General Reports

[QUOTE=Mudd024;1503559]Are Glory holes real? A friend of mine told me there was a place in New York that had them at some porn shops and them peep show joints. I've just never heard of them anywhere around here. Anybody know anything about them?[/QUOTE]I'm not sure anymore, but they certainly used to be. I used to go to the video stores on gasoline alley in Portsmouth, they had them, and they were active. Like I say, haven't visited that scene in quite a while, so I don't know if it's still there.

[QUOTE=Ho Hunter 328; 1504414]I'd avoid her,"snow bunny" means she does coke, and is willing to trade services for it. Not that most of the girls aren't on one drug or another, but the ones that are actually advertising it are just asking for trouble.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.[/QUOTE]The term also means white girl stupid pimps use the term to describe white girls. So it could mean she is an addict or she has a loser pimp which means he may try to cheat and or rob you. I avoid snowbunny as well as when they say no black guys as pimps are nervous their hoes will choose another brother over them

Hi all-

I always try to do my due diligence before I go somewhere or ask on here about a place or provider and hate to be told to RTFF as I read it on a daily basis and have gone back several years in the archives as well but can't remember everything. When using the search function, it seems to find the word, name etc. I am searching for and brings me to the thread-but always to the most recent post. It then seems I have to scroll back searching for the term and sometimes it can be many, many pages before. Am I missing something? Is there a way to search and be brought directly to the posting? Any help would be appreciated as I hate asking for info. That is here to find on my own.

Thanks guys!

Rugger

[QUOTE=Ruggerz66; 1518761]Hi all-

I always try to do my due diligence before I go somewhere or ask on here about a place or provider and hate to be told to RTFF as I read it on a daily basis and have gone back several years in the archives as well but can't remember everything. When using the search function, it seems to find the word, name etc. I am searching for and brings me to the thread-but always to the most recent post. It then seems I have to scroll back searching for the term and sometimes it can be many, many pages before. Am I missing something? Is there a way to search and be brought directly to the posting? Any help would be appreciated as I hate asking for info. That is here to find on my own.

Thanks guys!

Rugger[/QUOTE]That's better than what I get? Every time I do a search the terms come up but never in order? Most of the time I end up wading through pages of results to try and find the more recent ones. What the hell am I doing wrong?

[QUOTE=Ruggerz66; 1518761]Hi all-

I always try to do my due diligence before I go somewhere or ask on here about a place or provider and hate to be told to RTFF as I read it on a daily basis and have gone back several years in the archives as well but can't remember everything. When using the search function, it seems to find the word, name etc. I am searching for and brings me to the thread-but always to the most recent post. It then seems I have to scroll back searching for the term and sometimes it can be many, many pages before. Am I missing something? Is there a way to search and be brought directly to the posting? Any help would be appreciated as I hate asking for info. That is here to find on my own.

Thanks guys!

Rugger[/QUOTE]Set results to show as reports rather than threads. You can do this by clicking on "advanced search." I thought you used to be able to also do it from the basic search box, but I don't see it now.

[QUOTE=Mwooo;1519745]Set results to show as reports rather than threads. You can do this by clicking on "advanced search." I thought you used to be able to also do it from the basic search box, but I don't see it now.[/QUOTE]Ahhh, that's how you do it. That's some valuable intel right there, thanks. Having to wade through the threads for the yellow highlights is certainly a pain in the ass.

[QUOTE=Beepers;1504319]Imagine you getting junior sucked so good then a strong manly voice said best cock I ever have.[/QUOTE]Hahaha! I would have to see some **** meat through the hole before I stuck my unit though it!

I seen this lady on here a lot for the past year, I've always wanted to give her a ring but never have. Has anyone on here have a review of this woman?

[url]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/kiss-and-cuddle-caress-and-snuggle-on-this-hot-summer-evening-44/5234576[/url]

[QUOTE=Mudd024; 1520495]I seen this lady on here a lot for the past year, I've always wanted to give her a ring but never have. Has anyone on here have a review of this woman?

[url]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/kiss-and-cuddle-caress-and-snuggle-on-this-hot-summer-evening-44/5234576[/url][/QUOTE]I believe her name is "Deb". She adverts around here and is well reviewed if you do a little digging. Of course, I could be wrong and apologies if so.

[QUOTE=Spambox138;1522334]I believe her name is "Deb". She adverts around here and is well reviewed if you do a little digging. Of course, I could be wrong and apologies if so.[/QUOTE]Yes, the pics are real and she is reviewed here.

As far as I remember nothing special though, average reviews.

If you like mature women then go for it (by the pics personally I wouldn't, there's so much better out there).

Cheers

[QUOTE=Mudd024; 1520495]I seen this lady on here a lot for the past year, I've always wanted to give her a ring but never have. Has anyone on here have a review of this woman?

[url]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/kiss-and-cuddle-caress-and-snuggle-on-this-hot-summer-evening-44/5234576[/url][/QUOTE.

I believe her name is Anita, she used to have a website alwaysanita. Com which may or may not still be active. I don't think this is Deb who has been well reviewed here. That being said, I have not visited either.

[QUOTE=Mudd024; 1520495]I seen this lady on here a lot for the past year, I've always wanted to give her a ring but never have. Has anyone on here have a review of this woman?

[url]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/kiss-and-cuddle-caress-and-snuggle-on-this-hot-summer-evening-44/5234576[/url][/QUOTE]She is not Deb from the North shore. Has called herself "Carolyn Carr" as well as Anita. Has been around a long time with pretty much an open menu. Fair / mediocre reviews; worth at least one visit.

I know this is kind of late to ask, but with all the recent media stories surfacing, I am a little skiddish. I am trying to set something up with Kennedy, justcallmekennedy. Com. She is asking for height, weight, age, occupation, etc. I heard in the last sting that they asked the same. I do have a reference site that I use, so I didn't think she would need this additional information. I see that she is well reviewed on other sites, but wanted to check here. Does anyone have any information on her?

If a mature, full figured woman with terrific attention to detail is your requirement, give her a call. She isn't 20, not waive thin nor a crack HO. She is a honest mature gal who enjoys her work.

[QUOTE=Willcall44;1524270]She is not Deb from the North shore. Has called herself "Carolyn Carr" as well as Anita. Has been around a long time with pretty much an open menu. Fair / mediocre reviews; worth at least one visit.[/QUOTE]

(Didn't want to post on Escort Board, so moved it over to this Board)

Case is going to be tough to prove without testimony of some of the John against her. Violation of privacy for recording w / o permission needs testimony of those recorded w / o permission. Why do you think they are charging 150 guys? Because the Prosecutor is outraged? They want to make sure they can flip enough johns to testify against Lexi.

Prostitution needs connection of sex act with $$. Just her detailed notes without corroborating evidence is not a done deal. The videos are just plain stupid on her part, but even those alone without other elements is very difficult to prove for Prosecutor. It proves the sexual act. Of course, if video includes audio or video of discussion of money or shows any exchange of currency, Lexi and particular John are cooked. But no one is that dumb.

The LE has to flip one of the three, Lexi Wright, Strong or a few of the John's to convict Lexis, the Johns, & Mr Strong.

"Beyond a reasonable doubt" is very difficult standard, and you only need one of the Jurors to say not guilty to have hung jury.

Of course, with all this publicity, they will not get fair & impartial trial in Biddeford / Wells area.

Yes, the Prosecutor will definitely try to have them plead out to the charges, because going to trial is a risk that the Prosecutor doesn't want to take without a sure bet, and this is no sure bet. The media would love a trial because of all the salacious details they could print due to the "publics need to know".

IMHO.

[QUOTE=Gansett; 1571674]Sux to be them. Channel 12 in Providence reported that because the "authorities" didn't post their age or address there's several guys screaming they'll be falsely accused due to having the same name. A couple had motions denied by the court.

She's facing over 100 charges, her business partner 59 and if you think they, or any other provider, won't cut a deal you're only fooling yourself.

[url]http://bostinno.com/2012/10/15/alexis-wright-prostitution-client-list-21-names-released-in-high-profile-prostitution-case/[/url][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Longjblues; 1571757] (Didn't want to post on Escort Board, so moved it over to this Board)

Case is going to be tough to prove without testimony of some of the John against her.

IMHO.[/QUOTE]Well the just released a partial list of Johns in the Zumba case, either they want to flip one or more of the ones they outted or more likely they are going to try and flip one of the ones not released using the risk of their name being released as leverage. And it's got the national spotlight as well, cnn. Com has they story.

[url]http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/us/maine-alleged-prostitution/index.html?hpt=hp_t3[/url]

The 'Johns' are charged with misdemeanors, If me I'd quietly pay the fine and move on. Maybe there will be community service but normally you aren't jailed for a misdemeanor.

I wouldn't be pressing charges or testifying against her for my invasion of privacy. Like I said I'd go quietly. However I do know a guy who plays and is single and inheirited a ton. He'd be on the steps of the court house with a bullhorn blasting hell yeah I fukked her. He doesn't care. She better hope he isn't one of those yet to be named [grin]

What seems to me to be unclear is how are these guys deemed to be guilty. Just because they are on a list somewhere does not prove anything to me. I think that is also true of some of the lists.

[QUOTE=Aluver; 1571775]Well the just released a partial list of Johns in the Zumba case, either they want to flip one or more of the ones they outted or more likely they are going to try and flip one of the ones not released using the risk of their name being released as leverage. And it's got the national spotlight as well, cnn. Com has they story.

[url]http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/us/maine-alleged-prostitution/index.html?hpt=hp_t3[/url][/QUOTE]One of the items that I had read on a blog was that the cops were going to try and scrub the list keeping their people off it along with some of the better connected. It has been mentioned by a defense lawyer that if the full list isn't released (which obviously the defense lawyer has) they will use the names 'ommitted' at trial to deal. This will force (they are hoping) to either make the whoe list public or force them to deal or be embarrassed. No idea if it will work but it seems plausable.

Thanks LB, I for one appreciate it as it seems some feel that other topics take precedence over the exchange of providers reviews, it also shows that the discussion can be moved to another forum regardless of where the topic originated.
[QUOTE=Longjblues;1571757](Didn't want to post on Escort Board, so moved it over to this Board)[/QUOTE]

As for the trial, we're just going to have to wait & see how this all plays out.
We can speculate on how the trial & other things may go, but it seems surprises always come up, making things go other than what was anticipated.
I'd like to see her beat the charges (unlikely) & that none of her friends or supposed clients testifies against her (highly unlikely).
Her biggest challenge may come from the IRS for tax evasion.

Have fun stay safe

[QUOTE=Skatar018;1572250]Her biggest challenge may come from the IRS for tax evasion.[/QUOTE]I had mentioned the IRS previously. Regardless of what the results are at her trial, if it goes to trial, the IRS will be waiting.

[QUOTE=Gansett;1572525]I had mentioned the IRS previously. Regardless of what the results are at her trial, if it goes to trial, the IRS will be waiting.[/QUOTE]While she was evidently a prolific record keeper I would think that financial payments wouldn't be one she would keep?

If the IRS were going to be involved, they would be already.

When the Danish Health was raided, the IRS was part of the team that closed it. One of the ladies that testified was coerced into testifying by the suggestion that the IRS would look at her tax returns. But they never did, and she had reachable assets in her name, ie real estate.

Alexis won't have any assets left after this criminal proceeding is involved, even if she beats the rap. Her attorney / legal fees and living expenses will exhaust what little she has right now.

IRS doesn't go after someone unless they can justify their time with actual revenue collected.

IMHO.

[QUOTE=Stressed Out;1572665]While she was evidently a prolific record keeper I would think that financial payments wouldn't be one she would keep?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Longjblues; 1572687]If the IRS were going to be involved, they would be already.

When the Danish Health was raided, the IRS was part of the team that closed it. One of the ladies that testified was coerced into testifying by the suggestion that the IRS would look at her tax returns. But they never did, and she had reachable assets in her name, ie real estate.

Alexis won't have any assets left after this criminal proceeding is involved, even if she beats the rap. Her attorney / legal fees and living expenses will exhaust what little she has right now.

IRS doesn't go after someone unless they can justify their time with actual revenue collected.

IMHO.[/QUOTE]Say she beats the rap and goes on Oprah circuit do you think IRS may get involved then? Maybe adds her current income to passed income and hits her for passed violations?

[QUOTE=Skatar018; 1572250]Thanks LB, I for one appreciate it as it seems some feel that other topics take precedence over the exchange of providers reviews, it also shows that the discussion can be moved to another forum regardless of where the topic originated.

As for the trial, we're just going to have to wait & see how this all plays out.

We can speculate on how the trial & other things may go, but it seems surprises always come up, making things go other than what was anticipated.

I'd like to see her beat the charges (unlikely) & that none of her friends or supposed clients testifies against her (highly unlikely).

Her biggest challenge may come from the IRS for tax evasion.

Have fun stay safe[/QUOTE]If there is money involved and the goverment wants their share. The IRS will be involved. It will only take one john to plead or testify at trial that he paid for sex. Her videos will not help her.

[QUOTE=Longjblues; 1572687]If the IRS were going to be involved, they would be already.

Alexis won't have any assets left after this criminal proceeding is involved, even if she beats the rap. Her attorney / legal fees and living expenses will exhaust what little she has right now.

IRS doesn't go after someone unless they can justify their time with actual revenue collected.[/QUOTE]I am no expert, but who's to say the IRS isn't already involved in gathering & collecting information on Alexis Wright & perhaps her partner aslo?
Not sure & I could be wrong, but I don't think the IRS tends to issues warnings to those they are investigating, at least not till you get the summons to appear before them.

Though I tend to agree with you LB that the IRS shouldn't waste their time & our tax dollars going after revenue that would seem hard to collect.
However I would never underestimate what the IRS will & will not do, as they have shown too, if not a unpredictability, then at least a propensity to try & collect revenue on what assets you have today & what you may also have in future assets.

You can google any amount of high profile celebrities issues with the IRS, such as Chris Tucker, Wesley Snipes (did or doing jail time) , Nicholas Cage, Willie Nelson, etc the list goes on.

A not so high profile case Edward & Elaine Brown were indicted in the United States District Court in New Hampshire for numerous federal tax violations: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_and_Elaine_Brown[/url]

Frontline has all kinds of reports on IRS issues, both from dealing with the little guy up through very large corporations: [url]http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/tax/shelter/[/url]

I have friends that were well off financially, got into trouble with the IRS in 1989, lost their case in 1994 & are in financial ruin now & probably will be for the rest of their lives.

Whether or not the IRS gets involved reamains to be seen.
I can only say with certainty that out of all the dogma aspects of law enforcement, the TAXMAN is the one I don't want on my ass!

The IRS is ruthless. Some azzwipe called the IRS on a friend who owns a body shop, they destroyed him. He did "sidejobs" for cash. They went through all his purchases and determined that the amount of supplies, like paint, was far in excess of what would be used for the job tickets he had. They figured his income based on that. They also claimed his lifestlye, house, cars and boat couldn't be supported on the income he claimed. He had to sell everything in order to pay the tax and penalties they tacked, rather bolted, on.

They went after pizza places a few years back. X amount of sauce equaled Y numbers of pizza yet only z was claimed, pay up.

With the uptight, lily white, missionary only legislatures prodding the IRS they'll go after her. Getting restituation will be secondary to setting an example to other providers what could happen to them.

Took a page from LB & as he stated i didn't want to post this in the MP Reports forum

[QUOTE=French;1574092]Hope all works out as sex for a fee is a misdermeanor vio,[/QUOTE]If sex for a fee is a misdemeanor, then with the new laws inplace in Mass I would not want to be convicted and found guilty!

[url]http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section53A[/url]
[ Text of section as amended by 2011, 178, Sec. 25 effective February 19, 2012. For text effective until February 19, 2012, see above. ]
(b) Whoever pays, agrees to pay or offers to pay another person to engage in sexual conduct, or to agree to engage in sexual conduct with another person, shall be punished by imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than 2 and one-half years or by a fine of not less than $1, 000 and not more than $5, 000, or by both such imprisonment and fine, whether such sexual conduct occurs or not.

A little more info on the new laws: [url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?3725-General-Reports/page5[/url]
Have fun stay safe

Hey All,

If you have not seen any of the Zumba girl's vids (they are readily available on the net, and with excellent videography) , and have to pick one, it just has to be the popsicle one. (Some of the other vids, we have all seen plenty of screwing ones so those do not add much.)

What she can and does do with the popsicle is enticing, even if some is predictable. Some is not predictable. All of it is sexy. Zumba girl has a great body, but that little scarring problem on her face. It goes on for about 7 minutes, and make sure you watch to the end. What she does at the end of the video comes out of right field, WTF.

Thought I read somewhere that she came to this Country as a foreign exchange student? She looks Latino but I never detected an accent on a couple of her Porn Videos that I recently watched. Also, I read that she just got married. Apparently her boyfriend (now her Husband) was always aware of her Escort & Porn Business and in fact participated in a few of her kinky videos. After all this media coverage, when it's all said and done, the Judge will make an example out her and sentence her to prison for a brief stint.

[QUOTE=Skatar018; 1573381]I am no expert, but who's to say the IRS isn't already involved in gathering & collecting information on Alexis Wright & perhaps her partner aslo?

Not sure & I could be wrong, but I don't think the IRS tends to issues warnings to those they are investigating, at least not till you get the summons to appear before them.

Though I tend to agree with you LB that the IRS shouldn't waste their time & our tax dollars going after revenue that would seem hard to collect.

However I would never underestimate what the IRS will & will not do, as they have shown too, if not a unpredictability, then at least a propensity to try & collect revenue on what assets you have today & what you may also have in future assets.

You can google any amount of high profile celebrities issues with the IRS, such as Chris Tucker, Wesley Snipes (did or doing jail time) , Nicholas Cage, Willie Nelson, etc the list goes on.

A not so high profile case Edward & Elaine Brown were indicted in the United States District Court in New Hampshire for numerous federal tax violations:

[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_and_Elaine_Brown[/url]

Frontline has all kinds of reports on IRS issues, both from dealing with the little guy up through very large corporations:

[url]http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/tax/shelter/[/url]

I have friends that were well off financially, got into trouble with the IRS in 1989, lost their case in 1994 & are in financial ruin now & probably will be for the rest of their lives.

Whether or not the IRS gets involved reamains to be seen.

I can only say with certainty that out of all the dogma aspects of law enforcement, the TAXMAN is the one I don't want on my ass![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Djtuck;1577030]Thought I read somewhere that she came to this Country as a foreign exchange student? She looks Latino but I never detected an accent on a couple of her Porn Videos that I recently watched. Also, I read that she just got married. Apparently her boyfriend (now her Husband) was always aware of her Escort & Porn Business and in fact participated in a few of her kinky videos. After all this media coverage, when it's all said and done, the Judge will make an example out her and sentence her to prison for a brief stint.[/QUOTE]She talked in the videos? Must have missed it. Guess my mind was on something else. Have to check it out again. And if you could go home everynight to a woman of her looks, body and talent wouldn't you overlook a few things?

[QUOTE=Stressed Out;1577121]She talked in the videos? Must have missed it. Guess my mind was on something else. Have to check it out again. And if you could go home everynight to a woman of her looks, body and talent wouldn't you overlook a few things?[/QUOTE]Her mom still lives in Ma as well

[QUOTE=Ccup2;1577143]Her mom still lives in Ma as well[/QUOTE]Ma? I thought she originally was from Wells, ME

Didn't take long LOL

I bet you the guy reflects the opinion of the majority of the male population of the United States

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48qT_neSctE[/url]

[QUOTE=Nrlmus; 1577163]Didn't take long LOL

I bet you the guy reflects the opinion of the majority of the male population of the United States.

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48qT_neSctE[/url][/QUOTE]It goes well with my new t-shirt.

"I took Zumba classes and all I got was this louzy t-shirt!"

And seeing her in the video just enhances my opinion that she was a hot chick! And those nice white teeth...guess cum is a good whitner!

[QUOTE=Nrlmus; 1577163]Didn't take long LOL

I bet you the guy reflects the opinion of the majority of the male population of the United States.

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48qT_neSctE[/url][/QUOTE]Thanks for sharing, White boy can't rap for shit, but still funny.

Am emailing with a 43 year old black woman from CLCE in boston who wants two guys. Anyone interested pm me

[QUOTE=Stressed Out; 1577173]It goes well with my new t-shirt.

"I took Zumba classes and all I got was this louzy t-shirt!"

And seeing her in the video just enhances my opinion that she was a hot chick! And those nice white teeth. Guess cum is a good whitner![/QUOTE][url]Http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981748897[/url]

[QUOTE=Rito1;1592590][url]Http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981748897[/url][/QUOTE]Look at the 4th paragraph of the article. Read the whole paragraph. Now check this: instead of writing something like 'Hopefully, we will learn from these mistakes, make amends, etc, etc." they wrote what?

Human hypocrisy especially that of the righteous, knows no bounds.

Good point. Unbelievable self righteous attitude, like wright is the one and the only one responsible for. For what? People will say it's ok for someone to get a job because they did really well in that interview (ie, had charisma, ie, had sexual magnetism, ie, got hired because the f-ing interviewer was enthralled by, attracted to them on some level, even if it was an astrophysics position and the candidate was some old white haired man, but with the charisma of carl sagan. What a bunch of hypocritical be. S.).

Why do the puritans think it's somehow nobler to have a society that discriminates against the less attractive people? Who is the news anchor? The tv star? The magazine cover girl or guy? It's the person the puritans find sexually attractive, want to f-ck, etc. So why is it ok for the world to allow the nba star to get girls galore, but the short balding not-rich guy can't get it because he doesn't have the power, status, fame, and he should therefore according to the puritans be content not to get any p-ssy. Such hypocrisy. Why not let him pay for it. Everyone does anyway one way or another. The puritan be. S. Is a lie and I can't believe wright's life is going to be screwed because of this. Such be. S. I'm not some short fat balding buy by the way, I'm actually tall, dark, and handsome, (LOL) , but I loathe the witchburners. There is nothing fair about the puritanical society that rules on such matters.

[QUOTE=Nrlmus; 1592761]Look at the 4th paragraph of the article. Read the whole paragraph. Now check this: instead of writing something like 'Hopefully, we will learn from these mistakes, make amends, etc, etc." they wrote what?

Human hypocrisy especially that of the righteous, knows no bounds.[/QUOTE]