Bareback Providers

[QUOTE=Joseph1955;3931120]I doubt any deals were made. TNA just isn't that big or important to warrant it. They probably exist in some way that, for the moment, keeps them from being crushed by the wheels of the law.

They've certainly evolved into a forum that places a priority on giving the providers an equal or superior voice relative to the clients. That's fine. Who cares, just ignore it or work around it. Most reasonable people have no objection to the women having a place to express themselves or try to make the most of their situation.

What's too bad, in my opinion, is how that creates an environment of the least common denominator. People who should be the most accepting of diversity in thought and behavior become incredibly intolerant of both. A closed-minded attitude only hurts the women in the long run, as they are ultimately the vulnerable group and people will always find a way to do what they really want to do. Hence, this thread. In my experience, nearly as many women as men are okay with the possibility of uncovered play, given the right circumstances. It's just nobody is allowed to talk about it. How fucked up and unsafe is that?[/QUOTE]Agreed. The moralizing and shaming / shunning / lecturing of people on that board isn't any different behavior than the prudes who hate escorting entirely. Whom they supposedly vehemently dislike. It's disgusting behavior, especially coming from a group that should, in theory, know better about marginalizing people.

[QUOTE=JonathanSmyth;3930984]If some does see her, grab her by the pussy for me. .[/QUOTE]LMAO! Thanks, I needed a good laugh today.

[QUOTE=Joseph1955;3931092]My impression is an emphatic NO. Also, her board presence is her schtick, her act. She's pretty darn smart but much more personable and sweet than she lets on in public. Asking her by text prior to meeting is a suicide mission, don't bother. I've only met her once. Perhaps if you're a long time client or have some larger connection? I kind of doubt anyone in that category would post it here, but I've been totally wrong before![/QUOTE]Totally agree.

[QUOTE=Mojo567;3930669]She has reported several BB requests on TNA. So if you do txt her to ask, make sure she cannot link to your profile there (incase you have one). If anyone has intel on her please share, she is pretty bitchy on TNA.[/QUOTE]She and I had a deep discussion. Not the erotic kind. Several years ago. She really believes she's all that. She'd be great to take out for drinks, if what you want is several hours of fantastic and entertaining conversation. But those boundaries. She has lines that make my Asperger's look like Dale Carnegie. You aren't likely to get across them.

I haven't experienced her this way, but I think of her as an intellectual, not-intimate, dominatrix.

[QUOTE=Mojo567;3931059]$$$ for 30 mins $$ for 60. No LFK, DFK, FIV, GFE,69, Foreplay. Does she even enjoy doing it with men? I mean seriously when you look through her list of demands and what she will not do. You need to ask yourself what exactly are you paying $$ for. Talking?[/QUOTE]She doesn't like talking.

Basically she's just a fuckhole and she likes it in her ass more than her pussy, or at least she used too. Was also into getting golden showers (again not sure what's on her menu now).

Back when she started she did BBFS but that was short lived. She'd be a definite NO on that front.

Personally I think she's a fucking ***** who is trying really hard to shake her fucked up past. She says what she wants and gives no shits.

Follow her rules to the letter or fuck off. I think one of her problems (which there are many) was too many steroids back in the day.

She's a fit gal but buckled from the neck up.

Also I'm not a fan of big fake silicone tits.

[QUOTE=KurtCutter;3930032]Went looking for an ebony provider and ended up with a blond. I've noticed Morgan's ads before but I couldn't find anything about menu so I always passed and then I stumble across her video on porn hub. Texted and asked if I could get the same menu, her response ABSOLUTELY. She's cool GFE, BBBJ and BBFS multiple positions. Afterwards she had wipes to clean me up and enjoyed some great conversation. $200 VIP (BBFS) is an extra $80.

[URL]https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5a692e33ea952[/URL]

[URL]http://tacoma.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_e/beautiful-blonde-bunnyin-tacom/229095026657[/URL][/QUOTE]Awesome! Great work dude!

It's great that site provides explicit menu details, though I don't see anyone openly indicating they do BB. Please let us know if you find others and if you have any tips searching for them on the site. Again, great work. FBJ.

[QUOTE=Joseph1955;3930048]She very openly offered to me using a clearly cut-and-paste text: VIP upgrade charge, recent lab test, etc. I passed on her because of other negative reports of drama and aggressive attitude. I know others have had great experiences, so God bless. It's just too bad she (everyone!) can't just do what she wants, whenever she wants with whomever she wants. And not have so much bullshit attached.[/QUOTE]Labtest? Wow! Never had that with my experience.

First time I scheduled with her I only had $$, I came freshly showered from the gym, she took my shirt off and it was over from there. "I usually charge $$ for bare, but for you, fuck it".

Second visit. I only brought $$ sorry, still BBFS. Never asked.

And the 3rd, 4th and so on.

Never ask on text, show up clean.

[QUOTE=CreamPieSeeker;3873295]Rubbed private parts together, slowly put it in and she was into it. No discussion beforehand. Then asked if she did Greek.[/QUOTE]I come to Seatac every six weeks from a variety of places and am a well established man. Brig is always well prepared, her in-call location is very nice. If enjoyed our time together but after five visits, she allowed me to put the tip of my cock into her, then when I tried to go deeper, she stopped, pulled me over and was outstanding in follow-up to high expectations but no results.

Now you have to know that I am extremely fond of her. She treats me as a long time lover coming back from a long journey. I'm not sure she is BBFS friendly. When I first met her, I respected her parameters, and still do. But is a pinch of penetration a sign that I'm missing.

For those of you who have met her and broke the barrier of BB, what is your advise on taking it "willingly" on her part to full conclusion. Forcing penetration is as close as anyone can come to the are*P* category.

Am I doing something wrong or am I just disillusion in my expectations. Finally what is really difficult is, she is so sweet, eager to please and always delivers in all ways a person would expect from a talented MILF.

Anyone have any experience with her? Seems really hot and slutty.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?195007-Bella_Love22[/URL]

[QUOTE=Mojo567;3932818]Anyone have any experience with her? Seems really hot and slutty.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?195007-Bella_Love22[/URL][/QUOTE]Been texting her and she responded absolutely no cim or BBFS.

[QUOTE=Mojo567;3932818]Anyone have any experience with her? Seems really hot and slutty.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?195007-Bella_Love22[/URL][/QUOTE]I'd CIP'd her twice about a year and a half ago, when she was a bit thicker. I reached out to her as recent as 6 months ago, asked if she still allowed CIP, told her we done it before. Replied back saying no.

Hey guys,

Just checking in one more time to see if there is any updated intel on Amanda Walker? I'll be back in town this weekend and want to hit her up but not sure if she's still taking clients. I'll report back if I hear anything or get lucky with the menu.

Aka Trinity Pleasurez. Saw her recently when she started posting again. Wasn't too impressed, but I'm a bit of a harsh judge esp. At 400/ hr. I thought her pics were better. A little bigger than I expected. That all could have been manageable, but she was drier than the Sahara on a bad day and didn't have any lube or lotion available. I felt like I needed a shoe horn to get in there, and it never got any wetter. It was actually really uncomfortable, I've never been with anyone that dry in my life. Was also pretty boring, but tbh that could have just been because of the no lube and because she probably sensed I wasn't that into it, so take that w / a grain of salt. Anyway, to each their own, but as for my preferences, I wouldn't repeat especially at 400.

[QUOTE=Rhombur;3934181]Aka Trinity Pleasurez. Saw her recently when she started posting again. Wasn't too impressed, but I'm a bit of a harsh judge esp. At 400/ hr. I thought her pics were better. A little bigger than I expected. That all could have been manageable, but she was drier than the Sahara on a bad day and didn't have any lube or lotion available. I felt like I needed a shoe horn to get in there, and it never got any wetter. It was actually really uncomfortable, I've never been with anyone that dry in my life. Was also pretty boring, but tbh that could have just been because of the no lube and because she probably sensed I wasn't that into it, so take that w / a grain of salt. Anyway, to each their own, but as for my preferences, I wouldn't repeat especially at 400.[/QUOTE]She's not into it. She wasn't into it in the past either. Haven't seen her since she left town but back then she was pretty hot. She was plenty wet when I started rawdogging her but she's mechanical to the extreme. Still dunn dumped 2 loads in her.

[QUOTE=BBpornogeek;3934678]She's not into it. She wasn't into it in the past either. Haven't seen her since she left town but back then she was pretty hot. She was plenty wet when I started rawdogging her but she's mechanical to the extreme. Still dunn dumped 2 loads in her.[/QUOTE]I saw her a handful of times when she was first around last Fall. I think she came in through the Kirkland gang, but I don't remember. She was very down with anything, was sexy and youthful. But yeah, a bit going through the motions. Never had any physical problems or dryness issues. We actually shared some nice conversation, had some issues in common, etc. She was a good value then. Not so much at current rates.