Printable View
[QUOTE=Newbie1961;4847339]The bottom line is if she lived up to her end of the bargain (sex) or not really. I learned a couple things over the years on there (non pro escorts) because I only do in-call on my turf 99% of the time. . ...[/QUOTE]Who have done this for some time have experienced both sides. Some looking for dash and some not even counting. And you don't give them upfront, either it is on the counter.
The OP didn't get his 2 hours,. So no, I don't think he got what he paid for.
[QUOTE=RegularJoe1985;4847180]About her. Was looking at her profile, she contacted me but I wasn't sold on her pics.
Are her pics accurate since I'd some doubts.
Great to know about her M. O. Assuming you gave her full amount before. Nowadays I tell them allowance after we're done, not before. If they don't agree then no deal.[/QUOTE]She is cute in face but body is just ok. I have her pics. PM me if anyone wants that.
[QUOTE=Grasshopping;4845499]Ditto. Whether trans means transgender or transsexual, she is definitely not the natural kind LOL.[/QUOTE]Seeking's Android app sucks. To read their details you need to login in web app. I think in her case I missed doing that.
[QUOTE=LikItFun;4847312]She moves to text quickly; sent some great pics. Her bikini shot had a Euro plug in the background, so that pic isn't taken here in the US. After setting a date and time, she sent me an address on 7th St SE almost at the DC / PG County line.
Finally, she asks for $9 for her Netflix bill. Told her I'd give her 25 x that in cash in person for the date we were planning. No reply. Sent a follow up text a couple days; no reply and now I'm blocked on SA.
So, I'd say she's not real.[/QUOTE]Good eyes on the Euro plug! I missed that.
I got a location that was 7th Street SE near Chesapeake, about the same area.
I got the Netflix request for $9 again.
Agree--great photos, but not real.
[QUOTE=InSearch69;4847336]This has been discussed recently. If they have no location listed 99.9% it is a fake account. You can play phone / test all day but you will never meet them.[/QUOTE]I always assume a SB is guilty until proven innocent. With that said, I still want to give them the opportunity to prove to me that they are a real deal. So despite of the location on the profile, I still spend a few minutes to feel them out.
[QUOTE=DickLongwood;4847022]Thanks! I may try to meet her. If you get any info, please share it.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/f412ed17-2b26-4365-898b-7c8391925542[/URL]
So I responded to her after 5 days and gave her my GV number. She texted me and sent me a pic of "hers". After couple sentences of cordial exchanges she told me she's been stressed because she has been job hunting. And had to pay car insurance and phone bill yesterday so doesn't have anything left for groceries / gas for the week.
I think I have spent enough time already on her. Next thing she will say will be if I can cashapp her some change.
We have all seen too many of this. Blocking.
BTW the pic she sent me belongs to some chick named Sabrina that lives in Los Angeles. Came up on google image search.
[QUOTE=AksWorld;4847619]Seeking's Android app sucks. To read their details you need to login in web app. I think in her case I missed doing that.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I'm not a big fan of the app either. I only use it for two things: 1) Checking messages, and 2) Hiding / blocking profiles who aren't even in the DMV or are suspected scammers.
Too many "SBs" claiming to be near me when their last log-in location is Venezuela, or Peru, or Colombia, etc. With all the "favorites" I receive from there, maybe I ought to move down to South America and live like a god or something, haha!
[QUOTE=Shinshi86;4847808]Yeah, I'm not a big fan of the app either. I only use it for two things: 1) Checking messages, and 2) Hiding / blocking profiles who aren't even in the DMV or are suspected scammers.
Too many "SBs" claiming to be near me when their last log-in location is Venezuela, or Peru, or Colombia, etc. With all the "favorites" I receive from there, maybe I ought to move down to South America and live like a god or something, haha![/QUOTE]For me the Apple app is completely unusable, I keep getting errors when I open it or open it from a notification. Anyone else having an issue with it?
[QUOTE=Jsidd;4848150]For me the Apple app is completely unusable, I keep getting errors when I open it or open it from a notification. Anyone else having an issue with it?[/QUOTE]The SA App is no more. SA has been saying Apple won't support the App, so they shut it down.
[QUOTE=Jsidd;4848150]For me the Apple app is completely unusable, I keep getting errors when I open it or open it from a notification. Anyone else having an issue with it?[/QUOTE]Had no idea there was an app for it on Apple. Is it new?
[QUOTE=BigFrog;4841555]I posted this trick in the Baltimore section. If you've shared your private pics with someone and they block you (or you block them) then they remain in the list of "people I've shared my private pics with. " If they deactivate or get taken down, then they're removed from that list. You can use this to get a link to someone who has blocked you.[/QUOTE]Kudos for this valuable tip! So the following SA profiles have all pushed for an online-only arrangement (see my screenshots) and not even remotely attempting to be coy about it:
Bbabe3 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/31d2c58a-fe17-42a3-9bfd-ab5e2ac2362c[/URL]).
Kelly403 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ee84b6f6-7047-4d4f-ae2d-4e4ca1c9a9b0[/URL]).
Matcha4 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/22267d85-1332-4115-9f86-a5934ed26fdc[/URL]).
Mariahj3 ([URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/449a530a-224a-492f-9e36-4c01bbc9cb3f[/URL]).
What's really disappointing, however, is that those profiles are all still up as of this afternoon. I did as BigFrog suggested and shared my private photos, took screenshots, then reported the users in question. At this point, Seeking automatically blocks them from being viewed but are indeed still populating the list of those with access to your private pictures. Two days have come and gone, and they're still around. So the way I see it, there's three possibilities: Seeking's content admins are either 1) Tired of my reporting and passively telling me to fuck off, 2) Preferring to give these girls the benefit of a doubt owing to the pandemic making it supposedly "risky" to meet in-person, or 3) Require multiple user reports in order to take down another user.
Nothing can really be done if it's the first two scenarios, unfortunately. But if it is the latter (which I suspect to be the case), then I highly recommend that those of you with SA accounts to report these "SBs" as well. If they're not willing to meet until [B]after[/B] the pandemic, then that's one thing. But if they flat-out say they only desire a cyber arrangement, then this runs contrary to Seeking's own guidelines and is reportable.
Has anyone ever used this site to book a massage?
This smells like a scam to me but wanted to check with you mongers first.
[URL]https://indulgencetouch.com[/URL]
[QUOTE=AdcFellow;4846470]I think this is her (thanks Jbunk).
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/702016ba-3925-412c-a7ef-f69034cf9475[/URL][/QUOTE]Has anyone met her? How is she anyway?
🙋127995;8205;9794;65039; The whole neighborhood I'm guessing LOL.
[QUOTE=AksWorld;4848717]Has anyone met her? How is she anyway?[/QUOTE]
Posted in Richmond but just my thoughts.
They need as many young beautiful profiles on there so you and I will keep paying. They also don't mind because if FOSTA ever comes sniffing around they look more legit (no sex for sale here). There is a reason they even have a platonic tab you can add to what your seeking in your profile. They now permit online only wording in profiles it appears. It is worse than ever tho. I am wasting so much time sifting now I finally redid my search criteria to exclude platonic in my search menu. I know I will miss a few possibles, but if they added platonic my chances are usually slim to none with them anyway.