Escort Reports

[QUOTE=RoaminRoman;4025278]By the way, I don't know anything about the girl in question, but I did want to correct one thing you said in your post. "Incalls Only" is [U]not[/U] a bad sign. Most escorts offer incall in some form or other. However, whenever you visit a girl at her incall location, you always want to have your wits about you, especially if it's at a motel or some sketchy area. Pay attention to your "Sixth Sense" and, if things just aren't adding up, that's very often a clue to reconsider. Remember, there are many, many fish in the ocean of this hobby.

Also, regarding the "Outcall" option, if it's offered, that can come with a host of potential problems, some of which can dog you for a while or even cause grief in your personal life (more than the "Incall" option usually has the potential to do). Other members her can speak to this more specifically, but just be aware that outcall is [U]not[/U] risk-free by any means.[/QUOTE]Thank you Roman for the correction and advice.

[QUOTE=KrishKrish;4025317]Know for a fact that she has been reviewed on erotic monkey. A paid site.[/QUOTE]Standard for providers in her price range. Not a red flag at all.

Go see her & post a review. That's how you get your inquiries answered. Be specific to services offered & always include a link again, like you did on this post.

Otherwise stop asking for help. Your four posts are all kind of needy. Remember, ‘‘tis better to give than to receive!

Happy Mongering!

[QUOTE=DoggieFan;4025522]Standard for providers in her price range. Not a red flag at all.

Go see her & post a review. That's how you get your inquiries answered. Be specific to services offered & always include a link again, like you did on this post.

Otherwise stop asking for help. Your four posts are all kind of needy. Remember, tis better to give than to receive!

Happy Mongering![/QUOTE]Just a newbie trying be cautious, but I understand your point and appreciate your feedback.

Gents,

Paid a visit to Naomi in Chantilly to see what all of the hype was about. The good news, she was passionate, sensual, thick and a sweet girl. Paid. 6 for the quick and received ball licks, CBJ and she got into cg, reverse and ended in doggy. Honestly she had me fill the sack quicker than I ever have!

The mediocre news is while she certainly had the tummy tattoo as seen in her pics, those pics have to be old AF! She had a lot of cellulite and not to take away from my experience with her but the pics and her actual appearance were way off.

Again, she did the deed but I wouldn't repeat.

[URL]https://escortfish.ch/photos/view/571-660-3299[/URL]

In the face she looked much like Taraji P. Henson! Creepin.

[QUOTE=RP1313;4024148]Hello guys, I am new to this. Can't seem to find any info. Has anyone seen her?

[URL]https://adultsearch.com/washington-dc/washington-dc/female-escorts/1411386[/URL][/QUOTE]Chrome gives you the ability to do an image search without too much effort. Just right click the picture and "Search Google for image".

Here is a link that came up for a pic in her ad: [URL]https://www.immgrum.com/user/tofje_/1163452869[/URL].

I call fake.

BSOT.

Stoop.

Recently got back into the scene after a long time off. (Got a shock of a lifetime when I found TER was dead.) Been reading the posts on here for the last month, and I think I figured out the etiquette for newbies to the site.

Couldn't find any reviews for this agency (tdc. [URL]escortbook.com[/URL]), so I figured I'd TOFTT. Standard Agency verification - 2 references. Nice hotel by Tysons Corner. Pictures are her. Late 20's early 30's. Skinny blond with C cups. Extremely good GFE experience. Lots of DFK, BBBJ, different positions. No CIM, but COT was fair game. Pretty good looking, 8 or 9. I'd recommend. (I wouldn't repeat. I'm into variety.).

I've visited some other agencies as well, so I'll post those too in the near future. In the meantime I'd appreciate any feedback.

-FatKid.

[QUOTE=TheFatKid;4026467]Recently got back into the scene after a long time off. (Got a shock of a lifetime when I found TER was dead.) Been reading the posts on here for the last month, and I think I figured out the etiquette for newbies to the site.

Couldn't find any reviews for this agency (tdc. [URL]escortbook.com[/URL]), so I figured I'd TOFTT. Standard Agency verification - 2 references. Nice hotel by Tysons Corner. Pictures are her. Late 20's early 30's. Skinny blond with C cups. Extremely good GFE experience. Lots of DFK, BBBJ, different positions. No CIM, but COT was fair game. Pretty good looking, 8 or 9. I'd recommend. (I wouldn't repeat. I'm into variety.).

I've visited some other agencies as well, so I'll post those too in the near future. In the meantime I'd appreciate any feedback.

-FatKid.[/QUOTE]Be careful about putting links in parentheses, or using punctuation after them, because it can break the URL. The best thing to do is to hit Preview Report before uploading, to make sure that the links are formatted correctly.

[URL]http://tdc.escortbook.com/models[/URL]

I assume this is who you saw?

[URL]http://tdc.escortbook.com/model-blonde-gfe-alexa-available-30336[/URL]

[QUOTE=Cachito123;4025367]That was not my experience with her. I know, she has been in the area for a while.

So, I am sure many of you know of her. So, is regular joe right? If so, stay away from her.[/QUOTE]A search for Cece / Dawn and some other names that she's used is what I'd suggest people do before taking anyone's word. I was thoroughly disgusted and I think it shows from my posts, doesn't it?

Jim S, had also made a similar comment about the possibility of Cece being burnt out and thereby impacting service.

[QUOTE=BunkerBuster;4026563]Be careful about putting links in parentheses, or using punctuation after them, because it can break the URL. The best thing to do is to hit Preview Report before uploading, to make sure that the links are formatted correctly.

[URL]http://tdc.escortbook.com/models[/URL]

I assume this is who you saw?

[URL]http://tdc.escortbook.com/model-blonde-gfe-alexa-available-30336[/URL][/QUOTE]TDC, I think is the new name etc. For AME. The old agency. They got the customer list etc.

Been using them since AME days and they have a nice setup. Girls are nice though I wish the quality was as good as when AME was around. However, dealing with Jamie of AME is another matter altogether.

[QUOTE=Creeping;4026346]Gents,

Paid a visit to Naomi in Chantilly to see what all of the hype was about. The good news, she was passionate, sensual, thick and a sweet girl. Paid. 6 for the quick and received ball licks, CBJ and she got into cg, reverse and ended in doggy. Honestly she had me fill the sack quicker than I ever have!

The mediocre news is while she certainly had the tummy tattoo as seen in her pics, those pics have to be old AF! She had a lot of cellulite and not to take away from my experience with her but the pics and her actual appearance were way off.

Again, she did the deed but I wouldn't repeat.

[URL]https://escortfish.ch/photos/view/571-660-3299[/URL]

In the face she looked much like Taraji P. Henson! Creepin.[/QUOTE]I agree. She does look like Taraji P. Henson! That is the reason I said that probably she was using other photos.

But she really is a great provider and Johny is looking forward for another round if she comes back.

Just wanted to throw my 2 cents in Dawn\CeCe as I've seen her twice, but it was probably about 4 years ago. I met her for a quick BnG twice. The first time was fine, she did a good job, priced reasonably. The second time she freaked out, blew up my phone, and generally acted batshit crazy. I'd suggest avoiding her unless you like to roll the dice a bit.

[QUOTE=Powercho678;4025484]But I thought em is a scam, they steal pictures from places like eros, how do I know their reviews are legit? I truly appreciate ur help though.[/QUOTE]Them steals TER stuff and posts it as their own. Disappointing that they require payment now when everything was just taken from TER to begin with.

[QUOTE=Powercho678;4025192]Anybody knows her? I'm very new to this would truly appreciate any feedback.

[URL]https://www.eros.com/washington_dc/files/4035557.htm[/URL]

I have seen her post on Eros before, she also had a personal website hosted by cuties-sites, however that site is down. It seems like she does tour and only does incalls. I heard incalls only is bad sign so wondering anyone knows whether she's legit?[/QUOTE]Defying all odds, a newbie took a baby step. Nathalia's pics on Eros are accurate. To quote a fellow bro who PMed me some helpful info, "a killer bod" with a fabulous bottom for sure, it's hard to believe that level of hip to waist ratio truly exists naturally outside of screen but it does and that's the blessing of the Lord. She's also very pretty with a tiny face, easy to hold and fondle. Her eyes are something else, especially when she looks into your eyes at the right moment. Nathalia was friendly and patient, she helped relieve a lot of new comer (no pun intended) stress with her good attitude. However, she was not punctual and didn't speak the language well, but communication was not a barrier at all, so no big deal personally.

Summary: legit and recommendable.

[QUOTE=NotMe00;4027043]Just wanted to throw my 2 cents in Dawn\CeCe as I've seen her twice, but it was probably about 4 years ago. I met her for a quick BnG twice. The first time was fine, she did a good job, priced reasonably. The second time she freaked out, blew up my phone, and generally acted batshit crazy. I'd suggest avoiding her unless you like to roll the dice a bit.[/QUOTE]And that is the reason why I post when I see someone come and start to boost her. Too many negative feedback. Unless of course she has cleaned up her act but I am NOT going to roll that dice. Have much better options at my price point.

[QUOTE=TimoS80;4027258]Them steals TER stuff and posts it as their own. Disappointing that they require payment now when everything was just taken from TER to begin with.[/QUOTE]If they had just remained freemium for longer, they would have have had as shot at becoming a hub, like TER used to be. Instead, they went expensive to fast, and now the information there is spotty at best.