I tries logging into seeking- it isn't letting me sign in even though I typed correct credentials- anyone having a same issue?
Printable View
I tries logging into seeking- it isn't letting me sign in even though I typed correct credentials- anyone having a same issue?
[QUOTE=GoldMiner;5785627]I tries logging into seeking- it isn't letting me sign in even though I typed correct credentials- anyone having a same issue?[/QUOTE]Did you try a diffrerent browser and did you try incognito mode.
This might their way of telling you that you violated their terms of service too.
[QUOTE=Parakleet;5785653]Did you try a diffrerent browser and did you try incognito mode.
This might their way of telling you that you violated their terms of service too.[/QUOTE]It can't be, as that is my browsing account. No communication, no membership ever on that account. I do use VPN and duckduckgo browser, tho.
[QUOTE=GoldMiner;5785824]It can't be, as that is my browsing account. No communication, no membership ever on that account. I do use VPN and duckduckgo browser, tho.[/QUOTE]I'm having the same issue with logging in. I'm using the correct credentials, but I just repeat requests to log in. It's not like I'm getting an error, moreso just that it doesn't recognize me.
I'm not currently a subscribed member. I canceled my subscription in early December and haven't resub'd since. Just browsing. Like you Gold.
Seeking is now 109.99 a month.
[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;5786361]Seeking is now 109.99 a month.[/QUOTE]Increased price for a worse service than when it was like 50 bucks a month years ago. No thanks.
We had been going back and forth for a week or two trying to make both our schedules work. Well today seemed like the day. We agreed on a car date bbj for $65. I drove 30 minutes to Ferguson and waited in a park close to the address she gave me. Texted that I was there and waiting, and she responded she would be there in 10 minutes. Well, I waited for 40 minutes and she never showed. She texted later about how she walked around the small park and couldn't find me. I could see the whole park where I was, and not a soul was walking around. Plus, my very large vehicle was the only one in the park and it could be seen from anywhere in the park. I even sent a picture of my vehicle. No way she couldn't have seen it. She is a time waster.
Deposit Scam offers a low cost date and then half down.
[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;5786361]Seeking is now 109.99 a month.[/QUOTE]My assumption is it's a strategy to increase the price. The site is dominated by men, women get so many contacts and it's intentional to decrease the number of men on the site. It's frustrating for men who pay to have women with so many messages that they don't even open your message. Second, women complain that there's not enough "real" guys with money, it's expensive, so perhaps that eliminates some of that. Every site does data analytics. They probably found that fewer pay a lower fee for multiple months, or the price sensitivity is minimal between say $75 - $110 per month. The total revenue with a higher price and fewer users is not significant. In addition, they're always offering discounts of about 25% to get you to sign up so you can get on for a month at about $75 if you want to.
I always sign up for 1 month 3-4 times a year. The price increase doesn't matter to me, I know it does to a lot of people, but it's not significant when I look at an extra $100 a year and the total annual spend on pussy. It's like a marketing or sales budget to support the habit, or SG&A to a business.
Anyone met with Sexy69?.
[QUOTE=MiningForGold;5789425]My assumption is it's a strategy to increase the price. The site is dominated by men, women get so many contacts and it's intentional to decrease the number of men on the site. It's frustrating for men who pay to have women with so many messages that they don't even open your message. Second, women complain that there's not enough "real" guys with money, it's expensive, so perhaps that eliminates some of that. Every site does data analytics. They probably found that fewer pay a lower fee for multiple months, or the price sensitivity is minimal between say $75 - $110 per month. The total revenue with a higher price and fewer users is not significant. In addition, they're always offering discounts of about 25% to get you to sign up so you can get on for a month at about $75 if you want to.
I always sign up for 1 month 3-4 times a year. The price increase doesn't matter to me, I know it does to a lot of people, but it's not significant when I look at an extra $100 a year and the total annual spend on pussy. It's like a marketing or sales budget to support the habit, or SG&A to a business.[/QUOTE]The problem is, unlike 5 years ago, the site is littered with girls looking for only online shit, trying to sell their OF subs, or not willing to have sex as part of the arrangement. Even if they were offering it for 50 bucks a month, the fact they changed policies a few years ago and decided not to kick those girls off the site ruined it. I would say 40-50% of profiles are girls that will never meet anyone under any circumstances.
A few years back they made, what looked like, a minor policy change related to reported accounts. Prior to the change, when you blocked someone they were added to a list but you could go in to the blocked list and see them still so if you wanted to unblock them, you could, or see if they were still active on the site They made a change to remove that list and so once you block someone you can't unblock them. Seemed trivial at the time and since you were blocking people, you probably didn't care. But then they made a second change later. When you report someone they are automatically blocked so that they can't 'bother you' was the reasoning at the time. Originally when you reported someone and they were blocked, they ended up on that list and you could see if SA did anything to the account you reported but not anymore.
Looking at it through the lens of the prior change it is clear they were moving to an app where it didn't matter if you reported someone, the system would automatically block them and so you would never know that SA just ignored the report and let the person stay on the site. The only thing that seems to get people banned these days is if they commit the one cardinal sin. Mentioning sex and money in a conversation on their website. Now the site is just scammers and pic sellers, much like Tinder has turned in to. Tinder used to be a gold mine of 19-23 yrs olds looking for fun and who you could start chatting with at 7 pm and by 9 pm they were sucking your dick. Now it's all scammers selling private snapchat and OF links and who disappear 30 seconds after a match and they send their snapchat info to you.
[QUOTE=DonSpade;5790271]Anyone met with Sexy69?.[/QUOTE]I am talking to her, but she is slow to responded and only has one or two word replies. Which is odd because our talks on WYP where a bit longer. I am waiting for a sob story on why she cannot meet.
[QUOTE=DonSpade;5790271]Anyone met with Sexy69?.[/QUOTE]I am pretty sure this is her third profile. The other two are sexyredhor69 & straightup69. There is a report on straightup69 on here. She is looking for a dinner for money and nothing else.
Curious if anyone has had any luck with this chick. I go back and forth with her on texts and calls frequently (met on Tinder) but she seems a little much too in to herself for my liking. She's cute but not hot. I guess that's typical for St Louis women in general but calls herself a supermodel. From what I take, she is looking for an older, super wealthy guy to take her on vacations and nice dinners. She says she can't find that in stl and that it was much easier in Chicago. I have tried meeting her a couple times but she always wants to meet at the ritz or napali (both places make me want to vomit). If you want to see something entertaining. Go to the ritz and watch her and other "hot chicks" work the old crowd. It's obvious what's going on. Anyhow, enough with my rant. Any GTG experiences with her? Be curious if she DTF on first date. I'd maybe try and partake if so.
[URL]https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/lmz6PW1dL0kd9paAqEbwMDy8[/URL]
[QUOTE=Whaler;5791221]I am pretty sure this is her third profile. The other two are sexyredhor69 & straightup69. There is a report on straightup69 on here. She is looking for a dinner for money and nothing else.[/QUOTE]It's been a few yrs, but I picked her up at her house, drove to an empty parking lot behind Sybergs on Dorsett and got a BBBJ w cim. Dropped her off and that was that.