Printable View
[QUOTE=Mmmmm00;4610061]Chloe is already fully booked on her first day back and Rebecca is also asking $350 now.[/QUOTE]Strength in numbers the wrong way haha. Hopefully after a couple weeks of light booking at 350 it will go back down. But unlikely with some of you big ballers on here. Ha.
[QUOTE=McNutties;4610078]Strength in numbers the wrong way haha. Hopefully after a couple weeks of light booking at 350 it will go back down. But unlikely with some of you big ballers on here. Ha.[/QUOTE]
I am barely interested in Rebecca or Cami at $300. While Cami is good looking, she is HOT and COLD and very unpredictable and Rebecca is way TOO SCRIPTED. CAMI could be crazy great session and shit session the next day.
I used to like Chloe a lot and I saw her many times but the last two times that I saw her in LA in MW, it was not what it used to be when she was in Santa Monica location. I guess everything has its time.
Would I pay $350 for Chloe or Rebecca; Nope.
Would I pay $450 or $500 for Emma from EukGirls? Absolutely YES. I have been depressed since she has been gone. LOL.
[QUOTE=Undftd88;4609499]*raises hand up. What's an extra $50 when you are still getting an unbelievable value compared to non k-girl rates. There are many great kgirls out there but IMO none who look as stunning as Chloe and provide the right amount of PSE / GFE play that she does. I see girls weekly and I've been waiting for her to comeback. She's a true pro.[/QUOTE]Undftd88, You're missing the point. It's not that if fucking Chloe is worth the extra $50 or not. It's that this is going to be a major turning point in our whole relationship with providers. If Chloe is massively flooded with clients for many many months at that price, EVERYBODY's price is going to go up across the board. And that's bad for all us non-millionaires. Hey, I want to fuck Chloe too, but we've GOT to keep it in our pants for awhile until she sees the light. This is too much of an increase all at once.
Think long term instead of short term. That way you can have your Chloe and eat it, too. ☺ ☺ ☺
[QUOTE=JohnHada;4609912]1000% agree! Please hold off seeing chloe if she is 350. There are plenty of great k-girls in the 260-280 range!![/QUOTE]Since the price hike to 260-280, I've toned down my mongering significantly. I still have my 140-220 connections that are still going strong. But no way this hobby will keep me in it at the rate of 350; I would sooner move my dating adventures overseas.
For those of you who haven't flown out to Southeast Asia to do a little punting, you have no idea what you're missing and at what total price point (including flights, hotel, food, and girls) that's super affordable. Just sayin'.
[QUOTE=JohnHada;4609912]1000% agree! Please hold off seeing chloe if she is 350. There are plenty of great k-girls in the 260-280 range!![/QUOTE]I will hold off after today. There's no chance in hell I will be the last guy to see her today.
(I’m Bringing 2 extra hundo in-case she’s feeling bare today :-)
[QUOTE=Dwaeji;4609572]Pics are her (non-blurred pics were available the first few days). Great body with a nice ass and super toned stomach. Face is OK, but lots of makeup. A bit of a time waster (long shower, long massage, etc). Kinda seemed like she wanted to minimize the fucking time. I ordinarily wouldn't be tempted to repeat, but I do keep thinking about that body.[/QUOTE]Is this Rose with a tattoo on her side torso? I've had a Rose from another booker, and she fits the description.
[QUOTE=BenderOver;4610297]For those of you who haven't flown out to Southeast Asia to do a little punting, you have no idea what you're missing and at what total price point (including flights, hotel, food, and girls) that's super affordable. Just sayin'.[/QUOTE]Many times a year you can fly to Bangkok for $400. So, the girls who want to charge $350, whatever. You know where I will be instead.
[QUOTE=Undftd88;4609499]*raises hand up. What's an extra $50 when you are still getting an unbelievable value compared to non k-girl rates. There are many great kgirls out there but IMO none who look as stunning as Chloe and provide the right amount of PSE / GFE play that she does. I see girls weekly and I've been waiting for her to comeback. She's a true pro.[/QUOTE]I think we can all agree that the value leans heavily towards kgirls vs non-kgirls providers. And while the comparison helps to establish a simple baseline, it's important to distinguish that the issue at hand is not kgirl vs non-kgirl but kgirl vs kgirl.
Looking at it that way, the question becomes is Chloe worth the $50-110 (I'm including OC as well) premium? For some yes, but in my opinion, most will not consider it worthwhile. Although disparities in service and looks is always subjective, from my perspective, I've had great experiences with kgirls that were just as good as with Chloe without the jump in cost. What Chloe had on her side, until recently anyways, was permanence. No need to worry if an ATF would disappear in 3 months or travel to greener pastures.
Unfortunately, a large proportion of what most would consider top tier kgirls are concentrated in J's crew. They are essentially leveraging that majority to increase prices, which they've done in the past, just not as drastic.
If demand pushes prices to 300 or 350, hell even 400 I'm totally cool with it. Less mongers going in and out; this hobby shouldn't be for people that don't have disposable income tbh.
[blue]There is no place for you on this forum, as a matter of fact this sounds like management speaking if you ask me.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=Alex60;4610271]Undftd88, You're missing the point. It's not that if fucking Chloe is worth the extra $50 or not. It's that this is going to be a major turning point in our whole relationship with providers. If Chloe is massively flooded with clients for many many months at that price, EVERYBODY's price is going to go up across the board. And that's bad for all us non-millionaires. Hey, I want to fuck Chloe too, but we've GOT to keep it in our pants for awhile until she sees the light. This is too much of an increase all at once.
Think long term instead of short term. That way you can have your Chloe and eat it, too. ☺ ☺ ☺[/QUOTE]Well said Alex and absolutely correct! Think about all the times we take a chance on someone hoping for a future ATF. From my experience, most were duds and a dud at $350 hr is a problem!
[QUOTE=NocturnalM;4610642]If demand pushes prices to 300 or 350, hell even 400 I'm totally cool with it. Less mongers going in and out; this hobby shouldn't be for people that don't have disposable income tbh.[/QUOTE]Wow, NocturnalM, I can't believe the arrogance of your comment. Who are you to decide who the hobby should and shouldn't be for? The fault in your statement lies with the term "disposable income". I'm sure you're much better off than I am, but I still work hard so I can enjoy this hobby. Don't I (and others like me) deserve a voice here? Just because we're not as rich as you?
(2 minutes later) OK, I've taken some deep breaths and cooled down a bit. NM, I don't want to get into a flame war. You are certainly entitled to your opinion. But here's the point: If a loaf of bread is $1. 00, and then it suddenly jumps to $2. 50, that's not right. We have to let the "bakers" know that is not a fair increase. And the only way they will listen is... If we speak with our wallet.
Unite, everyone. Power to the people.
[QUOTE=Alex60;4610770]Wow, NocturnalM, I can't believe the arrogance of your comment. Who are you to decide who the hobby should and shouldn't be for? The fault in your statement lies with the term "disposable income". I'm sure you're much better off than I am, but I still work hard so I can enjoy this hobby. Don't I (and others like me) deserve a voice here? Just because we're not as rich as you?
(2 minutes later) OK, I've taken some deep breaths and cooled down a bit. NM, I don't want to get into a flame war. You are certainly entitled to your opinion. But here's the point: If a loaf of bread is $1. 00, and then it suddenly jumps to $2. 50, that's not right. We have to let the "bakers" know that is not a fair increase. And the only way they will listen is... If we speak with our wallet.
Unite, everyone. Power to the people.[/QUOTE]There will definitely be a few guys that go for it, that's fine. If Chloe, Rebecca and anyone else that want to drive the price up are ok with 2/3 visitors per day, so be it. I guarantee by the time we get to mid February they'll get the picture. It will be a HUGE difference going from a possible 25 k month to a 8 k month!
They won't reduce it for sure. You guys can still vote with your wallet to prevent it from spreading to more girls AND an increase in 10 to 20 across the board.
I was just being optimistic when I said other popular girls MAY raise price haha, when I actually meant WILL. And when I said POPULAR girls I meant the likes of Rebecca. Now that's Rebecca raised her price too, it's done. I knew at least one other girl would ask for 350 too if she gets wind of this and comes back to work.
It's also a matter of personal pride to some of these girls.
[QUOTE=JohnnyEm;4610069]Strength in numbers, boys! This won't work for us and by not booking these girls they will have no choice but to go back to original prices. I'm sure the agencies read these board and have others supplying them info from this site. We're not booking for $350![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4611082]They won't reduce it for sure. You guys can still vote with your wallet to prevent it from spreading to more girls AND an increase in 10 to 20 across the board.
I was just being optimistic when I said other popular girls MAY raise price haha, when I actually meant WILL. And when I said POPULAR girls I meant the likes of Rebecca. Now that's Rebecca raised her price too, it's done. I knew at least one other girl would ask for 350 too if she gets wind of this and comes back to work.
It's also a matter of personal pride to some of these girls.[/QUOTE]Rivalry, vanity, superiority / inferiority fixations will drive them to "price match" each other. I believe Cami and Mio have a good relationship but I'm not sure about the rest. This competitiveness leaves mongers with the short end of the stick.
From a purely mathematical standpoint, with the price increase, Chloe and Rebecca could only lose 16.6% of their base to break even. Said another way, they would need to retain 83.3% of their clients to earn as much as they did before the increase.
[QUOTE=Jack926;4610249]I am barely interested in Rebecca or Cami at $300. While Cami is good looking, she is HOT and COLD and very unpredictable and Rebecca is way TOO SCRIPTED. CAMI could be crazy great session and shit session the next day.
I used to like Chloe a lot and I saw her many times but the last two times that I saw her in LA in MW, it was not what it used to be when she was in Santa Monica location. I guess everything has its time.
Would I pay $350 for Chloe or Rebecca; Nope.
Would I pay $450 or $500 for Emma from EukGirls? Absolutely YES. I have been depressed since she has been gone. LOL.[/QUOTE]Hell, I'd pay 500 to see Mimilaxx again!