Escort Reports

Found my new ATF. Beautiful, skilled, energetic, fun. She's not a young spinner, but she looks better than her pics. Info on the website is true, no upselling, easy verify with p411.

[URL]http://elite-secret.companionfiles.com/models/38401[/URL]

[QUOTE=CoolPatrick;3204582]The only part appears to be "disrespectful" is you don't really read my reviews and what others responded before you asked such a blanket question. It would be nice if you either asked specifics or provided specific examples comparing providers and share information about even better providers working in Chicago.

Also, to one of its own, we can certainly find decent providers at $200/ hr or $250/ hr levels. So, I don't judge your question and I respect your preference. I also have a list of such providers, not many though. However, independent providers at $350/ hr, $400/ hr, or higher, consist of a big group of supply in this town. Many of them do provide services worthy of the price (incall, service, attitude, looks, age combined). They are not for you if you only look for a wet hole to stick into. For those who had tried higher-end options, they are likely to tell you please keep your criticism / doubt the reviews until you have tasted some of these girls yourself.

So, to answer your question, let's start by her TER ad.

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=44801&boardID=70&page=2#44801[/URL]

While you are on TER checking out ads, browse a few additional pages to see how many ads have hobbyists' greetings or praises in response to the ad. I can tell you not that many. Her ad got two guys expressing excitement about her visit (they are not me).

I only praise the providers who knocks out of the park at their price level, and I can give you my research / experience in a point-by-point comparison style.

Danica's appearance has 50%-60% assemblance of Lily Carter, especially when she looks at you very seductively doing wet BBBJ. Even without comparing DS with any porn star, she is above average GND. She reads people well and has a perfectly eager-to-please attitude, and gives out really nice illusion of passion that makes you feel like she is into you.

Danica is indeed late 20's, her body is literally like a VS model, her BMI, height-weight ratio etc. , all fits in that category. I don't call 5'5" a spinner, but DS is very toned and fit and thin.

Her facial skin is the imperfect part, but her overall appearance is at least slightly better than probably most girls from 2 KGs, CEC, EEC, ECE, Michelles, Chicago Cover Girls, Angelis, and WetNWild.

IMHO, DS has a slightly toner or thinner body than Allstar Allie, Stella Rosen. DS is younger than Avery Thatcher and Mia Westbrook. Comparing to the same age group, DS is way cheaper than Mara Blake and Elizabeth Dean and has better menu than Chloe Tao. Besides Mara Blake and Elizabeth Dean , every independent providers I mentioned above is at $350/ hr. Most agencies are at around $350/ hr or $400/ hr (CEC, WetNWild, Chicago Cover Girls). They all host incall at decent higher-end hotels. DS has at least one thing more preferable than everyone (price, menu, looks). By the way, all the independent providers' service are pretty good. DS is $25 more expensive (single hour touring rate) than all these independents while DS either have a more open menu is younger or thinner than most of them.

Yes, we can find girls at $300/hr level from some of the agencies too. If you want to stay away from the recent drama for a while, reliable independent providers may be a good option.

I believe a few $400/ hr independent local providers are as good as DS, Violette Park, Maria Valentina, and Jenicole (TER 288380), Sierra Benjamin, Nicoletta (TER I'd: 199391), Michelle Kendall, Kelly Swanson, and Anastasiya Woods. Beside the hot Russian MILF Nicoletta, these providers are all in the same age group as DS. VP, MV, SB have the same PSE menu, others are short of Greek. Michelle is pretty awesome but her boobs are really flat with cute and sensitive nipples. I haven't had the chance to meet the rest. Their reviews are nothing but consistently good, all of them allowed CIM, some more consistent than the rest.

If you read my review or those from TER or ECCIE, then you would know DS has a secret weapon: her kegel power. Your dick have to experience it before you ask me why she is 'expensive.' This is not something like CIM or Greek that you can just pay or tip more to get.

I'm not trying to convince you about how special DS is. Like I said, to one of his own. If nothing about her is what you are looking for, then she is not for you no matter how other people think of her. I'm just being a good sport sharing her news because several folks either PMed or responded publicly asking me to do so.

I do want to show you (and others who want to ask me a blanket question like that) that I'm not just praising her because my little head is dominating my senses and I want to give people good intel. So, next time, reply me with some specific comparisons or good information along with questions so that we can turn the discussion into an usable intel for others.[/QUOTE]I'm more of a 300+ guy myself since I have trouble getting it up and finishing unless many things are right. Especially appearance, usually young, hot, and thin, tall being a bonus. You've got a wealth of info in this post.

I've only seen Ana Woods out of those, awesome girl. Most of the others you listed are the same type that have been on my radar. Lately I have had a lot of love for XO Companions. Can't really beat that solid 350 for young, hot, thin Russian women. 3/4 experiences have been far above expectations, and the 4th was also very good, just not as memorable as the other 3.

That kegel thing sounds insane though. I've been off VIP for a little while at the other place, I think I very might well partake.

Saw her a couple years ago before she moved to Jacksonville FL. No new reviews in a while. Retired?

[QUOTE=CoolPatrick;3204621]Bree (TER286396).

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=44867&boardID=70&page=1[/URL]#44867.

$200/ hh and $300/ hr. Greek may be included as YMMV. But I think $300 is too pricy for only CBJ, even her stats suggest a spinner. Her reviews are consistently mediocre (around 7) and has a recent bad review. I'm not interested in meeting her. Just sharing information, partly as a price comparison to Danica Stone, Kaitlyn Knight, or Roselyn Small who visit Chicago from Dallas.[/QUOTE]Is there a better link to review or post? Pet peeve is links that go bad.

[QUOTE=MrCharmo;3208973]Is there a better link to review or post? Pet peeve is links that go bad.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=286396[/URL]

Been trying to find a Russian provider can you share or PM me?

[QUOTE=TheRedStar;3209805]Been trying to find a Russian provider can you share or PM me?[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.russiancupid.com/en/women/russia/brides/relocate/willing-to-relocate-to-another-country[/URL]

[QUOTE=IdiotBoy;3210273][URL]https://www.russiancupid.com/en/women/russia/brides/relocate/willing-to-relocate-to-another-country[/URL][/QUOTE]

Made me laugh. :)

Trying to locate two ladies that used to be with Wet and Wild. Presley and Miranda. Any info on either would be greatly appreciated. I know ladies can bounce around between agencies, or even become a free agent on their own. I'm not a Chi native, so not sure what happened to these gems.

Thanks.

[QUOTE=TheRedStar;3204994]A lot of charge too much are there any <2.[/QUOTE]And find posts about 262 agency or authored by Riina. You can get massage providers to give you BJ or even FS (or even both) around $200. But it's YMMV.

You can try contact [URL]youwannaseeme.com[/URL], an agency with less than $200 per 30 minutes and around $200 per hour.

This section is more about providers at $300/ hr or higher.

[QUOTE=SeansWinters;3207425]I'm more of a 300+ guy myself since I have trouble getting it up and finishing unless many things are right. Especially appearance, usually young, hot, and thin, tall being a bonus. You've got a wealth of info in this post.

I've only seen Ana Woods out of those, awesome girl. Most of the others you listed are the same type that have been on my radar. Lately I have had a lot of love for XO Companions. Can't really beat that solid 350 for young, hot, thin Russian women. 3/4 experiences have been far above expectations, and the 4th was also very good, just not as memorable as the other 3.

That kegel thing sounds insane though. I've been off VIP for a little while at the other place, I think I very might well partake.[/QUOTE]XO, Touring Companions, City Girls, Matchless Beauties are always worth checking out their visiting line-up. CG and MB are even at $300/ hr. The girls' appearance or age would have larger variation. Girls from XO or TC usually are prettier or thinner. Even if you like big boobs, these agencies are very likely to have some thin Euros with nicely enhanced boobs (likely without the muffin top or love handle) for you. If I am in the mood of only wanting a toy and do not want much chit chat or small talk, girls from these agencies almost always let you do whatever you want (non-stop) for the hour within reason. My experience with them were always as expected.

[QUOTE=CoolPatrick;3203017]Red tease has been around, offering mostly girls from Latin America, but also some European at times. Chicago is one of their touring spot, but not as a regular spot as others like XO companions, City Girls, etc. Several euro girl agencies are sending girls to Chicago weekly.

Someone asked about red tease at TER general Chicago board, and a couple reputable local independent providers vouched for this agency. Should be less drama. .[/QUOTE]I've used RedTease and love it. Always a fun session and the pics are legit them. The Miami Dolls is also wonderful and may favorite right now. RussianDollsNYC is great too. XO Companions is fine, but I've had two lemon experiences where the girls seemed so overworked and ridden that it was not fun at all. One I just walked out of because she seemed like she had run a marathon and was so exausted from fucking strangers. I could tell it was just going to be like fucking a sleeping body. Thats kinda weird, and I think they over book their women, so I've stopped using XO myself.

[QUOTE=CoolPatrick;3213073]XO, Touring Companions, City Girls, Matchless Beauties are always worth checking out their visiting line-up. CG and MB are even at $300/ hr. The girls' appearance or age would have larger variation. Girls from XO or TC usually are prettier or thinner. Even if you like big boobs, these agencies are very likely to have some thin Euros with nicely enhanced boobs (likely without the muffin top or love handle) for you. If I am in the mood of only wanting a toy and do not want much chit chat or small talk, girls from these agencies almost always let you do whatever you want (non-stop) for the hour within reason. My experience with them were always as expected.[/QUOTE]Forgot about CG since they're no longer on the other site. Their pics do look fantastic. I guess I'll report I got membership to EEC Chicago (the one that claims all are non-pros) but haven't yet partaken. I am all about pretty and thin. Don't really care about boob size tbh.

Yes, I've been pleasantly surprised by the mileage at XO. Although I'm usually only good for one pop. Also forgot about youwannaseeme, probably the best safe, reliable value play for guys who want to minimize spend and don't have high standards.

A few weeks ago I was driving west on North Avenue just west of 355 and saw a storefront that looked like a front for escorts. It was on the north side of street, they may advertise in the Sun Times. Anyone have an idea what this place is, another jack shack-type place?

[QUOTE=StanCopier;3215269]A few weeks ago I was driving west on North Avenue just west of 355 and saw a storefront that looked like a front for escorts. It was on the north side of street, they may advertise in the Sun Times. Anyone have an idea what this place is, another jack shack-type place?[/QUOTE]North Ave and 355 ish? Yeah it's a jack shack. Waste of money.