5 photos
16-Page Probable Cause Affidavit
[QUOTE=AnonymouCol;4163838]The article I read (NYT) said that they had videos of sex acts being performed, meaning they had cameras in the room. I assume that the business didn't install them it would be idiotic of them to record and archive illegal activity.
This leads me to believe that LEO got a judge to sign a surveillance warrant and then investigators either A) broke in or B) posed as clients and put small recording devices in the rooms. It wouldn't be hard to convince a judge of exhaustion in this case.[/QUOTE][URL]https://ewscripps.brightspotcdn.com/74/98/64c708b942ac9a24ed0e40f57db0/hua-pc.pdf[/URL]
I read the Affidavit last night, and I suggest others should too because its an interesting look at how LEO (at least in FL) investigates AMPs. It also raises a few questions for me.
Pic1: Man I hope you guys are paying cash at these establishments and not credit. No sense in getting caught with a paper trail before the investigation fully opens up. It also shows that LEO does indeed check sites and Rubmaps, and I would assume this site as well. Not surprising really. I would imagine that in this case they didn't bother with USASG because it doesn't look like there's a Jupiter thread in the FL forum.
Pic2: So they just find any old reason to pull someone over and then question them about their visit. My question is why didn't the mongers deny any sexual activity happened in there at all? I mean at this point in the investigation there's no interior surveillance, so I'd assume that anything the driver says would be circumstantial at best. Although I wonder what the context of, and what kind of questions the officer was asking.
Pic3: Like AnonymouCol, I too wonder how LEO got cams into the business. Since the workers were probably living there, they couldn't have broken in after hours. The affidavit focuses mainly on the two women running the AMP, and they have residences that they can leave after business hrs. But the affidavit does mention other nameless women that were working there as well, so I assume they were the ones living there. So I'm curious as to what kind of cams and how they were able to sneak them into the place and hide them in the massage rooms without any of the staff noticing them. I would assume that the cams were elevated because they were able to see not just how much they were tipping, but also the denominations as well. So the resolution / picture quality must be rather high.
Pic4: I just included this because I think it's funny that the Male #11 only lasted 3 minutes. Must've been one hell of a tug job LOL!
Pic5: This is just speculation on my part, but I wonder if this individual is Kraft. The time that he shows up is well after business hrs both at the AMP and at the strip mall the AMP is in. If I was a big wig NFL owner worth 6-7 billion, and I wanted to get a rub and tug while maintaining my anonymity, I'd pay a little extra for some after hrs privacy. No way to really know from the documentation.
Anyway anyone care to chime in on their thoughts? With RL possibly being watched here we should also be on our toes.
Happy Body: Unhappy ending
Technically a happy ending, but it was easily, without question, the least happy happy ending I've ever had. Medium build, 30-something I'm guessing. Went after it like was some kind of carnival game test of strength and speed. Uncomfortable and unpleasant. As I'm leaving I hand her $40 (out of force of habit). She says: "$60! I just say "No" as I'm walk straight out the door. And that was probably the most satisfying aspect of my visit. Obviously not returning.
A possible AMPing up in LEO activity
[QUOTE=DeerField;4165684]Thank you for the details. Wondering how you dug this up too?
So points 1 and 2 seem common sense. Cash only and deny anything but a sore back and draped massage if stopped (also don't speed or run red lights).
Pt. 3 - The most curious and troubling are installation of covert cameras. The mention visual only and no audio so probably installed by LEO customers? I so, did they also get a HE?
It also seems they had surveliance of the fron dest, not just room cams. Interesting.
I wonder how much pertains to OH AMPs.
Any thoughts?[/QUOTE]The Kraft case notwithstanding, could we ourselves be seeing the rumblings of the beginnings of a case opening up here in cbus? Uzumake said there were detectives poking around Sunflower recently and a couple others mentioned being watched over at Red Leaves when they were leaving. Isn't that how it starts, usually with outside surveillance? It could just be me being paranoid and I'm just speculating, but just like the Kraft case and others that were reported in the past, some of these AMP bosses own more than one spot in the city. If they're trying to nail one that means they could be looking at several places in order to gather evidence.
I think that what happened in Florida was a bit of a fluke. I think they were just doing a routine take-down of AMPs in the name of the war on human trafficking and prostitution and stumbled onto Kraft on accident. His name being attached made the case high profile which is why we even know about it, otherwise the news about the sting probably wouldn't have even made it out of Jupiter.