KAngels Discussion

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5592060]I don't know. I believe she is a ladyboy based on intel that I trust. The local Thai trans SWs know who each other are and aren't afraid of outing each other if you get them talking.[/QUOTE]And there are plenty of people who aren't afraid of shit-talking and back-stabbing for fun and profit if you get them talking.

I understand that the mods on this hell-site delete threads about STDs and accusations thereof and I'm not sure why they don't do the same with these poorly sourced "I heard she's a ladyboy" accusations as well.

[QUOTE=BoboThe55;5589995]Her reply was OMG I am not a lady boy!

How do you know she is a lady boy?[/QUOTE]She could be the case of 'I am a woman trapped in a man's body. '.

[QUOTE=KorbenDallas;5592301]And there are plenty of people who aren't afraid of shit-talking and back-stabbing for fun and profit if you get them talking.

I understand that the mods on this hell-site delete threads about STDs and accusations thereof and I'm not sure why they don't do the same with these poorly sourced "I heard she's a ladyboy" accusations as well.[/QUOTE]By the chance, why the hell are you guys discussing about a possible ladybody Thai model on Kangels Thread?

[QUOTE=BobSizemore53;5578933]Are you including the cost of travel? When all is said and done I'm probably out a whole day and haven't saved any money.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=WongHing;5577711]Go to Vancouver for better rates, and younger and prettier girls than Seattle.[/QUOTE]Agency I use in Vancouver is [URL]Korean604.com[/URL]. Chinese owned, but girls are great and a mix with Korean, mainland Chinese, HKer, and Tawainese. $260/ hr CAD = 210/ hr USD. That's right. $210/ hr USD. Can't even get that in LA.

Canada, in general, has a lot of great providers with great service for way cheaper prices than the US, especially the GPS nonsense I've come to find here in Seattle. I found in general that a lot of other countries, even the UK, have a lot of great escorts for way cheaper prices than the US. Even top-tier European porn stars will go for about $600-$800/ hr USD while top-tier porn stars here go from $1200-$2500.

[QUOTE=JasonShinamoto;5592320]By the chance, why the hell are you guys discussing about a possible ladybody Thai model on Kangels Thread?[/QUOTE]Because this thread has evolved since its inception to discuss any all non-AMP Asians.

Curious to know if anyone has seen Chloe at Kangels? I've seen Chloe at Lolipop girls and she does look similar to her photos (although not exactly the same girl. When is it ever).

[QUOTE=BackInSea;5592707]Agency I use in Vancouver is [URL]Korean604.com[/URL]. Chinese owned, but girls are great and a mix with Korean, mainland Chinese, HKer, and Tawainese. $260/ hr CAD = 210/ hr USD. That's right. $210/ hr USD. Can't even get that in LA.

Canada, in general, has a lot of great providers with great service for way cheaper prices than the US, especially the GPS nonsense I've come to find here in Seattle. I found in general that a lot of other countries, even the UK, have a lot of great escorts for way cheaper prices than the US. Even top-tier European porn stars will go for about $600-$800/ hr USD while top-tier porn stars here go from $1200-$2500.[/QUOTE]Nice link. How's the vetting process for clients?

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5593568]Because this thread has evolved since its inception to discuss any all non-AMP Asians.[/QUOTE]I don't think there was that evolution, most of the writers & readers are simply K-girl lovers.

I saw Chloe from Kangel today. She is not the same person as the other Chloe from Lolipop. Just a coincidence.

She says it's her in the pics but photoshopped. She pointed out that she was wearing the same bracelet as in the photo. She does look young I'd guess 26-28. Average build.

She is aware of this thread and asked to keep certain things private but nothing you can't find out from the booker.

I don't think she's into DFK but overall a good experience. I would see her again.

[QUOTE=Moose21;5593961]Nice link. How's the vetting process for clients?[/QUOTE]I'm not 100% sure at this point. I've used them for almost 5 years and back then vetting was very different. I used references from some Indy Kgirls and agencies back in the day.

I wouldn't be surprised if they ask for I'd though considering how most Kgirl agencies now operate that way today. All the kgirls agencies in DMV area and GFE AMPs in NYC ask for I'd. Pretty common nowadays it seems like.

I forgot to mention. Her TER page is: [URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/chloe-7703094201-363767[/URL].

[QUOTE=JasonShinamoto;5594058]I don't think there was that evolution, most of the writers & readers are simply K-girl lovers.[/QUOTE]The answer to your original question is January 2021.

With the unreliability of pictures and names at these agencies I can't guarantee that the Lani I saw was the same girl you've seen or will see. I've seen quite a few nice KAngels girls, and this session was one of the best. Lani's body is excellent, nice bubble butt, slender curves, and lovely natural breasts that hold their shape nicely and feel great, and she seems to love having them groped! I'd describe her face as cute and pretty enough, but not her best feature. Age: maybe late 20's. She's a great kisser, sexy smiles, and that positive attitude really sets the mood for me. Solid, un-rushed and deep BBBJ and 69. The only negative was that she doesn't like hands in her hair or guiding her head. OK with deep fingering, which many Asian girls, and many providers in general, are not. But I found her swollen cervix not far from the surface, so she's not too deep. If you're a really big guy, that might give you (or her) some difficulty. I did find a position for satisfying depth, and I must say that initial bareback penetration is just exquisite! Her English is good and she can talk dirty as well: "I am yours!" Standard pricing: 350 (+100 BBFS). I will repeat, when I can!

[QUOTE=DukeOfExeter;5595140]With the unreliability of pictures and names at these agencies I can't guarantee that the Lani I saw was the same girl you've seen or will see. I've seen quite a few nice KAngels girls, and this session was one of the best. Lani's body is excellent, nice bubble butt, slender curves, and lovely natural breasts that hold their shape nicely and feel great, and she seems to love having them groped! I'd describe her face as cute and pretty enough, but not her best feature. Age: maybe late 20's. She's a great kisser, sexy smiles, and that positive attitude really sets the mood for me. Solid, un-rushed and deep BBBJ and 69. The only negative was that she doesn't like hands in her hair or guiding her head. OK with deep fingering, which many Asian girls, and many providers in general, are not. But I found her swollen cervix not far from the surface, so she's not too deep. If you're a really big guy, that might give you (or her) some difficulty. I did find a position for satisfying depth, and I must say that initial bareback penetration is just exquisite! Her English is good and she can talk dirty as well: "I am yours!" Standard pricing: 350 (+100 BBFS). I will repeat, when I can![/QUOTE]As was previously mentioned and reconfirmed by the booker: Ivy = Lani.

[QUOTE=AlwaysSunny007;5594280]I saw Chloe from Kangel today. She is not the same person as the other Chloe from Lolipop. Just a coincidence.

She says it's her in the pics but photoshopped. She pointed out that she was wearing the same bracelet as in the photo. She does look young I'd guess 26-28. Average build.

She is aware of this thread and asked to keep certain things private but nothing you can't find out from the booker.

I don't think she's into DFK but overall a good experience. I would see her again.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the info! Know if Chloe at Kangels has BBFS available?

[QUOTE=Twister100;5595206]As was previously mentioned and reconfirmed by the booker: Ivy = Lani.[/QUOTE]Yes, I saw that. I saw a KAngel named Ivy just over a year ago. Different girl and lackluster experience.

[QUOTE=BackInSea;5594286]I'm not 100% sure at this point. I've used them for almost 5 years and back then vetting was very different. I used references from some Indy Kgirls and agencies back in the day.

I wouldn't be surprised if they ask for I'd though considering how most Kgirl agencies now operate that way today. All the kgirls agencies in DMV area and GFE AMPs in NYC ask for I'd. Pretty common nowadays it seems like.[/QUOTE]Thanks for your reply.

[QUOTE=Shaid345;5595286]Thanks for the info! Know if Chloe at Kangels has BBFS available?[/QUOTE]We need a brand new blog for 'CFS Only K-Girls Discussion'.

[URL]https://kbeauty.blog/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Nogardeulb;5596137][URL]https://kbeauty.blog/[/URL][/QUOTE]If anyone can figure out their screening process. Would be great! Hoping another k agency can vouch.

Found this useful website, maintains a directory for the k agencies for major cities.

[URL]https://seattlekoreangirls.com/[/URL]

[QUOTE=JasonShinamoto;5595900]We need a brand new blog for 'CFS Only K-Girls Discussion'.[/QUOTE]The ads for the girls say PSE if BBFS option is available with upcharge. So far, I have found that to be a extremely reliable indication of service offered without exception.

Anyone seen Chloe recently? I am hesitant to pull the trigger since there aren't as many reviews about her as others.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]

[QUOTE=CoolStud;5597001]The ads for the girls say PSE if BBFS option is available with upcharge. So far, I have found that to be a extremely reliable indication of service offered without exception.[/QUOTE]Actually, I was talking about the forum thread; we may need a separate discussion user blog for the most of us who prefer CFS only K-girls. It seems a brand new K-girl agencies are coming, and they are CFS only.

[QUOTE=Nobi22;5597266]Anyone seen Chloe recently? I am hesitant to pull the trigger since there aren't as many reviews about her as others.[/QUOTE]I saw her last week. Few notes:

She is super short (if I were to guess, probably 5 foot 1). She will greet you in heels. Very nice lady. Unfortunately her English is little to non existent. She will probably need to communicate w / you via an app. Honestly, it was an average experience. I would definitely repeat Chloe over Bani though. Chloe is a lot nicer than Bani. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to finish with her on top (She will probably ask you to take charge which I am okay with). I had to finish in doggy. In terms of ranking recent Lolipop / Gsl ladies, I would definitely say.

Adison Juicy (older side but she was actually super sweet / pays attention to detail. Hope she comes back) Chloe Ruby (saw her when she only did CFS few months ago back in June) Bani.

Only person who really had to force me to slow down was Adison (or else I would have popped too early). Maybe I just had good chemistry with her.

[QUOTE=Ultimate90;5597491]I saw her last week. Few notes:

She is super short (if I were to guess, probably 5 foot 1). She will greet you in heels. Very nice lady. Unfortunately her English is little to non existent. She will probably need to communicate w / you via an app. Honestly, it was an average experience. I would definitely repeat Chloe over Bani though. Chloe is a lot nicer than Bani. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to finish with her on top (She will probably ask you to take charge which I am okay with). I had to finish in doggy. In terms of ranking recent Lolipop / Gsl ladies, I would definitely say.

Adison Juicy (older side but she was actually super sweet / pays attention to detail. Hope she comes back) Chloe Ruby (saw her when she only did CFS few months ago back in June) Bani.

Only person who really had to force me to slow down was Adison (or else I would have popped too early). Maybe I just had good chemistry with her.[/QUOTE]Thank you! I appreciate your feedback. I actually liked Adison as well. She set the bar for me. I think I will pass on Chloe.

[QUOTE=Nogardeulb;5596137][URL]https://kbeauty.blog/[/URL][/QUOTE]Thanks. I hope it's real. How did you learn about it?

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5597904]Thanks. I hope it's real. How did you learn about it?[/QUOTE]Looks like they took it down since. Before they took it down, no phone number, just a form to fill in and similar to SF / LA scene wants references. Not sure if KAngels or Gangnam or Lolipop would be willing to be references.

I'll write a full review of my nuru session with Sedona a little later today once I can see straight.

Holy fuck. The entire thing was a blur. Just.. exquisite.

Not "rub baby oil and slide around. " Separate nuru bed. Warmed actual thick nuru gel. And she knows what the fuck she is doing. It was like a 40 min edging session and then MPCFS for a powerful finish.

Top 5 session of 2021 for me.

[URL]http://bellevueservices.net/[/URL]

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5599717]I'll write a full review of my nuru session with Sedona a little later today once I can see straight.

Holy fuck. The entire thing was a blur. Just.. exquisite.

Not "rub baby oil and slide around. " Separate nuru bed. Warmed actual thick nuru gel. And she knows what the fuck she is doing. It was like a 40 min edging session and then MPCFS for a powerful finish.

Top 5 session of 2021 for me.

[URL]http://bellevueservices.net/[/URL][/QUOTE]Never had it before and like to try. Thank you for advice and please share more detail about your session.

[QUOTE=Lego19;5596464]Found this useful website, maintains a directory for the k agencies for major cities.

[URL]https://seattlekoreangirls.com/[/URL][/QUOTE]I've only used Kangels.

Which agency is best?

Do they all offer BFFS?

Thank you.

BW.

MPCFS? And how much was it, all in? Did she allow MSOG?

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5599717]I'll write a full review of my nuru session with Sedona a little later today once I can see straight.

Holy fuck. The entire thing was a blur. Just.. exquisite.

Not "rub baby oil and slide around. " Separate nuru bed. Warmed actual thick nuru gel. And she knows what the fuck she is doing. It was like a 40 min edging session and then MPCFS for a powerful finish.

Top 5 session of 2021 for me.

[URL]http://bellevueservices.net/[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BirdWatching;5600045]I've only used Kangels.

Which agency is best?

Do they all offer BFFS?

Thank you.

BW.[/QUOTE]Bellevueservices aka GSL seems to be the pick of the lot these days. There are new providers every 2 weeks so read the reviews here and decide accordingly.

Useful info: If you get verified for GSL you also get automatically verified for Lollipop.

Longer time lurker and finally registered to contribute.

Saw Chloe at KA yesterday. I saw Romi maybe 2 years ago and back then there was no screening although I was new in town. This time I was asked to send name, job, race and a photo I'd (without personal info). Guess things have changed. Anyway, a typical process and place in DT Belleview. She looks about 60% to the photos on the site so don't expect that girl in person. Not as slim as the photos, not chubby but some heft. Nice rack but couldn't tell if they were enhanced or not (guess that's a good thing). Typical greeting and action in the shower but nothing significant. The initial flirting session, which I like, was too short with some BJ and 69, and the cover went on too soon. Overall, I got to say it was a pretty standard and average affair. FYI, she says she hates DFK because of the rona now. She's nice but I don't think I would repeat due to other options out there.

Longer time lurker and finally registered to contribute.

Saw Chloe at KA yesterday. I saw Romi maybe 2 years ago and back then there was no screening although I was new in town. This time I was asked to send name, job, race and a photo I'd (without personal info). Guess things have changed. Anyway, a typical process and place in DT Belleview. She looks about 60% to the photos on the site so don't expect that girl in person. Not as slim as the photos, not chubby but some heft. Nice rack but couldn't tell if they were enhanced or not (guess that's a good thing). Typical greeting and action in the shower but nothing significant. The initial flirting session, which I like, was too short with some BJ and 69, and the cover went on too soon. Overall, I got to say it was a pretty standard and average affair. FYI, she says she hates DFK because of the rona now. She's nice but I don't think I would repeat due to other options out there.

[QUOTE=Mybluemoon99;5602831]Longer time lurker and finally registered to contribute.

Saw Chloe at KA yesterday. I saw Romi maybe 2 years ago and back then there was no screening although I was new in town. This time I was asked to send name, job, race and a photo I'd (without personal info). Guess things have changed. Anyway, a typical process and place in DT Belleview. She looks about 60% to the photos on the site so don't expect that girl in person. Not as slim as the photos, not chubby but some heft. Nice rack but couldn't tell if they were enhanced or not (guess that's a good thing). Typical greeting and action in the shower but nothing significant. The initial flirting session, which I like, was too short with some BJ and 69, and the cover went on too soon. Overall, I got to say it was a pretty standard and average affair. FYI, she says she hates DFK because of the rona now. She's nice but I don't think I would repeat due to other options out there.[/QUOTE]Thank you for ToFTT. Seems like KAngels is still a hit or miss. Appreciate the review!

Oh boy oh boy. Cannot wait to get my dick wet with cherry. Have seen her multiple times in NYC area, never BBFS. Looks like she has the PSE option when she starts with KA tomorrow. Creampie with cherry has such a great ring to it. Will report back.

[QUOTE=Ultimate90;5603489]Thank you for ToFTT. Seems like KAngels is still a hit or miss. Appreciate the review![/QUOTE]My previous experience with Romi was really good and she really did look like the photos on the site. I feel like the photos on their site are becoming more and more photoshopped, perhaps due to the competition. Oh and I would put Chloe in early 30's, definitely not as young looking as in the photos.

I want to give KAngels a go, but in order to do so I need to provide a photo I'd with the private information covered. I'm super nervous about it.

How did you all do this? It seems really sketch.

Did you also cover your eyes (or anything else) to try and leave some anonymity? Or can you use any photo of yourself?

Thanks.