Sugarbabies?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/722165e6-3069-4388-aeca-ce4d0f180cd8[/URL]

Comes and goes on SA used to have a strict no hotel rule.

859-XXX-X471.

Anyone have any info?

Oh, the rest of us are definitely between 18 and 33!! I, for example, am only 29. And have been so for, um, 28 years. LOL.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;4058194]If a girl isn't interested in older guys, then she shouldn't be on a sugar *daddy* site. Right? Kind of like one of us going onto a gay dating site, and declaring "I'm not interested in men. " People would rightfully ask, "Then why are you here, dumbass?"

Seeking can't decide if it wants to be a sugar daddy site, or some version of Match.

I've also noticed that girls can now request guys in a certain age range. They also have the ability to screen messages from daddies above a particular age. This is the way Match does things.

Now, I understand perfectly that on a conventional site like Match, a 21 year old woman does not want to get messages from a 50 year old guy (me). But when I see some sugar babies requesting "daddies" between the ages of 18 to 33, I have to think: Do they really understand what's going on here? Most 30 year old men aren't interested in paying for 21 year old women. So it's a waste of time for all involved.

I understand that Seeking is only trying to preserve the fiction that it's a dating site. But I'm guessing that many of us are over 35.

Am I right? Or are the rest if you between the ages of 18 and 33, LOL?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HerrDoktor;4058080][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e9ca8f99-9c07-46db-9b2d-5b101ba29674[/URL]

We have been texting for a short time. She is wanting 500 per meet. Anyone else seen her?[/QUOTE]She's not worth your time or energy. I know who she is from meeting her a couple times a year ago. She never followed through with anything she says she'll do. She tries to say she's worth the wait and then sell you pictures. She had several friends on the site at one point who were much more willing to have fun at a more reasonable allowance (compared to her asking of $$.

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;4058216][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/722165e6-3069-4388-aeca-ce4d0f180cd8[/URL]

Comes and goes on SA used to have a strict no hotel rule.

859-XXX-X471.

Anyone have any info?[/QUOTE]Either I am blocked or she deleted her profile. I sent her an approach five months ago when she was using 'Bambi" as her profile name.

Bam.

I think it is pretty clear that Seeking is presenting itself one way to the women they are recruiting and the public while winking and nodding to the men who are its heaviest users. They say no online only but every day new profiles pop up with that stated. By the same standard, there are multiple new profiles a day stating platonic and that is an option in the female drop down menu. Seeking is allowing women to think Seeking is a dating site where they can meet needy 18-35 millionaires (sheeesh!) and Seeking is expecting us to expand their understanding and convert them into the SB's. I am willing to accept the challenge as long as the flow of attractive young women remains high.

BAM.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;4058194]If a girl isn't interested in older guys, then she shouldn't be on a sugar *daddy* site. Right? Kind of like one of us going onto a gay dating site, and declaring "I'm not interested in men. " People would rightfully ask, "Then why are you here, dumbass?"

Seeking can't decide if it wants to be a sugar daddy site, or some version of Match.

I've also noticed that girls can now request guys in a certain age range. They also have the ability to screen messages from daddies above a particular age. This is the way Match does things.

Now, I understand perfectly that on a conventional site like Match, a 21 year old woman does not want to get messages from a 50 year old guy (me). But when I see some sugar babies requesting "daddies" between the ages of 18 to 33, I have to think: Do they really understand what's going on here? Most 30 year old men aren't interested in paying for 21 year old women. So it's a waste of time for all involved.

I understand that Seeking is only trying to preserve the fiction that it's a dating site. But I'm guessing that many of us are over 35.

Am I right? Or are the rest if you between the ages of 18 and 33, LOL?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DeniaLusmc;4058073]I have a meeting set up with her well for Tuesday. Any info before would be greatly appreciated.[/QUOTE]Treat her well and respectfully and you will have a great time.

Hey fellas, sorry for no link, I currently do not have a profile on SA. This one reached out to me after months wanting to set something up. Anyone have any info on her? Get a feeling of GPS but was hoping for information before wasting time. Anyone?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/d59e8e08-d9b9-4d3e-b97d-d0af20276dc5[/URL]

Have a meeting set up with her tonight. Anyone taken the plunge yet?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/965f8945-1021-4a77-822a-c30ffbf054ef[/URL]

Anyone played with this one?

[QUOTE=LTL429;4065434][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/d59e8e08-d9b9-4d3e-b97d-d0af20276dc5[/URL]

Have a meeting set up with her tonight. Anyone taken the plunge yet?[/QUOTE]I have been speaking with her too. How did it go?

[QUOTE=HerrDoktor;4065725]I have been speaking with her too. How did it go?[/QUOTE]SW looks with SA aspirations 😂128514;. Is my take on her. Is real, will meet, was open to Fc for 100. I declined and we parted ways. Heavily tatted super nice just not my thing. Very short and skinny. Rough wore out look.

[QUOTE=LTL429;4066154]SW looks with SA aspirations 😂128514;. Is my take on her. Is real, will meet, was open to Fc for 100. I declined and we parted ways. Heavily tatted super nice just not my thing. Very short and skinny. Rough wore out look.[/QUOTE]Thanks for that. She seemed eager and in need. I get worried when the urgency is really high and what else they may be doing on the side or in addition to me.

Just to confirm. Is there a dictionary of abbreviations? LOL.

Not sure what SW and FC mean and the string of numbers. Is that significant?

[QUOTE=HerrDoktor;4066244]Thanks for that. She seemed eager and in need. I get worried when the urgency is really high and what else they may be doing on the side or in addition to me.

Just to confirm. Is there a dictionary of abbreviations? LOL.

Not sure what SW and FC mean and the string of numbers. Is that significant?[/QUOTE]SW = street walker.

Fc = Fuck chamber aka hotel.

String of numbers was just a emoji that didn't get converted.

[QUOTE=LTL429;4066615]SW = street walker.

Fc = Fuck chamber aka hotel.

String of numbers was just a emoji that didn't get converted.[/QUOTE]Perfect. Thanks.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ac8f8c36-33e1-4b5e-aad6-9ae1dd3105ef[/URL]

I've seen that a couple members inquired about this person recently. My advice would be to steer clear. I'll provide details privately. Do yourself a favor, don't get caught in her web of drama.