[QUOTE=RockItAllNite;6902253]Are you saying she is skinny in these pics?[/QUOTE]She is a bit skinnier than her pics suggest. She is now in Sawtelle.
Printable View
[QUOTE=RockItAllNite;6902253]Are you saying she is skinny in these pics?[/QUOTE]She is a bit skinnier than her pics suggest. She is now in Sawtelle.
Anyone have info on Dream 32 E from CAKD? Feel free to PM me, thanks!
[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;6900915]Lately, biz have been slow for several Korgs on OC and LA.
I've had 3 different bookers text me if I 'have friends who want to see a girl.
All said if you (meaning I) vouch for them it will be okay. Also, said NO AA and know one over 50. LOL.
I said do they need refs they said NO, will go with your word we trust you since you been a VIP client for many years.
Yes, that happens for vouching but also remember if that buddy of yours gets physical or rip of gal you just might be 86'd?[/QUOTE]I'm puzzled by the "no one over 50" restriction. I thought us older guys tended to be more polite, less demanding, more grateful, and often have more money lying around.
Any ideas, thoughts?
Lift Her Up.
[QUOTE=LiftHerUp;6912321]I'm puzzled by the "no one over 50" restriction. I thought us older guys tended to be more polite, less demanding, more grateful, and often have more money lying around.
Any ideas, thoughts?
Lift Her Up.[/QUOTE]Perhaps it is provider specific for the bookers Hapa is referencing? I agree this is the first I have heard of such a thing for age specifics (am aware of the AA clause). However, I may admit that I used to think K-orgs clientele are mostly older gentleman but I believe that is the case for the hobby as a whole, whereas recently majority of clientele would probably entail a cohort consisting of gentleman 35-50 for the K-orgs.
[QUOTE=LiftHerUp;6912321]I'm puzzled by the "no one over 50" restriction. I thought us older guys tended to be more polite, less demanding, more grateful, and often have more money lying around.
Any ideas, thoughts?
Lift Her Up.[/QUOTE]The economy must be bad if agencies are looking for clients.
I've never heard of no guys over 50 before. Sadly, no AA is extremly common. I don't know why.
Possibly to limit the possibility of some monger having a stroke or heart attack during the appointment? Lmao.
[QUOTE=LiftHerUp;6912321]I'm puzzled by the "no one over 50" restriction. I thought us older guys tended to be more polite, less demanding, more grateful, and often have more money lying around.
Any ideas, thoughts?
Lift Her Up.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CoffeeLake1151;6912407]The economy must be bad if agencies are looking for clients.
I've never heard of no guys over 50 before. Sadly, no AA is extremly common. I don't know why.[/QUOTE]AA and Indian dudes have the worst reputation amongst WGs.
[QUOTE=BigZhangMang;6912476]Possibly to limit the possibility of some monger having a stroke or heart attack during the appointment? Lmao.[/QUOTE]I don't remember seeing an age cut off, so health might be one thing, but I think a more likely reason is length of session.
Most of these agencies are turn and burn, cycling through as many as they can schedule that's reasonable.
Young guys will pop quicker & rebound quicker & many of the mills are MSOG at an up charge, so if you are done, your done, and if you pay more, that's more cash for them, same time commitment.
Older guys by and large are going to take longer, and likely won't need / able to do multiple shots, so if you do a 30 minute session, it might take all of the 30 minutes.
But that's just my initial thought.
[QUOTE=BobLove;6912546]AA and Indian dudes have the worst reputation amongst WGs.[/QUOTE]What does WGs stand for? I am assuming providers?
I assumed overweight ugly guys would have the worst reputation but I digress.
[QUOTE=Taws6;6913467]I don't remember seeing an age cut off, so health might be one thing, but I think a more likely reason is length of session.
Most of these agencies are turn and burn, cycling through as many as they can schedule that's reasonable.
Young guys will pop quicker & rebound quicker & many of the mills are MSOG at an up charge, so if you are done, your done, and if you pay more, that's more cash for them, same time commitment.
Older guys by and large are going to take longer, and likely won't need / able to do multiple shots, so if you do a 30 minute session, it might take all of the 30 minutes.
But that's just my initial thought.[/QUOTE]Great point, especially since profit is higher for longer sessions and individuals rarely stay the whole session time frame I presume.
Originally Terra LSC, also Sally M in 2023. Don't sleep on her. She's a steal for 320. Sheesh.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6914624]Originally Terra LSC, also Sally M in 2023. Don't sleep on her. She's a steal for 320. Sheesh.[/QUOTE]Banged her at PSC. She's a cutie. She always tries to get another pop out of me but I'm a 1 pop dude LOL. Paid $200+ for a hr. Love her old agency, PSC, such a good bargain.
[QUOTE=LabiaFedora;6914203]What does WGs stand for? I am assuming providers?
I assumed overweight ugly guys would have the worst reputation but I digress.[/QUOTE]Working Girls, I think.
I heard good things here about her and decided to see her the other day. I mean don't get me wrong, she is pretty good performance-wise but I don't see what the hype is personally. Maybe I am just averse to lots of plastic. And her total package didn't do it for me.
Pro's.
She has a very nice body with surprisingly soft bolt-ons, surprising because they visually look like they would be quite hard. Really nice hair and seems she tries to take care of herself. Nice nails. Does try to give a good performance and service. Hips have a good curve to them (maybe had a transfer of fat from belly to hips). Enjoys having her clit rubbed. The blue contacts look exotic. Lots of eye contact during the BJ. Seems to enjoy what she is doing. Her nuru if you opt for it is good, not great, but good, she uses coconut oil which was alright and only did a back slide really. She gave a pretty nice rim job. She is very sweet and smiles a good deal. The price is nice.
Con's.
Visually hard-looking bolt-on's. Her face has had quite a bit of work which I think looks pretty bad by most people's standards. Lips have much too much filler. Cheeks have a bit of a chipmunk cheek look to them. Bottom half of her face really shows some signs of a sort of a mama-san to me whilst the skin is still smooth looking as though she has had it tightened up. Seems as though she is a smoker because she has the smoker gut stench that she just can't mask or hide. She isn't into kissing hardly at all which after a small kiss I determined that due to the stench I wouldn't want anyhow. Won't let you touch her hair, not that I really tried or wanted to but I accidentally did and she made it clear I shouldn't. She was probably fairly pretty about 2-5 face procedures ago.
Whomever called her a Korean Kim Kardashian you are on crack and / or need your vision checked. In no way does she look like her nor is there any feature of her I would rate similarly. I mean maybe they have had the same number of procedures but her surgeon (s) butchered her face.
Drea is now in OC at CAKD. She was just down in SD for about two weeks. Here is my review of her:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers&p=6902766&highlight=drea[/URL]#post6902766.
To summarize she is tall and nice to look at. White skin, full boobs, good attitude. Hard to guess age but younger than average. Hot BBBJ, thorough shower. No rush service I really enjoyed, I did repeat visit. The only unusual thing was afterwards she took a long thorough shower so there is a bit of a wait, I don't mind but others might. She brought hot towels for me after each visit. She was very nice to look at which is one of my criteria for a good time.
I don't recognize the other girls on the OC roster but you guys are lucky with 24 choices. I'm curious if one or two of the girls are jgirls. I actually had a good experience with two of the jgirls who toured in SD with CAKD so hope more come.