Sugar bowl sites and sugar babies

Anyone know about this one?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e6163db8-0de7-4c7e-ac45-241366148c86[/URL]

Start at post #2799 and search that profile name before she changed it.

[QUOTE=EsGarcea;5407937]Anyone know about this one?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e6163db8-0de7-4c7e-ac45-241366148c86[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=EsGarcea;5407937]Anyone know about this one?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e6163db8-0de7-4c7e-ac45-241366148c86[/URL][/QUOTE]She is a chunkie high volume prostitute that thinks she's the best thing ever. She hosts in South County. Asks for $400. Not worth it at all.

[QUOTE=ChrisHansen92;5408033]Start at post #2799 and search that profile name before she changed it.[/QUOTE]I have seen also a while back, she is worn out old stripper as many have said, talks so much about herself like how good she is at everything and how much money she has in the bank listen girl if you were that good you would not be in the ratty ass apartment, she thinks she is the best in bed that you will ever have and really she was pretty crappy, told she was married three times and didn't give her first BJ till she was 39 and she is 41 now but claims to be the best in the world at it now, really with only two years practice avoid this one at all costs she changes her mood all the time from nice to crazy.

Thanks all. It's going to be a big avoid for me.

[QUOTE=TossAway7;5405402]I'm talking to her as well so if you meet I'd love to know how it goes.[/QUOTE]She was a no-show with no message, no response. Hope you have better luck!

I'm sure I'm not the only one frustrated that these girls can't read / comprehend pretty common phrases. I'm pretty sure that half of them think NSA actually means FWB. SA needs to add a category called "high protein shakes" while they're at it.

[QUOTE=TDG777;5412316]She was a no-show with no message, no response. Hope you have better luck![/QUOTE]Same here, supposed to meet last night and nothing as far as showing up or texting.

[QUOTE=TossAway7;5413132]Same here, supposed to meet last night and nothing as far as showing up or texting.[/QUOTE]I saw that profile. Shows that she's new, but at least one of her pics looks really familiar from a while back. Either fake, scammer, rinser, or fake. At best, my guess is she is one those girls that likes the idea of sugar, but chickens out when the rubber hits the road. I've been out of the game I while, but some things never change. Did she ask for money upfront or anything?

Has anyone seen rosesarered from SA. Been talking with her and trying set up a meet with her. Any info will help. Thanks.

[QUOTE=Whaler;5414634]Has anyone seen rosesarered from SA. Been talking with her and trying set up a meet with her. Any info will help. Thanks.[/QUOTE]No though I'm not sure based on her pics that I'd pay for her. No judgement as I do have a thing for older women but she's not the 50's I'd be trying to get with. Please let me know if I'm wrong.

Gingercutie5 - gtg. Easy to deal with, checks some boxes for me, will probably repeat.

Lex1 jade. Moved to texts pretty easily but seems to be in favor of "platonic" and doing the traditional date thing as a first meet. Not what I'm looking for so I passed.

Babybea. Similar to above. Wanted to meet in public while bringing a friend along. Not my thing, so I passed.

Emma97 - been easy to deal with. Hopefully gtg trying to schedule something soon.

Littlest Angel. Seems gtg but asked so much I didn't bother to negotiate. Didn't respond and moved on.

Sweet_Aries. Ghosted after failing to make contact on day we were going to meet.

FeistyBabyy. Gtg, easy to deal with, has a place available, will likely repeat.

FlirtyBlondeBabe. Looking for something virtual. Passed.

Kristiana92 - seems gtg trying to schedule something soon.

Anybody got any info on her?

[QUOTE=TDG777;5405277]I've got Reckless7 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/62c98185-d4ae-4746-a4b9-671813549810[/URL]) scheduled for a meetup. She seems far too comfortable to have just started doing this a few days ago (according to her profile). And one of her pictures does seem to indicate a hotel room. However, her phone # does end up at a facebook profile that doesn't raise any red flags.

Any experience out there with this young woman?
[/QUOTE]She is a pro. It is not her first profile. I can't recall what name she used before but she works the midwest cities.

Emss. G2 g, out far in Illinois, doesn't have own place.

Ellebelle0523 - scammer.

Kitten 1221 - g2 g kinda, meet up once and had fun but ghosted after, YMMV.

Selena rose. G2 g not the most timely, doesn't have own place.

LizLovesYou690 - just tries to get ya to spend on her.