Korean Agency BB

On principle alone, I'm going to start using this booker since on their website it says who using real pics! I have spent thousands of dollars total getting riled up from various bookers websites profile pics to only be disappointed that the actual girl was 20+ years older and not even close in appearance. I understand it's supply and demand and most mongers aren't going to walk out but I hope other bookers follow suit and start listing whose pics are real. LOL, obviously the ones that don't say real pics are not the girl in the pic and then you just have to hope its at least close.

Has anyone tried GKS and can confirm that anyone they saw on this site (or another bookers site) that gks says real pics is actually using real pics? I get that these pics are airbrushed extremely and of course they'll always be much older than stated and breast cup size exaggerated but at least it's really them hopefully! That's all I want as a monger, to know that the picture is of the actual provider even if its from a decade ago LOL.

[QUOTE=PussyProwler;6626204]On principle alone, I'm going to start using this booker since on their website it says who using real pics! I have spent thousands of dollars total getting riled up from various bookers websites profile pics to only be disappointed that the actual girl was 20+ years older and not even close in appearance. I understand it's supply and demand and most mongers aren't going to walk out but I hope other bookers follow suit and start listing whose pics are real. LOL, obviously the ones that don't say real pics are not the girl in the pic and then you just have to hope its at least close.

Has anyone tried GKS and can confirm that anyone they saw on this site (or another bookers site) that gks says real pics is actually using real pics? I get that these pics are airbrushed extremely and of course they'll always be much older than stated and breast cup size exaggerated but at least it's really them hopefully! That's all I want as a monger, to know that the picture is of the actual provider even if its from a decade ago LOL.[/QUOTE]Well, to your point on "booker post saying real photo", its a tactic to draw you in. Over the course of 15 years in the game, I have came across many that said real photo and happens to be no where close or 10-20 years older. YES it was really her but 10-20 years ago or in reality, just someone look like her about 70%. The justification of real photo is subjective and no standard definition on how long ago, before and after plastic and etc. On the other hand, I have came across many that look exactly the same or even better than photo that the booker did not say it's real photo or not.

At the end, real photo or fake, we all depends on monger reviews and therefor we are here to do the reviews and find the truth, all bookers shares the same girls in L. A pretty much, so either you book from GKS or CGLA or M or KGLA or Melos or etc. You get what you get, LOL.

[QUOTE=Phazze93;6625938]Disclaimer for someone who had to try viki (only kbliss provider that accepted new clients). She's older than her photos.

She's pushing mid 30's if not older.

She's a pro, but she's not a HYA or CYA.[/QUOTE]LOL, the key word is OLDER, she is def early 40's.

One time I was with a provider who is friend with viki and after the deed while we were chichatting, viki called.

The way her voice sound and the way she talk in korean, def 40 and over, and I remember those rough hands of hers.

Yes she is a spinner but way pass her prime.

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6626257]LOL, the key word is OLDER, she is def early 40's.

One time I was with a provider who is friend with viki and after the deed while we were chichatting, viki called.

The way her voice sound and the way she talk in korean, def 40 and over, and I remember those rough hands of hers.

Yes she is a spinner but way pass her prime.[/QUOTE]So which girls are okay and not okay with new clients for first time? Is Maia one of them because she was the first girl I saw.

I see your point but as long as the picture (enhanced or 10 years ago) is actually of her, I don't mind. I don't mind them being older than stated because I expect that and don't mind Milfs etc.

But it's important that it's really them. Why? Because when I look at these profiles I'm picking based on their facial features. Not sure if you've been around a lot of Koreans / Asians but as a Korean myself, I'm very particular about what type of face I find attractive on these girls, and thus when I walk in and the girl isn't even close in terms of the face period, it's total disappointment. To me when I say real photo, it's not that complex, it's that the photo of the actual provider, with the assumption it's been heavily photoshopped, brightened, from 10 years ago etc. etc. at least it's of her and thus you know what type of face you're getting. To me that isn't subjective, it's either of them or it's not. Close is subjective. For now (and granted I have NO CLUE) if GKS website's claims of real pics on certain profiles will pan out, but what do I have to lose to test this? I assume that the pics are either real, or close, and the ones that don't say "real pic" are a bit further away from what they look like (and obviously not them period). A lot of non asian mongers I feel like can't really distinguish Korean faces on these providers well which is fine since they haven't been immersed around as many Koreans as for example, someone who grew up and was raised amongst Koreans. Anyhow, I'll end this rant now and am hoping someone will be kind enough to chime in on any of the GKS girls who they've seen that clearly are them (whether photoshopped or of them from many years ago).

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6626248]Well, to your point on "booker post saying real photo", its a tactic to draw you in. Over the course of 15 years in the game, I have came across many that said real photo and happens to be no where close or 10-20 years older. YES it was really her but 10-20 years ago or in reality, just someone look like her about 70%. The justification of real photo is subjective and no standard definition on how long ago, before and after plastic and etc. On the other hand, I have came across many that look exactly the same or even better than photo that the booker did not say it's real photo or not.

At the end, real photo or fake, we all depends on monger reviews and therefor we are here to do the reviews and find the truth, all bookers shares the same girls in L. A pretty much, so either you book from GKS or CGLA or M or KGLA or Melos or etc. You get what you get, LOL.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=PussyProwler;6626204]On principle alone, I'm going to start using this booker since on their website it says who using real pics! I have spent thousands of dollars total getting riled up from various bookers websites profile pics to only be disappointed that the actual girl was 20+ years older and not even close in appearance. I understand it's supply and demand and most mongers aren't going to walk out but I hope other bookers follow suit and start listing whose pics are real. LOL, obviously the ones that don't say real pics are not the girl in the pic and then you just have to hope its at least close.

Has anyone tried GKS and can confirm that anyone they saw on this site (or another bookers site) that gks says real pics is actually using real pics? I get that these pics are airbrushed extremely and of course they'll always be much older than stated and breast cup size exaggerated but at least it's really them hopefully! That's all I want as a monger, to know that the picture is of the actual provider even if its from a decade ago LOL.[/QUOTE]Yeah, good luck with that. I booked Viva through a different booker. She was also listed on GKS as having "real pics," which were the same ones she used with the other LA / OC bookers.

See this cached link for proof of the GKS ad:

[URL]https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:aUIEveOx-u8J:https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/vivaoc/&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us[/URL]

Her old ad on CGLA, so you can see the photos enlarged:

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/viva[/URL]

She looked nothing like that. Her face wasn't merely Photoshopped. It's a completely different face. Also had absolutely no ass. Flat and frumpy. In dire need of some heavy squats and hip thrusts.

"Real pics" is hardly a hallmark of authenticity.

[QUOTE=DaeWrong;6626275]So which girls are okay and not okay with new clients for first time? Is Maia one of them because she was the first girl I saw.[/QUOTE]Elena was my first because she was OK with new clients.

Sugar (the older one in DTLA, not to be confused with Baby Sugar) was not OK with new clients.

When it's you're new, the booker will tell you whether the provider you want to see takes on newbies.

[QUOTE=DaeWrong;6626275]So which girls are okay and not okay with new clients for first time? Is Maia one of them because she was the first girl I saw.[/QUOTE]Even though I got in on referral to Kbliss. They told me Viki was the only girl that saw New clients. She's basically the filter LOL.

[QUOTE=DaeWrong;6626275]So which girls are okay and not okay with new clients for first time? Is Maia one of them because she was the first girl I saw.[/QUOTE]It's not like there's a science to it. It's more likely contingent on how busy the girls are, or even something as arbitrary as the booker's mood at the time of scheduling.

[QUOTE=Phazze93;6625938]Disclaimer for someone who had to try viki (only kbliss provider that accepted new clients). She's older than her photos.

She's pushing mid 30's if not older.

She's a pro, but she's not a HYA or CYA.[/QUOTE]I did include "not the youngest or newest" for that exact reason.

But she also did everything I wanted and then some.

But yes if you want 23 year old. She is not that.

And I will be looking younger next LOL.

Kbliss Thursday availability. Booker now handles Lovelyn in the oc.

Viki Iris Maia Juni Hana Krystal and Nina (upcharge) and Lovelyn in OC now.

I believe multiple people have stated the bookers don't know what the really girls look like in most cases. They were probably just told that the pics were real so not entirely the booker's fault if they turn out to be fake.

There was an instance a couple of weeks ago where KTF had a listing that said real pics. People reviewed her and said the pics were fake. The booker did update the listing to remove the part about real pics so credit to them. Makes them a bit more reputable in my eyes but they have a small roster so I've only used them once. The girl I saw with them did have real pics as advertised but photoshopped and taken with good lighting. Still was happy with what I saw in person.

Kind of related but most photoshopped photos seem to make the chins more pointy due to Korean standards of beauty. If the pics are real, the girls will usually have a rounder chin / face. As a Korean myself, I don't mind rounder faces as long as it's not too round like a perfect circle LOL. However, I like my girls with a little bit of meat.

[QUOTE=PussyProwler;6626483]I see your point but as long as the picture (enhanced or 10 years ago) is actually of her, I don't mind. I don't mind them being older than stated because I expect that and don't mind Milfs etc.

But it's important that it's really them. Why? Because when I look at these profiles I'm picking based on their facial features. Not sure if you've been around a lot of Koreans / Asians but as a Korean myself, I'm very particular about what type of face I find attractive on these girls, and thus when I walk in and the girl isn't even close in terms of the face period, it's total disappointment. To me when I say real photo, it's not that complex, it's that the photo of the actual provider, with the assumption it's been heavily photoshopped, brightened, from 10 years ago etc. etc. at least it's of her and thus you know what type of face you're getting. To me that isn't subjective, it's either of them or it's not. Close is subjective. For now (and granted I have NO CLUE) if GKS website's claims of real pics on certain profiles will pan out, but what do I have to lose to test this? I assume that the pics are either real, or close, and the ones that don't say "real pic" are a bit further away from what they look like (and obviously not them period). A lot of non asian mongers I feel like can't really distinguish Korean faces on these providers well which is fine since they haven't been immersed around as many Koreans as for example, someone who grew up and was raised amongst Koreans..[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=PussyProwler;6626483]I see your point but as long as the picture (enhanced or 10 years ago) is actually of her, I don't mind. I don't mind them being older than stated because I expect that and don't mind Milfs etc.

But it's important that it's really them. Why? Because when I look at these profiles I'm picking based on their facial features. Not sure if you've been around a lot of Koreans / Asians but as a Korean myself, I'm very particular about what type of face I find attractive on these girls, and thus when I walk in and the girl isn't even close in terms of the face period, it's total disappointment. To me when I say real photo, it's not that complex, it's that the photo of the actual provider, with the assumption it's been heavily photoshopped, brightened, from 10 years ago etc. etc. at least it's of her and thus you know what type of face you're getting. To me that isn't subjective, it's either of them or it's not. Close is subjective. For now (and granted I have NO CLUE) if GKS website's claims of real pics on certain profiles will pan out, but what do I have to lose to test this? I assume that the pics are either real, or close, and the ones that don't say "real pic" are a bit further away from what they look like (and obviously not them period). A lot of non asian mongers I feel like can't really distinguish Korean faces on these providers well which is fine since they haven't been immersed around as many Koreans as for example, someone who grew up and was raised amongst Koreans. Anyhow, I'll end this rant now and am hoping someone will be kind enough to chime in on any of the GKS girls who they've seen that clearly are them (whether photoshopped or of them from many years ago).[/QUOTE]My favorites from GKS are Stella and Asia. Asia's pictures are especially as close to reality as she looks. She isn't BB tho.

[QUOTE=MisterDotD;6625216]I visited her last week when she was in OC, 3rd + 5th pic looks 99% like her, plus it the exact outfit she greet me with.

Face and Body: 7/10, cute, short. Tits have natural sag, prob D?, not firm. Ass is tone, soft, stack, and feels good to touch. Slightly bit of tummy fat but not too much. Shave kitty. No abnormal odor.

English: just giggle and some simple words.

Attitude: Engaging, aim to please, no rush.

Service: All except no FIV. I came in and loved her engaging attitude. Shower (no preview). Burst 1 nut in mish. Try for 2nd but couldn't (but not for the lack of trying). Make her squirt near the end. I left supper happy.

Cost: $320 (BBFS) with some tips.

Repeat: 100% if she returns to OC.[/QUOTE]Seen Kona before. These new pics are definitely not her. Heavily photoshopped, like 99% of the other girls at these agencies. She's in her early 40's and service was not memorable. Better choices elsewhere.

[QUOTE=Phazze93;6625938]Disclaimer for someone who had to try viki (only kbliss provider that accepted new clients). She's older than her photos.

She's pushing mid 30's if not older.

She's a pro, but she's not a HYA or CYA.[/QUOTE]Pushing mid 30's? Nah, try pushing mid to late 40's.