Rants, Raves, and Stupid Tinfoil Hat Wearing Conspiracy Bullshit

[QUOTE=MythMan2010;3187260][URL]http://reason.com/blog/2016/12/13/12-more-charges-in-trb-prostitution-case[/URL]

They basically arrested anyone that gave a review. That's pretty low. I assume since this site is offshore it's not susceptible to that sort of shakedown? Could Wake co. Pull that sort of shit?[/QUOTE]Not saying your lying but these guys were on a forum then decided to make their own "club" made a site, then got involved with the girls. It's a whole different thing.

Taking you specifically, I have no fucking idea who MythMan2010 is. If I can't identify you then who can.

As far as the site being off shore that's not the only thing that is, so are we.

A2.

[QUOTE=MythMan2010;3187260][URL]http://reason.com/blog/2016/12/13/12-more-charges-in-trb-prostitution-case[/URL]

They basically arrested anyone that gave a review. That's pretty low. I assume since this site is offshore it's not susceptible to that sort of shakedown? Could Wake co. Pull that sort of shit?[/QUOTE]Well I'm pretty sure A2 is the one that could and did answer your question. A rookie mistake that is common is members hold back on posting information or give the well intended advice on the open board that guys should not say this or that like names etc. Because it could get the girls in trouble or a establishment in trouble. Shit I've made this mistake and was educated it is not my job to give out instructions or advice about what is allowed to be posted or said on this board, just post don't tell other what to do. So anything can and should be posted within the boards guidelines and rules with the exception of STD claims and those sort of taboos that the board has rules about. I read somewhere in the last week on another board, sorry I can't even remember which fucking State it was maybe Florida. But the Admin was explaining to a guy making the mistake of telling people to hold back info etc. (I'm editing the original story but the point is the same) Admin explained to him he can put a post on here saying he fucked let's call her Hazel and can have a picture of him handing Hazel the cash, and have a picture of him with his dick in her poontang. And can give the address he fucked her at and a picture of the house he fuck her in. He can give out Hazels phone number. With all this information right there on the screen in police head quarters there is nothing that can be done to him or Hazel. Why? Because the police were not in the room to catch them in the act. What's not to say him and Hazel are not husband and wife and they are just posting shit on line. Words being posted are only words. No law has been broken! As A2 pointed out a group that goes out on their own and starts up their independent boards can run into issues or these sick fuckers with under age kids or human trafficking victims fall under total different realm of suspicion by LE than guys getting on here posting about what we do. So my understanding is anything can be posted about within the boards rules and if one chooses not to post names etc.. for whatever reason that's fine that's a personal choice. Will the big LE folks come and get you? Well yea if they are in the next room with a sting going on. They CANNOT come and get anyone typing on the key pad about pussy they got or are going to get or most of the country would be in jail. They got's to catch you in the act handing over cash for that pussy. It's all about the cash exchange always has been always will be. If the tax man ain't getting his cut your ass belongs to him "IF" you get caught. The law is the law. Post like the wind fellas.

I can only guess you didn't understand my post since you didn't remove his post as well, and they were on the same subject.

I was agreeing with the post I was responding to. I was expanding on what he had posted. What I was saying is it is naive to think you have to be with a trashy provider for that to happen to you. And it was sick for a provider to behave in that way. Nothing was directed at the poster. We have no issue and have pm'd on the subject in the past. Read it again.

If there if some other rule I broke would you pm it to me because otherwise I don't have a clue what the issue was.

And I reread the guidelines before I posted this. Still confused.

[QUOTE=Crtchadialhntr;3192888]I can only guess you didn't understand my post since you didn't remove his post as well, and they were on the same subject.

I was agreeing with the post I was responding to. I was expanding on what he had posted. What I was saying is it is naive to think you have to be with a trashy provider for that to happen to you. And it was sick for a provider to behave in that way. Nothing was directed at the poster. We have no issue and have pm'd on the subject in the past. Read it again.

If there if some other rule I broke would you pm it to me because otherwise I don't have a clue what the issue was.

And I reread the guidelines before I posted this. Still confused.[/QUOTE]I agree that nothing was directed at me or my post, crutch was just agreeing and expanding on my comment.

I'm a bit confused too, as my post was also deleted and an infraction levied. A2, if you have a moment I would like for some clarification as to what policy I violated. I really try to post within site guidelines and could use a little guidance on this to assure it doesn't happen again. Thank you.

[QUOTE=Crtchadialhntr;3192888]I can only guess you didn't understand my post since you didn't remove his post as well, and they were on the same subject.

I was agreeing with the post I was responding to. I was expanding on what he had posted. What I was saying is it is naive to think you have to be with a trashy provider for that to happen to you. And it was sick for a provider to behave in that way. Nothing was directed at the poster. We have no issue and have pm'd on the subject in the past. Read it again.

If there if some other rule I broke would you pm it to me because otherwise I don't have a clue what the issue was.

And I reread the guidelines before I posted this. Still confused.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JoeLooking;3193054]Indeed it is.[/QUOTE]Ad is down sadly. You happen to have her number? $?

[QUOTE=Buki1;3193082]I'm a bit confused too, as my post was also deleted and an infraction levied. A2, if you have a moment I would like for some clarification as to what policy I violated. I really try to post within site guidelines and could use a little guidance on this to assure it doesn't happen again. Thank you.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Seven4535;3192903]I agree that nothing was directed at me or my post, crutch was just agreeing and expanding on my comment.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Crtchadialhntr;3192888]I can only guess you didn't understand my post since you didn't remove his post as well, and they were on the same subject.

I was agreeing with the post I was responding to. I was expanding on what he had posted. What I was saying is it is naive to think you have to be with a trashy provider for that to happen to you. And it was sick for a provider to behave in that way. Nothing was directed at the poster. We have no issue and have pm'd on the subject in the past. Read it again.

If there if some other rule I broke would you pm it to me because otherwise I don't have a clue what the issue was.

And I reread the guidelines before I posted this. Still confused.[/QUOTE][BLUE]All of these posts were on the "Backpage Advertisers Reviews" thread. None of them are reviews to Backpage advertisers. If you have a question for me then send me a PM, if you are an unmoderated senior you can put up all the posts you want asking me stuff and I will never know what the issue is.

On that thread there were a bunch of guys who were giving their two cents about fucking chicks bareback. This is a general violation of forum rules;

[quote]No Safe Sex Complaints Forum Members wishing to criticize other Members for not following what they consider to be safe sex procedures may do so only in the Safe Sex Thread. Members may not comment upon, criticize or confront other members on this subject in the general discussion threads.[/quote]

In addition Raleigh has special restrictions, they are posted at the top of the page;

[quote]Effective immediately, posters in the Raleigh forum are prohibited from criticizing, complaining about or discussing other forum members.
This restriction is necessary to stop the endlessly pointless rhetoric.
The 1st violation will result in the perpetrator being placed on Permanent Moderation status.
The 2nd violation will result in the perpetrator being permanently banned from the Forum.
I am sure that I will need to ban one or more members before everybody takes this seriously, but I'm tired of dealing with these constant arguments.[/quote]These were put in place because you guys would just expand on each others comments for days at a time.

So "What I was saying is it is naive to think you have to be with a trashy provider for that to happen to you." would be a violation of them both.

The only exception to that rule would be here, on this thread, which was created for you guys to fingerwag other guys for how they use their very own cocks as much as you want.

If I took down yours and missed somebody elses it was an error, and that would be why there is a button on all the posts that says "Report Post."

A2[/BLUE]

[QUOTE=Admin2;3193293][BLUE]All of these posts were on the "Backpage Advertisers Reviews" thread. None of them are reviews to Backpage advertisers. If you have a question for me then send me a PM, if you are an unmoderated senior you can put up all the posts you want asking me stuff and I will never know what the issue is.

On that thread there were a bunch of guys who were giving their two cents about fucking chicks bareback. This is a general violation of forum rules;



In addition Raleigh has special restrictions, they are posted at the top of the page;

These were put in place because you guys would just expand on each others comments for days at a time.

So "What I was saying is it is naive to think you have to be with a trashy provider for that to happen to you." would be a violation of them both.

The only exception to that rule would be here, on this thread, which was created for you guys to fingerwag other guys for how they use their very own cocks as much as you want.

If I took down yours and missed somebody elses it was an error, and that would be why there is a button on all the posts that says "Report Post."

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]So I get a violation for warning guys there "top provider" might be tricking them into eating another guys semen. Yeah that seems right. I didn't say anything about others sexual practices. It was a warning to not assume based on reviews or rates. I would want someone to tell me before I ate a load. But I'll drop it.

[QUOTE=MythMan2010;3187260][URL]http://reason.com/blog/2016/12/13/12-more-charges-in-trb-prostitution-case[/URL]

They basically arrested anyone that gave a review. That's pretty low. I assume since this site is offshore it's not susceptible to that sort of shakedown? Could Wake co. Pull that sort of shit?[/QUOTE]I get the approach LEO is using here, but ultimately when I really think of this in day to day life in America I have a very hard time grasping how this and the back page arrests are allowed to go forward in this country. Really makes me wonder what country I live in. I will not engage in the typical LE bashing. They evaluate these things and attempt to apply the law how they see fit. But to me, it's thought policing and belongs in places like China and North Korea. I was taken back that most of the defendants just pleaded out. I have to believe that a judge would toss these cases out along the way. But it's a scary proposition when you're possibly facing 4-10 years in the slammer and having your entire life ruined for posting to a message board. Just crazy!

I get these guys were also meeting in person and many were actually directly assisting these girls with customers and housing them etc. That is the definition of promoting as the law is written, HOWEVER, in the second round of arrests, they charged a bunch of guys who merely posted in the forum. That is insane in my opinion. I know for fact many of the posters on these type of forums post fake reviews for whatever reason. Maybe to gain trust and be one of the "boys" people have different reasons. And for that, you should not be subject to 10 years in prison. Not in America. If this stands, this will be a slippery slope into almost anything we say and do. It's equivalent to a construction worker who whistles out at a street walker and draws attention to her. Is he really promoting and or pimping? Just insane in my opinion. Again, I get the first round of arrests, but not the second. They arrested men for just posting on a forum.

The first Amendment is designed so that you do not have to live in fear of having your front door kicked down by armed police for talking, for expressing, for engaging. And stories like this make people have a common fear and are silenced in other ways besides this. That is not American. That is thought policing. Why hasn't people like Howard Stern been arrested? He's had hookers on his show and talked about how great they were. Same damn thing. Think about it.

Quote Originally Posted by TheSting24.

Maybe this poor girl is trying to fix a really bad life she started for herself.

I would do her bare back, no problem. I guess I can't since I am not Mexican. Damn shame. You fellas have too many rules.

[QUOTE=Crtchadialhntr;3193551]So I get a violation for warning guys there "top provider" might be tricking them into eating another guys semen. Yeah that seems right. I didn't say anything about others sexual practices. It was a warning to not assume based on reviews or rates. I would want someone to tell me before I ate a load. But I'll drop it.[/QUOTE]Sting's post set off a string of comments and nobody was bashing anyone who chooses BB, but rather those providers who do BB and lets the next guy DATY like it's no big thing. I read the posts and I know the one provider who is well liked, high dollar, has the reviews and has a BB preference that is not talked about on the forum.

Ok, I get that USASG has a no discrimination policy on all sexual activities. The only two requirements is that the girl has to be of legal age and only sexual activities of men with women will be posted. There is no USASG policy on safe sex, even though an overwhelming majority of health agencies worldwide say that using a male / female condom helps prevent STD's dramatically when inspected and used correctly. The average person wants safe sex with a partner they don't really know, especially if that partner is a sex worker with unknown medical history with an unknown number of sexual partners. It makes sense to follow medical recommendations, but USASG doesn't have policy either way and chooses neutrality on the issue.

So what's the balance of not violating forum policy but yet inform members of a providers services? Easy, just state the facts about the provider and all services available. Say in your review what you liked and what you didn't like. It's your review so write it truthfully but not critical of the provider because she only did a CBJ when you preferred a BBBJCIM. That's her choice on service and it's your choice to write a factual review on the services you were offered and/or experienced.

I think we worry about the fallout for a provider if she does BB, especially if we like the overall experience she provides. Here is the truth; she provides BB service, then she should expect honest reviews that mentions BB as a service, period. Seeing any sex worker has an increased risk. Some implement measures to lower risks, while others way the risk and decide that no measures are needed. To each his own and we all have opinions on the matter, but the bottom line is USASG doesn't care if you personally like a particular service or not just don't criticize the provider for offering or member for partaking in something that you personally would not engage in.

IMO taking measures to minimize risk is wise, especially in a hobby that has so many increased risks ranging from fraud, robbery and STD's. IMO it's wrong for a provider to provide BB and make the client believe he is special and the only one. Why lie? It's a legitimate service so she should own it or not offer it, period.

Yeah, some folks wear pink satin thongs that are a couple of sizes to small. Causes them to act like they're a schoolgirl having her first period and throwing a temper tantrum.

Can someone take a joke?

[QUOTE=Crtchadialhntr;3193551]So I get a violation for warning guys there "top provider" might be tricking them into eating another guys semen. Yeah that seems right. I didn't say anything about others sexual practices. It was a warning to not assume based on reviews or rates. I would want someone to tell me before I ate a load. But I'll drop it.[/QUOTE]

Very well said and I completely agree. Thank for your thoughts.

[QUOTE=Purple45;3194189]Quote Originally Posted by TheSting24.

Maybe this poor girl is trying to fix a really bad life she started for herself.

I would do her bare back, no problem. I guess I can't since I am not Mexican. Damn shame. You fellas have too many rules.

Sting's post set off a string of comments and nobody was bashing anyone who chooses BB, but rather those providers who do BB and lets the next guy DATY like it's no big thing. I read the posts and I know the one provider who is well liked, high dollar, has the reviews and has a BB preference that is not talked about on the forum.

Ok, I get that USASG has a no discrimination policy on all sexual activities. The only two requirements is that the girl has to be of legal age and only sexual activities of men with women will be posted. There is no USASG policy on safe sex, even though an overwhelming majority of health agencies worldwide say that using a male / female condom helps prevent STD's dramatically when inspected and used correctly. The average person wants safe sex with a partner they don't really know, especially if that partner is a sex worker with unknown medical history with an unknown number of sexual partners. It makes sense to follow medical recommendations, but USASG doesn't have policy either way and chooses neutrality on the issue.

So what's the balance of not violating forum policy but yet inform members of a providers services? Easy, just state the facts about the provider and all services available. Say in your review what you liked and what you didn't like. It's your review so write it truthfully but not critical of the provider because she only did a CBJ when you preferred a BBBJCIM. That's her choice on service and it's your choice to write a factual review on the services you were offered and/or experienced.

I think we worry about the fallout for a provider if she does BB, especially if we like the overall experience she provides. Here is the truth; she provides BB service, then she should expect honest reviews that mentions BB as a service, period. Seeing any sex worker has an increased risk. Some implement measures to lower risks, while others way the risk and decide that no measures are needed. To each his own and we all have opinions on the matter, but the bottom line is USASG doesn't care if you personally like a particular service or not just don't criticize the provider for offering or member for partaking in something that you personally would not engage in.

IMO taking measures to minimize risk is wise, especially in a hobby that has so many increased risks ranging from fraud, robbery and STD's. IMO it's wrong for a provider to provide BB and make the client believe he is special and the only one. Why lie? It's a legitimate service so she should own it or not offer it, period.[/QUOTE]

If I make a date and stuff isn't going to be fresh then that's pretty important. Haha it's funny to think the next guy ate my load but seriously. Who wants to be on the receiving end. I'd like to think that people here are watching out for each other and not making dudes eat their cum.

[QUOTE=MbncMar;3194380]If I make a date and stuff isn't going to be fresh then that's pretty important. Haha it's funny to think the next guy ate my load but seriously. Who wants to be on the receiving end. I'd like to think that people here are watching out for each other and not making dudes eat their cum.[/QUOTE]If it's offered to you. Your not the only one. Can only hope she likes you enough to clean up before you taste "her juices". To each his own. It's like Russian roulet with cum. Me, I am not there to please her so why stick that "pistol in your mouth". But I guess what you don't know don't hurt you.

[QUOTE=MbncMar;3194380]If I make a date and stuff isn't going to be fresh then that's pretty important. Haha it's funny to think the next guy ate my load but seriously. Who wants to be on the receiving end. I'd like to think that people here are watching out for each other and not making dudes eat their cum.[/QUOTE]I was told I violated policy by judging others sexual practices. I was commenting on the provider not the guy visiting. If you don't know what you're doing it is not voluntary. I wouldn't call a girl who got roofied and gang raped a sloot because she had been with a bunch of guys. Same thing, if you are doing something without your knowledge or consent it is not your sexual practice and you can't be judged for it.

I wasn't going to say who, but since it seems you can now get violations arbitrarily, I will just in case I get another violation can't post anymore. I was talking about Noa. She also said for guys who did dato she would shit before they came and not wipe. Just dab some mouthwash on it. She thought it was hilarious. FYI