One wonders what the incentive / motivation is for the BBFS providers, especially in cases where there is no surcharge.
Printable View
One wonders what the incentive / motivation is for the BBFS providers, especially in cases where there is no surcharge.
[QUOTE=DonkeyKwan87;4642439]Just met Chanel, very nice girl. A little too thick for my liking but as many has said to each their own. I though her personality was golden along with her willingness to please, I'm sad that she had man made- I though she had real ones. Other than that great girl but wouldn't repeat as she isn't my cup of tea looks wise. Other than that, she's great.
I've also seen Mio, very nice and willing to please as Chanel, but I like her breast real- I'm pretty sure they're real, if not, I don't want to know haha.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the review. I've seen both and agree with your descriptions. Channel and Mio both have great attitude in wanting to please. Mio has a thin small frame with best d cups you can find among the girls working here in LA. Can't tell if real or man made but they have natural tear drop shape to them that aren't saggy looking. Channel all around has nice curvy body that isn't Latina thick / curvy but lot more than your typical kgirl.
BTW both are not BBFS. Just so people don't get confused since the original post was posted here in the BBFS thread. Just a reminder, let's try to keep them separated. Thanks all!
[QUOTE=DukeTopaz;4642452]One wonders what the incentive / motivation is for the BBFS providers, especially in cases where there is no surcharge.[/QUOTE]1. Looking for repeat business, particularly by older ladies (need to compete with the 20 year old spinners.
2. Less work -- most guys blow relatively quickly raw, so girl doesn't have to work as long. If they are seeing 10 guys a day makes a difference.
3. Girl is a nympho and just likes the sex. Rare but have encountered a couple over the years. SubAmy?
4. Girl is allergic to latex -- happened once to me. She said we could use a non-latex brand (which she had run out of) or this once we could go raw.
[QUOTE=Xxmishmaxx;4642634]Thanks for the review. I've seen both and agree with your descriptions. Channel and Mio both have great attitude in wanting to please. Mio has a thin small frame with best d cups you can find among the girls working here in LA. Can't tell if real or man made but they have natural tear drop shape to them that aren't saggy looking. Channel all around has nice curvy body that isn't Latina thick / curvy but lot more than your typical kgirl.
BTW both are not BBFS. Just so people don't get confused since the original post was posted here in the BBFS thread. Just a reminder, let's try to keep them separated. Thanks all![/QUOTE]If you look at Mio lying on her back you can see the part of her breasts defy gravity a little. They don't fully sag to the side as they would if there were no enhancements. Don't know why she did it. They seem big enough that she wouldn't need it and it doesn't give her any more support that she may have wanted. Aside from that they are great.
[QUOTE=Punter3;4642641]1. Looking for repeat business, particularly by older ladies (need to compete with the 20 year old spinners.
2. Less work -- most guys blow relatively quickly raw, so girl doesn't have to work as long. If they are seeing 10 guys a day makes a difference.
3. Girl is a nympho and just likes the sex. Rare but have encountered a couple over the years. SubAmy?
4. Girl is allergic to latex -- happened once to me. She said we could use a non-latex brand (which she had run out of) or this once we could go raw.[/QUOTE]All of the above but you would be surprised at how a little extra charm and seduction can turn around some no BBFS girls to the direction you're looking for.
[QUOTE=DonkeyKwan87;4642427]Left J's spot around 12 pm today. Cop car right in front with lights on but no cop in sight. Safe safe fellas.[/QUOTE]Probably a Starbucks and donut break.
[QUOTE=DukeTopaz;4642452]One wonders what the incentive / motivation is for the BBFS providers, especially in cases where there is no surcharge.[/QUOTE]It's the same motivation as putting random cocks inside their mouths and having sex with strangers for money.
[QUOTE=XavierLee;4641704]Is there any good Korean MILF / BBFS and OC or LA.[/QUOTE]Pepsi, Miss X, Jenny O. All Palace chicks.
[QUOTE=DannyFknKay;4642930]Pepsi, Miss X, Jenny O. All Palace chicks.[/QUOTE]And Yoona.
I believe jenny O is gone.
Holy shit, I've been looking for this girl forever. Guess I'll be going over budget now. I think in the past it was said that she likes to stick to her routine. True, but I think it's a pretty good routine. She's much cuter than the other girls that rim, etc. , in my opinion. I mean like Pepsi and cohort must be in their 40's approaching 50 by now.
Today, I officially joined the dark side. A lot of the posts here contributed to desire to do BB. Curious, is everyone here on Prep? I plan to start before my second BB session. Also, doing Gardisol vaccines to get around HPV and warts. Also, what's the frequency of STDs with you regulars? Low frequency? Trying to learn. Thanks guys.
[QUOTE=Xxmishmaxx;4642634]Thanks for the review. I've seen both and agree with your descriptions. Channel and Mio both have great attitude in wanting to please. Mio has a thin small frame with best d cups you can find among the girls working here in LA. Can't tell if real or man made but they have natural tear drop shape to them that aren't saggy looking. Channel all around has nice curvy body that isn't Latina thick / curvy but lot more than your typical kgirl.
BTW both are not BBFS. Just so people don't get confused since the original post was posted here in the BBFS thread. Just a reminder, let's try to keep them separated. Thanks all![/QUOTE]I prefer Connie's tits to Mio's. She's one to see if you like large and shapely tits.
[QUOTE=DHorn420;4592431]What agency is Tess with?[/QUOTE]January told me she flew back home to SK.
[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;4642964]And Yoona.
I believe jenny O is gone.[/QUOTE]She's still available and at her usual location in Ktown. Just spoke to her.
I recommend. Young and cute GND. Pics accurate if I remember correctly, with shop of course but I wasn't disappointed with her looks. I won't pay extra for BB but you guys may want to try her. She was PSE in the Bay and was in OC with Ca-Kdolls before.
Jina. 5'3" 32 B 24 34.
M. Allie, Nuri, Cherry, Jina. Fox (last day).
Sunny. Glow.
Newtopasian. LA Sera, Ruby.
Sexy Angels. Jane.
Sexyfunkgirls. Janet, Nancy.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4643640]Jina. 5'3" 32 B 24 34.[/QUOTE]Man, I wish that was the girl in the pics!
Thanks for the update. Got to see her before she left. Hope she comes back soon.
[QUOTE=JetLagJeff;4643427]January told me she flew back home to SK.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4643647]M. Allie, Nuri, Cherry, Jina. Fox (last day).
Sunny. Glow.
Newtopasian. LA Sera, Ruby.
Sexy Angels. Jane.
Sexyfunkgirls. Janet, Nancy.[/QUOTE]Can someone PM the numbers or websites of these agencies?
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4643647]M. Allie, Nuri, Cherry, Jina. Fox (last day).
Sunny. Glow.
Newtopasian. LA Sera, Ruby.
Sexy Angels. Jane.
Sexyfunkgirls. Janet, Nancy.[/QUOTE]Aw man got to see Fox one last time before she leaves, love filling her up.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4643647]M. Allie, Nuri, Cherry, Jina. Fox (last day).
Sunny. Glow.
Newtopasian. LA Sera, Ruby.
Sexy Angels. Jane.
Sexyfunkgirls. Janet, Nancy.[/QUOTE]I can't find the M or sunny agency online. Can someone pm the site or number? And how much extra usually tip for bb?
How much do you guys tip for BBFS on top of the house fee?
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4643639]I recommend. Young and cute GND. Pics accurate if I remember correctly, with shop of course but I wasn't disappointed with her looks. I won't pay extra for BB but you guys may want to try her. She was PSE in the Bay and was in OC with Ca-Kdolls before.[/QUOTE]Read her bay area reviews and I gave her a spin when she was in OC and she wouldn't give me BBFS. I even offered extra. Maybe I caught her on a bad day or maybe now enough people asking so she's milking it while she can with KTE. I would put her as YMMV but with KTE advertising BBFS so it's probably for certain.
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4643891]Read her bay area reviews and I gave her a spin when she was in OC and she wouldn't give me BBFS. I even offered extra. Maybe I caught her on a bad day or maybe now enough people asking so she's milking it while she can with KTE. I would put her as YMMV but with KTE advertising BBFS so it's probably for certain.[/QUOTE]Yeah but KTE is always an upcharge.
[QUOTE=Chosun1;4643824]I can't find the M or sunny agency online. Can someone pm the site or number? And how much extra usually tip for bb?[/QUOTE]Check them. All the info you need.
Zero. It's not necessary and the don't expect it. Tips are for low income workers like waitresses, cabbies, etc.
[QUOTE=Chosun1;4643801]Can someone PM the numbers or websites of these agencies?[/QUOTE]Look the girls up on them.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4643640]Jina. 5'3" 32 B 24 34.[/QUOTE]Wow. Thanks for the pics and updates!
[QUOTE=Dakegg;4643789]Man, I wish that was the girl in the pics![/QUOTE]Jina with M, I think, is same girl as Christine used to be with Sexy Angels. When M sent me pics with slide show, one of the pics was of Christine in red lingerie that I recognized. This is speculation so far as I haven't booked yet. But I like Christine, sweet girl works hard cute thin BBFS definitely a winner.
[QUOTE=Chosun1;4643874]How much do you guys tip for BBFS on top of the house fee?[/QUOTE]$100 seems to make them happy.
Had some fun with Jamie this week, opted for the BBFS option and busted a huge load inside her because she was so fine. Well worth it for me, will try a few others before repeating.
[URL]https://ktownescort.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=435[/URL]
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4643891]Read her bay area reviews and I gave her a spin when she was in OC and she wouldn't give me BBFS. I even offered extra. Maybe I caught her on a bad day or maybe now enough people asking so she's milking it while she can with KTE. I would put her as YMMV but with KTE advertising BBFS so it's probably for certain.[/QUOTE]This girl is a winner IMHO. If the pics are her, they are photoshopped beyond recognition. However, she's quite pretty in a GND type of way. Smallish girl with a slightly tanned complexion and nice smooth skin. Slightly thicker in the thigh department, but not in a bad way. After some foreplay warmup, she was fucking me back in every position I could think of. BBFSCIP with the standard house upcharge. Glad to pay it, as she was far more attractive to me than anyone I've seen at the "no charge" houses in the past 12-18 months. Some guys in the OC forum mentioned she had a bit of an attitude, but I didn't receive any of that. Just a good fucking from a hot KGirl that looks like she would be at home walking around the UCLA campus. I will repeat if she sticks around.
[QUOTE=KGirlAddict;4644134]Jina with M, I think, is same girl as Christine used to be with Sexy Angels. When M sent me pics with slide show, one of the pics was of Christine in red lingerie that I recognized. This is speculation so far as I haven't booked yet. But I like Christine, sweet girl works hard cute thin BBFS definitely a winner.[/QUOTE]I don't know Christine so can not comment on if they are the same. Jina is older for sure, probably 40's but she still has a cute face. Totally fake pictures. She has natural A tits that are not firm but they are nice enough. She doesn't have much definition in the waist so her measurements are probably like 32 A-30-32. (She probably has had a kid considering her tits and her waist however her stomach had no stretch marks) Her kitty is trimmed. She has a small tattoo on her left tit.
For the people that liked Lia that was at M's you would probably like Jina. Lia was really old but screwed like crazy. Jina is not quite as old and she also gets involved. It is nice to be doing the deed with a woman that is actually moving on her own part and screwing you back. Jina grinds a bunch and even tries to grind when she is in mish. Actually seemed pretty real. Jina's BBBJ was really good. Kissing not so much.
No regrets but wouldn't repeat.
[QUOTE=Dwaeji;4644219]This girl is a winner IMHO. If the pics are her, they are photoshopped beyond recognition. However, she's quite pretty in a GND type of way. Smallish girl with a slightly tanned complexion and nice smooth skin. Slightly thicker in the thigh department, but not in a bad way. After some foreplay warmup, she was fucking me back in every position I could think of. BBFSCIP with the standard house upcharge. Glad to pay it, as she was far more attractive to me than anyone I've seen at the "no charge" houses in the past 12-18 months. Some guys in the OC forum mentioned she had a bit of an attitude, but I didn't receive any of that. Just a good fucking from a hot KGirl that looks like she would be at home walking around the UCLA campus. I will repeat if she sticks around.[/QUOTE]Jaime is one of the better BBFS girls.
Definitely better than Jane for both face and service
One of the better bbfs girls out there. Cute gnd 7.5/10 low late 20’s
[QUOTE=Chosun1;4643874]How much do you guys tip for BBFS on top of the house fee?[/QUOTE]Don't tip. If you tip agencies are goin to find out and will instead charge more. This is what happen to KTE. With the big upcharge.
[QUOTE=KGirlAddict;4644134]Jina with M, I think, is same girl as Christine used to be with Sexy Angels. When M sent me pics with slide show, one of the pics was of Christine in red lingerie that I recognized. This is speculation so far as I haven't booked yet. But I like Christine, sweet girl works hard cute thin BBFS definitely a winner.[/QUOTE]Jina is Christine from SA. Saw her today.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because it contributed nothing of value and in fact constituted a complete waste of bandwidth.
The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange if information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Let's stick to the subject.
It took you two whole days to get banned this time.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=Smokey1981;4644263]Don't tip. If you tip agencies are goin to find out and will instead charge more. This is what happen to KTE. With the big upcharge.[/QUOTE]Some girls insist on tip before going BBFS, so YMMV.
[QUOTE=Chosun1;4643874]How much do you guys tip for BBFS on top of the house fee?[/QUOTE]The only tip I've ever given to an AAMP girl is the tip of my cock followed by the rest of it.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4632821]She is sassy and sexual but of course as always with anyone. It's YMMV. She has a real personality and she doesn't suppress it or change it. That said; my encounter was great! I like when a girl is herself as long as she loves sex and isn't a ***** (and sometimes I like to fuck the "*****" or "sass" right out of them by making them feel good typically will do their best to make me feel good.
Sometimes sex is complicated and sometimes it's very simple. IMHO worth a try. If you connect you will be in for a roller coaster of pleasure.[/QUOTE]Saw Scarlet. Speaks English well and nice personality. Nice body. Great BBBJ skills. She did not allow me BBFS. Finished CIM with her great BBBJ. Fun cuddle and chat session. As always BBFS is YMMV but probably reason Scarlet chose to work for kdolls whose girls typically do not provide BBFS.