One of the prettiest Kgirls. Kora
FYI.
One of the prettiest Kgirls is starting at AG.
Last time Kora visited DMV was long ago, I guess by now most of her slots were filled and booked.
[URL]https://asiangem.site/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=148[/URL]
[URL]https://www.kora-xoxo.com/gallery[/URL]
ATM Ina / Baby Cindy switch
Am I mistaken or did they just switch out the girls? I've seen Baby Cindy's pics before but I think they weaved in one of Ina's. Not sure what's going on since I wanted to visit Ina this weekend.
Ina left due to lack of biz
Looks like our scene is cooked unless our economy gets better. Or at least gov opens up?
[QUOTE=Konichi1;7427978]Am I mistaken or did they just switch out the girls? I've seen Baby Cindy's pics before but I think they weaved in one of Ina's. Not sure what's going on since I wanted to visit Ina this weekend.[/QUOTE]
ATM was threatening to share PII?
US sex guide / DMV board #9945.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33082-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7432211&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7432211.
ATM - [URL]https://www.asiantopmodel.com/[/URL].
In reference to the disturbing account detailed in post #9945, the agency's conduct—specifically the threat to disclose a new client's personally identifiable information—is profoundly unacceptable and frankly alarming. Even if we acknowledge that the client bears partial responsibility for the scheduling mishap, including his failure to promptly reconfirm the appointment he initially intended to keep, such miscommunication does not justify an agency's attempt to weaponize confidential data. The adult-services industry is already fraught with inherent safety and privacy concerns, and agencies routinely emphasize discretion as a foundational component of their operations. For any agency to pivot from that standard and allegedly threaten to expose a client's PII over a relatively minor and common scheduling error is not merely unprofessional—it is unethical, retaliatory, and corrosive to the trust that holds the entire business model together.
If the client's account is accurate, the agency's response reveals a deeply troubling disregard for basic privacy obligations. The difference between blacklisting a client and actively threatening to disclose his private information is enormous. Blacklisting, while disappointing for the client, is at least within the realm of industry norms. But leveraging personal data as a form of intimidation is something else entirely. It signals that this agency is willing to escalate a simple administrative issue into a form of coercion, which should alarm both clients and providers. Even individuals who may believe the client handled his part imperfectly should be able to recognize the disproportionate nature of the agency's reaction. A business that is entrusted with sensitive information must demonstrate maturity, fairness, and professionalism when conflicts or misunderstandings arise—not resort to punitive threats that could expose someone to real-life harm.
If the claims in post #9945 hold true, then this agency has crossed a boundary that no reputable operation should ever approach. It is a breach of trust, of ethics, and of the most basic standards of client confidentiality. And frankly, it is behavior that should prompt serious reconsideration from anyone contemplating doing business with them.
AG Lexi a 9/9 Petite Firecracker
[URL]https://asiangem.site/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=218[/URL]
Walked in and my jaw hit the floor. Lexi's blonde waves framed a doll-perfect face—big eyes, pouty lips, skin like silk. That toned 110-lb frame is insane: tiny waist, perky D's that bounce just right, legs for days. She's the full package in a pocket-sized body.
Zero warm-up needed. She flashed a naughty grin, dropped to her knees, and delivered a BBBJ for the ages—wet, deep, perfect angles, zero teeth. Hands roaming my thighs while she hummed. I almost popped early.
On the bed she grinds like she's dancing for tips, hips rolling slow then fast, eyes locked on mine. Flip her over and take the wheel? Game on. She's insanely tight, moans real, begs for harder. I pounded missionary, doggy, spoon—every thrust met with a gasp and a smile. Zero faking; the girl loves it.
This is her first DMV visit and the new-girl energy was electric. 100 % GFE, zero rush, showered me with kisses on the way out.
Verdict: Prettiest face + tightest body + top-tier skills = instant ATF.
Do you not think customer has the right to publicly criticize a booker?
If I go to a business and the receptionist berates me, do I not have the right to go on yelp and write about it?
Pretty sure that's a basic customer right. And while this biz is illegal, that does not give booker license to be an asshole to customers.
Move on as in shut up and not tell anyone? Isn't this what forums like these are for? To publicly tell others about biz?
Why wouldn't you want as many customers as possible to know about the mistreatment?
[QUOTE=Azf06;7434886]Only a couple people seem to have noticed, but it was OP who broke the trust first and threatened to post the whole conversation public. And it was after that, that the agency supposedly made a threat. It wasn't over the minor scheduling issue. Agency was supposedly berating him over that but no threats.
Both parties are wrong. OP should have just blocked and moved on if he thought he was mistreated. Agency should have blocked and moved on once OP made his threat.
Some of why'all are wild af tho. LOL.[/QUOTE]