YoYo at CH minor disappointment
Travelled south again on a Friday frolic and detour.
Stopped by CH for a session.
Pulled in, the parking lot looked full, one particularly troubling sight was a single guy sitting in his car backed into a spot in the parking lot. Wonder what he was there for?
Inside say Mamasan. Usual $.6 for the 50 min session. Room C, on the walk in saw two new, to me, girls, and an old favorite Connie.
Mama puts me in the sauna for a few, Yoyo, one of the new girls comes into get me out. Yoyo about 5.5, 130, natural see cups probably 28 to 34, shoulder length hair. OK, not playmate material, but OK.
Nice table shower, but YoYo complains that I grope and try to get her wet.
Nice draped massage back in the room, but yoyo tells me $1.5 for full service, $1.2 for BJ. Inquiry about BBBJ rebuffed, Kisses rebuffed, digits propmpted her to hand me a glove, too small but she told me to just put in one finger.
BJ was more hand job than BJ.
After the BJ, it was a very thorough massage, including walking on my back from my shoulders to my knees. I walked out of there feeling very relaxed and loose, a very good body rub, with a not so good extra experience. Soo,
YoYo was, one thumb up, one down.
All in all, I wouldn't repeat.
Just my $.02.
Similar situation in Ma with racing
[QUOTE=Shamrock5]Here is a copy of the revised bill that is going to the House this week. I don't think they thought this through properly. RI has the 2nd highest unemployment rate in the nation. Passing this will make the girls and owners either leave the state or file for unemployment, not to mention the lose of the tax base when businesses close. All spas pay taxes, where are they planing on compensating for the lose in tax base, ad more taxes to the residents?
[url]http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText09/SenateText09/S0596a.pdf[/url][/QUOTE]
A similar (sort of) situation is happening in Ma with reference to dog racing that was 'outlawed' last year. it actually takes effect at the end of the year although one track has closed already. lawsuits have been filed by dog owners, workers and owners asking for reversal based on the premise that you are taking what was a legal business under the law and now and making it illegal. They are asking that it be voided since it is taking a 'business' away or if that doesn't work they are asking for huge payments from the state for taking their 'property'. Not sure of the legalese of it but in effect they want payment for their business and for future earnings.
Secondly there is a a huge brew ha over the fact that it will cost thousands of dollars in unemployment benefits (now extended) from state and federal coffers not to mention welfare and food stamp ect.
Again this isn't apples to apples but the premise is the same. They have outlawed legal businesses which should be entitled to compensation. And of course those who are able can and should file for benefits including unemployment and welfare. All we need are some lawyers who want to take a chance.