General Reports

[QUOTE=MyOwnIllness; 1824773]Well this was my problem, the ladies are never stated, it's bullshit that someone is running a fucking page where these chics can send some private message PRIVATELY and the admin will just post that shit! Here the ladies have the chance to defend themself as do we.

There our first name and number is fucking plastered on a web site and we have no chance to call a liar a fucking liar because we don't even know it was written!

We just get a big FUCK OFF or ignored by providers and never know why!

I'd rather see who wrote it, what they wrote and be able to respond.[/QUOTE]Let's face it, that's where much of the best info here is exchanged.

All of this again just reinforces why it's important for guys here to maintain ANONYMITY. If you want to post honest, I. E. Sometimes negative, reviews without reprisals by providers, you need to try to maintain your anonymity. Otherwise, you end up with the kinds of suck-up reviews so common on this site among guys who want to make a name for themselves here.

This is among the reasons I don't tell providers, or anyone, my screen name and don't deal with providers who want references. If you take the precaution of changing your hobby name and burn phone periodically, that increases your security.

This is not, by the way, because I'm interested in doing anything bad to any of these providers. It is because it's an activity that can expose you to blackmail and legal entanglements, not to mention that providers, pimps and hobbyists alike are prone to cattiness and vindictiveness.

[QUOTE=MyOwnIllness; 1824773]Well this was my problem, the ladies are never stated, it's bullshit that someone is running a fucking page where these chics can send some private message PRIVATELY and the admin will just post that shit! Here the ladies have the chance to defend themself as do we.

There our first name and number is fucking plastered on a web site and we have no chance to call a liar a fucking liar because we don't even know it was written!

We just get a big FUCK OFF or ignored by providers and never know why!

I'd rather see who wrote it, what they wrote and be able to respond.[/QUOTE]You can always report the page to Facebook under settings for that page.

Old Budget Host.Central Pkwy.

Millennium Downtown.

One in Mason- don't know why on this one or the official name just yet.

[QUOTE=Simonpieman;1825895]You can always report the page to Facebook under settings for that page.[/QUOTE]I already reported the page 48hrs ago and so did a lot of other mongers, the report I got back is just this, I will paste exact info.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________.

Page report on "Client Review's" page. 7/23/2013.

You'll find the status of reports you made below.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________.

The page "Client Review's" was NOT FOUND to have any violations with the "personal information","photos containing nudity", violations of personal rights" or "misleading information" regulations.

Phone / mobile numbers are accessible using many search engines and individuals can block callers or contact their service provider to report harassment.

With Phone / mobile numbers given out excessively on "Face Book", it is virtually impossible to decide which page has permission to pages that do not.

This page will remain in ACTIVE STATUS unless further information is given or proven.

You can BLOCK this page from contacting you're page by going to the top right hand corner and choosing PRIVACY and then selecting BLOCK Page.

Thank you for taking the time to inform us.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________.

That is some serious BULLSHIT! I also found out the admin running the page is always informed if someone makes a request to shut it down and they get told a decision also! So this B!T(H is sitting back thinking this is comical!

The Red Roof Inn in Sharonville, and soon maybe the reopening of that notel at Chester & KEMPER about a block down from there.

Maybe even the Red Roof at the end of Chester Road too.

Everybody wants that Crime Statics Money the Feds give out Annually.

[QUOTE=Strolnarnd; 1825947]Old Budget Host. Central Pkwy.

Millennium Downtown.

One in Mason- don't know why on this one or the official name just yet.[/QUOTE]

Apparently there's a lot of activity in Sharonville at the moment, a regular I see was just enlightening me about getting busted at the holiday in at rt 42 last night. Obviously I'm not going to go see her to confirm, but just a general heads up as to what I caught wind of.

SD just emailed me about Leo hanging out at the place we were going to meet in West Chester. Appointment rescheduled.

Just thought you'd like to know.

Take care ladies and gents.

[blue][deleted by admin][/blue]
[b][u]editor's note[/u]:[/b] [blue]this report was edited to [u]remove references to **** persons[/u].

i am aware that the vast majority of references to **** girls are legitimate attempts to warn other fellow members about how easy it is to accidentally pickup an **** girls, the potential dangers of being caught with **** girls, etc. however, past discussions in the forum has repeatedly demonstrated that the subject simply cannot be discussed intelligently, in any form or for any reason, without being misinterpreted, and without starting flame wars.

please do not post references to **** persons in the forum. [i]thanks![/i][/blue]

I've heard a rumor that the HCSO and CPD received a grant focusing on prostitution (under the guise of human trafficking). Expect heavy enforcement over the next few months.

Things that I've heard that they're considering:

Vehicle Owner Notification.

Spousal Notification.

Mandatory HIV Testing.

DL Suspension (if you're caught cruising).

I honestly think they're going to focus on the 'Johns' more than the girls.

Be careful out there, guys and gals.

[QUOTE=MisforMaster; 1831091]I've heard a rumor that the HCSO and CPD received a grant focusing on prostitution (under the guise of human trafficking). Expect heavy enforcement over the next few months.

Things that I've heard that they're considering:

Vehicle Owner Notification.

Spousal Notification.

Mandatory HIV Testing.

DL Suspension (if you're caught cruising).

I honestly think they're going to focus on the 'Johns' more than the girls.

Be careful out there, guys and gals.[/QUOTE]They were just talking about that on Cunningham when I ran out for lunch. Changing the focus from supply to demand including spousal notification. Said they expected and were prepared for backlash on that one. Also said they are backing away from locking up girls and shifting to treatment / counseling and are instead going to focus on johns and pimps.

[quote=cintixtreme;1831104]they were just talking about that on cunningham when i ran out for lunch. changing the focus from supply to demand including spousal notification. said they expected and were prepared for backlash on that one. also said they are backing away from locking up girls and shifting to treatment / counseling and are instead going to focus on johns and pimps.[/quote]i guess what really bothers me about most of this is that if you are seeing a woman who is a victim of human trafficking, how the hell do we know that? it's not like we're out there advertising,"hey, if you've got some chicks locked up in your basement, call me!". we don't know that they're trafficked, either. now, if you're looking for **** girls, all bets are off. but, even anyone who's 20 and 'looks 16, ' i stay away from, just on principle: i want the women that i spend time with to be, well, women.

i'm probably venturing a little bit off topic there, but, it'll be interesting to see how they're spending the several hundred thousand dollars that they got from the doj.

[QUOTE=Cintixtreme;1831104]They were just talking about that on Cunningham when I ran out for lunch. Changing the focus from supply to demand including spousal notification. Said they expected and were prepared for backlash on that one. Also said they are backing away from locking up girls and shifting to treatment / counseling and are instead going to focus on johns and pimps.[/QUOTE]They chased girls around, and now they plan to chase johns.

If they really wanted to curb the 'problem' they would go after the dealers.

Oh, I forgot, they might be armed, unlike the girls and johns.

Hey guys I was wondering if anyone had heard or seen Satin who used to work with Stormy / Wetvelvet if you have her number or any additional info please pm me.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting reports claiming that another person is or was collaborating with Law Enforcement officials, largely because many of these reports are less than genuine.

The fact I'll just come out and say it: From my long history running this forum, the vast majority of these accusations are authored by ex-boyfriends, ex-clients, competitors, and other individuals with a grudge who post the accusations solely to disparage their "target".

But nevertheless, let's follow the logic:

1. How exactly do you know that the individual is cooperating with LE? From my perspective, the only way I can imagine that you would know this would be if you were "in the room" at the time, which makes you either LE or an imformant yourself.

2. From experience, many of these accusations are substantiated solely by the author having witnessed the individual talking to cops on the street, which is not in and of itself sufficient evidence of anything. If you're claiming that as the source of your accusation, then every person who has been given a traffic ticket is also cooperating with LE. It just doesn't wash.

3. Nevertheless, let's assume that the individual you mentioned is in fact "working with LE". OK, so what? What exactly are they going to tell them? That they fucked some guy for money? I've never heard of any individual being prosecuted for engaging in commercial sex based on the testimony of a street prostitute. It just doesn't make any sense. Can you imagine the scene in the courtroom where a jury is listening to some street prostitute on a witness stand pointing at some average Joe and claiming "He paid me for sex!". It's just laughable.

Like I said, so what?

The bottom line: Don't waste my time posting this sort of stupidity in my forum.

[i]Thanks![/i]

So we are all clear, this comes from el Jeffe, not me. A2[/blue]