who got access to the client list from other bookers. I wonder if they paid for the list like how tech companies sell user data.[/QUOTE]