Printable View
[QUOTE=BobLove;5406893]Going along with your logic, here's a hot chick: [URL]https://www.eros.com/california/los_angeles/files/1509427.htm?cat=54[/URL].
I've never tried but just wanted to share.[/QUOTE]We are in year 2021, ad says Visiting until December 7th, 2020.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5421568]She's back and for how long I don't know but I made sure I took advantage of her being available as soon as I knew about it. What I love about Jenny is that everything is so sensual and hot with the perfect touch of GFE and PSE. Her DFK is as good as it gets as her tongue moves in and out of my mouth as she holds me like a long lost lover. She really knows how to hit all the hot spots. She loves being satisfied as much as being the satisfier. Her clit is like a magic button when she feels my tongue working it. She shivers and shudders as I suck and lick her clit and the surrounding areas. Her pussy gets so wet as I use my fingers to get her so crazy with loud screams and her pressing her pussy against my mouth. She speaks English pretty well and hearing her say fuck me is music to my ears. Jenny can fuck with the best of them and has the energy to keep fucking and sucking for as long as I want. She is never done with me. Her BBBJ is so good. Takes it pretty deep and knows how to use her spit to slobber all over my cock as she strokes it while stroking and sucking and moaning. When I told I would cum soon she goes at it even harder with her mouth wide open and moaning for my cum until she feels my cock pulsating and then takes it deep in her mouth and sucks me to the last drop. She loves to play with my cum and kiss and share it with a DFK which is passionate and sensual. Jenny is so hot and such a great fuck while she is still so much a GFE with deep kisses, sensual touching and holding and IMHO the complete experience.[/QUOTE]Can someone explain why this review is virtually identical to the one on TER (see photo), even though these sessions are supposedly 5 months apart?
Despite this poster's countless contributions to LA's kgirl scene, there's still room for improvement.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5421884]Can someone explain why this review is virtually identical to the one on TER (see photo), even though these sessions are supposedly 5 months apart?
Despite this poster's countless contributions to LA's kgirl scene, there's still room for improvement.[/QUOTE]Your question sounds like a rhetorical question to me.
We all know why these reviews are identical. The author is copying and pasting his ter review to advertise a girl. The author is too lazy to write up a new one to make it at least look like he actually has seen the girl recently. Just like photoshop people at orgs are getting lazier and lazier with their work.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5410567]To be fair, I don't recall a review when you've written anything less than positive about your experiences. It's like every session is a unicorn.[/QUOTE]LOL, when he has subpar sessions, he doesn't post them publicly. God forbid some girl might get less business.
This is against these guys religion. Theyd rather have mongers waste their $. They. Just like people from the league and so on. Have put girls far above mongers.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5422158]LOL, when he has subpar sessions, he doesn't post them publicly. God forbid some girl might get less business. This is against these guys religion. Theyd rather have mongers waste their $. They. Just like people from the league and so on. Have put girls far above mongers.[/QUOTE]When he posted this, he essentially admitted to doing just that: Omitting negative experiences with girls.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5413287]Anyone I've reviewed who opens the door with hardly any clothes on and her tits and ass hanging out and takes me in her arms for a DFK with her hands all over me would get no less than an 8 (really hot) from me. If I couldn't give that at least an 8 I wouldn't review them.[/QUOTE]When he posted this 'less than stellar' take on Pink, he quickly attempted to do damage control on himself, and add on another one of his trademark.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5416258]I just wanted to add to my last post since when I read it it sounded kind of negative. Pink is still one of the best and busiest girls available to us. It's no secret why. She's one of the prettiest with a great natural body.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5422152]Your question sounds like a rhetorical question to me.
We all know why these reviews are identical. The author is copying and pasting his ter review to advertise a girl. The author is too lazy to write up a new one to make it at least look like he actually has seen the girl recently. Just like photoshop people at orgs are getting lazier and lazier with their work.[/QUOTE]To be honest, I wasn't quite sure how this fight thread works. Didn't even realize it existed until just recently. But since it seems we have some latitude in here, my question was less rhetorical, and more like passive-aggressive shots fired. He doesn't have the balls to out himself and tell the truth, and would probably offer some lame excuse like it was an "accident" or some similar bs story, even if he did respond. With each attempt at playing this charade, he continues to sell his castrated soul to the devil.
As far as I was told, the only things off limits in thi thread are doxxing and family members.
Maybe I took what admin said too literally but whatev.
The only issue in talking about it here is barely anyone, including people on the fence, reads this fight club subforum. If girls get business via shill reviews, that's a win for them. There's a reason shills and orgs and girls read active forums and indirectly advertise there. It literally brings them $. And a negative review will lose them $.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5423345]As far as I was told, the only things off limits in thi thread are doxxing and family members.
Maybe I took what admin said too literally but whatev.
The only issue in talking about it here is barely anyone, including people on the fence, reads this fight club subforum. If girls get business via shill reviews, that's a win for them. There's a reason shills and orgs and girls read active forums and indirectly advertise there. It literally brings them $. And a negative review will lose them $.[/QUOTE]While this thread pales in comparison to the LA KBB thread as far as traffic goes, it's nonetheless amusing to me. That is, the thought of him reading this is kinda funny.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5422152]Your question sounds like a rhetorical question to me.
We all know why these reviews are identical. The author is copying and pasting his ter review to advertise a girl. The author is too lazy to write up a new one to make it at least look like he actually has seen the girl recently. Just like photoshop people at orgs are getting lazier and lazier with their work.[/QUOTE]I'm ok with repeated reviews across boards but to simply gush and write basically "10/10" reviews for every review irrationally annoys me. Like, I want to ignore his reviews but like I said in my original post, I still want him to contribute, but less "shill-ey" and just more subjectively.
[QUOTE=ImYours;5424776]I'm ok with repeated reviews across boards but to simply gush and write basically "10/10" reviews for every review irrationally annoys me. Like, I want to ignore his reviews but like I said in my original post, I still want him to contribute, but less "shill-ey" and just more subjectively.[/QUOTE]You want a shill to stop being a shill, LOL good luck. That guy already made his choice of telling the truth to fellow mongers vs generating money for girls, a long time ago.
[QUOTE]
While this thread pales in comparison to the LA KBB thread as far as traffic goes, it's nonetheless amusing to me. That is, the thought of him reading this is kinda fun[/QUOTE]It's amusing but I don't think he or the entities he shills for care much. Those entities only understand things when $ is involved. Now that people are prohibited to comment on others reviews in the BB thread, the "damage control" is relegated solely to "counter" negative reviews with positive reviews.
What's imperative imo is that everyone's voices are heard, especially those who are not satisfied.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5425532]You want a shill to stop being a shill, LOL good luck. That guy already made his choice of telling the truth to fellow mongers vs generating money for girls, a long time ago.
It's amusing but I don't think he or the entities he shills for care much. Those entities only understand things when $ is involved. Now that people are prohibited to comment on others reviews in the BB thread, the "damage control" is relegated solely to "counter" negative reviews with positive reviews.
What's imperative imo is that everyone's voices are heard, especially those who are not satisfied.[/QUOTE]We'll see how long this moratorium lasts in terms of effect. I'm already seeing people question each other's POV and it's barely been 1 week.
Saw that this morning and I'm expecting many banned accounts or worse yet the forum being locked down. Hopefully it doesn't lead to everyone who has ever posted on the forum from being banned.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5428785]We'll see how long this moratorium lasts in terms of effect. I'm already seeing people question each other's POV and it's barely been 1 week.[/QUOTE]
I saw a review of Dana today in which she offered anal which caught my attention immediately. I called and spoke with the booker and manager with whom I'm very familiar and was told emphatically that it is not true. It was posted by someone with notoriously low scores and this one was not much different in spite of the offering of anal. All I can say is that the information I got tells me that we should not go in there with a predisposition for going to the Greek isles. It just ain't going to happen and now puts Dana in an awkward situation.
[QUOTE=FirstClass1;5438782]By the mere fact that this girl agreed to show up at a hotel room without having met you, she must be a pro. That being said, her reaction is understandable, as there are tricks that will refuse to provide the allowance after a trip to the FC.
I'd recommend not booking the room until you've actually met the girl and know if you're into each other. Otherwise you have no idea who will show up, and it can become a "bait and switch" or a "cash and dash" situation.[/QUOTE]Every chick that is on a "SB" (huge eyeroll) site that is looking for an "allowance" is a pro. Not saying that's a bad thing, the modern "sugar world" started so that chicks who don't want to think of themselves as hookers could sell pussy. Used to be guys went along with this polite fiction in order to get fuck them. Some of you guys now actually believe that an "allowance" isn't payment and that paying for sex, isn't paying for sex.
I find it weird as fuck.
[QUOTE=Admin2;5438880]Every chick that is on a "SB" (huge eyeroll) site that is looking for an "allowance" is a pro. Not saying that's a bad thing, the modern "sugar world" started so that chicks who don't want to think of themselves as hookers could sell pussy. Used to be guys went along with this polite fiction in order to get fuck them. Some of you guys now actually believe that an "allowance" isn't payment and that paying for sex, isn't paying for sex.
I find it weird as fuck.[/QUOTE]If there is anyone here that thinks an allowance isn't paying for sex. Please speak up. LOL. Sorry I couldn't help myself.