The Rat Trap

[QUOTE=Pinoboy;2193786]Out of all due respect A2, from what I gather from his posts, Implied isn't implying (no pun intended) any ill will towards me. Rather, he is simply wondering why I caught so much flak when I would make posts containing details of my BBFS escapades, whearas no one ever seems to find any fault when the Jag's posts appear to imply that he too engages in uncovered activity. Of course, I could be totally wrong concerning Implied's intentions, but if I'm not wrong then I'd like to thank him for sticking his head out there for me on this one.

Regarding Jag, I have nothing but the utmost respect for him and what he does for this forum and the intel he provides. He has always responded to me via PM each and every time when I have sought details and advice about providers, which I'm sure he has done for every other reputable member here. I am very familiar with his writing style and how he has mentioned countless times about "fertilizing the cervixes" of so many of the SP's he has been with. And while he doesn't include the disclaimer "covered of course" in every one of his posts, after reading so many of his reviews you kind of assume that to be the case and not to take the comments like the one above literally. Then again, only he and his selected "partners" would know for sure. Regardless, with him being the undisputed king mackdaddy of this board, very few if any would call him out on thedetails present in his reviews. Doing so would not only potentially make such a person disliked by the most valuable source of information here, but also from Jag followers alike.

And for those of you that take issue with by BBFS activities, while I have made no such posts containing info about it in quite some time, that certainly does not mean that it has ceased to be an aspect with my hobbying. I just feel there's no need to mention it for all of the masses to be aware of anymore. With that kind of info out in the open, more people are just going to go see the same provider and want BB as well, obviously this doesn't apply for all of you anti-BB'ers out there. While I like contributing to this board just like anyone else, bb'ing is something that I now like to keep on the down low.[/QUOTE][BLUE]Pino, we have another infraction called "Unsafe Sex Complaining." If your posts about unwrapped sex are primarily about the experience with the provider and the "unwrapped" portion is informational you have no issue with me. If the fucking ladies knitting circle clutches their pearls and posts a bunch of shit about you going in raw then they, not you, are guilty of the douchebaggery and if somebody reports that post then I will most certainly throw a fucking flag.

It is the position of the USASG that unless you happen to be borrowing somebody else's cock for your dates then how you go about them is your fucking business.

You are correct, Jag does indeed talk about fertilizing the cervix's of lots of coed cheerleaders but he refrains from mentioning a word about the presence or absence of safety gear.

A2[/BLUE]

[QUOTE=Rowdyreptile;2193764]Does King Swaganna sound at the very least mildly retarded? Or maybe she's on street meds? Regardless, she does sound quit stupid. Can someone help me translate her posts? "STUPIDATONICS"? But, what am I thinking, we only fuck these ladies. Right? She is a genius though at anti marketing. Sure hope her pussy also doesn't stink like some mongers have posted. Just another negative if you know what I mean. I'll just stick with sane providers, thank you.

EOM.

RR.[/QUOTE]Wait for it!

LOL.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2193824]I was not reading this in your posts. My apology is as public as my duchebaggery. This is not sarcasm, I'm really sorry. I misunderstood.

[blue]I also apologize for my dim witted alter ego.

Good day,

A2[/blue][/QUOTE]Thanks for your response and I appreciated hearing your point of view and civility.

[QUOTE=Pinoboy;2193786]Out of all due respect A2, from what I gather from his posts, Implied isn't implying (no pun intended) any ill will towards me. Rather, he is simply wondering why I caught so much flak when I would make posts containing details of my BBFS escapades, whearas no one ever seems to find any fault when the Jag's posts appear to imply that he too engages in uncovered activity. Of course, I could be totally wrong concerning Implied's intentions, but if I'm not wrong then I'd like to thank him for sticking his head out there for me on this one.

Regarding Jag, I have nothing but the utmost respect for him and what he does for this forum and the intel he provides. He has always responded to me via PM each and every time when I have sought details and advice about providers, which I'm sure he has done for every other reputable member here. I am very familiar with his writing style and how he has mentioned countless times about "fertilizing the cervixes" of so many of the SP's he has been with. And while he doesn't include the disclaimer "covered of course" in every one of his posts, after reading so many of his reviews you kind of assume that to be the case and not to take the comments like the one above literally. Then again, only he and his selected "partners" would know for sure. Regardless, with him being the undisputed king mackdaddy of this board, very few if any would call him out on thedetails present in his reviews. Doing so would not only potentially make such a person disliked by the most valuable source of information here, but also from Jag followers alike.

And for those of you that take issue with by BBFS activities, while I have made no such posts containing info about it in quite some time, that certainly does not mean that it has ceased to be an aspect with my hobbying. I just feel there's no need to mention it for all of the masses to be aware of anymore. With that kind of info out in the open, more people are just going to go see the same provider and want BB as well, obviously this doesn't apply for all of you anti-BB'ers out there. While I like contributing to this board just like anyone else, bb'ing is something that I now like to keep on the down low.[/QUOTE]I don't take his descriptions literally. He's made some posts saying things like 'pm for BBFS info' and my assumption that he does BBFS is based on those posts.

For what its worth, I'm in the camp that takes issue with your and everyone else's BBFS activities. It makes hobbying more dangerous for all of us. I'd also like you to post when you do it and with who. I'd rather know than not know.

[QUOTE=ImpliedFoldeq;2193851]I don't take his descriptions literally. He's made some posts saying things like 'pm for BBFS info' and my assumption that he does BBFS is based on those posts.

For what its worth, I'm in the camp that takes issue with your and everyone else's BBFS activities. It makes hobbying more dangerous for all of us. I'd also like you to post when you do it and with who. I'd rather know than not know.[/QUOTE]Ok I respect that you are against it, but I will not make it a habit of coming out and revealing with whom I have done it with on the open forum like I did in the past. I have realized that nothing good comes out of revealing such info to just everybody. Not only could it be detrimental to a provider's reputation thus hurting businesss, but also looking at it the other way there is the high probability that BB service will be asked of them now on a regular basis from others besides me. I'm sure most, if not all the providers that I have done it with are not willing to provide the same for just anybody for whatever reason. And yes I have got my fair share of "this is my first time", "you're the only one I do this with", and "you look clean" etc. Just imagine all of the "you did it with so and so, why not me" type of scenarios this could incite. I'm sure that wouldn't go over too well for me should I decide to make a repeat visit with her knowing I leaked that info out.

My advice to you is, if you feel that your health is substantially more at risk due to my actions and others like me then STOP HOBBYING! If that is not an option for you then just stick to providers who are reviewed extensively and well known to be non-GFE with EVERYTHING covered. Off the top of my head girls like KaitlynLove, Cassie and Ashley Monroe (although I did nut all over her asshole on last visit way back) fit that bill perfectly! FWIW, I have never dreamed with either KaitlynLove or Cassie so they are still very much viable options for you.

I have been accused of posting A BS review of Maddie who tried coming on this site yesterday. Her BP link is attached below. Maybe describing her pics as accurate was the wrong word. Some of her pics do seem to be her so maybe I should have said that they were a fair representation. I will say however that I don't think any of you would be disappointed with this girls looks. She has the body and looks that rivals KaitlynLuv, Dallas and Amber Bliss.

Because of the insults that were thrown at me and accusations of "ruining this forum" via PM I will not be posting anymore reviews in a public forum. I will stay here and share intel with a select few of you that I have mutual trust with through PM's. Maybe if a couple of you see Maddie and confirm that I didn't throw out a BS review I will change my mind about this situation!

[URL]http://orlando.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/d-real-pics-ll-rvd-23/11026422[/URL]

[QUOTE=NedleyMandingo;2193965]I have been accused of posting A BS review of Maddie who tried coming on this site yesterday. Her BP link is attached below. Maybe describing her pics as accurate was the wrong word. Some of her pics do seem to be her so maybe I should have said that they were a fair representation. I will say however that I don't think any of you would be disappointed with this girls looks. She has the body and looks that rivals KaitlynLuv, Dallas and Amber Bliss.

Because of the insults that were thrown at me via PM I will not be posting anymore reviews in a public forum. I will stay here and share intel with a select few of you that I have mutual trust with through PM's. Maybe if a couple of you see Maddie and confirm that I didn't throw out a BS review I will change my mind about this situation!

[URL]http://orlando.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/d-real-pics-ll-rvd-23/11026422[/URL][/QUOTE]It has been confirmed by many that Maddie is hot. And besides, since when is the criteria that all pics be accurate for them to advertise as was noted? Our gals do need to protect their true identity. Body shots need to be accurate, but the face? I wouldn't do it if I were them.

Also, after thinking it through, you just might conclude you are over reacting. Stick around.

[QUOTE=NedleyMandingo;2193965]I have been accused of posting A BS review of Maddie who tried coming on this site yesterday. Her BP link is attached below. Maybe describing her pics as accurate was the wrong word. Some of her pics do seem to be her so maybe I should have said that they were a fair representation. I will say however that I don't think any of you would be disappointed with this girls looks. She has the body and looks that rivals KaitlynLuv, Dallas and Amber Bliss.

Because of the insults that were thrown at me and accusations of "ruining this forum" via PM I will not be posting anymore reviews in a public forum. I will stay here and share intel with a select few of you that I have mutual trust with through PM's. Maybe if a couple of you see Maddie and confirm that I didn't throw out a BS review I will change my mind about this situation!

[URL]http://orlando.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/d-real-pics-ll-rvd-23/11026422[/URL][/QUOTE]I recall in earlier posts regarding Maddie that you mentioned she looked very similar to the pics she uses on BP. Meaning not her pics but a close resemblence. Just to back you up sir.

[QUOTE=FLAdventurer;2193989]since when is the criteria that all pics be accurate for them to advertise as was noted?[/QUOTE]All the way back to the World Sex Guide. Chicks don't have to post pics. Chicks can post pics of internet models with the disclaimer "These pics are not me but they are representative of what you will see when you meet me. " Then the guy making the phone call has that info before calling and if she's lying, he can say so on the forum.

What they can't do, and have never been allowed to do is post pics they rip off from the internet without saying so.

A2.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2194047]All the way back to the World Sex Guide. Chicks don't have to post pics. Chicks can post pics of internet models with the disclaimer "These pics are not me but they are representative of what you will see when you meet me. " Then the guy making the phone call has that info before calling and if she's lying, he can say so on the forum.

What they can't do, and have never been allowed to do is post pics they rip off from the internet without saying so.

A2.[/QUOTE]OK, that is more than fair.

Thanks.

[QUOTE=Pinoboy;2193919]Ok I respect that you are against it, but I will not make it a habit of coming out and revealing with whom I have done it with on the open forum like I did in the past. I have realized that nothing good comes out of revealing such info to just everybody. Not only could it be detrimental to a provider's reputation thus hurting businesss, but also looking at it the other way there is the high probability that BB service will be asked of them now on a regular basis from others besides me. I'm sure most, if not all the providers that I have done it with are not willing to provide the same for just anybody for whatever reason. And yes I have got my fair share of "this is my first time", "you're the only one I do this with", and "you look clean" etc. Just imagine all of the "you did it with so and so, why not me" type of scenarios this could incite. I'm sure that wouldn't go over too well for me should I decide to make a repeat visit with her knowing I leaked that info out.

My advice to you is, if you feel that your health is substantially more at risk due to my actions and others like me then STOP HOBBYING! If that is not an option for you then just stick to providers who are reviewed extensively and well known to be non-GFE with EVERYTHING covered. Off the top of my head girls like KaitlynLove, Cassie and Ashley Monroe (although I did nut all over her asshole on last visit way back) fit that bill perfectly! FWIW, I have never dreamed with either KaitlynLove or Cassie so they are still very much viable options for you.[/QUOTE]I understand why you wouldn't want to share that info with others. I assume others who do BBFS also like to keep it to themselves. Which makes me wonder how deep the rabbit hole goes and do a silent "Our Father" after seeing a girl.

Your advice to stop hobbying is understandable and maybe I'll take it. In the meantime, I feel denouncing BBFS will make me and everyone else involved safer so I don't mind occasionally trying. At the end of the day, adults are going to do what they want regardless of what I think. Thanks for the recommendations by the way. Never heard a bad thing said about Ashley or Kaitlyn.

[QUOTE=NedleyMandingo;2193965]I have been accused of posting A BS review of Maddie who tried coming on this site yesterday. Her BP link is attached below. Maybe describing her pics as accurate was the wrong word. Some of her pics do seem to be her so maybe I should have said that they were a fair representation. I will say however that I don't think any of you would be disappointed with this girls looks. She has the body and looks that rivals KaitlynLuv, Dallas and Amber Bliss.

Because of the insults that were thrown at me and accusations of "ruining this forum" via PM I will not be posting anymore reviews in a public forum. I will stay here and share intel with a select few of you that I have mutual trust with through PM's. Maybe if a couple of you see Maddie and confirm that I didn't throw out a BS review I will change my mind about this situation!

[URL]http://orlando.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/d-real-pics-ll-rvd-23/11026422[/URL][/QUOTE]Well deserved you defeat the entire purpose of the forums. You post a review and don't mention the pics are fake? Well thanks for fuckin nothing.

Your reviews will not be missed because nobody can believe you.