Her face is 'more plain' than the pix
[QUOTE=BigSkyConferen;2046662][URL]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/i-love-wat-i-do-and-you-will-too-sweet-sexy-mixxed-hottie-visiting-21/14131178[/URL]
Dreamed of this relatively new girl, not the most professional (kept me waiting in lobby for 30 minutes. Only contacted again when I've left and I turned back. At least 1 hr wasted. Oh well) but was still friendly and nice. Could've been more engaged. With no make up on (I was her first of the day. Caught her out of the shower) her face is more plain. OK, here're the negatives. Now - the memorable!!
BEST-TITS-EVER! I dare say her kitty is the tightest I've dreamed of, and I don't have a big Johnson. Damage was 1.2 for half. I've submitted review on the other board. PM if you have more specific questions. Be safe out there![/QUOTE]Because the pix are at least 3-4 years old, and they're probably not her pix. Google image search brings up 300 separate examples of each of her pix, in ads by dozens of girls all over the country.
Her phone 530-921-7026 comes up with multiple ads with different names and pictures.
Met Jada...Hurry before she leaves!
[URL]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/cute-face-small-waiste-juicy-booty-new-dominican-cutie-100-real-80-special-all-day-24/13030324[/URL]
Met Jada for a QV for .8, she had a chill cool personality, didn't rush, no clock watching, perfect ass, great head skills, nice body and extremely tight box! The only thing weird was her friend was in the bathroom, it didn't make a difference or negative impact but worth mentioning. Catch up with her before she leaves because she won't be here for long.
Creepin'.
First time poster, long time monger... A couple of quick reviews
Here's my take on a few.
Gya: same girl as pics +10 lbs phenomenal service, very accomodating. Maybe preggo, face not that pretty.truly enjoys her work not as tight as years past.
Pamela: great service, pretty face. Has gained a couple of pounds but is super nice, responsive and also enjoys her work.
Honey (alexandria): awesome girl, laid back, hot face. Exacltly like the pics. A little less accomodating as gya and pamela but close.
Khlo dias: great service (same as gya and pamela) , same girl in pics but a couple lbs heavier.
Sydney pure: okay, good faker, now preggos, face is a little off.
Trevi: chantilly. Retired? Older, awesome body w some stretch marks on belly. Great service, same as gya, pamela and khloe.
Suggestions for better reviews
[QUOTE=LarryTrain;2054093]Here's my take on a few.
Gya: same girl as pics +10 lbs phenomenal service, very accomodating. Maybe preggo, face not that pretty.truly enjoys her work not as tight as years past.
Pamela: great service, pretty face. Has gained a couple of pounds but is super nice, responsive and also enjoys her work.
Honey (alexandria): awesome girl, laid back, hot face. Exacltly like the pics. A little less accomodating as gya and pamela but close.
Khlo dias: great service (same as gya and pamela) , same girl in pics but a couple lbs heavier.
Sydney pure: okay, good faker, now preggos, face is a little off.
Trevi: chantilly. Retired? Older, awesome body w some stretch marks on belly. Great service, same as gya, pamela and khloe.[/QUOTE]Ad links, or some other way to identify the provider (partial phone number, etc), are always advisable. I understand well-known providers like Gya and Pamela don't need that so much but it's a good habit to develop. Also, there are some newbies who may not be familiar with all the providers on your list. Posting their ad links makes it easy for others to check them out without having to post needless questions in the forum or to you via PM.
And packing so many reviews into one post means you're not providing much information of interest. You've given us one line per provider and your wording is rather vague as in "little less accommodating. . . But close." Since the general GFE standard is DFK, BBBJ and DATY, it would be helpful to let the board know how each provider measures up. Comparing them to one another isn't very useful since not everyone has seen each of the providers you mentioned.
Research results: Vanessa = Trina?
Vanessa's ad: [URL]http://washingtondc.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/behind-cl0sed-d00rs-i-am-a-freakk-seductivel-sexy-red-head-20/13641313[/URL].
Trina's ad: [URL]http://washingtondc.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/6p-6p-22/11102200[/URL].
Using the same number: 609-675-5721 for both ads. Also, an image search found another number (603-425-2665) and a search of that number turns up pics used in both ads.
Her reviews on the oThER site are mediocre to poor and some of the pics from her personal site show her much heavier than those she uses on BP: [URL]http://mssexythicktrina.escortwebsite.com/photos.phtml[/URL].
While I guess it's possible she's sharing the number with another BBW, the more likely explanation is that she's posting under both names to try to get more business and to avoid her poor rep under her Trina persona.