Printable View
I have not seen her in a couple of months, but she just messaged that she's back home from a vacation.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/17d9be3c-b029-44e9-97dc-bd3c62a7d038[/URL]
She is very responsive but also sends photos and videos if you are nice to her and treat her very well. The winter holidays and summer times are the best times to find a steady SB.
Have a fun time and enjoy.
Olivia is the real deal. Treat her well!
[QUOTE=BigCoolie;6723397]I have not seen her in a couple of months, but she just messaged that she's back home from a vacation.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/17d9be3c-b029-44e9-97dc-bd3c62a7d038[/URL]
She is very responsive but also sends photos and videos if you are nice to her and treat her very well. The winter holidays and summer times are the best times to find a steady SB.
Have a fun time and enjoy.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BigCoolie;6723397]I have not seen her in a couple of months, but she just messaged that she's back home from a vacation.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/17d9be3c-b029-44e9-97dc-bd3c62a7d038[/URL]
She is very responsive but also sends photos and videos if you are nice to her and treat her very well. The winter holidays and summer times are the best times to find a steady SB.
[/QUOTE]Not sure how responsive she is. I texted back and forth with her and she just ghosted on me. She want 500 upfront like before we do anything. One pop. I suggested we do meet and great. She look kind of fat hence the reason I didn't move forward with her.
[QUOTE=SCX13;6721079]Thanks. Appreciate the info. I'm not too crazy about the potential of someone hanging around / hovering about. I did find it weird she was able to host. So I figured she had a roommate or a bf.[/QUOTE]I'm curious about her also. Did you end up seeing her?
If you like to come on here to screen shot reviews / conversations we're having so you can send them to the women they are about in some misguided attempt to score brownie points with them. Kindly take a long walk off a short pier.
Saw some people reappear on the platform.
RedRuby1 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/315bd890-50eb-45ac-9e42-3e3eca32001e[/URL].
From Southern NH / Seacoast area. Great great great rack. We met awhile back like 2 years ago. She was hesitant to do a lot of stuff but I got what I wanted. 400. Claims to not remember me. I think she is just selling pics now.
Mamatayyy720 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9338e94e-ca0c-4c7f-81ad-09f63f15ff26[/URL].
Been reviewed on here. Total whack job drug addict. Does not look like the pics. Will steal from you if you let your guard down. I offered 250 and she was good with that.
Lily [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1158067e-8a83-4438-abf2-4e6bf9ec8b43[/URL].
Seems cool at first but at least in my situation she got a hold of some personal info and became a nightmare. If you do see her go somewhere neutral, don't give her your real phone number or name, park far away so she can't get your license plate. She was pretty good in terms of intimacy. Asked for 500 I gave her 350.
PinkHarpist [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3a51489f-ccf7-4497-b8df-4e629c615ea5[/URL].
Tall, very beautiful. When I did a M&G with her she could host and pretty much every act was on the table. But she wanted 800 per date and it just wasn't financially something I felt like doing. I didn't try negotiating. Maybe I should have??
Kendall [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c0ac78c6-3d67-4ef6-8aec-3a6c2ff74e30[/URL].
Former stripper. Pretty good bedroom skills. Can be annoying to talk to. I got her when she was new at 400.
[QUOTE]
PinkHarpist [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3a51489f-ccf7-4497-b8df-4e629c615ea5[/URL].
Tall, very beautiful. When I did a M&G with her she could host and pretty much every act was on the table. But she wanted 800 per date and it just wasn't financially something I felt like doing. I didn't try negotiating. Maybe I should have??[/QUOTE]Same story here. She's great but we couldn't make the financials work.
[QUOTE=Mfp79;6732251]Same story here. She's great but we couldn't make the financials work.[/QUOTE]I just signed up for the 30 day premium membership yet everyone of these links that I click on directs me to the SA website and an error message comes up as "Profile Not Available? ".
Are these current profiles and they are deleting their account that quickly? Or what? Also when I search their username on the website a message apppears Profile not found!
So what's happening? .
Thanks for your help.
PL.
[QUOTE=PinayLuver;6732513]I just signed up for the 30 day premium membership yet everyone of these links that I click on directs me to the SA website and an error message comes up as "Profile Not Available? ".
Are these current profiles and they are deleting their account that quickly? Or what? Also when I search their username on the website a message apppears Profile not found!
So what's happening? .
Thanks for your help.
PL.[/QUOTE]That happened to me once. Turned out I had accidrntally clicked "seeking successful members" which means you will only see links for possible sugar mommas. And in case anyone does not know, there are none. I got support at sa to change my account so it is a guy looking for sb's.
I accidentally posted this in Worcester's forum:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a...8-568338ac98a1[/URL]
My coworker actually met this one after my previous post #152.
She updated her photos recently, so that are pretty accurate within the last year or so. She wanted $$ for any platonic dates "building towards sex".
Otherwise, from his story she was a relaxed, a bit talkative, and fun date.
[QUOTE=BigCoolie;6732784]"building towards sex".
[/QUOTE]Veterans know what this means. Buyer beware.
I'm ok with intra-day building (coffee, drinks, to vibe), not inter-day building (aka dating, romance, scams).
[QUOTE=Bran001;6732882]Veterans know what this means. Buyer beware.[/QUOTE]
This one used to post on STG as Daisy. Ripped a lot of guys off.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f661c4f2-22a2-4fe8-94b8-0efcc036afdf[/URL]
[QUOTE=BR1201;6731808]Saw some people reappear on the platform.
RedRuby1 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/315bd890-50eb-45ac-9e42-3e3eca32001e[/URL].
From Southern NH / Seacoast area. Great great great rack. We met awhile back like 2 years ago. She was hesitant to do a lot of stuff but I got what I wanted. 400. Claims to not remember me. I think she is just selling pics now.
Mamatayyy720 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9338e94e-ca0c-4c7f-81ad-09f63f15ff26[/URL].
Been reviewed on here. Total whack job drug addict. Does not look like the pics. Will steal from you if you let your guard down. I offered 250 and she was good with that.
Lily [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1158067e-8a83-4438-abf2-4e6bf9ec8b43[/URL].
Seems cool at first but at least in my situation she got a hold of some personal info and became a nightmare. If you do see her go somewhere neutral, don't give her your real phone number or name, park far away so she can't get your license plate. She was pretty good in terms of intimacy. Asked for 500 I gave her 350.
PinkHarpist [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3a51489f-ccf7-4497-b8df-4e629c615ea5[/URL].
Tall, very beautiful. When I did a M&G with her she could host and pretty much every act was on the table. But she wanted 800 per date and it just wasn't financially something I felt like doing. I didn't try negotiating. Maybe I should have??
Kendall [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c0ac78c6-3d67-4ef6-8aec-3a6c2ff74e30[/URL].
Former stripper. Pretty good bedroom skills. Can be annoying to talk to. I got her when she was new at 400.[/QUOTE]How was Kendall was she hard to get hold of does she go bare.
I asked a girl how she was thinking about the arrangement. By which I meant how much. And she responded "fun and treats". What do we think that means?
[QUOTE=Laurion;6723455]Olivia is the real deal. Treat her well![/QUOTE]She gives off vibes of someone who can suck a mean one. ??
[QUOTE=Gkastanza99;6734999]I asked a girl how she was thinking about the arrangement. By which I meant how much. And she responded "fun and treats". What do we think that means?[/QUOTE]Considering the site you are on and the reasons people are on there. Fun (sex) in exchange for treats (money / gifts). What else do you believe she meant by that?
[QUOTE=EireAnn;6729811]I'm curious about her also. Did you end up seeing her?[/QUOTE]No but she's constantly texting me to meet. I thinks she's set on $300 tho.
[QUOTE=SCX13;6735851]No but she's constantly texting me to meet. I thinks she's set on $300 tho.[/QUOTE]I had a similar experience. I didn't like what was said on here so I passed.
[QUOTE=SCX13;6735851]No but she's constantly texting me to meet. I thinks she's set on $300 tho.[/QUOTE]Same here. She's a little too aggressive for my comfort level right now.
[QUOTE=Jdl0313;6735231]Considering the site you are on and the reasons people are on there. Fun (sex) in exchange for treats (money / gifts). What else do you believe she meant by that?[/QUOTE]That's what I was assuming. I guess I was too vague in my question.
Brazilian and pics are accurate. IMO not worth the money she asks for. Happy to share additional info with senior folks.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0278e0b4-f490-4cf1-816a-87cb071da67d[/URL]
Happy Hunting,
FK.
Did I miss the review? What's the word on her? Recommend. Good time or too many rules or slightly better tha stg girl?
Any help appreciated on Izzy.
[QUOTE=AcknowledgeMe;6720989]That's izz, she's from st Louis and came here last year with her bf and is back now. She doesn't live alone, she doesn't even live here.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BR1201;6731808]
Lily [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1158067e-8a83-4438-abf2-4e6bf9ec8b43[/URL].
Seems cool at first but at least in my situation she got a hold of some personal info and became a nightmare. If you do see her go somewhere neutral, don't give her your real phone number or name, park far away so she can't get your license plate. She was pretty good in terms of intimacy. Asked for 500 I gave her 350.
[/QUOTE]Saw her at a hotel on super short notice. Everything bare for $300. I'll probably see her again.
We need to figure out how to make this happen: girls that want to be sugar babies should be inclined to offer a "trial screw". I hate wasting time with all the chit chat and arrangement discussion, only to find out she's a boring lay.
[QUOTE=Longjblues;6738296]Did I miss the review? What's the word on her? Recommend. Good time or too many rules or slightly better tha stg girl?
Any help appreciated on Izzy.[/QUOTE]Is she still here? I thought she was heading back yesterday. Overall I'd categorize as Meh. Fine.
[QUOTE=JClearMan1;6738732]We need to figure out how to make this happen: girls that want to be sugar babies should be inclined to offer a "trial screw". I hate wasting time with all the chit chat and arrangement discussion, only to find out she's a boring lay.[/QUOTE]I always found the first time to be a little awkward with a true non pro SB anyway. I typically would be very open during the talk up so to inquire what she liked and if she was into anything other than "normal" sex. I also keep my selection limited to under 30 and slim. Worst case you end up banging a really hot college girl but don't go back. Remember it takes 2 to not have "boring" sex. Find out what turns them on and push their boundaries. I have had many girls want to keep repeating not just because of the money, as they can just go to the next guy for that, but because they liked being there. Make it fun, all about them, and keep them satisfied and they will call you for another round. Once the first time is in the books you usually know if she is worth developing into what you want to keep repeating.
[QUOTE=JClearMan1;6738732]We need to figure out how to make this happen: girls that want to be sugar babies should be inclined to offer a "trial screw". I hate wasting time with all the chit chat and arrangement discussion, only to find out she's a boring lay.[/QUOTE]I don't think there is a sound way to figure out if it's a boring lay. I think the best way is to do a meet and greet or a video chat. Sometimes people here would post their experience that helps. Personally, I usually tell them straight up what type of arrangement I want. The one that is kind of a 'pro' would ask me what is my kink.
I had some bad ones even when I do the M&G. One 21 year old, she was boring AF. She just lay there, kept covering her pussy. Don't want to do anything. I always have this fear that if I paid 500 plus, the sex is going to be 15 minutes because Peter is being sensitive.
You must have some kind of mojo if you can find a dead fish from a video chat. There are no short cuts. You have to do the date and find out. Even reviews are only partly helpful because one guy's gem is another guy's stone.
[QUOTE=PlayTrey;6739259]I don't think there is a sound way to figure out if it's a boring lay. I think the best way is to do a meet and greet or a video chat. Sometimes people here would post their experience that helps. Personally, I usually tell them straight up what type of arrangement I want. The one that is kind of a 'pro' would ask me what is my kink.
I had some bad ones even when I do the M&G. One 21 year old, she was boring AF. She just lay there, kept covering her pussy. Don't want to do anything. I always have this fear that if I paid 500 plus, the sex is going to be 15 minutes because Peter is being sensitive.[/QUOTE]
Has anyone had the pleasure of meeting this girl?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/63bcdcad-d3e9-4afc-b1df-cdfdd59d4753[/URL]
[QUOTE=RealGent401;6739793]Has anyone had the pleasure of meeting this girl?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/63bcdcad-d3e9-4afc-b1df-cdfdd59d4753[/URL][/QUOTE]Most likely a fake profile:
[URL]https://c3.coomer.su/data/02/12/021219de310bff884df767aadf43b41aba8a65e8d11267cb19faac9e5742df30.jpg[/URL]
[QUOTE=RealGent401;6739793]Has anyone had the pleasure of meeting this girl?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/63bcdcad-d3e9-4afc-b1df-cdfdd59d4753[/URL][/QUOTE]Looks like a fake profile brother (from reverse image search): [URL]https://www.topfapgirls.com/biglivvv/t/5527499/[/URL].
[QUOTE=DarkClouds;6739374]You must have some kind of mojo if you can find a dead fish from a video chat. There are no short cuts. You have to do the date and find out. Even reviews are only partly helpful because one guy's gem is another guy's stone.[/QUOTE]That's what I was thinking. I've done only one FaceTime call since getting on SA (December 2021) and I have met and fucked 46 different women. I currently have two PPM regulars, but always trying to fuck my way through more flesh just to keep things interesting. I'm saying that sometimes a gal seems like she'll be fun, but when it comes down to it she's just not a good fit and I'm annoyed when I have to give a full gift for a mediocre fuck.
I hear you brother. But I figure you got to take the losses with the wins. Sometimes it's such an amazing experience that I feel as if I'm getting away with robbery LOL.
There are many ways to make sure that the girl is real, legit, whatever you want to call it. But what she will be like in the moment is not possible to predict until you meet her.
[QUOTE=JClearMan1;6740063]That's what I was thinking. I've done only one FaceTime call since getting on SA (December 2021) and I have met and fucked 46 different women. I currently have two PPM regulars, but always trying to fuck my way through more flesh just to keep things interesting. I'm saying that sometimes a gal seems like she'll be fun, but when it comes down to it she's just not a good fit and I'm annoyed when I have to give a full gift for a mediocre fuck.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=JClearMan1;6738732]We need to figure out how to make this happen: girls that want to be sugar babies should be inclined to offer a "trial screw". I hate wasting time with all the chit chat and arrangement discussion, only to find out she's a boring lay.[/QUOTE]Your "trial screw" is their "platonic date for full allowance. ".
If you don't want to do a platonic date for full allowance, don't be asking SB's to fuck you for free.
Ya I agree. You have to be willing to go for the ride and take the risk. The idea of sugar dating is to enjoy the whole experience, and not be too fixated on just one thing. I personally like the "chit chat" because it gives the girl character. Approaching every date the same way makes it boring. If you're not looking for a fuller dating experience then you might be better off with platforms like STG or AMPs where it's completely time-boxed and there's little or no room for character.
[QUOTE=Bran001;6740702]Your "trial screw" is their "platonic date for full allowance. ".
If you don't want to do a platonic date for full allowance, don't be asking SB's to fuck you for free.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DarkClouds;6740714]Ya I agree. You have to be willing to go for the ride and take the risk. The idea of sugar dating is to enjoy the whole experience, and not be too fixated on just one thing. I personally like the "chit chat" because it gives the girl character. Approaching every date the same way makes it boring. If you're not looking for a fuller dating experience then you might be better off with platforms like STG or AMPs where it's completely time-boxed and there's little or no room for character.[/QUOTE]I have a limited sample size of approximately 25 women. Based on this, I've formulated a straightforward set of guidelines that have proven effective in filtering out uninteresting or unsatisfactory encounters. Firstly, I adhere to the 24-hour rule, avoiding engagement with women who take more than a day to respond after transitioning to texting. Secondly, I prioritize interactions with women who express a genuine interest in getting to know me, delving into topics such as hobbies. Thirdly, there should be a level of mental or physical attraction, demonstrated through compliments on appearance, activities, or interests. Lastly, a key criterion is the woman's eagerness to meet in person, as opposed to delaying or hesitating in arranging a face-to-face encounter.
I do deviate from these rules to introduce some variety into my experiences, engaging in one-time encounters with "UTR" women.
[QUOTE=FriendlyKing;6740822]I have a limited sample size of approximately 25 women. Based on this, I've formulated a straightforward set of guidelines that have proven effective in filtering out uninteresting or unsatisfactory encounters. Firstly, I adhere to the 24-hour rule, avoiding engagement with women who take more than a day to respond after transitioning to texting. Secondly, I prioritize interactions with women who express a genuine interest in getting to know me, delving into topics such as hobbies. Thirdly, there should be a level of mental or physical attraction, demonstrated through compliments on appearance, activities, or interests. Lastly, a key criterion is the woman's eagerness to meet in person, as opposed to delaying or hesitating in arranging a face-to-face encounter.
[/QUOTE]Solid advice all around. Guys would benefit from implementing this in ALL their relationships, sugar or not.
There's a little dissonance in this thread vis a vis successful connections in general (which entails a host of factors) and the 'will she be a dead fish in bed' issue. All of what you wrote is perfectly valid and I agree with. I'm not convinced it predicts sexual performance, but to be fair I don't think you're saying it does.
What I want out of great SB "arrangements" is all of what you write, plus compelling sex. Because that's overall a very time-consuming search, lately I'm content with a couple of very long-term regulars (the lack of novelty is outweighed by their overall reliability and good sex performance) and stopped looking for new partners. I love 'novelty' but recently lost the energy to seek it out.
[QUOTE=FriendlyKing;6740822]I have a limited sample size of approximately 25 women. Based on this, I've formulated a straightforward set of guidelines that have proven effective in filtering out uninteresting or unsatisfactory encounters. Firstly, I adhere to the 24-hour rule, avoiding engagement with women who take more than a day to respond after transitioning to texting. Secondly, I prioritize interactions with women who express a genuine interest in getting to know me, delving into topics such as hobbies. Thirdly, there should be a level of mental or physical attraction, demonstrated through compliments on appearance, activities, or interests. Lastly, a key criterion is the woman's eagerness to meet in person, as opposed to delaying or hesitating in arranging a face-to-face encounter.
I do deviate from these rules to introduce some variety into my experiences, engaging in one-time encounters with "UTR" women.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Bran001;6741488]There's a little dissonance in this thread vis a vis successful connections in general (which entails a host of factors) and the 'will she be a dead fish in bed' issue. All of what you wrote is perfectly valid and I agree with. I'm not convinced it predicts sexual performance, but to be fair I don't think you're saying it does.
What I want out of great SB "arrangements" is all of what you write, plus compelling sex. Because that's overall a very time-consuming search, lately I'm content with a couple of very long-term regulars (the lack of novelty is outweighed by their overall reliability and good sex performance) and stopped looking for new partners. I love 'novelty' but recently lost the energy to seek it out.[/QUOTE]Certainly! You're correct! I didn't intend to imply a direct correlation between what I mentioned and sexual performance. However, it's likely that if a woman possesses those qualities, the probability of having a better sexual experience is high.