Agency Discussion and Reviews

[QUOTE=RichmondPhoto;5488045]Tessa has a very beautiful body. Nice, tone, and small. But due to age her face is rougher than the model. In my opinion, it's not close. I will be running back to see her if she is the one in the picture.

Also no rimming like most K girl, and no FIV. It's not a deal breaker for me but definitely not running back. Now, definitely no match for the younger J girl like Meriko. How Rocket is able to find that model is beyond amazing.

Now, Tessa is definitely not ugly. So, don't count her out. The pictures are what draw me in to begin with. Especially with cc info now. It's a no no in this hobby.[/QUOTE]She's not even really that old. Definitely older than the age they give on the site. Anyone who's used to Asian looks can tell Tessa is older. I'd say late 20's early 30's, but again, she's Asian so she looks younger than her age. On that note, yea her face is far from the picture on the site. It is a good representation of her body, though. Except she's a bit darker skin tone than the picture. She's hella cute, though. Way cuter than many of the k-girls out there. In my opinion, more so than some of the more popular k-girls here.

I would like to pull the trigger but knowing C-girl is not known for GFE, I want to see a review from you guys before I drive 2 hours down.

From my past experience, C- girls are none GFE, J-Girls are over and beyond the scope of service, and J-Girls are right on the spot, but a tap older- which is not an issue.

Let me know. I can get info here faster than the other board.

[QUOTE=RichmondPhoto;5484918]Saw the true spinner today. Very nice girl. Booker has the same instructions to get to building and the circle gave it away. Even the style of writing is the same.

Wow, super busy street. You will be noticed, and cam everywhere from shops.

There is no way to avoid contact with other people. At least 5 people greeted me during my walk in.

Parking is difficult but fairly safe place. I shopped there several times when I was down this way.

Tessa is a nice girl but I still like Mariko and NaNa better. Some limitations on her service. But not a deal breaker. If she has a better looking face, she will easily be one of the top 10. I think she is much older. Just my guess. J-girls are truly 20 something. Not bad.[/QUOTE]Can't believe they're doing it exactly the same without changing. They're bound to get caught again.

She is tiny, light smooth skin. Are the pictures her? I don't know but the video of the person swimming might just actually be her. The pictures are a fair representation of her except smaller. Honestly they should have used her pictures, she's petite and has a pretty face.

She is a true definition of a spinner, tiny package and boy is she super tight, might be the tightest or one of the tightest providers I have encountered. She is young, I would say early twenties. DFK, DATY, BBBJ, not sure if CIM was available.

I don't see C-girls often but she was a good experience. I've seen Seria which everyone raved about, I would say lulu body is an even match.

All this talk about Tessa, anyone seen seven?

[QUOTE=Hum115;5488398]She's not even really that old. Definitely older than the age they give on the site. Anyone who's used to Asian looks can tell Tessa is older. I'd say late 20's early 30's, but again, she's Asian so she looks younger than her age. On that note, yea her face is far from the picture on the site. It is a good representation of her body, though. Except she's a bit darker skin tone than the picture. She's hella cute, though. Way cuter than many of the k-girls out there. In my opinion, more so than some of the more popular k-girls here.[/QUOTE]

I agree. I don't think the pics are her, as her hips are not that wide. The movie may be. Lulu is tiny and tight with a great attitude. Early / Mid 20's. Beautiful face and nice teeth unlike some other providers. I would guess 5'1, 90-100 lbs, A / B cups, long black hair almost to her butt. Highly recommend if you like tiny spinners.

[QUOTE=Balix;5489246]She is tiny, light smooth skin. Are the pictures her? I don't know but the video of the person swimming might just actually be her. The pictures are a fair representation of her except smaller. Honestly they should have used her pictures, she's petite and has a pretty face.

She is a true definition of a spinner, tiny package and boy is she super tight, might be the tightest or one of the tightest providers I have encountered. She is young, I would say early twenties. DFK, DATY, BBBJ, not sure if CIM was available.

I don't see C-girls often but she was a good experience. I've seen Seria which everyone raved about, I would say lulu body is an even match.[/QUOTE].

[QUOTE=RichmondPhoto;5484918]Wow, super busy street. You will be noticed, and cam everywhere from shops. There is no way to avoid contact with other people. At least 5 people greeted me during my walk in.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JWebster;5488970]Can't believe they're doing it exactly the same without changing. They're bound to get caught again.[/QUOTE]When I came back to the DMV, the agency was known as Lotus Flowerz / Star Bunnyz--two different sites yet run by the same folks with identical models & rates. After my one jaw-droppingly awesome experience in fall 2019, the agency got rolled up by LE a few weeks later. Figured that was the end of them, which was a shame owing to it being the best Asian agency experience I'd ever had.

While I wouldn't mind a go with some cute Asian spinners, the rates aren't what they used to be (500 for two hours was hard to beat). Also, I'm personally hesitant to trust someone with my PII who just had to contend with legal issues as recently as they have. Even more so if the foot traffic is as bad as others are reporting with the agency engaging in careless shenanigans. As JWebster pointed out, it's probably just a matter of time. Stay safe, everyone.

I just wanted to point out that MP's affiliate agency in NYC is charging less than them, which doesn't make sense to me. The quality of their girls is also comparable, if not better, than what we have here. Much more consistent GFE service according to reviews.

[URL]https://mylover-nyc.com/[/URL]

BEG moving into the big time now.

[URL]http://larissaisback4u.cuties-sites.com[/URL]

[QUOTE=RichmondPhoto;5491001]BEG moving into the big time now.

[URL]http://larissaisback4u.cuties-sites.com[/URL][/QUOTE]I don't think they're related. I think that's just cuties-sites' default template. I'm pretty sure she had a site with a different domain before BEG surfaced.

Larissa used to be with Book a Latina (now The Booking Agent) who has gone independent, has nothing to do with any other agencies.

[QUOTE=FloorHump422;5490595]I just wanted to point out that MP's affiliate agency in NYC is charging less than them, which doesn't make sense to me. The quality of their girls is also comparable, if not better, than what we have here. Much more consistent GFE service according to reviews.

[URL]https://mylover-nyc.com/[/URL][/QUOTE]Yes they must've found that the people in Northern Virginia we're happy to be ripped off. I warned everybody when the price went up for that one provider not to pay it. Everybody did and now the prices are even higher than that for every provider.

[QUOTE=PootyLover;5491407]Yes they must've found that the people in Northern Virginia we're happy to be ripped off. I warned everybody when the price went up for that one provider not to pay it. Everybody did and now the prices are even higher than that for every provider.[/QUOTE]Most ladies on there look to be Chinese. I had one Chinese lady a few months ago (at the same price as that site) and it was completely non GFE. She was constantly spraying me with alcohol or some sort of disinfectant before any physical contact LOL. This was even after the shower. The same lady got a lot of good reviews on here. Needless to say I now tend to stay away from the Chinese ladies unless I know they're GFE.

[QUOTE=Balix;5489246]She is tiny, light smooth skin. Are the pictures her? I don't know but the video of the person swimming might just actually be her. The pictures are a fair representation of her except smaller. Honestly they should have used her pictures, she's petite and has a pretty face.

She is a true definition of a spinner, tiny package and boy is she super tight, might be the tightest or one of the tightest providers I have encountered. She is young, I would say early twenties. DFK, DATY, BBBJ, not sure if CIM was available.

I don't see C-girls often but she was a good experience. I've seen Seria which everyone raved about, I would say lulu body is an even match.[/QUOTE]I agree with this, I saw her last weekend. Her eyes were beautiful and we had a very nice time. She would not allow me to go as deep as I like as her hands kept holding me off, but not in a way that made me angry, just a little frustrated. Cim was available.

Tried to schedule a first-time appointment with MP and they've tightened up. Asked demographics, which I provided, and offered to find a girl to fit my schedule, then immediately asked for references. I'm new to this, so I don't have references, which I explained. I offered driver license and business card and they went dark on me. Ghos-ted.