2 photos
Simps and stupid screening process
[QUOTE=HappyDave;7227259]And the Epstein list is still hush. Wonder why?[/QUOTE][URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/providence/female-escorts/caucasian_w/gorgeous-redheadincallsoutcall/817095715672[/URL]
Guys for the life of me I feel so bad for the men that got arrested I'm not going to say something stupid like I'm glad this happened. Because I don't want no one to get arrested but on the other hand when guys are putting fuel to the fire and sending their driver's license real phone numbers to these girls that feel entitled. Then what the hell do you think is going to happen? I mean I had a conversation with the red head down in Rhode Island named Kat we.
Got into an argument because she didn't want to see me without me sending her all my personal information and she told me she has thousands of clients with their real phone numbers pictures addresses she even told me she can ruin a lot of people's lives and do a lot of men dirty. But she would never do that. And I'm like oh yeah? if you get arrested by the police I'm sure you're going to rat all these guys out. So for the life of me just because these girls have.
A hole that bleeds every month and feel entitled to charge $500 and want all your personal information tell them to go fly a kite and just do not give them your personal info. Obviously nobody listens because men continually get arrested because of the stupid behavior. I have over 100 girls that are under the radar that charge $100 and will spend two three hours with me and before you blow up my inbox I put in a lot of work and it pays off on Facebook Snapchat Instagram etc. Why guys continue to jeopardize their whole life is really beyond me.
It's the release Friday again
Looks like the mob finally got a head today: a Cambridge city councilor: [URL]https://www.wgbh.org/news/local/2025-03-21/cambridge-city-councilor-facing-charges-of-buying-sex-in-high-end-brothel-case[/URL].
Debatable how important he really is, but that doesn't matter for our puritan society.
On a different note, finally a bit of press decency? GBH news, in the above linked article, refuses to name the other alleged sex buyers, as they're not people of prominence. Of course, the gesture is futile, as their names are all over.
Wrongly accused human trafficking charges
[QUOTE=Hyperion11;7240857]Last Cambridge show cause hearings. Last names disclosed.
So far, it looks like one or two biotech executives, a doctor, an actor and maybe a business owner. No elected official, military, or any prominence figures. I remember the whole noise around high level officials, with security clearances, that could be blackmailed due to their involvement. All a smoke show.
On the same topic, a good article presenting sex worker's position (https://www.cambridgeday.com/2025/03/27/sex-workers-and-the-black-response-seek-nuance-without-assumption-of-trafficking-in-brothel-case ). They insist that the "sex trafficking" label has been used too liberally and truly has nothing to do with this case. Even the US Attorney had to admin that "the evidence gathered during the investigation did not support charges of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion"..[/QUOTE]Their lawyers should file for dismissal, is if the prosecution cannot present enough evidence to prove the defendant's guilt on human trafficking beyond a reasonable doubt, and then, launch a defamation claim to recover damages caused by the false accusations IMO.