The Massholes

[QUOTE=BillyPilgrim;2723209]I've made it clear what I believe, but don't take my word for it: take a look at these stats from the Mass State Police:

[URL]https://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?docid=1I8WNJgAfHGxsgWczqigoEw50DgJh7rSW7GreTHUl[/URL]#rows: I'd=1.

The table covers the years from 2011 to 2013. If you look at the cities and towns with large numbers of male customer arrests, they are primarily urban areas like Lowell, Lawrence, Brockton, New Beford, Worcester, etc. Where the street scene is very active. One can only infer that these large numbers of arrests of johns are from arrests made on the street, and not in hotels. The police in those cities focus their efforts on the street scene, and not hotel-based workers. Take a look at Lynn, for example.

I'm done with this. The data speaks for itself.[/QUOTE]Your posted evidence is proof positive!

[QUOTE=Ambrose;2723232]You've had nothing of substance to add to USASG, unless you think your rude remarks about Deb constitutes substance. She has posted lots of useful information including information about other providers that she thought we would be interested in. When was the last time, if ever, you contributed anything about a provider other than your abuse of Deb. Oh ya, I almost forgot, you're a member of that bisexual site and you know better than to post anything about that here, don't you. So it looks like the only action you're getting is from that site. Guess what, you can fool yourself into thinking you're bisexual but you're not. You do guys, you're a homo. You're not only a homo, you're an immature one too. You seem to think calling someone fat over and over again is funny, it's not, it's childish. As far as the 2 or 3 idiots that chime in with you, they aren't much better than you. Who knows, maybe the bunch of you are all bisexual, or homos is more to the point.[/QUOTE]Such anger SmokeScreen? Are you taking a break from the Rhode Island forum?

I'm as much as a bisexual as Fat Deb is Pamela Anderson.

Make up what you want. Nothing changes the FACT that Deb is a pathetic attention seeking slob. She likes to battle and have her minions do it for her. Anyone that sees her better use a monger phone and don't use your real name. She's unstable as per her posts reveal.

Thank you for your post. It gives me more of a reason to continue. I'm sure Deb will appreciate the fallout from it. Stay tuned.

Please don't forget to go fuck yourself.

BB.

[QUOTE=BillyPilgrim;2723209]I've made it clear what I believe, but don't take my word for it: take a look at these stats from the Mass State Police:
[URL]https://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?docid=1I8WNJgAfHGxsgWczqigoEw50DgJh7rSW7GreTHUl[/URL]#rows: I'd=1.

The table covers the years from 2011 to 2013. If you look at the cities and towns with large numbers of male customer arrests, they are primarily urban areas like Lowell, Lawrence, Brockton, New Beford, Worcester, etc. Where the street scene is very active. .[/QUOTE]Escorts are also very active in large cities, the point being most SW & escorts are looking for volume, large cities & towns are what attract providers to begin with.

[QUOTE=BillyPilgrim;2723209]One can only infer that these large numbers of arrests of johns are from arrests made on the street, and not in hotels[/QUOTE]How do you come to that conclusion?

The stats shown are for prostitution arrests, the stats do not state if it is Street Walkers, Escorts, MPs or any other prostitution activity.

You can infer the stat numbers anyway you want, but you would still be wrong to infer that the numbers are exclusively for street walkers only, were the fuck does it state that, [RED] IT DOESN'T[/RED].

Show me where in the stats it states the information is on street walkers and not Escorts.

If you feel it does show me where on the provided stats it states the information is for Street walkers only, again it doesn't it's for prostitution arrests.

More guys are arrested in hotel stings than on the street, you know it, I know it, & those arrested know it.

It's just a fact that there are more hotel stings than street stings.

[QUOTE=BillyPilgrim;2723209]The police in those cities focus their efforts on the street scene, and not hotel-based workers.[/QUOTE]Police focus their efforts everywhere including the street, MPs, & yes especially hotels known for this activity, to state police do not focus their efforts on hotel-based workers is ignorant.

[QUOTE=BillyPilgrim;2723209]Take a look at Lynn, for example.[/QUOTE]I did what's the point? Lynn doesn't have hotels! Yeah right.

[QUOTE=BillyPilgrim;2723209]I'm done with this.[/QUOTE]Lets hope so.

[QUOTE=BennyBGoodman;2723250]Your posted evidence is proof positive![/QUOTE]Another guy that doesn't comprehend what it is he reads.

BG can you show in the stats provided where it states the numbers shown are for street walkers or otherwise infers that a larger number street walkers are arrested as compared to any other prostitution activity.

I believe there is a perceived perception that escorts are safer than SWers but that's all it is, a perceived perception.

You can believe what you want that Escorts are safer than Street Walkers, both have risks & bottom line, no one wants to get busted, scammed, ripped-off or worse, regardless of the hobby they participate in, so it is the individuals responsibility to minimize their risk as best they can.

S018,

You are on the right track, let's all get rid of discussion of stats because people who do not know how to interpret stats but post them without clarification or understanding to put in perspective the premises behind them, should not shoot from the hip and throw them out there. Stats lie, and numbers lie, and the supposed-monger who put of the post with the stats and then write their own misleading invalid and irrational narrative conclusions for what the stats mean and represent are intentionally dreaming. The explanations also denote that there is a broad category for what is included within the prostitution category in the stats.

Here is the real story of what the stats mean, right from the stat horse's mouth. When reading from the source official website where the stats were posted (that site does not seem to have been updated for years now, hence the old info from 2008 to 2013), it clearly explains the stats and what is behind the stats and data of why cities have high stats, the supporting information clearly states the reason for the high numbers: "decoy SW le street stings" in cities, nothing more, nothing less, and it further explains a big factor as because the city police forces are staffed and budgeted for doing stings and finds that they can get multiple arrests with the resources devoted to the sting operations vs. The 1-off arrests from going after and proving the pursuit of individual johns and SWs doing business. It is NOT related to busting Johns or legitimate SW's during the course of them doing their business, the information behind the stats notes that to be a small portion of the numbers. The explanations also denote that there is a broad category for what is included within the prostitution category in the stats.

Also on the site that the stats came from, there were a bunch of charts denoting 5 years of up and down trends by major cities of males vs. Females arrested for prostitution.

Take care, this will likely be my last post on this forum site for several months.

[QUOTE=Skatar018;2723540]Escorts are also very active in large cities, the point being most SW & escorts are looking for volume, large cities & towns are what attract providers to begin with.

How do you come to that conclusion?

The stats shown are for prostitution arrests, the stats do not state if it is Street Walkers, Escorts, MPs or any other prostitution activity.

You can infer the stat numbers anyway you want, but you would still be wrong to infer that the numbers are exclusively for street walkers only, were the fuck does it state that, [RED] IT DOESN'T[/RED].

Show me where in the stats it states the information is on street walkers and not Escorts.

If you feel it does show me where on the provided stats it states the information is for Street walkers only, again it doesn't it's for prostitution arrests.

More guys are arrested in hotel stings than on the street, you know it, I know it, & those arrested know it.

It's just a fact that there are more hotel stings than street stings.

Police focus their efforts everywhere including the street, MPs, & yes especially hotels known for this activity, to state police do not focus their efforts on hotel-based workers is ignorant.

I did what's the point? Lynn doesn't have hotels! Yeah right.

Lets hope so.

Another guy that doesn't comprehend what it is he reads.

BG can you show in the stats provided where it states the numbers shown are for street walkers or otherwise infers that a larger number street walkers are arrested as compared to any other prostitution activity.

I believe there is a perceived perception that escorts are safer than SWers but that's all it is, a perceived perception.

You can believe what you want that Escorts are safer than Street Walkers, both have risks & bottom line, no one wants to get busted, scammed, ripped-off or worse, regardless of the hobby they participate in, so it is the individuals responsibility to minimize their risk as best they can.[/QUOTE]

S0108,

Sorry, left this out of my last post, and do not have the ability to edit it due to A2. Interesting that BPilgrim purported to have been affiliated with a string attempt back in one of his long and very first posts in this forum in a January 2012 post.

[QUOTE=Skatar018;2723540]Escorts are also very active in large cities, the point being most SW & escorts are looking for volume, large cities & towns are what attract providers to begin with.

How do you come to that conclusion?

The stats shown are for prostitution arrests, the stats do not state if it is Street Walkers, Escorts, MPs or any other prostitution activity.

You can infer the stat numbers anyway you want, but you would still be wrong to infer that the numbers are exclusively for street walkers only, were the fuck does it state that, [RED] IT DOESN'T[/RED].

Show me where in the stats it states the information is on street walkers and not Escorts.

If you feel it does show me where on the provided stats it states the information is for Street walkers only, again it doesn't it's for prostitution arrests.

More guys are arrested in hotel stings than on the street, you know it, I know it, & those arrested know it.

It's just a fact that there are more hotel stings than street stings.

Police focus their efforts everywhere including the street, MPs, & yes especially hotels known for this activity, to state police do not focus their efforts on hotel-based workers is ignorant.

I did what's the point? Lynn doesn't have hotels! Yeah right.

Lets hope so.

Another guy that doesn't comprehend what it is he reads.

BG can you show in the stats provided where it states the numbers shown are for street walkers or otherwise infers that a larger number street walkers are arrested as compared to any other prostitution activity.

I believe there is a perceived perception that escorts are safer than SWers but that's all it is, a perceived perception.

You can believe what you want that Escorts are safer than Street Walkers, both have risks & bottom line, no one wants to get busted, scammed, ripped-off or worse, regardless of the hobby they participate in, so it is the individuals responsibility to minimize their risk as best they can.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=FourQ;2723689]S0108,

Sorry, left this out of my last post, and do not have the ability to edit it due to A2. Interesting that BPilgrim purported to have been affiliated with a string attempt back in one of his long and very first posts in this forum in a January 2012 post.[/QUOTE][BLUE]The reason you can't edit your own posts is because you're moderated and the reason you're moderated is because you wouldn't stop being an asshole on review threads.

So if you want to be honest this post should read; I do not have the ability to edit my own posts because I was acting like an asshole who wouldn't play well with others.

A2[/BLUE]

She posts some funny shit and some good info on this forum. Why keep picking on her? I've never met her but enough is enough.

[QUOTE=JoeMuckInFutch;2723912]She posts some funny shit and some good info on this forum. Why keep picking on her? I've never met her but enough is enough.[/QUOTE]Oh dude, why did you make this post? Now the lawyers on both sides would feel the need to respond LOL.

[QUOTE=JoeMuckInFutch;2723912]She posts some funny shit and some good info on this forum. Why keep picking on her? I've never met her but enough is enough.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Nrlmus;2723967]Oh dude, why did you make this post? Now the lawyers on both sides would feel the need to respond LOL.[/QUOTE]Both sides? As in a masshole bar spitroast!

[QUOTE=Baconbits;2723528]

I'm as much as a bisexual as Fat Deb is Pamela Anderson.

Make up what you want.

BB.[/QUOTE]You should have known that I would not have posted something like that if I didn't have some proof. So for all you non believers that don't think Baconbits is a homo, take a look at the lincs referenced in posts # 2186 on 10/9/15 by DoubleDippin and post # 2199 on 10/10/15 by Odysseus1250.

I don't make up anything, no need to, it's right there in print. You rotten homo, it sickens me to even respond to you, but I thought your friends here should know what kind of slime they are sticking up for.

A2,

Fuck you A2, how about you be honest for a change. The real reason you put me on moderation is because I ripped you a new asshole in posts and I made mild comments against one of your biggest backdoor buds in the site, and you didn't like it. Your constant being a pus*why politically correct marshmallow with monitoring people for mild post comments, is the reason a bunch of people Who are longtime respected members I know for a fact have left the site.

I have requested in the past to have my I'd terminated, and was told I could not. It just shows that overall a tube in the site to not want screen names terminated because they want to pump up the number of misleading screen names stats.

So I adjust my comment in my latest post, and this is in fact will be my last post on the site.

[blue]I'm going to hold you to this promise. I wouldn't delete your account because you're an asshole and I never give assholes what they want.

Thank you for improving the overall quality of the forum with your absence. Don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out.

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=Ambrose;2724040]You should have known that I would not have posted something like that if I didn't have some proof. So for all you non believers that don't think Baconbits is a homo, take a look at the lincs referenced in posts # 2186 on 10/9/15 by DoubleDippin and post # 2199 on 10/10/15 by Odysseus1250.

I don't make up anything, no need to, it's right there in print. You rotten homo, it sickens me to even respond to you, but I thought your friends here should know what kind of slime they are sticking up for.[/QUOTE]You are a fucking retard. Sit tight, I am on the lookout and I guarantee that I will find you, "Ambrose" registered on some gay and tranny sites. I just need a little time to create, I mean find, them. Moron.

[QUOTE=Ambrose;2724040]You should have known that I would not have posted something like that if I didn't have some proof. So for all you non believers that don't think Baconbits is a homo, take a look at the lincs referenced in posts # 2186 on 10/9/15 by DoubleDippin and post # 2199 on 10/10/15 by Odysseus1250.

I don't make up anything, no need to, it's right there in print. You rotten homo, it sickens me to even respond to you, but I thought your friends here should know what kind of slime they are sticking up for.[/QUOTE]Newsflash! Everyone knows Debs a fucking fat nutty Sweathog that's looking for attention.

We are suppose to look up two members posts and somehow that correlation makes me gay? Or am I bisexual? LOL!

You look like an idiot banging that gay gong. Those that know me, know my word is good. No one is buying what you're selling.

Is that Debbie? Or, Baconbits' mother? I see you are still trying to work up that pathetic pecker of yours. Maybe to "pay" Deb a visit?

[QUOTE=Baconbits;2724229]Newsflash! Everyone knows Debs a fucking fat nutty Sweathog that's looking for attention.

We are suppose to look up two members posts and somehow that correlation makes me gay? Or am I bisexual? LOL!

You look like an idiot banging that gay gong. Those that know me, know my word is good. No one is buying what you're selling.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Moogaar1;2724390]Is that Debbie? Or, Baconbits' mother? I see you are still trying to work up that pathetic pecker of yours. Maybe to "pay" Deb a visit?[/QUOTE]Only a fucking coward would talk shit about someone's mother hiding behind a keyboard. You're a pussy dude.

However, That's that fat fucking Deb with her big basketball belly for everyone one to see.

Enjoy. LOL.


BB