So now we have 2 craigslist killers, a male and a female.
Printable View
So now we have 2 craigslist killers, a male and a female.
I've NEVER met one that isn't about the money and the lies.
If they are a few dollars short, they will blow the first dude. Cracks me up when they say, I'm quitting soon.
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because it was a completely pointless report regarding an individual who was [u]arrested[/u] for engaging in commercial sex activities.
The "report" was completely un-newsworthy, and was apparently posted with the sole intention of embarrassing and humiliating this individual.
I want to say this carefully so no one gets the wrong idea here, but if you think about it, posting the names of people who have been arrested is [u]somewhat heartless[/u] and really just helping the police in their efforts to embarrass these people.
Since this website is all about assisting people in obtaining commercial sex services, we don't want to add to the problems of the unfortunate people who have been arrested by publishing their names and/or photographs.
[i]Thanks![/i][/blue]
On the take, but even highly esteemed judges. This was out west, but you can bet it happens here:
[url]http://news.yahoo.com/nm-judge-arrested-rape-agrees-retire-202707817.html[/url]
Looks like his favorite ladies got special probation deals. Community service for servicing the lardazz judge. Stay safe!
Not real sure why such a big deal was made on this post. I personally do not like to go out to LEO sites to look up SW's that have been arrested so I post a new site that is NOT LEO and it gets deleted by admin? Maybe I miss understood this site as quoted below it says "Since this website is all about assisting people in obtaining commercial sex services, we don't want to add to the problems of the unfortunate people who have been arrested by publishing their names and / or photographs" I thought this site was about keeping us safe as well? Is it me or has no one else ever posted people arrested? I didn't even post arrested individuals I posted a site to view that is not LEO.
[QUOTE=Milfman; 1243790][b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because it was a completely pointless report regarding an individual who was [u]arrested[/u] For engaging in commercial sex activities.
The "report" was completely un-newsworthy, and was apparently posted with the sole intention of embarrassing and humiliating this individual.
I want to say this carefully so no one gets the wrong idea here, but if you think about it, posting the names of people who have been arrested is [u]somewhat heartless[/u] And really just helping the police in their efforts to embarrass these people.
Since this website is all about assisting people in obtaining commercial sex services, we don't want to add to the problems of the unfortunate people who have been arrested by publishing their names and / or photographs.
[i]Thanks! [/i][/blue][/QUOTE]
How is this post ok since it speaks of a person arrested for sexual behavior when my post was just censored by Admin. WTF.
[QUOTE=Peter Rammer; 1244727]On the take, but even highly esteemed judges. This was out west, but you can bet it happens here:
[url]http://news.yahoo.com/nm-judge-arrested-rape-agrees-retire-202707817.html[/url]
Looks like his favorite ladies got special probation deals. Community service for servicing the lardazz judge. Stay safe![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Knight Cock; 1230140]If you can only text,
[url]http://www.textforfree.net[/url]
Works well. We offer anonymous text messaging, which means that your friends will never know who sent them.[/QUOTE]You can also get a free phone number from Google voice that you can use for text messages. There is a free app for most phones that allows you to place calls with it and the GV shows on called ID.
[QUOTE=HoConsultant;1242575]So now we have 2 craigslist killers, a male and a female.[/QUOTE]Other killers out there on the stroll as well. This one killed her father. Alcohol, pills and sex were all involved in the drama. Alleged abuse as well. She won't walk anytime soon. But has in the past on GTB.
[url]http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=l8JaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=I1kDAAAAIBAJ&dq=luter&pg=3238[/url]%2C3126868
[QUOTE=Milfman;1245063]Not real sure why such a big deal was made on this post. I personally do not like to go out to LEO sites to look up SW's that have been arrested so I post a new site that is NOT LEO and it gets deleted by admin? Maybe I miss understood this site as quoted below it says "Since this website is all about assisting people in obtaining commercial sex services, we don't want to add to the problems of the unfortunate people who have been arrested by publishing their names and / or photographs" I thought this site was about keeping us safe as well? Is it me or has no one else ever posted people arrested? I didn't even post arrested individuals I posted a site to view that is not LEO.[/QUOTE]I'll have to admit I don't understand it either because I don't know exactly what was posted that got deleted.
I have no idea what you said that caused the post to be deleted, so how do I know what not to post myself?
Just wondering.
[QUOTE=Peter Rammer; 1245830]Other killers out there on the stroll as well. This one killed her father. Alcohol, pills and sex were all involved in the drama. Alleged abuse as well. She won't walk anytime soon. But has in the past on GTB.
[url]http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=l8JaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=I1kDAAAAIBAJ&dq=luter&pg=3238[/url]
%2C3126868[/QUOTE]Doesn't want to work properly? It's from The Evening Independent newspaper on page 11. Way back on June. 29, 1983. The person mentioned sometimes walks on GTB in Clearwater. In the story she murdered her dad. Don't know how comfortable I'd feel being her date.
Happened to notice this today. Just wish we had the same level of customer service here:
[url]http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2011/08/01/2011-08-01_dunkin_donuts_employee_busted_for_prostitution_sold_sex_to_customers_cops_say.html[/url]
I'd like a little extra sugar myself! This should be the new culture of all businesses.
I saw this one too. You know why she got busted? Because she couldn't imagine that a detective would create a full blown sting operation, waste six weeks of his time and involve at least two other officers for a misdemeanor bust of ONE person who was probably RORd later the same night. Stupid cops. If I lived in that town, I'd be writing the mayor and the cheif of police a letter about proper use of funds and police time. How much did THIS cost?
The lesson for all of us in this is to never think "Oh, they're not watching me. They have better things to do." Apparently, they don't.
[QUOTE=Peter Rammer; 1249166]Happened to notice this today. Just wish we had the same level of customer service here:
[url]http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2011/08/01/2011-08-01_dunkin_donuts_employee_busted_for_prostitution_sold_sex_to_customers_cops_say.html[/url]
I'd like a little extra sugar myself! This should be the new culture of all businesses.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Member #1658; 1249308]I saw this one too. You know why she got busted? Because she couldn't imagine that a detective would create a full blown sting operation, waste six weeks of his time and involve at least two other officers for a misdemeanor bust of ONE person who was probably RORd later the same night. Stupid cops. If I lived in that town, I'd be writing the mayor and the cheif of police a letter about proper use of funds and police time. How much did THIS cost?
The lesson for all of us in this is to never think "Oh, they're not watching me. They have better things to do." Apparently, they don't.[/QUOTE]They get a thrill from doing shit like that. It's fun for them, and a lot safer than going after real criminals.
[QUOTE=Lolligagger;1249328]They get a thrill from doing shit like that. It's fun for them, and a lot safer than going after real criminals.[/QUOTE]How many free donuts and lattes did they likely receive? They probab ly gained a good 20 or 30 lbs each. They'll be too slow to catch real criminals.
If you need a cop in Clearwater. Don't call 911. Go to Dunkin Donuts on Missouri Ave. Or Circle K Shell on GTB at Highland. Or Campogna's on GTB.
Chief Tony Hollowhead wants horse patrols. Nasty sex in parks has gotten his goat. Due to the parks' rugged terrain. Only horses can properly patrol. Even the Gateway tricyclists can't do the job. I, for one, feel much safer. For years I've avoided all parks. Afraid I'd see some unnatural act I might like! And let's not worry about all the unsolved violent crimes. Just forget they occurred. The 13 unsolved homicides are a figment of our imagination. Rapes, robberies and violent assaults. We don't need to solve them. Here's the story right from the horses mouth:
[url]http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/clearwaters-police-chief-seeks-horse-patrol-to-deter-sexual-encounters-in/1184133[/url]
Maybe they could put red light cameras on the trees. Catch all the humping on tape. What would Lt. Jim Dangle of Reno 911 do?
Remind me not to go to that park. If you read between the lines, it sounds like dudes are blowing each other back there, which is not anything I want to watch personally. How many chicks do you think are going to that park alone for "casual encounters". None, I suspect.
[QUOTE=Peter Rammer; 1249992]Chief Tony Hollowhead wants horse patrols. Nasty sex in parks has gotten his goat. Due to the parks' rugged terrain. Only horses can properly patrol. Even the Gateway tricyclists can't do the job. I, for one, feel much safer. For years I've avoided all parks. Afraid I'd see some unnatural act I might like! And let's not worry about all the unsolved violent crimes. Just forget they occurred. The 13 unsolved homicides are a figment of our imagination. Rapes, robberies and violent assaults. We don't need to solve them. Here's the story right from the horses mouth:
[url]http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/clearwaters-police-chief-seeks-horse-patrol-to-deter-sexual-encounters-in/1184133[/url]
Maybe they could put red light cameras on the trees. Catch all the humping on tape. What would Lt. Jim Dangle of Reno 911 do?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Member #1658;1250427]Remind me not to go to that park. If you read between the lines, it sounds like dudes are blowing each other back there, which is not anything I want to watch personally. How many chicks do you think are going to that park alone for "casual encounters". None, I suspect.[/QUOTE]I have always stayed clear of parks, there notorious for attracting gays.
[QUOTE=Lolligagger;1250460]I have always stayed clear of parks, there notorious for attracting gays.[/QUOTE]Po po from Clearwater linger there? I bet that with about 270 po po on the force. There are at least a few with happy pants? Hope none have serious horse fetishes. On the brighter side. Maybe this will remove some of the heat from Gateway area.
Over the past week late at night. A few different ladies were seen on GTB. Mostly just west of Highland Ave. Former Economy area was dead. East of Highland very few. From Budget Inn to Regal Motel is.
Where they cluster.
NFH has had a few as well from Eldridge north to 3 motel area.
Clr-Largo Road mostly dead. Saw Violet and a few other oldies.
[QUOTE=Peter Rammer; 1250709]Po po from Clearwater linger there? I bet that with about 270 po po on the force. There are at least a few with happy pants? Hope none have serious horse fetishes. On the brighter side. Maybe this will remove some of the heat from Gateway area.
Over the past week late at night. A few different ladies were seen on GTB. Mostly just west of Highland Ave. Former Economy area was dead. East of Highland very few. From Budget Inn to Regal Motel is.
Where they cluster.
NFH has had a few as well from Eldridge north to 3 motel area.
Clr-Largo Road mostly dead. Saw Violet and a few other oldies.[/QUOTE]Hey PR, have you actually seen anything worth scooping in clearwater. I gave up on the place, never saw anything that looked good walking. In a previous post you mentioned you may have seen Lindsay, if that is the same one I'm thinking of, Sto**
she used to be a lot of fun.
[QUOTE=Lolligagger; 1250807]Hey PR, have you actually seen anything worth scooping in clearwater. I gave up on the place, never saw anything that looked good walking. In a previous post you mentioned you may have seen Lindsay, if that is the same one I'm thinking of, Sto*
She used to be a lot of fun.[/QUOTE]That Lindsay, but I'm not positive. I had another provider with me so I coudn't scoop. It was about 2am Sunday morning.
Most of the recent sightings here have been poor quality.
[blue]Gentlemen,
The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between Men on the subject of finding Women for Sex.
Let's get back to the subject.
Thank You,
Jackson[/blue]
Now what's the does the VOP prostitution and the FTV prostitution stand for? Is that the same as the normal prostitution charge? And also I've seen a few charged with the 796. 08 then on more recent arrests get charged with 796. 07. What's up with that? And lastly If someone ever did have HIV and you used a condom, Do you get it guaranteed?
[QUOTE=Lgetit22;1271899]Now what's the does the VOP prostitution and the FTV prostitution stand for? Is that the same as the normal prostitution charge? And also I've seen a few charged with the 796. 08 then on more recent arrests get charged with 796. 07. What's up with that? And lastly If someone ever did have HIV and you used a condom, Do you get it guaranteed?[/QUOTE]VOP= violation of parole. Are you sure it is not FTA not FTV because FTA= failure to appear (missed court date). The numbers I don't have a clue
JJ
Why don't you go to google. Com and enter Florida 796. 07 and then Florida 796. 08 and read the results?
[QUOTE=Lgetit22;1271899]Now what's the does the VOP prostitution and the FTV prostitution stand for? Is that the same as the normal prostitution charge? And also I've seen a few charged with the 796. 08 then on more recent arrests get charged with 796. 07. What's up with that? And lastly If someone ever did have HIV and you used a condom, Do you get it guaranteed?[/QUOTE]
796. 08 Screening for HIV and sexually transmissible diseases; providing penalties.
Sounds like people charged under this staute have tested HIV positive.
[QUOTE=Hard Working 19;1272430]Why don't you go to google. Com and enter Florida 796. 07 and then Florida 796. 08 and read the results?[/QUOTE]
The purpose of being charged with VOP prostitution is so that the charge can be upgraded from a misdemeanor to a felony. Prostitution by itself is a misdemeanor for your first or second arrest. If you are out on parole for ANYTHING and you get caught committing another misdemeanor your arrest is upgraded to a felony and you could seriously be looking at jail time. FTA prostitution means you can't post bail at all until you see a judge and explain why you didn`t show up for a previous court appearence. It is then up to the judge to determine if you will be allowed to post bail.
I believe VPO = Violation of Probation not Violation of Parole.
Possibly FTV stands for First Time Violation
And anyone who listens to this kind of nonsense deserves whatever happens to them.
[QUOTE=SpeedRacer29;1272551]The purpose of being charged with VOP prostitution is so that the charge can be upgraded from a misdemeanor to a felony. Prostitution by itself is a misdemeanor for your first or second arrest. If you are out on parole for ANYTHING and you get caught committing another misdemeanor your arrest is upgraded to a felony and you could seriously be looking at jail time.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Hard Working 19;1273066]And anyone who listens to this kind of nonsense deserves whatever happens to them.[/QUOTE]Hey Hard Working. Show me where I`m wrong and I will publicly apologize to you. I just love it when someone tells you that you are wrong but can't or won't explain how you are wrong. That`s the same as saying "I don`t know what the answer is but that`s not it". Violation of parole or probation is just that. A violation and there is a price to pay for it. Ask anyone who has ever been on probation and they will tell you that the judge told them that " any negative contact with law enforcement while on probation is a violation which can send you to jail".
You are truly a dumbass. You clearly stated that the purpose of charging someone with a VOP is to upgrade the charge from a misdemeanor to a felony. A person is on parole or probation after having pled guilty or no contest to a charge. That charge can't be 'upgraded'. It has already been adjudicated. The purpose for charging someone with a violation of probation or parole is because they didn't comply with the terms of their release. If they are found to have violated probation the sentencing judge has the option of sentencing that person to a term of imprisonment consistant with the original charge. Don't bother to apologise. Just go back to your corner and put that pointed hat back on.
[QUOTE=SpeedRacer29;1273135]Hey Hard Working. Show me where I`m wrong and I will publicly apologize to you. I just love it when someone tells you that you are wrong but can't or won't explain how you are wrong. That`s the same as saying "I don`t know what the answer is but that`s not it". Violation of parole or probation is just that. A violation and there is a price to pay for it. Ask anyone who has ever been on probation and they will tell you that the judge told them that " any negative contact with law enforcement while on probation is a violation which can send you to jail".[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Hard Working 19;1273265]You are truly a dumbass. You clearly stated that the purpose of charging someone with a VOP is to upgrade the charge from a misdemeanor to a felony. A person is on parole or probation after having pled guilty or no contest to a charge. That charge can't be 'upgraded'. It has already been adjudicated. The purpose for charging someone with a violation of probation or parole is because they didn't comply with the terms of their release. If they are found to have violated probation the sentencing judge has the option of sentencing that person to a term of imprisonment consistant with the original charge. Don't bother to apologise. Just go back to your corner and put that pointed hat back on.[/QUOTE]First of all, before you call someone a dumbass, learn how to spell apologize. Second, being the dumbass that YOU are, you misunderstood what I said. I never said if someone violated their probation that the ORIGINAL charge could be upgraded from a misdemeanor to a felony. What I said was, if someone committed a misdemeanor while on probation, that misdemeanor could be upgraded to a felony. Seeing as how nobody else saw fit to "correct me", they all understood what I said. YOU are the only person who is lacking in reading comprehension skills.
[QUOTE=SpeedRacer29;1273424]learn how to spell apologize.[/QUOTE]Actually either spelling is acceptable, although using an s instead of z is more the British form.
[url]http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/apologise[/url]
[QUOTE=Longhairngotee; 1273633]Actually either spelling is acceptable, although using an s instead of z is more the British form.
[url]http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/apologise[/url][/QUOTE]Thanks Longhair. At least you didn`t come out of the gate swinging and verbally attack me.
[QUOTE=Hard Working 19;1273265]You are truly a dumbass. You clearly stated that the purpose of charging someone with a VOP is to upgrade the charge from a misdemeanor to a felony. A person is on parole or probation after having pled guilty or no contest to a charge. That charge can't be 'upgraded'. It has already been adjudicated. The purpose for charging someone with a violation of probation or parole is because they didn't comply with the terms of their release. If they are found to have violated probation the sentencing judge has the option of sentencing that person to a term of imprisonment consistant with the original charge. Don't bother to apologise. Just go back to your corner and put that pointed hat back on.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=SpeedRacer29;1273424]First of all, before you call someone a dumbass, learn how to spell apologize. Second, being the dumbass that YOU are, you misunderstood what I said. I never said if someone violated their probation that the ORIGINAL charge could be upgraded from a misdemeanor to a felony. What I said was, if someone committed a misdemeanor while on probation, that misdemeanor could be upgraded to a felony. Seeing as how nobody else saw fit to "correct me", they all understood what I said. YOU are the only person who is lacking in reading comprehension skills.[/QUOTE]No attacks are needed!
You are still nuttier than a fruitcake. A misdemeanor is a misdemeanor and a felony is a felony. If someone is under parole or probation supervision and trespasses, it is a misdemeanor. If they trespass with a firearm or other dangerous weapon it is a felony. They are seperate and distinct charges. The purpose with charging someone with a violation of probation or parole is to bring them back to face the judge or DOC to determine first if it is a violation of the terms of release and second if further punishment on the original charge is warranted. The new charge is an entirely seperate matter. And don't tell me when and when not to call you a dumbass.
[QUOTE=SpeedRacer29;1273424]First of all, before you call someone a dumbass, learn how to spell apologize. Second, being the dumbass that YOU are, you misunderstood what I said. I never said if someone violated their probation that the ORIGINAL charge could be upgraded from a misdemeanor to a felony. What I said was, if someone committed a misdemeanor while on probation, that misdemeanor could be upgraded to a felony. Seeing as how nobody else saw fit to "correct me", they all understood what I said. YOU are the only person who is lacking in reading comprehension skills.[/QUOTE]
I'm sorry for asking a question on here. I didn't know a troll was going to pop out LOL. My advice speedracer is not to respond. They go away pretty fast with no material to work with.
Happy day.
[QUOTE=Hard Working 19;1273808]You are still nuttier than a fruitcake. A misdemeanor is a misdemeanor and a felony is a felony. If someone is under parole or probation supervision and trespasses, it is a misdemeanor. If they trespass with a firearm or other dangerous weapon it is a felony. They are seperate and distinct charges. The purpose with charging someone with a violation of probation or parole is to bring them back to face the judge or DOC to determine first if it is a violation of the terms of release and second if further punishment on the original charge is warranted. The new charge is an entirely seperate matter. And don't tell me when and when not to call you a dumbass.[/QUOTE]OK Einstein. You need serious help. Since when does the DOC in ANY state have any say in determining whether someone is innocent or guilty? Let me explain to you how our legal system works.
1- The police arrest people when there is evidence someone committed a crime.
2-The defendant hires a lawyer or uses a public defender to represent them in court.
3-If the lawyer is not able to get the charges dropped, the next step is a trial.
4-The defendant makes a decision as to whether they want to be judged by a judge or jury.
5-If found guilty, it is up to the JUDGE to determine what the sentence will be.
6-If sent to jail, it is up to the DOC to house, feed, and keep the convicted person behind bars until either the sentence has been served,
Or a JUDGE makes a decision to release the defendant earlier.
7-AT NO TIME does the DOC have any say in whether a person is guilty or innocent, or if they violated their probation.
I have seen many women arrested for prostitution which was charged as a felony, because there was an additional charge of violation of parole. But don`t take my word for it Mr Know It All, all you have to do is scan the arrests reports and eventually you will see it.
-
7-
[QUOTE=Bushluver; 1272741]I believe VPO = Violation of Probation not Violation of Parole.
Possibly FTV stands for First Time Violation[/QUOTE]You are correct. My Bad VOP is Violation of probation.
JJ
This topic has gotten a few folks kinda worked up to say the least!
Anyway for what its worth, if someone violates their probation on a prostitution charge-just by not complying with the terms of the probation-for example she misses her probation appointments-she is not charged with a felony. This is considered a violation of probation and the judge can impose penalties at his discretion that are allowable for that original charge. It is not a felony to violate probation on a misdemeanor prostitution charge.
However, if a streetwalker is arrested on a NEW prostitution charge which may also violate an existing probabtion she had from a previous charge, if that new charge was her third arrest under the statute, it would be a felony arrest. I hope this make sense, I haven't had my coffee this morning yet.
Hopefully everyone has a good weekend and finds some good bearded clam!
Best of luck and be safe.
[QUOTE=SteelThunder; 1274199]This topic has gotten a few folks kinda worked up to say the least!
Anyway for what its worth, if someone violates their probation on a prostitution charge-just by not complying with the terms of the probation-for example she misses her probation appointments-she is not charged with a felony. This is considered a violation of probation and the judge can impose penalties at his discretion that are allowable for that original charge. It is not a felony to violate probation on a misdemeanor prostitution charge.
However, if a streetwalker is arrested on a NEW prostitution charge which may also violate an existing probabtion she had from a previous charge, if that new charge was her third arrest under the statute, it would be a felony arrest. I hope this make sense, I haven't had my coffee this morning yet.
Hopefully everyone has a good weekend and finds some good bearded clam!
Best of luck and be safe.[/QUOTE]I know a SW that I have been seeing for over 2 years now. She had a clean record. 1st arrest for prostitution was a misdemeanor. 2nd arrest was also a misdemeanor. She fulfilled her obligations related to her arrests. Her 3rd arrest was a felony. She had no other open cases against her for anything. When you are released on probation or parole, it is made very clear to you that you are to have NO negative contact with LE. Also, the bail for 1st arrest is $250, 2nd arrest is $500. 3rd arrest you MUST see a judge before you can bail out. As I said, this is not my opinion but it is coming straight from a SW. Now, what I have also noticed is that you have an arrest record for a misdemeanor only, if you keep your ass clean for a blank amout of time, a 2nd arrest for a misdemeanor for the same offense will be treated as a first offense, which would mean lower bail.