Printable View
[QUOTE=BigJoe1979;1393895]Just curious if anyone has seen Lexi I've called her several times and goes straight to vm. And she's not advertising on Indys or here. Is she done just wondering I enjoyed her visits.[/QUOTE]Lexi is having some family issues and will not be back for a coupke weeks (as of about a week ago).
[QUOTE=Caligulaxxx;1394256]I've seen a PS in the past an when it has happened I had a good time. Price was about even with other providers in the city. Full report expected from you if you indulge[/QUOTE]I saw Krissy Minxx [url]http://krissy.my-age.net/[/url] six years ago in Indianapolis. The word was she was from Chicago and would be around for a month or two, then be gone for six months. The Chicago board always had somebody looking for her. She posted for Indianapolis and I thought, "Why not?" Scheduling was a snap. But I felt like a fool driving there. No way would the girl behind the door really be Krissy Minxx plus look like Krissy Minxx from the movies or so I doubted. Understand I never saw one of her movies. The same thought went through my head as I knocked on the door. The girl that opened the door was Krissy Minxx with a big smile on her face and was still every bit Krissy Minxx in appearance. I could not believe my eyes and it was all I could do to not act like Opie of Mayberry. The experience was GFE and more than worth the standard donation at the time for two hours with a top line provider, $600.
For other surprises she was absolutely normal personalitywise, not into herself at all. If anything she came off a bit insecure. Her site listed the altitude as 5'8". I'm 6'1" and she was every bit 6"1" herself. I would see her again in a heartbeat. I enjoyed her company and the conversation. I enjoyed everything.
About a year later I met Sammie Sparks [url]http://www.sammy4u.com/[/url] and ended up seeing her more than a few times. I saw her a couple of times not knowing she was in the movies (those sites are down now). Again the experience was GFE and the standard donation at the time. I took her to one meet and greet that happened to coincide and she was a real attraction. Sammie was a real solid woman.
I hope both these women are doing fine.
Went to see sexyeve at shady hotel yesterday after no callback or answer for several hours and delays. Look like she needed a hot meal. Bought another girl which I did not request who was not pretty! Wanted to charge me extra for them both and then sexyeve was on her period WTF! Wanted me to take my pants off and then give them the money. Quicky left as some guy was sitting in car outside staring me down. I was scared for my life. Stay away! Wasted 4 hours of my day.
Deliah,
FYI, She says she is leaving in a week or two. Hae to see her go. But she did say the same before so who knows.
Happy hunting
An add on BP says Eve at XXX-XXX-7116 go his friend busted. Be careful.
And THIS is why I asked for MORE input from someone with more than 1 post on the forums. Seems as though SexyEve is LEO in disguise. Thank god I didn't go and TOFTT.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?4525-Escort-Classified-Ads-Member-Discussions[/url]
As always, if something feels strange guys, don't do it. If something looks TGTBT, it is. Follow your gut instinct.
Did anyone watch this week's episode? $250. 00 gets you an overnight with the hot chicks they had playing the prostitutes that were being murdered in Atlanta? I know you are supposed suspend disbelief when you watch a movie or television for entertainment, but "C'mon, man!"
Do these show producers even do a little bit of research? If $250 got you an overnight, with even a mildly attractive woman, our hobby funds would go MUCH further. LOL!
[QUOTE=Gam33;1394665]An add on BP says Eve at XXX-XXX-7116 go his friend busted. Be careful.[/QUOTE]This one says she is a fraud and a thief.
[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/but-i-did-it-anyway-32/9340330[/url]
If both complaints are by the same guy I wonder why he didn't tell the story the same way twice.
[QUOTE=Anonone; 1395003]Did anyone watch this week's episode? $250. 00 gets you an overnight with the hot chicks they had playing the prostitutes that were being murdered in Atlanta? I know you are supposed suspend disbelief when you watch a movie or television for entertainment, but "C'mon, man!"
Do these show producers even do a little bit of research? If $250 got you an overnight, with even a mildly attractive woman, our hobby funds would go MUCH further. LOL![/QUOTE]It is all about location location.
For about $350 you can get 24 hrs with some stunning ones in middle europe.
Yes a flight is between 500. 700 but hey.
Well, I got several PMs from senior members that I really should try Molly before I risk my money on Sydney Thomas. I was finally won over this afternoon. I sent a few PMs that went unread and at first got confused since so many folks gave her such high praise for her professionalism and communication. Then I read her post about her computer being down, and I forgave all:
[QUOTE=MollyDaniels; 1394220]Want to have some hot, sweaty, dirty, naked fun? I sure do. But it gets sooooo boring playing alone, and I want to add to my film collection.
Call me at 513-426-8357.
Or text 765-977-0248.
My laptop is broken right now so I can't upload pictures, but I have pictures everywhere.[/QUOTE]
I tried texting the number listed in the advertisement and all I got back was a bunch of nonsensical texts. Either the number is wrong, someone has her phone, or she ain't nearly as professional as you all have suggested. I don't want to jump to the gun, so please provide some guidance. Is the 765 number good? Does she perhaps have a odd sense of humor? The last few texts that the number returned to me seemed playful, but a little silly like a kid was using the phone. The last two were so odd that my gut is telling me to tread very carefully. Any clarification, gents?
Jackson, first, thank you for maintaining this wonderful site.
I have a small favor to ask.
Would it be possible for you to pull the post below, or at least open the the edit window on it so I can put my review of Molly on there instead? We just had a miscommunication issue, and given the weird weather in this region yesterday, it is completely understandable.
As it turns out, I just caught her on a bad evening. She has since explained what happened and we are in the process of figuring out a future time to meet. If not, I will just quote the post below and submit a new report/review after we meet to update about my experiences with her in person and hope everyone gets that the two posts are linked. I have a feeling that she is a wonderful lady when you meet her under normal circumstances.
Thanks for all you do!
Looking for a lady that takes care of older men. Anyone let me know if you know any. Looking for discreet lady.
Bill Senior
[QUOTE=RzrsEdge; 1395002]And THIS is why I asked for MORE input from someone with more than 1 post on the forums. Seems as though SexyEve is LEO in disguise. Thank god I didn't go and TOFTT.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?4525-Escort-Classified-Ads-Member-Discussions[/url]
As always, if something feels strange guys, don't do it. If something looks TGTBT, it is. Follow your gut instinct.[/QUOTE]You have very few posts. Mostly about 2 girls. One you promote and one you are saying is Leo. 2 posts against her on back page. Firs says Leo, second says fraud and thief. Neither one mentions the other. So which is it? Or is it all three? Both posts bring up cause for concern, but I wouldn't believe anything you say. Your new, and we all know newbies have to earn their stripes. I just think its odd. I will research this and report back. Something just doesn't seem right here. She may be a liar or thief or Leo, but I will find out. Does anyone else see it the way I do?
Check My ad's out.
[QUOTE=Massagefreak;1395927]You have very few posts. Mostly about 2 girls. One you promote and one you are saying is Leo. 2 posts against her on back page. Firs says Leo, second says fraud and thief. Neither one mentions the other. So which is it? Or is it all three? Both posts bring up cause for concern, but I wouldn't believe anything you say. Your new, and we all know newbies have to earn their stripes. I just think its odd. I will research this and report back. Something just doesn't seem right here. She may be a liar or thief or Leo, but I will find out. Does anyone else see it the way I do?[/QUOTE]Something didn't smell right. If his friend got busted with her I can't find any info of that on jail info. Hmmm seems odd.
As you may know from reading my earlier posts, I have been reading a few books on lucid dreaming and trying to craft a great dream about Molly Daniles. So far, nothing in the books has worked, but a number of you told me to just take a chill pill and let it happen naturally. I took your advice, and you guys were right about a light sedative. It led me to a very short, but peaceful nap that gave me the most unexpected, but very enjoyable dream that i have had in quite some time about this lovely lady named Candice
In the dream I drove through a rougher area of town that I have always avoided in the past because the roaches that live in those hotels will carry off a man to feed to its young, much less mug or attack you. Made a turn and instantly neighborhood became much nicer and found a pleasant incall location that was clean, quiet and safe. The subject of my dream was very attractive, even better than the pics I glanced at before drifting off to sleep. She was very fun to talk to, had dexterous fingers that danced everywhere, and long nails that traced seductive circles in places that even I didn't know could make you aroused. The queen in my dream mentioned that she had read some of the posts I wrote and wanted to me a little sample of her oral skills. Skill was the right word. This woman could do more than bob and pump-she swirled, danced, and sang during the BBBJ. It was magnificent. I didn't want my dream to end early, especially given the long lean body this wonderful dream woman has.
I asked her to show me how well she could ride a horse, and let me tell you, this lass could win a championship at a rodeo. She would break the mechanical bull at Cadillac Ranch. I had a great time, but sadly it was only a short nap.
I was refreshed and felt like I new man when I awoke. I still would like to dream about MD later this week, but let's just say I won't be too disappointed if all those books on lucid dreaming were wrong and I relax, go with what comes naturally, and let Candice become the new queen of my dreamworld. Time will tell-look for more entires from dream diary later this week.
It took a few tries to get everything set up with Candice, but it was my first with her, so a little extra work is understandable.
I opted for 30/.6$
From the moment I got there, she was extremely friendly and accommodating. Definition GFE. She comes across as smart and kind, and would probably be a blast to have a beer with. Of course, I had other things on my mind.
Started off with a 10min+ BBBJ. Awesome.
Moved to a little doggie and finished with a pearl necklace.
You can bet I'll be back for a little more Candice!
Big Joe was kind enough to give me Jolie's number, but now she has an ad up in the classified ad section. Big Joe gave her a strong report, so I thought I'd have a dream as well.
Very good dream. Met Jolie at her place in NKY. She is a cute young blond. Nice girl who is not an idiot and can carry a conversation. She lives in a nice place.
Jolie has a nice bod; not spectacular, but nice and she has very good skills.
The best part about Jolie was her enthusiasm-she was texting when I got there, and put me off for a minute; I was thinking "oh no, this is going to be bs." But then she shut off her phone, and told me to tell her
Exactly what I wanted. She was GFE. Had a fun time with MSOG and a very nice massage. Will repeat.
Like a smart provider, Jolie would like to develop a few regulars then go completely utr. I plan on being one of her regulars.
Stay safe and smart out there,
Crazykev
Had a wonderful dream with stormy on Friday. She took me in on last minute. Greeted me with lfk. Was very eager to please and that she did. We both ended very happy! Would not mind seeing again.
Contacted to rebook with Molly after the Friday's fiasco as she instructed. Left voicemail and a couple of texts. So far no response all day. I know you guys said "to be patient-she is worth it," but I am sure not seeing any evidence of what some of you folks have described as "professional and great communication," in reviews or in your descriptions of her to me in your PMs. I even asked Jackson to redact the previous post since she was so apologetic on the phone Saturday and promised this was unusual for her and that if I called and booked with her on Monday she would prove it in person.
I will give her a third chance Tuesday and post another update. Hopefully we will finally connect and be able to do a session. If not at least these updates serve to capture a pattern of just how professional she is and how good her communication is just in case what has really been posted here in the past about her is a bundle of white lies told by white knights. I wouldn't want anyone else to be misled and frustrated as I have been. Yes she is pretty, and she seems like she would be a fun time, but life is too short to continue to put up with this especially when there are so many other lovely women here that return your contact almost immediately because they value your business.
YMMV, but so far the engine won't even turn over for me. Maybe this spotty customer service is very unusual for the young lady and her bad Friday has extended into a bad week, but then again, maybe she does this all the time and you gents have enabled her by not noting it in your reviews and PM's.
[QUOTE=ByronDee; 1394644]Deliah,
FYI, She says she is leaving in a week or two. Hae to see her go. But she did say the same before so who knows.
Happy hunting[/QUOTE]Hope that is not true. Great service
Anon,
Your experience scheduling with MollyD is different that mine and w'eve had that conversation via PM. You raised some questions Friday and your comments post-storm on Saturday were a class move. Add to that how you're approaching this second round of unreliability and you're going above and beyond giving her the benefit of the doubt.
Just like the PGA, a pro is only as good as their last round. In the PPA (that would be the Pro-Provider-Association) , you're only as good as your last appointment. That's all aspects of your last appointment. Unfortunately, it seems like a lot of PPA members forget it's not just the in-room experience that sets the tone for the entire encounter. It starts with the little stuff like how you answer the phone, how your outgoing voice mail message sounds, the speed with which you return calls, and the ease of scheduling. Certainly none of this can offset a bad in-room experience but seriously, there comes a point where even the best in-room experience is tainted by poor up front reliability and predictability.
The top PPA players know this and deliver on it. That's what puts them on our leader board week after week.
I'm still a supporter so hopefully, third time's a charm. That said, if you strike out tomorrow, I think it's time for me to reassess my experience as "old news". Good luck.
Have a great day.
Dz
[QUOTE=Dweezil; 1396986]Anon,
Your experience scheduling with MollyD is different that mine and w'eve had that conversation via PM. You raised some questions Friday and your comments post-storm on Saturday were a class move. Add to that how you're approaching this second round of unreliability and you're going above and beyond giving her the benefit of the doubt. * Dz[/QUOTE] I haven't read what's been going on between Dweezil and Anonone about Molly D so no sides are being taken on that one. I'm jumping in to say I think the girl's last appointment can influence how she responds to the next request for one and influence how she handles the next appointment. I also think our particular approach can drive success or failure. She is more a reactor than an actor, or so I think. I've been doing this a while.
Case in point. I wanted to see a particular girl in a town where I had a business meeting. The board reported this particular girl had excellent service and accurate pics but she was hard to get a hold of and slow responding. Her ad said she prefers text.
My plans had me in town all day tied up with business, that evening I would be on my own and the following day I would again be tied up on business. My only chance to see her would be that first evening. On purpose I stayed in the same general area where her advertising said she was located, a small area in a major market.
I sent her a text around noon that first day saying I wanted to see her that evening and I would know my time availability by 5:00 pm. My text was literally that short and literally said only that. This girl, a girl the board reported was slow responding, texted back 5 minutes later saying, "Ok." Notice I texted her I would know by 5:00 pm.
I finished my day and sent her a text I was good to go at her convenience. It was 5:10 pm. She texted back a few minutes later saying she waited and didn't hear from me and went on to something else. I concluded my window of time was clearly less than 10 minutes with her and that told me she was a person on time herself, hardly the conclusion other posters had drawn. People on time themselves tend to hold others to the same thing. So I'm starting to conclude that maybe problems others reported with her happened because they were not on time. But I was SOL regardless. One can't push on a string. I texted no reply.
Around 8:00 pm that evening I was alone in my room and I sent her another text just on the chance. Recall we were both in the same general area but at this point she did not know that. So I texted I was in such and such area. Less than a minute later she texted saying she was sorry, again saying she waited until 5:10 pm and she could have seen me had she known I was still in town. A minute later she texted, "Good night." Mind you, she knows I'm close by. She is disengaging nonetheless.
I texted, "Good night" thinking I was SOL. One can't push on a string.
About a minute later she texted directions to her hotel, very clear directions. I went to my car and was in the parking lot of her hotel 4 minutes later. She met me at the door and I had a good time. All her reviews were accurate except the part about her being difficult in responding. I'm convinced she operated on time and others, the complainers about her, did not, and likely displayed drama when they did not get their way. They were the problem. Just my opinion.
This girl is Shannon of Louisville Back Page. I highly recommend. Be on time, whatever time you say. Show no irritation about anything. Treat her, in other words, like you would want to be treated.
Had a dream about her this evening that was completely delightful. This girl has a fun attitude and proved to be a better than average playmate. There was no rush and she was fun both with and with out clothes. She is a well upholstered girl soft and cuddly. As a long term hobbyist who has both been disappointed and thrilled I can honestly say she is at least an 8 on the personality and performance, and if you like your girls on the thicker side you will be more that happy with her appearance, I know I was. A+ service I will definitely see her again and I can't say that about most the girls out there.
[QUOTE=Golfcart; 1397037]I haven't read what's been going on between Dweezil and Anonone about Molly D so no sides are being taken on that one. I'm jumping in to say I think the girl's last appointment can influence how she responds to the next request for one and influence how she handles the next appointment. I also think our particular approach can drive success or failure. She is more a reactor than an actor, or so I think. I've been doing this a while.
Case in point. I wanted to see a particular girl in a town where I had a business meeting. The board reported this particular girl had excellent service and accurate pics but she was hard to get a hold of and slow responding. Her ad said she prefers text.
My plans had me in town all day tied up with business, that evening I would be on my own and the following day I would again be tied up on business. My only chance to see her would be that first evening. On purpose I stayed in the same general area where her advertising said she was located, a small area in a major market.
I sent her a text around noon that first day saying I wanted to see her that evening and I would know my time availability by 5:00 pm. My text was literally that short and literally said only that. This girl, a girl the board reported was slow responding, texted back 5 minutes later saying,"Ok." Notice I texted her I would know by 5:00 pm.
I finished my day and sent her a text I was good to go at her convenience. It was 5:10 pm. She texted back a few minutes later saying she waited and didn't hear from me and went on to something else. I concluded my window of time was clearly less than 10 minutes with her and that told me she was a person on time herself, hardly the conclusion other posters had drawn. People on time themselves tend to hold others to the same thing. So I'm starting to conclude that maybe problems others reported with her happened because they were not on time. But I was SOL regardless. One can't push on a string. I texted no reply.
Around 8:00 pm that evening I was alone in my room and I sent her another text just on the chance. Recall we were both in the same general area but at this point she did not know that. So I texted I was in such and such area. Less than a minute later she texted saying she was sorry, again saying she waited until 5:10 pm and she could have seen me had she known I was still in town. A minute later she texted,"Good night." Mind you, she knows I'm close by. She is disengaging nonetheless.
I texted,"Good night" thinking I was SOL. One can't push on a string.
About a minute later she texted directions to her hotel, very clear directions. I went to my car and was in the parking lot of her hotel 4 minutes later. She met me at the door and I had a good time. All her reviews were accurate except the part about her being difficult in responding. I'm convinced she operated on time and others, the complainers about her, did not, and likely displayed drama when they did not get their way. They were the problem. Just my opinion.
This girl is Shannon of Louisville Back Page. I highly recommend. Be on time, whatever time you say. Show no irritation about anything. Treat her, in other words, like you would want to be treated.[/QUOTE]First, there is nothing going on between me and DZ. He was simply referring to a PM he sent me where he mentioned he was impressed that I did not flame a provider immediately just because some of her communication was poor initially and that it was a class act to give the provider the benefit of the doubt given the storms we had Friday. He had no horse in this race, it was just a general comment of "hey, thanks for being honest, but polite in updating us on your experience." He had nothing to say about Molly D specifically.
I am not sure what your overall point in that post was Golfcart, but if I am reading it correctly, you seem to be suggesting a Gestalt approach is best: "The whole is other than the sum of the parts."
If that is wrong, I am sorry for misunderstanding you. If that is correct, I am afraid you and I completely disagree.
While no one likes to be critical of another person, it is important that we strive to provide the courtesy of polite truthfulness on this board. This place exists, first and foremost, for the exchange of information.
If a given lady is spotty with her communication and professionalism, despite her bedroom skills, it should still be noted in your report of that lady. As DZ pointed out, we shouldn't just review the time spent behind closed doors-it is the total process of the appointment. It is important to note things about the setting an appointment process, the safety and condition of the incall site, etc.
You should not give a free pass to a provider for dropping the ball on some elements of the session, just because she gave you an awesome blowjob. Instead, you should note the parts of the session that were problematic, but qualify it by saying that in your opinion while some parts of the overall session were less than stellar you believe that it is worth enduring those faults for the overall experience. It possible to note such things without making it personal or being overly judgmental.
In this particular case, this young lady has nothing but stellar reviews, some of which exert that she is a consummate professional that has excellent communication skills in setting up the appointment. To the person reading such reports, that would lead them to think that if they contact the woman, even given YMMV, the appointment should go fairly smoothly.
There is an extreme frustration when you find your experience is drastically different from the one reported by others with a given lady. That frustration is exacerbated when you post a report about the difficulty you are having and suddenly you have multiple PMs from several different members that this is par for the course with the lady and that they had a great time with her, but when dealing with her, that is just something you have to accept. That is very annoying. You want to reach through the WIFI connection and thump them on the back of the head and ask: "Why the fudge didn't you write that in your report in the first place?"
You are not being mean or hurtful when you mention things you wish had been better in the session. Such information not only helps the next guy decide if he is going to book, it provides feedback to a provider on how well she is doing. Some providers, not all, actually care about such things and appreciate learning that there may be areas where she could improve. They understand that there is a direct correlation to the amount of revenue they can generate and the level of quality service they provide.
That is why this site exists. For lack of a better term, it is the Angie's List of the pay-to-play world.
Deficiencies should be noted in the reviews, otherwise your review is little more than you tooting your horn about the great blow job she gave you-which is basically useless to the rest of us.
Mere descriptions of the menu and the great time you had, while forgetting to mention that you had problems like:
1) Several no-shows before you actually had the session.
2) Difficulty with communicating with the provider while booking.
3) Unusual or invasive screening requirements.
4) The presence of pimp or boyfriend.
5) Lack of cleanliness / safety of the location.
6) Constant cell phone interruptions.
7) Other small annoyances.
Leaving such "little" details out of your report and filtering the writing through rose colored lenses is not only disservice to your fellow monger, it is unfair to the ladies here that do strive to provide excellent service in all aspects of the session.
I made the point, an opinion I hold, that problems we have in scheduling are often our own making. I used my recent experience in Louisville as an illustration. That was my only point. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Wow, What a delicious dream I had. Great all around experience! Pm me for details.
I did not know that a few drunken texts and a few missed calls / unanswered texts would make me so popular!
Please keep in mind that I am not always available 24/7 for your fiendish need to release sperm.
But when I am available, I return texts and answer the phone in a timely and professional manner.
So I apologize to anyone and everyone who contacted me when I was held hostage by Mr. Vodka.
[QUOTE=Golfcart;1397320]I made the point, an opinion I hold, that problems we have in scheduling are often our own making. I used my recent experience in Louisville as an illustration. That was my only point. Sorry for the misunderstanding.[/QUOTE]I am afraid I still disagree. How can you blame a lady's failure to get a message and return a call in timely manner on something the client did?
Perhaps you jumped into this with your comments without reading the full thread. Your description of your experience in Louisville is not even remotely comparable to this situation.
So, Golf, let me make the point perfectly clear for all, since you have forced my hand by suggesting that it is somehow my fault that Molly has failed to conduct herself professionally over the last few days by divulging what I was going to hold back until I met Molly in person for a session:
[i][b]I first contacted Molly earlier in the week with a PM. A few days went by without a response. She placed an ad on Thursday night that mentioned her computer was broken and that she could only communicate via the phone and listed two phone numbers. When I called the 513 number she listed, it was out of service. I then tried the 765 number and got a recording. I left a message early Friday on that number and followed it up with a text inquiring about her availability for either Friday or Saturday.
She did not get back to me until much later that evening by sending a number of nonsensical texts. At first, I excused this as perhaps garbled cell tower transmission given the storms we had Friday night. At first not one word was decipherable-just strings of letters and characters that were unintelligible. I responded by sending a text back explaining that the text messages I was getting were unreadable and asking her to attempt sending them again after the storms. The responses that came after that text were indeed readable.
The response: Who is this?
I paused, wondering if the number was even correct. I went back and double checked her ad and my phone record-I had indeed sent everything to the number she listed on the ad. Then several more text followed that were quite profane.
I began to wonder if the phone number was even correct. For all I knew I was texting somebody completely outside of the hobby, if she had listed the wrong numbers. I decided the best move was to turn my phone off, go to bed, and try again Saturday. I posted the report of my experience and asked if anyone else had problems connecting with her lately.
Saturday came, I checked the board to see if anyone else had similar problems, or if perhaps someone that knew her could give us an update, especially given the storms. The 765 area code is after all the area code used in the very areas devastated by the storm. I found nothing other than a few encouraging PMs that said I did the right thing and that suggested,"with Molly you just have to be patient, but if you are you will be richly."
Later that morning, my phone chimed with a text message from Molly:
"WTF! LOL, I am sorry I was really drunk last night."
Well, we can't expect these ladies to be on call 24/7 and we have all perhaps let our drinking get out of control a time or two. No harm, no foul. I figured this was just a one-time mishap. It happens. I called her on the phone. She was very apologetic, told me she didn't realize she was talking to a client, and that she thought she was texting with a friend and promised to make it up to me in person. I asked her about meeting me later that day, and she asked me to call her back after lunch.
I decided all was well in hobby world and, perhaps prematurely, asked Jackson to redact my previous post since she seemed so contrite on the phone, as if this never had happened before. I called her back as instructed, and you guessed, I got voicemail. I left a message, waited a while-no response for an hour or so. She sent me a text:
"I am headed to the shower call me back in a half hour." I did as instructed and she answered the phone. She laughed and said she "was having a lazy day, and hadn't even taken her shower yet." I figured she may have been more hungover than she wanted to admit and asked her if she wanted to try for Sunday and she said that she had gotten her period earlier in the week and she was still bleeding, maybe we should try on Monday."
[/i][/b]
Now keep in mind, she had placed an ad late on Thursday to do business on the weekend. This all seemed a bit weird, but maybe it was just a collision of circumstances. I decided to give Molly a third chance on Monday. I called and the phone kept going right to voicemail so I left a voice message inquiring about her availability for Monday, as she instructed. I had no response from her on Monday, so Monday evening I reported an update. Upon posting that, several members (not a few, SEVERAL) , sent me PMs telling me that Molly was a wonderful lady and very sexy. They said if you catch her on a good day, you will have a great time, but, many of them hinted that she likes to drink and sometimes this gets in the way of her conducting her business. I was absolutely boggled at this. Why in the world is she getting glowing reviews from everybody, but in private, the reports aren't so hot.
I have been doing this for over 25 years now. I have encountered a few providers that had substance abuse problems. I know we tend to look the other way when it is drinking or just a little bit of grass, but we are very quick to identify the so-called "addict." We usually do this because many of us have learned that seeing a provider with these problems makes us vulnerable to all sorts of bad outcomes. Perhaps we look the other way when it is just drinking, because it is generally socially acceptable, but those of us that have been doing this regularly for a few years know that even booze and the hobby don't mix well. While you might want to "take the edge off" before doing a session, or perhaps even relax with your date and enjoy a libation together, you figure out pretty quickly that you always want to be in control of your faculties when participating in the hobby. If you haven't learned this lesson the hard way, consider yourself lucky, but I wouldn't keep rolling those dice if I were you.
Some of you may think I am over-reacting. That is fine. There are others that are reading this and getting ready to thank me, because they don't want to visit a provider with a drinking problem (if it is getting in the way of you conducting business it is a problem) than one that might be using drugs. Substance abuse leads to careless mistakes, and this hobby has enough perils without factoring in a lack of sobriety.
Now before you say I am being too harsh on Molly, keep in mind it is now Tuesday afternoon, and after plenty of contact attempts and wide open availability, she has yet to follow through on her own instructions of setting something up when she "felt better" at the start of the week.
All I can say is that her pussy must be made of candy, if some of you guys are regularly tolerating this behavior and hoping to "catch her on a good day" so you can have that awesome experience you are always ready to describe while conveniently failing to mention it took you several attempts to find her sober enough to make an appointment. I am moving on, the Molly fanboys out there can continue to wait in line for her to sober up. There are plenty of other wonderful providers on this board that appreciate the time and money we spend on them with prompt and courteous service.
Golf, don't ever suggest it is my fault that a provider doesn't follow through on her communication.
Attitudes like that enable poor providers to continue to flourish. That is a disservice to your fellow monger and it is unfair to the numerous ladies that do conduct themselves in a serious manner, lest we all forget, this is still a business. For us it is entertainment. For them it is performance and revenue, and if they happen to enjoy themselves while working, that is an extra bonus, hence the idea of YMMV.
I am sorry, YMMV does not cover allowing your alcohol abuse to impact your customer service as a provider, and I think most ladies that take this business seriously would agree with that.
I say let the market rule. I am taking my business elsewhere.
[url]http://ohio.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/perfect-exotic-and-s-e-x-y-treat-26/9359530[/url]
Anyone partake. I tineyed the pics to 0 result each. Texted but she said she doesn't text. With all this talk about
Too good to be true and sexyeve. I'm a little shaken up to TOFTT, though my other head is persuading me. Even these Dayton busts. Too much risk in this area rite now, if neone has seen give me a headsup.
Hello, anyone partake in this one?
[url]http://ohio.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/perfect-exotic-and-s-e-x-y-treat-26/9359530[/url]
I'm tired of dealing with your childish drama. Or better yet, why don't you just go ahead and call the Better Business Bureau to report my unprofessional behavior?
I do like my vodka. I also like cock too. But everyone seems to be fine with my love addiction for cock, but if I drink a little vodka, all of the sudden I have a substance abuse problem.
Maybe you have a sex addiction problem. I mean, you are the one that is paying for it every week.
But, if you could get someone half as sexy as me to do you for free, you wouldn't need to be on this website now would you?
Okay. Enough of the childish bullshit.
I'm done bitching and dealing with you.
But if you think you are going to hurt my business with your tattle-telling posts, you are so wrong.
Remember I'm here by choice, not necessity. I graduated from college, and I can get a real job making way more than the 50g's a year you wish you made.
Feel free to call me at 765-977-0248 if anyone else wants to fight or bad mouth me.
Gentlemen enough already. Please take it to pm's if you must continue.
Thank you,
Buster
It is becoming very tiresome listening to the few people who use this form as a platform to bicker back and forth. You guys are just taking up too much of the space that could be used for the basic purposes of this form which is to give honest and respectful reports on their activities. Shame on the members who falsely report on a provider! Shame on the providers that are ripoffs and who you are associated with LE.
Yes members and providers fail to show up, cancel late or fail to return calls. Sometimes it can't be helped and other times it is for selfish reasons. Yes some of the providers, and I'm sure members, have addiction issues that interfere with their reliability. The fact is most of us here have some type of addiction issue or we would probably not be here at all.
I would ask all members to stop with the BS on this form and let the 99% use the form for its proper purpose and not to be used to exercise one's ego or vent out their frustrations on people they don't even know.
[QUOTE=Cokscok; 1397665]It is becoming very tiresome listening to the few people who use this form as a platform to bicker back and forth. You guys are just taking up too much of the space that could be used for the basic purposes of this form which is to give honest and respectful reports on their activities. Shame on the members who falsely report on a provider! Shame on the providers that are ripoffs and who you are associated with LE.
Yes members and providers fail to show up, cancel late or fail to return calls. Sometimes it can't be helped and other times it is for selfish reasons. Yes some of the providers, and I'm sure members, have addiction issues that interfere with their reliability. The fact is most of us here have some type of addiction issue or we would probably not be here at all.
I would ask all members to stop with the BS on this form and let the 99% use the form for its proper purpose and not to be used to exercise one's ego or vent out their frustrations on people they don't even know.[/QUOTE]This forum is here for the exchange of information so mongers can hobby smarter and serious providers can conduct their business.
You have a right to your opinion about how much slack you cut a provider for whatever you define as unprofessional, as do I and other members. If you have a problem with somebody posting about what they, and others, think is a problem or a provider that should be avoided, I suggest you just skip those reports and move on.
I for one won't stop posting bad reports along with good reports just because it makes you uncomfortable.
Just stop! Really, I am sick of seeing your 1000 word philosophical ramblings.
So is everyone else.
Per Molly-GO AWAY!
[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/BodyRubs/hey-its-ashley-20/8920258[/url]
I visited Ashley last week. She was young and cute. Offered a good service. Only problem is unclean apartment filled with smoke.
[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/BodyRubs/warm-relaxing-massages-come-join-me-21/9332151[/url]
Visited Felisha last weekend. Service was too good, but the place was a bit scary, unclean apartment and smoke. Will see her again if she moves to a better place.
[QUOTE=Pepsicrush; 1397590][url]http://ohio.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/perfect-exotic-and-s-e-x-y-treat-26/9359530[/url]
Anyone partake. I tineyed the pics to 0 result each. Texted but she said she doesn't text. With all this talk about
Too good to be true and sexyeve. I'm a little shaken up to TOFTT, though my other head is persuading me. Even these Dayton busts. Too much risk in this area rite now, if neone has seen give me a headsup.[/QUOTE]Here is a Houston BP add same number dif chick.
[url]http://houston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/23yrs-old-_-hot-asian-princess-p-lay-m-ate-23/13171332[/url]
[QUOTE=Pepsicrush; 1397590][url]http://ohio.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/perfect-exotic-and-s-e-x-y-treat-26/9359530[/url]
Anyone partake. I tineyed the pics to 0 result each. Texted but she said she doesn't text. With all this talk about
Too good to be true and sexyeve. I'm a little shaken up to TOFTT, though my other head is persuading me. Even these Dayton busts. Too much risk in this area rite now, if neone has seen give me a headsup.[/QUOTE]I was thinking about seeing her today but had to go into work early. May take the plunge tomorrow.