[QUOTE=Belly888;6464544]Haven't seen marisa but joy is somewhat comparable to ka and mariah. Where ka and mariah were more "hot", joy is "cute" and more gnd. A notch lower for body scores but same age range.[/QUOTE]Thank you! That is helpful.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Belly888;6464544]Haven't seen marisa but joy is somewhat comparable to ka and mariah. Where ka and mariah were more "hot", joy is "cute" and more gnd. A notch lower for body scores but same age range.[/QUOTE]Thank you! That is helpful.
Are her stats incorrect then? Site says 5'2 but you say 5'6? Thanks.
[QUOTE=ElonMusk;6458939]Anyway moving on thread.
Saw lovely at a familiar location, first time and wow was I blown away by how beautiful she looks, she certainly earned the name lovely as I almost fell in love.
L: About 5'6 height, nice skinny and fit body, mostly mesmerized by her beautiful face and was just lost in her eyes. So gracious and friendly. B cup tits and nice ass.
A: Very nice and graceful plays some gentle piano music in the background and she's ready to please once she opens the door.
S: Walk in nice standard shower, with dfk and p2 p. Just getting lost in her arms lots of kissing. Nice wet bbj amazing technique, then in bed fondling each other to 69, then going doggie.
Just miss looking at her in doggie while kissing her, then switching with her putting her heels on and doing doggie in the mirror while we both stare into the mirror, then missionary, and couldn't hold it and popped. Gives a nice massage and dfk, shower me again and puts my clothes on like I'm a little kid which was very fun to experience.
E: $320 standard.
Are: I'm definitely going back for some more repeat sessions with her but I'll share her here so you guys can go run see her. She's amazing hands down 10/10.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Belly888;6464544]Haven't seen marisa but joy is somewhat comparable to ka and mariah. Where ka and mariah were more "hot", joy is "cute" and more gnd. A notch lower for body scores but same age range.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the recommendation! I saw Joy today and can confirm she is much younger (probably in 20's) and service was great too. Not in the Ka league but close enough. Would repeat and recommend.
[QUOTE=SomeoneOC;6465305]Thanks for the recommendation! I saw Joy today and can confirm she is much younger (probably in 20's) and service was great too. Not in the Ka league but close enough. Would repeat and recommend.[/QUOTE]No problem. Apparently, I'm "picky" because I have taken advice from some others and have been completely let down. Most recently tora who was aweful and still is giving me crawly skin even after a couple weeks. I don't score higher in looks just because the girl does rimming or bb. I score looks and service total separate and I wish more guys would do the same.
[QUOTE=JkSnake;6465259]Are her stats incorrect then? Site says 5'2 but you say 5'6? Thanks.[/QUOTE]Maybe was the heels, she was about my height though and I'm 5'10.
Are we talking about this Lovely:
[URL]https://orangecuties.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=1&product_id=659[/URL]
Stats says 5'2".
Or the other BBFS lovely who is taller.
[QUOTE=ElonMusk;6465968]Maybe was the heels, she was about my height though and I'm 5'10.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=JohnHada;6466039]Are we talking about this Lovely:
[URL]https://orangecuties.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=1&product_id=659[/URL]
Stats says 5'2".
Or the other BBFS lovely who is taller.[/QUOTE]Yes, I think she is the one. Saw her last week. If I remember correctly, she was around 5'3" - 5'5". Didn't come across as too short or too tall otherwise I would have noticed and remembered. I would rate face as 7, body as 9, service as 8. Overall, would recommend seeing her at least once. I may repeat if choices are limited.
[QUOTE=Belly888;6465792]No problem. Apparently, I'm "picky" because I have taken advice from some others and have been completely let down. Most recently tora who was aweful and still is giving me crawly skin even after a couple weeks. I don't score higher in looks just because the girl does rimming or bb. I score looks and service total separate and I wish more guys would do the same.[/QUOTE]Same here I am also picky when it comes to looks Have been burned one too many times looking at TER reviews that rate looks at 7. 5 or 8 when it was more about the excellent service and average looks at best.
[QUOTE=Belly888;6465792]No problem. Apparently, I'm "picky" because I have taken advice from some others and have been completely let down. Most recently tora who was aweful and still is giving me crawly skin even after a couple weeks. I don't score higher in looks just because the girl does rimming or bb. I score looks and service total separate and I wish more guys would do the same.[/QUOTE]I am curious if you have seen BabySky and how would you rate your looks?
[QUOTE=SomeoneOC;6466126]Yes, I think she is the one. Saw her last week. If I remember correctly, she was around 5'3" - 5'5". Didn't come across as too short or too tall otherwise I would have noticed and remembered. I would rate face as 7, body as 9, service as 8. Overall, would recommend seeing her at least once. I may repeat if choices are limited.[/QUOTE]I thiught she was really hot but I've also been burned a few times before. Any suggestions for girls in OC that are hot?
I only see LA suggestions like Ina being pushed the most. Not much from Oc.
[QUOTE=SomeoneOC;6466129]Same here I am also picky when it comes to looks Have been burned one too many times looking at TER reviews that rate looks at 7. 5 or 8 when it was more about the excellent service and average looks at best.[/QUOTE]In case you haven't seen this post.
[QUOTE=MisterDotD;6450395]Probably one of my fav girl so far. I saw her review last year around August, 2022 on TER and it was very positive. So I give her a try. And been repeated her 3 times now. Very great GFE service. Here are my overall impression.
Photo: It is her in the picture. Photoshop is slightly used, but it does resemble her look IRL. I'll link the picture that looks the closest to her.
Look: Young, cute, and again, very similar body shape in the photo, natural breast C size, perky, fairly flat butt, nice hair trim down there. Overall, a very cute young girl.
Service: GFE, DKF (she love it), DATY, BBBJ, 69. She stay true to the menu. She greet me at the door wearing a kimono (all 3 times she wear it), blue toast, preview BBBJ in the shower, jump on the bed, DATY, BBBJ, then finish with missionary. While you finish, she also does a Kegel move which tighten her vagina and squeeze the very last ounce of your semen while your penis is still inside that I just love it so much.
Attitude: She speaks decent English (6/10). No rush. Very positive and polite, definitely aim to please.
Repeat: Absolutely yes.
Donation: $320 for 1 h.
Overall as usual, YMMV. I have a super fun time with her.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=JasonVee;6467041]The farthest I go is enclave and I'm in irvine LOL.
Pretend that you make $200 k which I assume people who participate in this consistently must be making if not more.
Each hour you commit to th is is $100 of lost productivity, so 4 hours plus $320 and logistics = $800 trip?[/QUOTE]I don't know what you're talking about. Pussy is always going to cost time and money. Regardless, even if you go the civie route its still going to take up time you can't just equate it to a dollar amount 100%.
Selina_HB (on HX) recently returned and is as hot as before and now has a private apartment incall in Irvine. She gets better every time I see her.
She has a Chinese friend (Cici) who is her until June 5. Here real pics are posted under Selina's HX profile. She is also an HYA and was also very good with her GFE service. English also very good, like Selina.
[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;6468371]Selina_HB (on HX) recently returned and is as hot as before and now has a private apartment incall in Irvine. She gets better every time I see her.
She has a Chinese friend (Cici) who is her until June 5. Here real pics are posted under Selina's HX profile. She is also an HYA and was also very good with her GFE service. English also very good, like Selina.[/QUOTE]I saw Cici & enjoyed my session with her.
I think only the right most picture is her, the others appear to be body shots.
[QUOTE=AsianHunter;6469915]I saw Cici & enjoyed my session with her.
I think only the right most picture is her, the others appear to be body shots.[/QUOTE]As of a few days ago, all five of her pictures show a face.
Now with multiple bookers in Irvine.
CYA, though I wouldn't fault you for calling her HYA.
Spinner galore and yes you can spin her.
Very good English.
Enhanced boobs.
No real ass.
She's like 88 lbs.
But does a great BBBJ with DT and BL / sucking.
Yes I spun her and she took it like a champ.
Upbeat, full GFE with DFK.
For 320, you cannot go wrong with her.
How old? She could be 22-30: I can't tell!
There were some threads of CG Jane being HYA. Anyone else saw her?
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/jane[/URL]
[QUOTE=ReDtoLaunch;6479943]There were some threads of CG Jane being HYA. Anyone else saw her?
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/jane[/URL][/QUOTE]Saw her recently, she definitely looks young. Natural tits. Face in her photos looks different from real life. I can maybe see the resemblance, but didn't feel like I saw the same person as in the photos. Her stats on the website seem accurate.
Service isn't as good as most Kgirls (undressed myself, no shower preview).
I might repeat if I don't have a long backlog of other girls to try.
[QUOTE=ReDtoLaunch;6479943]There were some threads of CG Jane being HYA. Anyone else saw her?
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/jane[/URL][/QUOTE]I have seen her twice and plan to repeat before she leaves. She is more like CYA but may qualify as HYA too. Definitely on the young side and provides great service.
[QUOTE=ReDtoLaunch;6479943]There were some threads of CG Jane being HYA. Anyone else saw her?
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/jane[/URL][/QUOTE]Not yet, but there are already 2 mentions and TER reported of her not recommended for BBFS.
Do we have Hya OC list? Seems pretty dry here.
[QUOTE=DumbDonald;6479956]I don't have any new Hya info to talk about and talking about anything besides what was being said would've been better.[/QUOTE]Well then maybe it's time to cast a wider net and consider HYAs outside of OC? Sammy CG hasn't been mentioned on this thread, but I'd say she's worth the drive to LA at 320. I don't usually dabble in CFS girls, and I always avoided her because of her upcharge. But for guys that actually avoid bb girls, upcharge or not, I think she's a solid option. Decent face, smokin body. And her head game is respectable. She even offered P2 M between session by taking off the cover, then treating me to some slobbery-tongue slapping gawk gawk action, before slapping the old back condom on and hopping back on board. All without blinking an eye.
She's got a tight snatch and may bite off more than she can chew by encouraging you to go deep, and risk her cervix taking a merciless beating. Few things compare to a hot girl that sacrifices pain for the purpose of pleasure. Just don't be the dummy that gets blackballed because you thought she wanted you to do it.
[QUOTE=ReDtoLaunch;6479943]There were some threads of CG Jane being HYA. Anyone else saw her?
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/jane[/URL][/QUOTE]I thought Jane was very pretty. It was a bit awkward, mainly because I'm a bit akkward. But she provided great service for me. She's probably the young one I've seen in the past couple of years.
[URL]https://mykupcake.com/joy[/URL]
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/jane[/URL]
Same pics are used. Are they the same person?
[QUOTE=DoctorTwoGuns;6482862][URL]https://mykupcake.com/joy[/URL]
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/jane[/URL]
Same pics are used. Are they the same person?[/QUOTE]Yes, they are the same. She said as much that she goes by both of those names. I think she also goes by Jenna with one of the other providers.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]
For those who had not seen her, I would definitely recommend. She is HYA for purpose of this thread. Slender all natural body. Cheerful and accommodating. Good service and enjoy sex. Experience is a chill sex with a cute coed. This agency also asks for lower rates. Can't miss IMO while she is in town.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/198[/URL]
[QUOTE=SomeoneOC;6482899]Yes, they are the same. She said as much that she goes by both of those names. I think she also goes by Jenna with one of the other providers.[/QUOTE]Definitely on the younger side with exotic mixed look. Good service. Didn't go for BB since CIP is not available. Definitely worth seeing.
[QUOTE=HornyToad75;6485759]For those who had not seen her, I would definitely recommend. She is HYA for purpose of this thread. Slender all natural body. Cheerful and accommodating. Good service and enjoy sex. Experience is a chill sex with a cute coed. This agency also asks for lower rates. Can't miss IMO while she is in town.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/198[/URL][/QUOTE]Are her pics real?
[QUOTE=DankDonk;6485782]Are her pics real?[/QUOTE]No, but she does resemble the girl in the pic. Beauty is in the eyes of beholder, but I would say most guys would find her attractive.
[QUOTE=TrustProcess;6438008]Anyone see Garam (Pepper)? She looks like she could be a HYA but no mention of her in the threads. She's listed on MKC, LAK, OrangeCuties, TopAsians, etc.[/QUOTE]I was actually looking into garam just now. GardenKsecret says real pics so I got excited. Found no info on here about her, but TER says disappointing.
[QUOTE=Goku17;6485867]I was actually looking into garam just now. GardenKsecret says real pics so I got excited. Found no info on here about her, but TER says disappointing.[/QUOTE]The worst part of TER is that their reviews are more fake than the ones mentioned here.
[QUOTE=CzTop;6481619]I thought Jane was very pretty. It was a bit awkward, mainly because I'm a bit akkward. But she provided great service for me. She's probably the young one I've seen in the past couple of years.[/QUOTE]How do you rate her look and body?
[QUOTE=Cali0082;6486014]The worst part of TER is that their reviews are more fake than the ones mentioned here.[/QUOTE]Yeah that's why I trust the outlier reviews more, the ones that don't hype the girl.
[QUOTE=HornyToad75;6485759]For those who had not seen her, I would definitely recommend. She is HYA for purpose of this thread. Slender all natural body. Cheerful and accommodating. Good service and enjoy sex. Experience is a chill sex with a cute coed. This agency also asks for lower rates. Can't miss IMO while she is in town.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/198[/URL][/QUOTE]Used to be in OC for a while 4-5 years ago. I agree she's cute but that's about it.
[QUOTE=Goku17;6485867]I was actually looking into garam just now. GardenKsecret says real pics so I got excited. Found no info on here about her, but TER says disappointing.[/QUOTE]I tried garam before. Her pics are photoshopped to make her look skinnier but her face is semi close. It was fun grabbing her ass.
Lovely from MKC is CYA in my book. Probably around 27 yrs old.
She is playful and provided a satisfying GFE session.
Face: 8.5, body: 7.5, Service: 9.
I just saw maeve today, she's 4'9 beautiful K spinner.
I wanted BB special.
Looks wise she is cute, has nice and beautiful skin.
She has a beautiful smile and a twinkle in her eye.
Body 8/10.
Amazing small package built for fun, nice enhanced D cups.
Her performance, of course good in CG.
She took a good pounding while I was doing Mish and K9.
Perfomance 9/10.
Fake pics. Not sure why nobody reviewed her. My type of young pretty face with slender body and nice looking MMs. Good English. Thai / Korean mix.
Selina said if you don't like her then you may like Tiffany. Selina is right. I prefer Tiffany over Selina cause Tiffany is younger. Tiffany is pretty GND. She is not as fit and thin as Selina but her body looks great to me. She wore something that drawn my eyes to her nice looking ass, almost like heart shape. It's weird when people hyped up Cici and not a beep about Tiffany.
You would feel pretty lucky after a streak of grannies and MILFs at a spa then see her, unless you prefer the service of older girls. Her service is as good as Kgirl at a fraction of the cost 260/45 or 300/60. She had some nice catch phrases that would sound corny from another girl, but somehow motivated me as I stared at that pretty face and did what she wanted.
She's only here till 6/20. It sucks for me when bros don't appreciate girls like that. I would like to see her coming back and more young girls here. LA bookers may ask 350/60 for her.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Selina_HB[/URL]
Since Tiffany been here, these are the girls that have been reviewed on TER and here in OC.
Cari, Diana, J, Zuri, Sakura, Scarlett, Hera, SAG Jane / Joy, Pearly, Keer, LA Nicole, Tina, Leah, Selina_HB, Ace / Diva / Amora, Garam, Bea, Stefany, Wynn, White, Loro, Sophia and Lily, Jace, Tiny and Melody, Loren, Lovely, Rainbow, Joyce, Tyra, Tomi / Pink, Trista, Sophia, EJ, Baby Sky, MKC Suzie, Olivia / Hari. I have moved on from most girls being reviewed a lot in OC/LA.
Most of them are older than Tiffany, mostly MILFs and BB girls. YMMV but I think Tiffany is at least the same level in looks as MILF Cari, MILF Selina_HB, CYA Lovely, CYA Baby Sky. Perhaps only HYA Eleven may make me want to visit over Tiffany.
She looks better than CYA Tiny. Other people have recommended potential CYAs like SAG Jane / Joy, CAK Joyce. I am also interested in CAK Yurika and CAK Wynn.
Surely someone will think I over hype her. Just want share my evaluation of current talents in SD / OC / LA. I still have a few more talents to try but it would be hard to find someone who can impress me more in looks. Looks wise, there are not more than 5 active girls in LA that I want to see over Tiffany. It gets muddled when including service cause most of my favorites are in LA.