Massage Parlor Reports

[QUOTE=Love Kgirls; 1529724]Under both of those scenarios, you are likely going to be arrested for solicitation of prostitution. I was generally referring to sex, but a hand job would almost certainly be encompassed within the scope of the conduct prohibited by whatever statute or local ordinance applies under the circumstances. Obviously, there could be evidentiary issues that come into play with proving that you paid for that hand job, but judges and juries know the score. If you are engaged in sexual activity in an AMP, it's not because the masseuse was overcome with passion and had no choice but to grab hold of your johnson or hop up on it.

I remember that setup in Spartanburg, as well as the media coverage. Damn shame, that was. That was a good place![/QUOTE]I guess they would have to prove that you gave her money in exchange for sexual favors, which we all know does not happen! We pay for their time only! Having a good lawyer will probably fix the situation, you pay a fine, court, and your lawyer. The real issue here (imo) is that your mugshot gets pasted all over the web, plastered all over the "slamer" magazine thats in every gas station, and all your personal business is spread out for everyone to see.

Has anyone been to Belle Deese [url]www.belledeese.com[/url] Was thinking about trying the Nuru. Their rates seen reasonable but I don't know if if they are looking for a big tip before the fun begins. As my funds are limited, I don't want to get there and find out that I'm under funded. PM with any intel.

Wasn't too thrilled with my two trips to Spa One. Saw Sky and then Suzie. Received very ho-hum TS, then a lazy / below average message. Full press up sell occurred 10 minutes into the message. Their expectations of my budget were much higher than the market calls for. I didn't give them what they were asking; settled for a lesser service and left both times feeling like I wasted my money.

Honestly, guys, who the hell is going to risk an AMP this close to the dnc? Out of all the avenues for the hobby it seems to me to be the most vulnerable to stings.

[QUOTE=Ntowl;1523424]I almost forgot, old mamasan is back. She is so much fun and I'm sure service will improve now that she is back.[/QUOTE]Went there the other day. No old mamasan! But I get along great with Ginnie / Jeannie. Had Linda who I had not seen before and she was much younger than the typical Lilly's talent. However I found her skills somewhat lacking and roaming somewhat limited. Still, left happy, although not as good as some other times I've been there.

[QUOTE=PieMonger;1532845]Honestly, guys, who the hell is going to risk an AMP this close to the dnc? Out of all the avenues for the hobby it seems to me to be the most vulnerable to stings.[/QUOTE]That is exactly what I am thinking. After seeing all of the practice motorcades, cops everywhere etc etc over the last few days I am going to be saint for the next week.

[QUOTE=PieMonger;1532845]Honestly, guys, who the hell is going to risk an AMP this close to the dnc? Out of all the avenues for the hobby it seems to me to be the most vulnerable to stings.[/QUOTE]I don't know, I feel more comfortable going to the AMP, than walking into a hotel room after you've answered an ad for P4P. I think if you went to an established AMP (NOT close to downtown / balentyne area) and you followed the monger rules and your "spidey" sense I think it would be fine. Now if you wanted to say that mongering in general over the next few weeks will be riskier than normal, than I would agree.

[QUOTE=Dgfclt;1533048]After seeing all of the practice motorcades, cops everywhere etc[/QUOTE]There are only so many cops. If a bunch of them are assigned to security and crowd control, there are fewer left to work other things. Besides, the last thing CharMeck PD wants to do is create a political shit storm by accidentally arresting convention delegates. So I'm more inclined to think they're going to turn a bit of a blind eye during the actual convention. But this pre-convention holiday weekend would probably be a good time to stick with tried-and-true, UTR providers. Or just take a break.

I read last week that they are closing some roads in the balentyne area, so there could be some high brass around there. You may want to avoid that too.

[QUOTE=Bouinage;1533089]I don't know, I feel more comfortable going to the AMP, than walking into a hotel room after you've answered an ad for P4P. I think if you went to an established AMP (NOT close to downtown / balentyne area) and you followed the monger rules and your "spidey" sense I think it would be fine. Now if you wanted to say that mongering in general over the next few weeks will be riskier than normal, than I would agree.[/QUOTE]

Went by the new spa on Baldwin off Providence. Ad on BP said new spa having a "soft opening". $40 special. The manager and the couple of the girls I saw were from SCS. Place still needed some decorating, and the AC wasn't working. The girl tried in the room but it was too damn hot. Best thing is I work uptown and this saves me a long haul to Hwy 51.

[QUOTE=TwistedFace;1528753]Say I am at an AMP where the masseuse is licensed. Would LE coming in during a table shower where I am in the buff (not getting an HE or anything sexual at this point) be illegal?[/QUOTE]The City of Charlotte has law against massaging a person of the opposite sex. (Sec. 6-403) (I've yet to see this applied at any fully legitimate places.) The state massage therapy law seems to classify a table shower as massage (NGCS 90&8209; 622 (3) (be).

These two laws taken together should be sufficient to make a table shower illegal. However it should only apply to the masseuse and only if the masseuse is the opposite sex. There maybe larger Fourth amendment rights at play here as well.

City Code:

[url]http://library.municode.com/HTML/19970/level3/PTIICOOR_CH6BUTR_ARTVIIMAPAHESAREBU.html[/url]#PTIICOOR_CH6BUTR_ARTVIIMAPAHESAREBU_S6-403PRAC.

State Law:

[url]http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/enactedlegislation/statutes/html/bychapter/chapter_90.html[/url]

Stopped by Friday afternoon. Met Yuni. TS was good she made sure the boys were nice and clean. Massage was okay. On the flip

She gave a nice and slow HE. Would only allow roaming over her clothes. Would pull away when I tried to go further. I asked for extras but nothing else was on menu.

I certainly don't want a guy to massage me. So they could shut down massage envy with these laws if they wanted to?

[QUOTE=Shilowbar; 1534260]The City of Charlotte has law against massaging a person of the opposite sex. (Sec. 6-403) (I've yet to see this applied at any fully legitimate places.) The state massage therapy law seems to classify a table shower as massage (NGCS 90&8209; 622 (3) (be).

These two laws taken together should be sufficient to make a table shower illegal. However it should only apply to the masseuse and only if the masseuse is the opposite sex. There maybe larger Fourth amendment rights at play here as well.

City Code:

[url]http://library.municode.com/HTML/19970/level3/PTIICOOR_CH6BUTR_ARTVIIMAPAHESAREBU.html[/url]

#PTIICOOR_CH6BUTR_ARTVIIMAPAHESAREBU_S6-403PRAC.

State Law:

[url]http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/enactedlegislation/statutes/html/bychapter/chapter_90.html[/url][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=NC Transplant;1534428]I certainly don't want a guy to massage me. So they could shut down massage envy with these laws if they wanted to?[/QUOTE]Theoretically, yes. Law enforcement in Charlotte regularly cites women in the AMPs for massaging a person of the opposite sex, usually together with a charge for massaging the private parts of another. Apparently, the constitutionality of the opposite sex massage ban was upheld many years ago, but I am not sure it would withstand constitutional scrutiny if challenged today. It's pretty obvious even to a casual observer that CMPD arbitrarily enforces that provision of the code by singling out establishments which are believed to be offering sex for money. However, for this provision to be struck down, someone has to have the appetite and the means to challenge it in court and pursue any necessary appeals. It's doubtful that the providers at an AMP or an AMP itself would have the interest or money to challenge that provision. If, however, CMPD cites Massage Envy or another similar business for a violation, you can bet that they would probably put up a fight.

[QUOTE=Love Kgirls;1534924]Theoretically, yes. Law enforcement in Charlotte regularly cites women in the AMPs for massaging a person of the opposite sex, usually together with a charge for massaging the private parts of another. Apparently, the constitutionality of the opposite sex massage ban was upheld many years ago, but I am not sure it would withstand constitutional scrutiny if challenged today. It's pretty obvious even to a casual observer that CMPD arbitrarily enforces that provision of the code by singling out establishments which are believed to be offering sex for money. However, for this provision to be struck down, someone has to have the appetite and the means to challenge it in court and pursue any necessary appeals. It's doubtful that the providers at an AMP or an AMP itself would have the interest or money to challenge that provision. If, however, CMPD cites Massage Envy or another similar business for a violation, you can bet that they would probably put up a fight.[/QUOTE]There is a big difference between an AMP and a national spa / massage chain. The AMP have a rep for one type of service and most likely are owned or controlled by some criminal or criminal organization. Massage Envy has 700 franchised locations nationwide. Using only Licensed Massage & Bodywork Therapy Professsiona. LMBTP, licensed by the state. Chiropractors use the same. CMPD knows no HE are going on in Massage Envy. It may be illegal at the city level but is it at the state level. The cops mostly likely tack the opposite sex charge only if they catch some Asian gal with her lips on your dick. At one time you could only get a ticket for no seat belt if you were pulled over for something else. Same concept. I don't do massage parlors, it's like putting a target on your back. The cops know where to look.