Massage Parlor Reports

[QUOTE=Aimstraight; 1465101]So I experienced my first 4-hand massage

On the flip they stood on eother side of me and one gave an acceptable ending (well it got the job done) and the other let me do some OTC roaming. Overall it was not a good experience and although I got the ending I wanted, it was pretty miserable. Costs were 60 + 60 and I may return but I will definately never do a 4 hand again![/QUOTE]Don't let one so so 4 hand massage discourage you from 4 handed massages. I've had a few 4 handed massages and they have all been good, you just need to try a different spa. Also, you only paid 120, that's the cost for one girl, you got the other for free.

Stopped in for an hour. Drew 'Lu Lu' I think that was her name. 5 in looks. Ok massage, good HE with small A cups hanging out and OTC bottom. Draw back was she answered phone 3x during massage. 60+40. Will repeated.

[QUOTE=Fly Dangler;1460985]Hither and yon Angel has consistently gotten good reviews. With her history first a few years back on Hancock and then more recently in both locations on Beale there's enough info out there if anyone is interested enough to use the thread search tool to do a little research. Consequently there should be absolutely no reason for you to have to go into detail in PMs if that's your preference.[/QUOTE]Angel works alone. So she will not be able to answer all of your calls.

I am going to be spending some time in Waltham this weekend and am wondering if anyone can recommend a good AMP. More services the merrier (like Nancy or Coco!). I cannot travel to Marrett Road or anywhere that far. AAMP would be even better.

Please PM me. Thanks.

[QUOTE=Diogenesbarrel; 1462260]After JP's positive review, I gave her a call. My experience was ok, but you should be aware of a few things.

She answers phones for THREE AMPs in the area. On Sundays, she covers the 200 Great Road location, since the other girl is off.

Her massage was pretty good, lots of overt hints of things to come, but I found the HE itself rather lackluster.

More importantly, there were six calls during my almost hour (50 minutes). Really, really annoying.

I liked her but would not repeat, given the interruptions. She's very much in demand, probably thanks to you guys.[/QUOTE]I've seen her more than once and have never been interrupted by a phone call. Once or twice the next appointment rang the bell early and that's a problem because it's usually when you're getting down to business. At any rate, my experience with Jenny def got better with time. The first few sessions got me a little OTC roaming and a decent HE. But after a few visits I could get all her clothes off and roam at will. Of course, the tip went up. When I started it was the standard $40 for a HE. For the last few visits it was a $. Once she gets comfortable, things are pretty good.

[QUOTE=Beepers;1457920]Went to see Angel at AAA in quincy. Damn those tits![/QUOTE]I started seeing Angel back in 2001 when she was working out of a salon in Dorchester, she didn't have her implants then, all natural and very hot. I am an early riser and she would accomodate my request for Sunday early AM appointment (7 AM) I moved to Thailand in 2003 and have not seen her since. I am back living in the Boston area and I am looking forward to seeing her again (I miss the mirror thing!) the sweetist MT I have ever been to.

Visited this weekend. I like this place cause its very private, has a big shared parking lot with plenty of parking. Just walked in as there were no other cars in the lot. Had Wendy, I think she was the only one working at the time actually. 1/2 hr massage, and it was actually a pretty decent / soothing massage. She asked what I wanted after which was kind of strange, opted for just the good old HR which was above average. She is not much in the looks department but extremely pleasant and nice. Can't imagine this place being around to much longer. 40/40

[url]http://www.sexyandfunny.com/view_joke/happy-ending-massage_41426.html[/url]

I am scheduled to be working in the area all week with a few hours off in the afternoon. I wanted to try a few of the places I have seen advertised and there seem to be a few new places. I don't really want to a have a Jolin ladyboy experience I know they have a place in the landing. I was debating on the place on washington street or one of the places on broad street. Anyone steer me in the right direction. PM or post is fine

Thanks.

I will report back after I try and report my findings.

[QUOTE=Jon Gris; 1467761]I am scheduled to be working in the area all week with a few hours off in the afternoon. I wanted to try a few of the places I have seen advertised and there seem to be a few new places. I don't really want to a have a Jolin ladyboy experience I know they have a place in the landing. I was debating on the place on washington street or one of the places on broad street. Anyone steer me in the right direction. PM or post is fine

Thanks.

I will report back after I try and report my findings.[/QUOTE]I would stick with Broad St. Spots. Dropped into the new location that has been advertising on Washington St. And got no extras. It was one of the first days it was open, so they may have been extra cautious. My guess is that things will get better there.

[QUOTE=Jon Gris; 1467761]I am scheduled to be working in the area all week with a few hours off in the afternoon. I wanted to try a few of the places I have seen advertised and there seem to be a few new places. I don't really want to a have a Jolin ladyboy experience I know they have a place in the landing. I was debating on the place on washington street or one of the places on broad street. Anyone steer me in the right direction. PM or post is fine

Thanks.

I will report back after I try and report my findings.[/QUOTE]Likewise I will be working in the Weymouth area and I am totally unfamiliar with it. Can anyone give me some recommendations? PM or post.

Thanks

[url]http://boston.backpage.com/BodyRubs/new-open-exotic-asian-body-work-25/19910567[/url]

I happened to be in the area recently, and decided to give this place a second chance. Walked in without an appointment, and got the only provider available at the time. Not bad looking.

Much better experience this time. She put her finger to her lips to gesture for silence, and then earned a tip of 40. I really do think this place might have a "no extras" policy, so I won't mention her name in this report. I'd hate to get someone fired. However, I'd be happy to pass that information along if you've posted at least one review. PM me if you'd like the name.

Please note that this is the place with phone 9789. There is a similar establishment in the building next door (phone 0498) , which has a table shower, and older and heavier (but very enthusiastic) providers.

[QUOTE=Rule43; 1438768]This new place has recently become a regular advertiser on Boston BP Body Rubs. I couldn't find any previous reviews, so I thought I'd check it out.

It wasn't very busy when I arrived. There were four or five women waiting for customers, all young and attractive.

I'd only recommend this place if you're looking for a therapeutic massage. If not, you should know that they apparently have a "massage only" policy. The provider that I saw gave me the impression that she wished she could offer more, but didn't want to risk losing her job.

It's possible that one of you might be more persuasive. However, if you do manage to negotiate additional services, it might be better if you didn't post the name of the provider, because she could be fired if word gets back to management. I'd be very pleased if you were to PM her name to me, though!

By the way, you shouldn't confuse this establishment with Chinese Bodywork, which is located in the building next door and advertises on CL Therapeutic ("so relaxing"). The latter features a table shower and two older women, who are both very friendly and playful.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=WantToForget; 1455354]I went there a while ago. Its a bit weird because the parkign is in the back and you have to walk to the side of the building in order to get in.

Bring you to the table area, nice pro table. Put down your stuff and put you in the sauna box and bathrobe. Give you some water leave you in there for a bit.

Decent massage. They had a couple girls working there, I got a semi chub one. Did see one girl who looked pretty skinny though. Did get a he. Was leaving standard 40 tip when she said no its 60. I was a little ticked off about that, it wasnt worth 60, but I didn't want a hassle. I've been thinking about repeating, but was going to consider trying this new westford place thats posting in therapeutic section first. Anyone try that one?[/QUOTE]I'm assuming it was an hour appointment because a 60 tip is ridiculous otherwise. Even so, it wouldn't occur to me to leave more than the standard 40 unless the service went above and beyond, such as unrestricted UTC roaming, top and bottom, or full nude, multiple pops, or service beyond HE. In a 'burb like Chelmsford, a 40 tip IMO is adequate for ordinary HE service.

You can try Nini's of Weymouth. 750 broad st. I believe. (CL listings).

[QUOTE=Jon Gris; 1467761]I am scheduled to be working in the area all week with a few hours off in the afternoon. I wanted to try a few of the places I have seen advertised and there seem to be a few new places. I don't really want to a have a Jolin ladyboy experience I know they have a place in the landing. I was debating on the place on washington street or one of the places on broad street. Anyone steer me in the right direction. PM or post is fine

Thanks.

I will report back after I try and report my findings.[/QUOTE]

Both Marrett Road and School St AMPs were busted in Lexington last Friday. More here.

[url]http://goo.gl/T8tCy[/url]

SSHH, Phin

[QUOTE=Phindroid; 1469134]Both Marrett Road and School St AMPs were busted in Lexington last Friday. More here.

[url]http://goo.gl/T8tCy[/url]

SSHH, Phin[/QUOTE]Lesson to be learned, Don't open an AMP in Lexington, especially in the neighborhoods those bozos did! Near the res? Children swimming and locals sunbathing just 500 feet or less away from the Marrett Road location and prime 95 accesible houses at the school st one. Stupid. Arrogant. Best advice for you all is to avoid Lex and even Waltham (as I have said much out here) , which is surely going to be next, because the people who tipped off the LPD probably mentioned Waltham in the same breath. I know one of the complainants myself. And I know how he thinks.

I was curious what the etiquette was for tipping on 4 handed massages. It would seem cost prohibitive to give both girls 40, but both ladies are working for an hour. I wouldn't want to give a bad tip, or have to spend too much. Just not sure, but would like to get a 4 handed massage, so any answers are welcomed.

Thanks

[QUOTE=Member #4075;1469218]Lesson to be learned, Don't open an AMP in Lexington, especially in the neighborhoods those bozos did! Near the res? Children swimming and locals sunbathing just 500 feet or less away from the Marrett Road location and prime 95 accesible houses at the school st one. Stupid. Arrogant. Best advice for you all is to avoid Lex and even Waltham (as I have said much out here) , which is surely going to be next, because the people who tipped off the LPD probably mentioned Waltham in the same breath. I know one of the complainants myself. And I know how he thinks.[/QUOTE]OK, probably not the best place to locate, but : Everytime I hear of how someone got a massage or a hand job or sex within X number of feet from a school, child care facility, whatever, and because of that it is a quality of life issue and the place must be shut down immediately, it just drives me absolutely crazy. Did anyone stop to think that almost every night in the housing unit wherever almost every one of those children live, within a few feet, probably in the next room, someone is screwing, blowing, giving or trying to receive oral, anal, regular sex, maybe even S / M or bondage. Who knows what? With one or more of the student's parental units. How many of those neighbors along the area close to 95 are, as I write this, trying to slip their dicks into these children's mother's ass?

As long as the AMPs are quiet, unassuming, with minimal signage, curtains on the windows, etc, who are they really bothering? Whose quality of life really just improved because those places got closed?

[QUOTE=Adobe;1468295]I'm assuming it was an hour appointment because a 60 tip is ridiculous otherwise. Even so, it wouldn't occur to me to leave more than the standard 40 unless the service went above and beyond, such as unrestricted UTC roaming, top and bottom, or full nude, multiple pops, or service beyond HE. In a 'burb like Chelmsford, a 40 tip IMO is adequate for ordinary HE service.[/QUOTE]I agree completely, and for that reason I have never been back.

[QUOTE=Maximus77; 1469767]I was curious what the etiquette was for tipping on 4 handed massages. It would seem cost prohibitive to give both girls 40, but both ladies are working for an hour. I wouldn't want to give a bad tip, or have to spend too much. Just not sure, but would like to get a 4 handed massage, so any answers are welcomed.

Thanks[/QUOTE]Yes, both girls are working for an hour, so of course each should get a minimum of 40, plus you will have to pay the house double also. 60 + 60 = 120, 40 + 40 = 80, total 200, and that's only the minimum. Expensive, yes, but well worth it IMHO.

[QUOTE=Smoke Screen;1469918]Yes, both girls are working for an hour, so of course each should get a minimum of 40, plus you will have to pay the house double also. 60 + 60 = 120, 40 + 40 = 80, total 200, and that's only the minimum. Expensive, yes, but well worth it IMHO.[/QUOTE]Maybe I've just been lucky but every time it's turned into a 4-hand session (as in Bonan in Malden, where Mamasan would often join JoJo) it hasn't been at my request, so although I tipped a little more I didn't double everything. I figure why should the house get double just because they can catch me at a vulnerable (little head doing the thinking) moment? So if the house fee is 70 and my tip is usually 40, I might up that tip to 60. After all, the 4-hand usually begins in my experience when the session is at least half over, and the only reason it's been offered is because there's no other customers around and although a 4-hand can feel great, it's still just a happy ending once it's over. Maybe I'd feel differently if it was two nude twenty year old coeds rubbing me off instead of a couple of mostly dressed middle-aged ladies. Just my 2 cents.

[QUOTE=SMS 54; 1469800]OK, probably not the best place to locate, but : Everytime I hear of how someone got a massage or a hand job or sex within X number of feet from a school, child care facility, whatever, and because of that it is a quality of life issue and the place must be shut down immediately, it just drives me absolutely crazy. Did anyone stop to think that almost every night in the housing unit wherever almost every one of those children live, within a few feet, probably in the next room, someone is screwing, blowing, giving or trying to receive oral, anal, regular sex, maybe even S / M or bondage. Who knows what? With one or more of the student's parental units. How many of those neighbors along the area close to 95 are, as I write this, trying to slip their dicks into these children's mother's ass?

As long as the AMPs are quiet, unassuming, with minimal signage, curtains on the windows, etc, who are they really bothering? Whose quality of life really just improved because those places got closed?[/QUOTE]Really do not think the problem is whether it is near a school or not but with all the traffic going in and out next to other businesses, it has others jealous. Not to blame others also but sites like this give out way to much info and Uncle LEO reads this. LEO needs an excuse to bust them and they get it from here and other sites. I believe that LEO just uses the excuse that complains are coming in from all over. Let us face it once words gets out that HJ BBBJ are available we all want to get there. Just be careful and do not get caught on the bed or massage table doing the nasty deed when LEO busts the door down.

[QUOTE=Adobe;1469996]Maybe I've just been lucky but every time it's turned into a 4-hand session (as in Bonan in Malden, where Mamasan would often join JoJo) it hasn't been at my request, so although I tipped a little more I didn't double everything. I figure why should the house get double just because they can catch me at a vulnerable (little head doing the thinking) moment? So if the house fee is 70 and my tip is usually 40, I might up that tip to 60. After all, the 4-hand usually begins in my experience when the session is at least half over, and the only reason it's been offered is because there's no other customers around and although a 4-hand can feel great, it's still just a happy ending once it's over. Maybe I'd feel differently if it was two nude twenty year old coeds rubbing me off instead of a couple of mostly dressed middle-aged ladies. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]I think there is a difference if they turn your massage into a 4-hand after it is half over, or if you walk in or make an appointment and specifically ask for 4-hand. If that is the case, you should have both ladies full attention for the full hour, but be willing to pay double, house fee and tip. And for me, I would also want 2 pops. Tina that was in Danvers a while back would offer you 4 hands at the outset if they weren't busy, for one house fee and double tip, but then would shrink the session to 30 minutes. I never partook. Would still like to try one, but not just anywhere, it would have to be somewhere I had already established is known for giving good value and time for the money, and with providers that I know fairly well.

[QUOTE=Adobe;1469996]Maybe I've just been lucky but every time it's turned into a 4-hand session (as in Bonan in Malden, where Mamasan would often join JoJo) it hasn't been at my request, so although I tipped a little more I didn't double everything. I figure why should the house get double just because they can catch me at a vulnerable (little head doing the thinking) moment? So if the house fee is 70 and my tip is usually 40, I might up that tip to 60. After all, the 4-hand usually begins in my experience when the session is at least half over, and the only reason it's been offered is because there's no other customers around and although a 4-hand can feel great, it's still just a happy ending once it's over. Maybe I'd feel differently if it was two nude twenty year old coeds rubbing me off instead of a couple of mostly dressed middle-aged ladies. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]We're talking about 2 different things. If someone comes in on her own, half way through your massage, just to help out for the ending, then by all means an extra 20 should suffice. What I'm talking about is if you call to make an appointment and ask specifically for a 4 handed massage or if you walk in and ask for a 4 handed massage then everything is doubled.

[QUOTE=SMS 54; 1469800]OK, probably not the best place to locate, but : Everytime I hear of how someone got a massage or a hand job or sex within X number of feet from a school, child care facility, whatever, and because of that it is a quality of life issue and the place must be shut down immediately, it just drives me absolutely crazy. Did anyone stop to think that almost every night in the housing unit wherever almost every one of those children live, within a few feet, probably in the next room, someone is screwing, blowing, giving or trying to receive oral, anal, regular sex, maybe even S / M or bondage. Who knows what? With one or more of the student's parental units. How many of those neighbors along the area close to 95 are, as I write this, trying to slip their dicks into these children's mother's ass?

As long as the AMPs are quiet, unassuming, with minimal signage, curtains on the windows, etc, who are they really bothering? Whose quality of life really just improved because those places got closed?[/QUOTE]I wonder if Bedford is next? Newton locales couldn't sustain quality AMPs. Wellellsley didn't work either.

Recent popular reviews and also "pretty pic" of "J" draw more attention to the area.

Scheduling has to be proper, not over booked. Does it also help to "look like youbelong" in that area? Maybe?

Dress appropriately and does your vehicle look too out of place for the area? No disrespect to the gents out there.

It's seems too difficult to set up / maintain shop in the towns where LE work flow differs from a more "populated" area.

[QUOTE=Top Floor;1467724][url]http://www.sexyandfunny.com/view_joke/happy-ending-massage_41426.html[/url][/QUOTE]I've seen this over the years and it still is a hoot every time. Someday I figure it will happen tgo someone here on this forum LOL.

[QUOTE=Skindeep; 1465000]Driving through Boston from south Shore, even later than my usual 8 PM, and decided to give the south end Tremont place a try. She said 'closed' on the phone. I asked her what the hours were and she said 10-10. I said it's 8:30 the and she said something incomprehensible.

So, OK, I drive through Arlington on my way home and frequently stop at Blue Sky (previously Forever Young) But I called there and she said 'no more massage. I tried to get more information from her, but she said something like now Body Time (not Body Tune which is up the road). I asked whether they would be open tomorrow and she said 'maybe'.

Anyone know what gives? Full moon? It'll be a shame if I lose my late at night options, as marginal as they were.[/QUOTE]I had heard or read somewhere that when the 'new mgmt' took over they cleaned house. I believe they offer 'body rubs' cause the new girls aren't licensed (yet?). I'm sure the possibilities of anything else is gone. But I do have the memories of Nicole and her awesomely large tits getting down on nher knees and taking it in the nface after an awesome BBBJ. Those werfe the days. Wonder where she went?

[QUOTE=Walls World; 1464818]I just read from the Lowell sun online that Goldfish on Boston Road in Billerica, was recently involved in a sting.

But what gets me is that the cops or nobody would know what's going on if a rival spa didn't check on them. Geez!

Here's the link :

[url]http://www.lowellsun.com/breakingnews/ci_20797342/billerica-spa-owner-pleads-not-guilty-offering-sex[/url][/QUOTE]Yea that sounds like the idiot cops in Billerica. I still remember when they tried to close down Mac's 2 by turning it into a 'juice bar'. All it did was lower the age to get in and make it more popular. Damn idiots.

[QUOTE=Walls World; 1464818]I just read from the Lowell sun online that Goldfish on Boston Road in Billerica, was recently involved in a sting.

But what gets me is that the cops or nobody would know what's going on if a rival spa didn't check on them. Geez!

Here's the link :

[url]http://www.lowellsun.com/breakingnews/ci_20797342/billerica-spa-owner-pleads-not-guilty-offering-sex[/url][/QUOTE]Funny, when this place opened in January there was minimal discussion about it and consensus seemed to be that it was legit (supported by at least one review) ; go figure.

The link has apparently been disabled, by the way, but you can find the article by doing a search of the site.

[QUOTE The link has apparently been disabled, by the way.[/QUOTE]

Below is the story. What I find interesting is the officer told her he didn't have time for a massage but wanted oral. He gave her 100 and she gave him 30 back. Sounds more like the price of a massage.

LOWELL. The owner of a Billerica spa pleaded not guilty Wednesday to a charge of sexual conduct for a fee after she allegedly accepted $70 from an undercover Tewksbury police detective to pay for more than just a massage.

In Lowell District Court, <women's name deleted> 54 was released without bail after pleading not guilty to the charge in connection with the undercover sting operation May 22.

According to court documents, Billerica police began investigating the Goldfish Spa at 884 Boston Road after the Board of Health received a complaint in February from another spa that the company was offering more than massages.

The owner of the rival spa told police she sent a male employee into the Goldfish Spa to check out the competition. The employee told police he was told to lie nude, facedown on the massage table without a robe, towel or anything to cover his body. During the massage, the masseuse rubbed close to his private parts, making him feel uncomfortable, but there was no sexual contact.

On May 22, undercover Tewksbury Police Detective <officer's name deleted> arrived late to a massage appointment and told <women's name deleted> he didn't have time for a massage, but he'd pay for oral sex. <officer's name deleted> placed $100 on the massage table.

<women's name deleted> , who speaks Mandarin, allegedly told <officer's name deleted> ,"I do," then made <officer's name deleted raise his right hand and swear he wouldn't cause her any trouble. After he complied, <women's name deleted> allegedly took $70 and told <officer's name deleted> he could give her the other $30 as a tip afterward if he was satisfied. Then she motioned for him to get undressed.

Then <officer's name deleted> identified himself as a police officer and told <women's name deleted> she was under arrest. As <women's name deleted> was being led away with <officer's name deleted> 's money, she allegedly said,"I do not do anything."

While searching the spa, police said they found a 29-year-old Lexington man lying naked on a massage table behind a locked door. The client was told to get dressed.

<women's name deleted> is scheduled for a pretrial conference Aug. 3.

Cut and paste this link [url]http://www.lowellsun.com/rss/ci_20802669?source=rss[/url]

[QUOTE=MickPK; 1470415]Funny, when this place opened in January there was minimal discussion about it and consensus seemed to be that it was legit (supported by at least one review) ; go figure.

The link has apparently been disabled, by the way.[/QUOTE]It is not a surprise and very often that their business competitor or unsatisfied custommer report them.

[QUOTE=Yello Tail; 1470438]Below is the story. What I find interesting is the officer told her he didn't have time for a massage but wanted oral. He gave her 100 and she gave him 30 back. Sounds more like the price of a massage.[/QUOTE]Also, the article states that when the "rival spa" employee was checking them out,"there was no sexual contact." If not, why did LEO bother investigating?

Thanks for posting story.

Sounds like another outstanding piece of police work!

"The owner of the rival spa told police she sent a male employee into the Goldfish Spa to check out the competition. The employee told police he was told to lie nude, facedown on the massage table without a robe, towel or anything to cover his body. During the massage, the masseuse rubbed close to his private parts, making him feel uncomfortable, but there was no sexual contact."

I am in metro west area I have no recent reports other than I tried "Jolin's" in Framingham.

I had the impression the "types" employed were the exception than the rule.

Wasnt looking for FS. But I must say the few "ladies" seen when I dropped in were pretty and "passable".

Nothing exposed or requested to be. Excellent massage and all the oil was washed off with a hot toil.

[QUOTE=MickPK;1470464]Also, the article states that when the "rival spa" employee was checking them out,"there was no sexual contact." If not, why did LEO bother investigating?[/QUOTE]BILLERICA. The bright-neon, flickering open-for-business sign could still be seen flashing in the window of a Boston Road massage parlor on Tuesday, even after its owner had been arrested approximately one week earlier and charged with offering sexual services to customers in exchange for cash.

However, Police Chief <name deleted said it will only be a matter of time before the state shuts down the Goldfish Spa for good.

Police Chief <name deleted said that on the night of May 22, Detective Sgt. <name deleted visited the 884 Boston Road massage parlor and arrested 54-year-old Chelmsford resident <name deleted .

According to the Secretary of the Commonwealth's Corporations Division, the Goldfish Spa had only been open since Jan. 11.

"I will say that almost immediately after they opened we started to get complaints from residents and businesses," Police Chief <name deleted said.

He said he could not yet elaborate on the details of the investigation but added that the state Department of Public Health inspected the spa and is working to revoke its business license.

The 884 Boston Road address is also home to Enterprise Rent-A-Car. An employee at the rental- car agency said Tuesday nobody had any idea that an arrest had been made at the Goldfish Spa.

Inside the spa, a smiling woman who identified herself as <name deleted said news that the was business closing "is not true," but added she couldn't talk about it further because her "English was not good."

Police Chief <name deleted said other than having the state complete its investigation,"the next step is to work with the landlord to get the place shut down."

According to land records, the property is leased to <name deleted by owner <name deleted who also owns a real-estate company located just a few doors away from Goldfish Spa. A message left for <name deleted at Realty World Advantage, located at 880 Boston Road, was not returned.

Goldfish Spa has no website but advertises its services through other websites like craigslist. Org and backpage. Com. On the same day that <name deleted was arrested, an ad appeared on craigslist. Com offering "Chinese Tui Na bodywork and foot reflexology for men in women in a quiet, relaxing atmosphere" at a rate of $60 per hour or $40 per half-hour.

Police Chief <name deleted said police regularly keep tabs on online massage advertisements,"whether they run on craigslist. Org or another site."

In March 2010, Billerica police busted what they described as a prostitution ring operating from a Concord Road apartment. Months earlier, police staked out the front of the apartment building and confronted a man who had gone inside. The man told police he had obtained the phone number of a woman who had posted an ad on craigslist. Org for massages.

The woman was arrested after she offered various sex acts in exchange for money to an undercover officer who had called the number hours earlier and arranged for a massage.

These AMPs should unioninze and counter sue for malicious prosecution, and get court orders against "investigators" who come by for a visit.

Imagine the dirt on all the "good citizens" who allege wrong doing by these places that would be played out in court.

With the wave of a pen or an anonymous phone call one can ruin a life.

I remember working at a MP back in the 90's and one of the clients had an allegation against one of the emplooyee's. Her lawyer called (she did not even go to the D. A.)

Event though the complaint was groundless.

Within 6 months we went from 50 clients a day to 10 and 4 of the massage therapist left and the place went out of business a year later. A half decent lawyer could prove harm from an allegation and counter sue for big money. As to make "sex for a Fee" stick it is just he said she said. And if the accused records are clean, they will get off. Even though most just plea no lo contende and take 6 mo. S probation and pay a fine.

My only thought is that the state is having a purge to catch the bigger fish in running these people though national crime data bases and looking for rings and other crimes.

Who knows, the power the state has over 2 consenting adults and in the privacy of your selected morals is unwaranted and should be left alone.

[QUOTE=Amp Slave;1470139]I believe that LEO just uses the excuse that complains are coming in from all over. Let us face it once words gets out that HJ BBBJ are available we all want to get there. Just be careful and do not get caught on the bed or massage table doing the nasty deed when LEO busts the door down.[/QUOTE]AMP Slave and the rest of you; I'm sorry to disagree, and to upset or bum out people who really believe that there are no concerned or otherwise interested citizens who would contact LE, but there are, they are the minority, and they have their reasons. It wasn't me but someone I have known since Junior High and I trust and believe him. I wasn't in the room with him at the time and didn't see his phone records, but I can tell by the way he told the story and his facial expression and voice (etc.) that this was real. He was one of several who complained / tipped the Lexington Police regarding 430 Marrett Road, and "the other massage place down the road." LPD are not lying, and neither am I. My friend made an anonymous (no name but didn't block his number from a trac type phone) complaint via the Lexington Police tip line and asked for them to call him back. When they did, he told them that he had additional and better info for them but wanted to know first if they had had other citizen complaints (any how many) before he would share because he didn't want to be the sole caller. When he was satisfied with their response (that yes there were complaints from immediate neighbors and businesses alike) , he shared the rest that he knew, and even called back to thank them on same tip line after the article came out, and he was satisfied that they actually responded in some fashion. I know, he's loco, but that's him not me. He had his reasons, one's that I will respect and keep secret, but he certainly wouldn't care to share that he called in a tip to any of you. If he had the courage to contact LE twice then it's a no-brainer which is more stressfull and tougher to do. Also, he is no longer on this forum. So to all who are doubtful, there you go. To all who want to more info, there is no more I'm willing to say. It is what it is. And I'm just the messenger, so please don't attack me, I'll just put you on ignore list and delete your pm's, and laugh out loud after reading your possible negative responses. We just don't care what you do or don't believe. This is just a courtesy message. Take it or leave it. I'm out.

Woke up, saw the rain, started thinking about all the stings and busts in mass recently and decided it was time to take a ride to providence. Called and mamasan told. Me sunny was working and made appt for an hour later. Got there five minutes early and. Mamasan took me into the room closest to back door. Sunny walked in log looking great. Big smiles and some sweet kisses. Ts was thorough and very pleasant. Back on room I asked for medium. She got right to work on a very nice massage. The whole time I'm laying there I'm hearing guy after guy come to the door asking for sunny, sorry guys. She laid on my back and gave my neck soft kisses pre flip. She lets her hair slide up and down your back as she gently touches and it feels like she its lightly rimmimg but its just am illusion, a great one. Flipped and. More kissing, cuddling and moaning. Finished with nice slow release. She dressed me and big hugs and kisses goodbye. .60. 40 I would have slipped her another 20 if if brought out in. She is the best but I worry that each time I see her could be the last. I hope not. With all the problems in mass RI just seems safer.

[QUOTE=Member #4075;1470794]AMP Slave and the rest of you; I'm sorry to disagree, and to upset or bum out people who really believe that there are no concerned or otherwise interested citizens who would contact LE, but there are, they are the minority, and they have their reasons. It wasn't me but someone I have known since Junior High and I trust and believe him. I wasn't in the room with him at the time and didn't see his phone records, but I can tell by the way he told the story and his facial expression and voice (etc.) that this was real. He was one of several who complained / tipped the Lexington Police regarding 430 Marrett Road, and "the other massage place down the road." LPD are not lying, and neither am I. My friend made an anonymous (no name but didn't block his number from a trac type phone) complaint via the Lexington Police tip line and asked for them to call him back. When they did, he told them that he had additional and better info for them but wanted to know first if they had had other citizen complaints (any how many) before he would share because he didn't want to be the sole caller. When he was satisfied with their response (that yes there were complaints from immediate neighbors and businesses alike) , he shared the rest that he knew, and even called back to thank them on same tip line after the article came out, and he was satisfied that they actually responded in some fashion. I know, he's loco, but that's him not me. He had his reasons, one's that I will respect and keep secret, but he certainly wouldn't care to share that he called in a tip to any of you. If he had the courage to contact LE twice then it's a no-brainer which is more stressfull and tougher to do. Also, he is no longer on this forum. So to all who are doubtful, there you go. To all who want to more info, there is no more I'm willing to say. It is what it is. And I'm just the messenger, so please don't attack me, I'll just put you on ignore list and delete your pm's, and laugh out loud after reading your possible negative responses. We just don't care what you do or don't believe. This is just a courtesy message. Take it or leave it. I'm out.[/QUOTE]I had a pm from a non senior member about Lexington BW about the service recently and if they had handicap access. Hmmm. Probably not related but who knows.

I couldn't tell if your friend was a fellow monger or just joined to get info. It really doesn't matter. Lexington was definitely not a good place for an AMP. I wonder why they chose such places? There's another in Newburyport and Danvers near uncle Leo that I see the same thing happening to. I will miss that Sophia.

BB

[QUOTE=Member #4075;1470794]I know, he's loco, but that's him not me. He had his reasons, one's that I will respect and keep secret, but he certainly wouldn't care to share that he called in a tip to any of you. If he had the courage to contact LE twice then it's a no-brainer which is more stressfull and tougher to do. Also, he is no longer on this forum.[/QUOTE]Let me get this straight:

He is Loco.

You respect his reasons for shuttering two well liked places.

He had "courage" in anonymously calling LPD.

And he was a brother at one time on this forum?

Spin it any way you like but IMO you and your friend are nothing more than petty, disgruntled assholes. Oh, and please follow thru with putting me on your ignore list as it will save me the trouble.

[QUOTE=BaconBits; 1471264]I had a pm from a non senior member about Lexington BW about the service recently and if they had handicap access. Hmmm. Probably not related but who knows.

I couldn't tell if your friend was a fellow monger or just joined to get info. It really doesn't matter. Lexington was definitely not a good place for an AMP. I wonder why they chose such places? There's another in Newburyport and Danvers near uncle Leo that I see the same thing happening to. I will miss that Sophia.

BB[/QUOTE]That was me BB. And I have posted in the past as well as PM'ed many of you with varying success about wheelchair access and with all the limited MPs with accessibility I would never shoot myself in the foot figuratively since I really couldn't do it literally due to paralysis. But all joking aside,"can't we all just get" a long massage with a stress relief without the drama. I've had my share of situations with MPs saying no at the door, or trying to get my wheelchair in small ass rooms, and best of all the pity look where one time one of the girls began crying (awkward). Sorry I just needed to vent because I've run out of accessible places and never had an opportunity to try Lexington.