Massage Parlor Reports

[QUOTE=Snowmadics]I had a dream that I finally went and saw ninela for the best ever ukranianian massage yesterday. I followed the rules of previous postings.

(don't touch her. And let her do her thing.)

She was a nice lady. Not as old as suggested here.

Massage sucked. Very light touch and lots of teasing with HJ finish. She got really close to my member close to the finish. The sight of that in the mirror made me bust.

I might go back. Too costly.[/QUOTE]
Saw Ninela recently. She drapes herself all over you and lets the hand roam feely.

No touch, older and heavier than what I want, heavy make-up. A little pricey but she does know what she is doing.

Also, kinda chatty.

The door man couldn't care less, it he's like most doormen. He's getting pressure from management who is getting it from the other tenants/owners. Somebody wants the MP out of there. IMHO.

[QUOTE=Ringo64]You regulars will no doubt be familiar with the MP across from Millennium Park. There is an older--but okay looking therapist named Mei and a much younger Asian whose name I forget who answered phones. Mei was booked when I got there but the young when said she could massage me. She obviously is not trained. Just a light rubbing on the back with lots of oil. Seeing as we were getting no where fast I turned over and asked her to do my front. She rubbed my chest, but ignored my hard on that came out from under the towel accidently. She didn't volunteer so I came right out and asked her for the finish. She said no and I even offered more than I normally would. She seemed to be thinking it over but told me that she would get Mei--May to handle the finish. May came in and did the heavy lifting with a fair amount of glee. No talk of money--which I love. Just an HR, which is all I wanted. Nothing to write home about but got the job done. I would appreciate it if any of the regulars would let me know if they have had any sucess with the young one. She is a cutie.

The only bad thing about this case is the doorman. He was busy when I came in so I just wrote down a fake name and headed up. On the way out, he says to me that I am supposed to show ID before going up. Then he says you went to Mercy, didn't you? It's all on camera anyway. Obviously he knows what is up with this place and is trying to disuade people from visiting. I am wondering if any regulars have found a way to deal with this nuisance. This place is very convenient but I am not showing ID to anyone.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Paleface]Where is it?

Any more details?

PM if you want.[/QUOTE]

It's next to the Portage Theatre on Milwaukee Ave. Ella is there only 3 times a week. Never on Saturday and Sunday. May be shy the first visit.

It looks like City Massage Center is opening up a location on the south side of Cermak at Leavit & Cermak. I noticed the sign Tuesday morning on my drive in to work. I drove past going home around 9:30 pm that night and there was a crew inside painting, etc. I never went to the one on 31st St. I'll have to pay a social call after my next payday if they are open.

[QUOTE=Truthfu11]Saw Ninela recently. She drapes herself all over you and lets the hand roam feely.

No touch, older and heavier than what I want, heavy make-up. A little pricey but she does know what she is doing.

Also, kinda chatty.[/QUOTE]She is a bit of a nut job and run's really hot and cold. Her studio is pretty good and private, but I get a Sybil vibe from her! Never know who you are going to get and don't distract her by touching her. I'd rather spend my money somewhere else.

[QUOTE=Paleface]The door man couldn't care less, it he's like most doormen. He's getting pressure from management who is getting it from the other tenants / owners. Somebody wants the MP out of there. IMHO.[/QUOTE]Do you think they are filming people to press charges on them later?

[QUOTE=Donny Devito]Do you think they are filming people to press charges on them later?[/QUOTE]Press charges for what?

You going walking in to what is at worse getting a massage?

[QUOTE=Donny Devito]Do you think they are filming people to press charges on them later?[/QUOTE]Many places film entrances these days. There is nothing to charge you with for visiting the place. If a camera and mike is inside the room perhaps, but not worth the effort.

[quote=al melrose]many places film entrances these days. there is nothing to charge you with for visiting the place. if a camera and mike is inside the room perhaps, but not worth the effort.[/quote]


i believe that sometimes patrons get charged with visiting a common nuisance. but i think that is only during the initial bust of an establishment. you see more of this during drug raids and sometimes **** drinking parties being raided.

but of course that doesn't prevent anyone from filming you on their own and setting up a website. this has been done in the past in other communities but i believe the one i'm thinking of was filming johns picking up streetwalkers and following them to the site of "business." it was meant to scare johns into avoiding the neighborhood.

b

[QUOTE=Bkmsw]But of course that doesn't prevent anyone from filming you on their own and setting up a website. This has been done in the past in other communities but I believe the one I'm thinking of was filming johns picking up streetwalkers and following them to the site of "business." It was meant to scare johns into avoiding the neighborhood.

B[/QUOTE]I think filming LE is legal as long as you don't use audio, anyone know? (who is watching the Watchers?)

[QUOTE=And Again]What are the names of other places there and what floor? I don't want to deal with that crap. Last time I tried to go there, a while back, was the day they had trouble and I reported it here. I didn't get asked for ID then. But, I don't want to go unprepared.[/QUOTE]

Judith Ansteth Jewler 1201
American Hearing 814
Barney

On case people were wondering if the downturn was effecting the industry please follow the link below:

[url]http://www.suntimes.com/business/1490108,w-jobless-women-going-topless-032209.article[/url]

[QUOTE=Al Melrose]Many places film entrances these days. There is nothing to charge you with for visiting the place. If a camera and mike is inside the room perhaps, but not worth the effort.[/QUOTE]Normally the lighting is so low the camera would have to be pretty expensive to film any activity in the room. LE might be able to afford it and if that were the case you'd probably pick up on it by the way the girl treats and talks to you. In which case you're just here for a massage for your sore back) If they are doing it on their own, they would probably be using fairly cheap cameras with infrared illuminators. These cameras would get decent monochrome images in near-dark conditions. Luckily they are very easy to spot. While you're "getting ready" quickly scan the room with your camera phone. You'll see any IR light sources instantly. Try it on your TV remote. Aim the camera phone at the front end of the remote and press a button. You'll see the IR LED light up. Same with the IR camera light sources except they are brighter. (One more thing to do to avoid problems.)

[QUOTE=Khai Yai]I think filming LE is legal as long as you don't use audio, anyone know? (who is watching the Watchers? )[/QUOTE]I once researched this for a problem with a dumbass neighbor.

If you are filming and "happen" to get LE, that's legal because you can't control what's in the background or what gets in the way. However, you can't put it on-line or use it for commercial purposes. You'd need a pretty convincing cover story if you're going to try it.

Audio recording is different and requires permission of all parties.

It worked very well with the dumbass neighbor. We had a street light that kept getting broken and being the good citizen I am, I was trying to catch the culprit. The light happened to be between the camera and the neighbor so they just happened to be in the background. When the neighbor complained to their attorney he just told them tough shit, get over it. They even complained to the City Attorney and he told him the same thing but in nicer terms.

Lets not forget that VIP on Milwaukee was shut down for having cameras all over the place.

[quote]December 27, 2006

BY ANNIE SWEENEY Crime Reporter

Patrons of a Northwest Side massage parlor may have had their visits with prostitutes broadcast over the Internet, police said.

Based on statements from a woman who worked there and the sophistication of computer equipment seized from V.I.P. Salon & Day Spa, police believe sex acts might have been transmitted from small, curtained cubicles onto the Web, said Jefferson Park District Cmdr. Ralph Price.

Officers found tiny cameras mounted in the ceiling of several rooms at V.I.P.

"It's gone beyond just prostitution," Price said. "What you think may be private could be all over the place."

Investigators with the Vice Control Section said they had not heard of any similar computer set-up at other places of prostitution in the city.

"Really, this is kind of unchartered territory for us," said Lt. Paul Kusinski.

Price said the V.I.P. Salon at 4422 N. Milwaukee -- where customers have to be buzzed in -- has been a longtime problem for the neighborhood.

Chicago vice officers have raided the business seven or eight times over the past 18 months, and the city has filed complaints against the business, police said. The landlord of the business also filed a lawsuit in January 2006 seeking to evict the business owner, according to Cook County records.

The owner could not be reached for comment.

Charges stemming from the police raids were typically never more than misdemeanors. But now Chicago Police and the Cook County state's attorney's office are seeking more serious charges against the owner and manager for the alleged unlawful videotaping.

Price -- who has done premise checks himself on the business because of complaints -- said he hopes this latest raid will rid the neighborhood of V.I.P. for good.

"Finally, we can shut this guy down," Price said. "This could be the nail in the coffin."

Price's officers got their break on Dec. 20 when someone placed a 911 call to report that a woman at the business was screaming.

When officers arrived, a sergeant pulled back a curtain on two cubicles to find men having sex with women. But officers then spotted something else -- a pinhole camera in the ceiling.

"We followed all the wires," Price said. "They all went to a central computer."

Real money online: female suspect

One of the women arrested told police they charged the men for sex acts, but the real money was made from the share of profits from broadcasting on the Internet, Price said.

The officers obtained a search warrant, which was executed the next morning, Price said. The computer's hard drive was seized and will be analyzed, and police photographed all the cameras and the wires leading to the server.

The raid resulted in four people being charged, including a 20-year-old man for patronizing a place of prostitution, two women -- 39 and 20 -- for solicitation and a 51-year-old man for keeping a place of prostitution.

[email]asweeney@suntimes.com[/email][/quote]