Sugar Daddy & Other Related Websites

[QUOTE=HiRub;4230120]This 22 yro white girl wants 1 k for a shag. She won't even send any other pics than the one posted on her profile showing her from the neck down in a baggy blouse. Plus, her about me section is empty.

Goddess421.

"My body is a temple. Be prepared for that when you come to me with an offering. ".[/QUOTE]I blocked her profile the minute I read the "my body is a temple"!

But you could play her along. Safely off of SA of course. Tell her she is a slutty *****, selling herself for a mere 1 k, for a grubby hookup, and that you only talk to high-class real sugarbabies.

Of course, "her" entire profile may also be a joke.....

[QUOTE=WilliamMonroe;4228351][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/09e6ca91-e9a2-40b0-bb5b-fd2071d966d3[/URL]

Asked for $500 for covered full service. I just said we are too far apart. She texted me a couple nice photos though.[/QUOTE]Even when they appear to have GPS, I still give a counter offer. Recently one said she wanted 2000 a month, I said I might consider it if that includes 10 meetings a month. Then she said how about 500 a week, I said ok as long as we get together 3 times a week. Then we got down to ppm discussion, she said she'd do 500 ppm. I countered with 200, she immediately responded with 300. I held firm at 200, then she agreed to do 250. After all that I still refused because she said she wanted it up front which was a non starter for me. She claimed she'd been ripped off before.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/eab0a261-5070-4abb-8c62-02ef22c53c7f[/URL]

As for your POT sb, when she says "500 for covered full service" sounds like a pro to me. I'm sure you could have worked her down to 200-250. Or even 300 max and that would be pushing it.

[QUOTE=Waxxon;4230921]Even when they appear to have GPS, I still give a counter offer. Recently one said she wanted 2000 a month, I said I might consider it if that includes 10 meetings a month. Then she said how about 500 a week, I said ok as long as we get together 3 times a week. Then we got down to ppm discussion, she said she'd do 500 ppm. I countered with 200, she immediately responded with 300. I held firm at 200, then she agreed to do 250. After all that I still refused because she said she wanted it up front which was a non starter for me. She claimed she'd been ripped off before.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/eab0a261-5070-4abb-8c62-02ef22c53c7f[/URL]

As for your POT sb, when she says "500 for covered full service" sounds like a pro to me. I'm sure you could have worked her down to 200-250. Or even 300 max and that would be pushing it.[/QUOTE]Ppm and description sounds like pro?

[QUOTE=TaylorTaste;4230928]Ppm and description sounds like pro?[/QUOTE]I like pros, and have a couple I have become friends with over the years. As for the sugar bowl. Pro, semi-pro, part time time pro, professional sb, high volume sb, non monogamous sb or "true" sb? As you get to know them you get a sense of which category they fall into.

[QUOTE=PussyPumper;4225395]Wow, you have way more patience than I ever have. But serrously, two things:

- With all the talent out there, is any one woman worth being wooed for an entire year, when you could have hooked 10+ other babes during the same time?

- In my experience, SA is a fast game. If they don't want to see you, I think it becomes apparent in a few days at most.

- PP.[/QUOTE]I agree that there's a lot more out there but I met her then for the first time and only once. I just keep my contacts just because I don't maintain my SA membership monthly but still meet someone different every month. But I am not discounting on wanting to see the same SB again.

And yet another professional meet and greeter? Or are you guys really that desperate to pay for this nonsense? Been messaging with this one, she says the right things and we set up a m&g. Now she says it will be 150 for her time and then we can go from there. My response--how about we just meet and go from there. The only girls that want money for their time are hookers.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/4330f705-c7dc-4360-8d9e-28a2c98eaf7b[/URL]

I saw her listing the day it went up and figured she'd get millions of messages so I didn't even try. Interestingly her profile shows that I favorited her 3 weeks ago but she doesn't show in my favorites list AND the red heart icon is missing. I wonder if that is what a profile looks like when they hide you? If I was blocked it would say so I think (I've seen other who have blocked me).

[QUOTE=Waxxon;4231689]And yet another professional meet and greeter? Or are you guys really that desperate to pay for this nonsense? Been messaging with this one, she says the right things and we set up a m&g. Now she says it will be 150 for her time and then we can go from there. My response--how about we just meet and go from there. The only girls that want money for their time are hookers.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/4330f705-c7dc-4360-8d9e-28a2c98eaf7b[/URL][/QUOTE]

This one hit me up initially. Chit chatted for a bit then tried to sell me a picture. Immediately blocked me when I told her no thanks.

There's a special on A&E titled, Sex for Sale: The Untold Story. Watching now and they're talking about Seeking Arrangements. Interesting!

I'm visiting San Diego next week so was looking for some company while I'm in town. I thought I'd hit the jackpot with this one:

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/b3e3ba8e-64f5-4215-9aa2-436bfa552bcf[/URL]

Replied to my message, good communication and moved to text. Set up a day for next week and then "allowance" came up. I told her I usually gift $300. She said she usually gets $1 k. That ended things quickly, LOL.

Good Hunting.

Travelin.

[QUOTE=TravelinSD;4238532]I'm visiting San Diego next week so was looking for some company while I'm in town. I thought I'd hit the jackpot with this one:

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/b3e3ba8e-64f5-4215-9aa2-436bfa552bcf[/URL]

Replied to my message, good communication and moved to text. Set up a day for next week and then "allowance" came up. I told her I usually gift $300. She said she usually gets $1 k. That ended things quickly, LOL.

Good Hunting.

Travelin.[/QUOTE]A bit of a tip off I figure when they say they are looking for an "alpha male".

[QUOTE=WilliamMonroe;4238600]A bit of a tip off I figure when they say they are looking for an "alpha male".[/QUOTE]I disagree. I didn't look at her particular profile, but a type of girl you want to target is the ones who want to be dominated by a powerful older man. They are on SA for the access to that sort of experience, not only for the $. Those are the ones you can get for reasonable $. There are lotsa tells for girls like that, if you read the LA sugar thread, the mod there, Hollywood Guy, has given some of the things he looks for.

[QUOTE=PussyPumper;4225398]I looked into Vanilla.

- Says that card has to be "registered" before it can be used.

- To register, seems to imply that SS number is needed. Is that so? That would be a deal breaker for me![/QUOTE]Like I said in Thread #: 928 - You had a "reloadable" card.

To make a Reloadable card work, it's like opening a bank account (well, 95%), which requires the SSN. When you see the word "reloadable" - Avoid!

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;4239782]I disagree. I didn't look at her particular profile, but a type of girl you want to target is the ones who want to be dominated by a powerful older man. They are on SA for the access to that sort of experience, not only for the $. Those are the ones you can get for reasonable $. There are lotsa tells for girls like that, if you read the LA sugar thread, the mod there, Hollywood Guy, has given some of the things he looks for.[/QUOTE]Well I am not looking to dominate any woman. I do, however understand how many women have an attraction to older men. This is often due to losing their father at a young age often due to divorce. I look for as well for telltale signs of a woman who needs approval. They can have low self esteem from bad relationships in the past. So to these points I agree with you.

My red flag is simply the term alpha male because women who would be attracted to that, who would use that tem, I think are looking for a very wealthy man, And they are almost certainly not my type.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;4239782]I disagree. I didn't look at her particular profile, but a type of girl you want to target is the ones who want to be dominated by a powerful older man. They are on SA for the access to that sort of experience, not only for the $. Those are the ones you can get for reasonable $. There are lotsa tells for girls like that, if you read the LA sugar thread, the mod there, Hollywood Guy, has given some of the things he looks for.[/QUOTE]There are SBs that really wants to be submissive and be dominated. It a chosen lifestyle. I've met a couple in Orange County and one in SD, some do it for a reasonable $ while some don't even ask for it. I am currently on a steady meet with someone, a blond SB from LA who just wants to be dominated.

[QUOTE=WilliamMonroe;4240985]Well I am not looking to dominate any woman. I do, however understand how many women have an attraction to older men. This is often due to losing their father at a young age often due to divorce. I look for as well for telltale signs of a woman who needs approval. They can have low self esteem from bad relationships in the past. So to these points I agree with you.

My red flag is simply the term alpha male because women who would be attracted to that, who would use that tem, I think are looking for a very wealthy man, And they are almost certainly not my type.[/QUOTE]Please, please, stay far far away () from girls who put 'alpha male' in their profiles! Leaves more for me. I don't give big bucks sugar, I have a regular 25 YO SB who is about 200 + some spoiling, b / c she likes being 'controlled' - they say it many different ways, as I said. Look at Hollywood Guy's postings for the tells. I am way more than 2 x her age.

I'm wondering what "dominated" concretely means to the female. Is that in the bedroom, out of the bedroom or what? Sounds fun but I have no where to even start with that.

Cheers,

Cruzier.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;4241326]Please, please, stay far far away () from girls who put 'alpha male' in their profiles! Leaves more for me. I don't give big bucks sugar, I have a regular 25 YO SB who is about 200 + some spoiling, b / c she likes being 'controlled' - they say it many different ways, as I said. Look at Hollywood Guy's postings for the tells. I am way more than 2 x her age.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JakeDSnake;4241145]There are SBs that really wants to be submissive and be dominated. It a chosen lifestyle. I've met a couple in Orange County and one in SD, some do it for a reasonable $ while some don't even ask for it. I am currently on a steady meet with someone, a blond SB from LA who just wants to be dominated.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Cruzier1;4242182]I'm wondering what "dominated" concretely means to the female. Is that in the bedroom, out of the bedroom or what? Sounds fun but I have no where to even start with that.

Cheers,

Cruzier.[/QUOTE]I seem to run into a lot of young ladies with serious daddy issues. Usually, it's because they either had a poor or absolutely no father figure in their life. They seem to welcome something as easy as, just a guy that knows what he wants. A guy that can make decisions. A guy that respectfully takes control. A guy with confidence. That said, I have also run into those that love being tied up and being taken complete advantage of. I am pretty good at all of that. So, your answer is somewhere in the middle of all of that.

I have several times had ladies allow me to tie them up that would never trust any guy with that power. One, an SP who is a dominatrix, loves it when I tie her up and abuse her. She says, and I'm quite sure, that I'm the only guy she gives that power to. I can tell that story on several others.

Almost all ladies enjoy being treated with respect by a confident guy. When they are SPs, ladies who fuck lots of guys with their own issues, and SBs, who’s moral compass is possibly a bit confused, it can be rewarding.

Just one man's opinion.

C3.

I see that Rachel has returned. Had a M&G a few years ago, she seemed nice but I wasn't really feeling it. She lists herself as "average" build, I would put it at "curvy + " so I wasn't really interested in a follow up date. A few days later she hits me up and wants to get together. I didn't have anything else going on so decided to play along. So she wants to meet the following day, but her rent is due "today" and wants me to advance her 300. We ahd not had discussions yet concerning allowance. I let her know any allowances are provided after the completion of a date that includes full private adult activities. She complains that guys routinely provide sugar in advance, and that if intimacy is involved it's even more. I said, then you should have no trouble coming up with 300 today since there's all these guys out there giving out sugar with nothing in return from her. Check out and see if she's gotten more realistic.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/6705f68b-adad-431d-82ec-5c149f6aaed9[/URL]

In 2+ years, I never had so much as a meet and greet with a duo (two women) from SA.

As far as I can see, duo profiles seem to be either.

- entirely platonic, or.

- wanting an unreasonably high donation (per person), from which they won't budge.

Anyone had better luck?

[QUOTE=PussyPumper;4244342]In 2+ years, I never had so much as a meet and greet with a duo (two women) from SA.

As far as I can see, duo profiles seem to be either.

- entirely platonic, or.

- wanting an unreasonably high donation (per person), from which they won't budge.

Anyone had better luck?[/QUOTE]Yes. Identical twins.

[QUOTE=DanteHaversham;4244442]Yes. Identical twins.[/QUOTE]And, almost certainly, they are the twins with their own category below; just scroll down. They are also at HX.

[QUOTE=ZooGuy1959;4244487]And, almost certainly, they are the twins with their own category below; just scroll down. They are also at HX.[/QUOTE]Unfortunately, those twins don't look like the type of college SB I like to go for.

[QUOTE=ZooGuy1959;4244487]And, almost certainly, they are the twins with their own category below; just scroll down. They are also at HX.[/QUOTE]Different pair of twins. They aren't active anymore and were just doing it to get tickets to Coachella.

[QUOTE=Cruzier1;4242182]I'm wondering what "dominated" concretely means to the female. Is that in the bedroom, out of the bedroom or what? Sounds fun but I have no where to even start with that.

Cheers,

Cruzier.[/QUOTE]Enough said.

Anyone use this site?

Any success?

Advice on price per meet, rather than monthly allowance?

[QUOTE=Gbrand;4254666]Anyone use this site?

Any success?

Advice on price per meet, rather than monthly allowance?[/QUOTE]Useless.

Worthless.

Anyone else notice the well known young black / mixed pornstar now among us on SA since last month?

I could not get her to move from Pro type pricing.

300 for BBJ.

600 for GFE.

800 for GFE+ (balls).

All these numbers being per hour!

Note that I think she has had a baby since her actress career.

[QUOTE=Gbrand;4254666]Anyone use this site?

Any success?

Advice on price per meet, rather than monthly allowance?[/QUOTE]Not worth your time.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting any discussion regarding [u]racial issues[/u]. This action is in no way a reflection of the merits of the author's comments.

I am aware that the vast majority of references to racial issues are legitimate attempts to advise other fellow members about local racial issues and prejudices. However, past discussions in the Forum has repeatedly demonstrated that the subject simply cannot be discussed intelligently, in any form or for any reason, without being misinterpreted and without starting flame wars.

Please do not engage in discussions about race in the Forum. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

[i]Thanks![/i]

This was from a book called Dataclysm, it wasn't from a survey, it was from "data" he cobbled together out of the public API's from various social media sites. There was no peer review, there was nothing approaching any sort of science involved in the collection of this data. The chart was from a coffee table book.

By saying "The attached graphic does not tell us anything we don't already know, or suspect." tells me that what I know or suspect about you is probably correct.

A2[/blue]

Can't provide link as I blocked her, but Mya1995 is not who she portrays herself as.

Via text she provided a link up front to a Pronhub movie, which she says is her, where the actress is misidentified as Maya Bijou.

She does not directly say that she is Maya Bijou, but the set up is such as to make you think that, and she does resemble her - but ethnicity, age and height are all wrong!

Had been messaging her and she wanted to meet. While negotiating allowance, she tells me she knows what she is worth and that's never a good sign. She wanted 500, I offered my usual and she countered with 400. I said I could go 200 since she expects an UBER both ways. Definitely not an escort, even worse. GPS-cort.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/36ebf7a3-eb03-422a-8758-18fe784b5178[/URL]

Her ad in your link is too phunny! I assisted you with letting her know what she's really worth. Used my burner and texted her for some pussy pie! She was insulted until I offered her $500, then told her that was a typo, I meant $50! Only pastry she's baking is a yeast infection! Ai yaaa!

[QUOTE=Waxxon;4263065]Had been messaging her and she wanted to meet. While negotiating allowance, she tells me she knows what she is worth and that's never a good sign. She wanted 500, I offered my usual and she countered with 400. I said I could go 200 since she expects an UBER both ways. Definitely not an escort, even worse. GPS-cort.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/36ebf7a3-eb03-422a-8758-18fe784b5178[/URL][/QUOTE]

Chatted with this one for a bit. She wants $3 k per month. She's cute but not $3 k / mo cute!

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/d5a451db-aa86-4052-9cfe-297e33c435a5[/URL]

This one isn't a pro? Well. 500 ppm with dinner drinks and some hotel fun. She's from PQ area so Uber-ing her to me was easy. .

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/12c4a02b-d49c-4504-b828-589fe02998da[/URL]

[QUOTE=Poksman;4271281]This one isn't a pro? Well. 500 ppm with dinner drinks and some hotel fun. She's from PQ area so Uber-ing her to me was easy. .

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/12c4a02b-d49c-4504-b828-589fe02998da[/URL][/QUOTE]I had talked her down to $200 ppm without the dinner and drinks. Our schedules just never lined up.

When they take money for a service, they're now a professional. Can you provide details on the hotel action? And to the member that claimed paying $200, how was your experience? Thanks for sharing!

[QUOTE=Poksman;4271281]This one isn't a pro? Well. 500 ppm with dinner drinks and some hotel fun. She's from PQ area so Uber-ing her to me was easy. .

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/12c4a02b-d49c-4504-b828-589fe02998da[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=TwoBlueBalls;4271693]When they take money for a service, they're now a professional. Can you provide details on the hotel action? And to the member that claimed paying $200, how was your experience? Thanks for sharing![/QUOTE]200? Maybe. I know she went down to 400 on our first time but I have 5 anyway. I'm fortunate to say that 100 doesn't make a difference to me. Anything is possible. I'm a long term monger but only been on the SB scene the last 2 years. Definitely cheaper option since I like flying them to places.

[QUOTE=Snwbdr;4271243]Chatted with this one for a bit. She wants $3 k per month. She's cute but not $3 k / mo cute!

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/d5a451db-aa86-4052-9cfe-297e33c435a5[/URL][/QUOTE]I tell them I might consider it if they will meet up 15 x a month.

Had been messaging with this young one. Finally comes out and says no sex. I know, I know, she lists platonic in her profile, but I have found even if listed, that it's not necessarily the case so I never let that stop me. She gives me some crap that there's all kinds of guys out there willing to pay to watch her be a complete waste of oxygen.

Please don't pay these fakers to sit and stuff their pie holes. I have a minimum 2 year waiting list of girls who want me to wine, dine and give them allowance just for allowing me the honor of their presence. Start messaging, educate them about what a real sugar relationship is. No hunny. No munny.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/eaddfa9f-464d-45ca-a627-64705e3be965[/URL]