News and Media Reports

Caught this one from Drudge Report, Senate wants to tweak the laws. Interesting read about the offshore contractor soliciting ads. Thought about it and it kind of makes sense in a way. A little sweat shop with a half dozen employees (re) writing ads. Maybe that's a reason for the over-emoji-fication that I find really annoying.

[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2017/08/01/senate-launches-bill-to-remove-immunity-for-websites-hosting-illegal-content-spurred-by-backpage-com/[/URL]

Here is the article they referenced from last month with the Philippine contractor.

[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/backpage-has-always-claimed-it-doesnt-control-sex-related-ads-new-documents-show-otherwise/2017/07/10/b3158ef6-553c-11e7-b38e-35fd8e0c288f_story.html?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.c76416dbda1c[/URL]

[QUOTE=WizardOfAahs;3492630]Caught this one from Drudge Report, Senate wants to tweak the laws. Interesting read about the offshore contractor soliciting ads. Thought about it and it kind of makes sense in a way. A little sweat shop with a half dozen employees (re) writing ads. Maybe that's a reason for the over-emoji-fication that I find really annoying.

[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2017/08/01/senate-launches-bill-to-remove-immunity-for-websites-hosting-illegal-content-spurred-by-backpage-com/[/URL]

Here is the article they referenced from last month with the Philippine contractor.

[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/backpage-has-always-claimed-it-doesnt-control-sex-related-ads-new-documents-show-otherwise/2017/07/10/b3158ef6-553c-11e7-b38e-35fd8e0c288f_story.html?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.c76416dbda1c[/URL][/QUOTE]This is not going to work. Ladies will just find another way to sling that pussy.

[QUOTE=WizardOfAahs;3492630]Caught this one from Drudge Report, Senate wants to tweak the laws. Interesting read about the offshore contractor soliciting ads. Thought about it and it kind of makes sense in a way. A little sweat shop with a half dozen employees (re) writing ads. Maybe that's a reason for the over-emoji-fication that I find really annoying.

[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2017/08/01/senate-launches-bill-to-remove-immunity-for-websites-hosting-illegal-content-spurred-by-backpage-com/[/URL]

Here is the article they referenced from last month with the Philippine contractor.

[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/backpage-has-always-claimed-it-doesnt-control-sex-related-ads-new-documents-show-otherwise/2017/07/10/b3158ef6-553c-11e7-b38e-35fd8e0c288f_story.html?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.c76416dbda1c[/URL][/QUOTE]The real problem is the precedent if it passes and isn't challenged. Because they hide this shit under "trafficking" like they made the first extra territorial jurisdiction law about sex with under aged persons, now that's been extended to pretty much everything. Because who's going to say that having a law like that is bad. Now this law is so they can prosecute BackPage for "trafficking" because again, who's going to say that's a bad idea, but once the precedent is set, then the door is wide open.

This is a really bad thing.

A2.

[QUOTE=WizardOfAahs;3492630]Caught this one from Drudge Report, Senate wants to tweak the laws. Interesting read about the offshore contractor soliciting ads. Thought about it and it kind of makes sense in a way. A little sweat shop with a half dozen employees (re) writing ads. Maybe that's a reason for the over-emoji-fication that I find really annoying.

[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2017/08/01/senate-launches-bill-to-remove-immunity-for-websites-hosting-illegal-content-spurred-by-backpage-com/[/URL]

Here is the article they referenced from last month with the Philippine contractor.

[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/backpage-has-always-claimed-it-doesnt-control-sex-related-ads-new-documents-show-otherwise/2017/07/10/b3158ef6-553c-11e7-b38e-35fd8e0c288f_story.html?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.c76416dbda1c[/URL][/QUOTE]Of course the most logic thing to do would be to decriminalize the sex trade so the legit workers could work in the open, but that will never happen. How many times has congress been caught in a sex scandal? They are such hypocrites. Men can destroy their bodies in football or boxing, but women can't sell their bodies for sex.

What will I do if Backpage or this site go away? Nightmare. Not into searching the streets.

It's looks like we are in the midst of a nationwide "johns" sting, using fake online classified ads. Curbing pimps involved in human trafficking makes sense, but wouldn't enforcing and strengthening immigration laws do more than busting a few johns?

Either way, look for well reviewed girls, to help take the "sting" of TOFTT.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-more-than-1000-nabbed-in-nationwide-sex-trafficking-sting-141-in-cook-county-20170802-story.html

[QUOTE=DrManhattan;3494530]It's looks like we are in the midst of a nationwide "johns" sting, using fake online classified ads. Curbing pimps involved in human trafficking makes sense, but wouldn't enforcing and strengthening immigration laws do more than busting a few johns?

Either way, look for well reviewed girls, to help take the "sting" of TOFTT.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-more-than-1000-nabbed-in-nationwide-sex-trafficking-sting-141-in-cook-county-20170802-story.html[/QUOTE]In 2000 the Taliban outlawed opium production in Afganistan. 2001 was the lowest opium production year for at least 25 years. Afganistan produces 90% of world opium.

In 2001 the us invaded afganistan and still has about 8,500 troops in afganistan. Opium production has soared since 2001.

Remember the 80's Iran contra? The CIA was involved with smugging drugs into our cities and were responsable for the crack epidemic.

Well its happening again.

Our taxes funded an army to reopen the opium route, our taxes fund the cia who run the drugs into our own country, our taxes fund the largest prison population in the world which is privatized.

Too bad the taxpayer doesn't get any cut of the profits. Our taxes are used to destabilize our own country for profit for a few. How do you get away with such a scam? Blame someone else. The immagrents, the blacks, the gays, the mongers, the ******, Osama bin Ladin, etc.

The enemy is in our midst. Together we stand divided we fall.

[QUOTE=ThotSlap;3494639]In 2000 the Taliban outlawed opium production in Afganistan. 2001 was the lowest opium production year for at least 25 years. Afganistan produces 90% of world opium.

In 2001 the us invaded afganistan and still has about 850,000 troops in afganistan. Opium production has soared since 2001.

Remember the 80's Iran contra? The CIA was involved with smugging drugs into our cities and were responsable for the crack epidemic.

Well its happening again.

Our taxes funded an army to reopen the opium route, our taxes fund the cia who run the drugs into our own country, our taxes fund the largest prison population in the world which is privatized.

Too bad the taxpayer doesn't get any cut of the profits. Our taxes are used to destabilize our own country for profit for a few. How do you get away with such a scam? Blame someone else. The immagrents, the blacks, the gays, the mongers, the ******, Osama bin Ladin, etc.

The enemy is in our midst. Together we stand divided we fall.[/QUOTE]We have no where near that many troops in Afghanistan anymore.

[QUOTE=Admin2;3493375]The real problem is the precedent if it passes and isn't challenged. Because they hide this shit under "trafficking" like they made the first extra territorial jurisdiction law about sex with under aged persons, now that's been extended to pretty much everything. Because who's going to say that having a law like that is bad. Now this law is so they can prosecute BackPage for "trafficking" because again, who's going to say that's a bad idea, but once the precedent is set, then the door is wide open.

This is a really bad thing.

A2.[/QUOTE]Our Government makes a problem then presents a solution. We simply have to give up some more of our civil liberties to draconian laws to protect us.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty.
To purchase a little Temporary Safety.
Deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Thomas Jefferson

[QUOTE=GoodTimes55;3494649]We have no where near that many troops in Afghanistan anymore.[/QUOTE]Hit too many 0's but trump is talking sending more after having said they will be reduced to 5500. These troops role is to back a pro US / opium gov.

[QUOTE=ThotSlap;3494639]In 2000 the Taliban outlawed opium production in Afganistan. 2001 was the lowest opium production year for at least 25 years. Afganistan produces 90% of world opium.

In 2001 the us invaded afganistan and still has about 8,500 troops in afganistan. Opium production has soared since 2001.

Remember the 80's Iran contra? The CIA was involved with smugging drugs into our cities and were responsable for the crack epidemic.

Well its happening again.

Our taxes funded an army to reopen the opium route, our taxes fund the cia who run the drugs into our own country, our taxes fund the largest prison population in the world which is privatized.

Too bad the taxpayer doesn't get any cut of the profits. Our taxes are used to destabilize our own country for profit for a few. How do you get away with such a scam? Blame someone else. The immagrents, the blacks, the gays, the mongers, the ******, Osama bin Ladin, etc.

The enemy is in our midst. Together we stand divided we fall.[/QUOTE]Are we seriously trying to have a political discussion on a Sex Forum. GTFO.

[blue]Apparently so

A2[/blue]

[URL]http://fox6now.com/2017/08/03/bradford-harrington-sentenced-to-3-years-in-prison-for-sex-crimes/[/URL]

[QUOTE=LikeHead;3495791][URL]http://fox6now.com/2017/08/03/bradford-harrington-sentenced-to-3-years-in-prison-for-sex-crimes/[/URL][/QUOTE]He did pretty good going from 54 to 3.

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;3495817]He did pretty good going from 54 to 3.[/QUOTE]Going to 3 charges, or 3 years in prison? FML if that is ever pretty good for me.

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;3495817]He did pretty good going from 54 to 3.[/QUOTE]From what I hear most where added to make him plea to something a majority were weak at best.