4 photos
Lauren On Wilkens Avenue Baltimore, Md
I just love the way Lauren catches cream. She is definitely one of the funner brain specialist in the Wilkens Ave area.
[URL]http://www.ccptube.com/video/1174/lauren-on-wilkens-avenue-baltimore-md-catching-that-nut.html[/URL]
[URL]http://www.ccptube.com/video/1174/lauren-on-wilkens-avenue-baltimore-md-catching-that-nut.url[/URL]
Hate to be the bearer of bad news
[QUOTE=Jonah1;2480441]What would be the difference if you picked up a convicted drug dealer? Can they arrest you just because you gave a drug dealer a ride? Or a convicted thief? They can not.
Not without what is called "Probable Cause" The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. In United States criminal law, probable cause is the standard by which persons acting under the color of law has the grounds to obtain a warrant for, or as an exception to the warrant requirements for, making an arrest or conducting a personal or property search, etc. When criminal charges are being considered. It is also used to refer to the standard to which a grand jury believes that a crime has been committed in conjunction with a preponderance of the evidence. This term comes from the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This is only an opinion of a non professional bull $hitter, who doesn't know what he is talking about. So don't take my advise.[/QUOTE]I really hate to break it to you but someone has to shed a little more light on the subject.
[URL]http://www.thenewspaper.com/rlc/docs/2014/us-goodposture.pdf[/URL]
That was a court case in which a circuit court judge ruled probably cause was justified on the grounds that her hands were at the 10 and 2 position and was therefore suspicious.
"As Ms. Westhoven drove past him, Agent Semmerling noticed she had a "stiff posture" and her arms were "straight and locked out" at a "ten-and-two position on the steering wheel". ".
Goes on to say; "Although Ms. Westhoven did not appear to be speeding, Agent Semmerling decided to turn around to follow her and run a registration check. ".
Unfortunately the 4th amendment doesn't really do anything anymore.
Wished I Could Have Got A Pic
[QUOTE=Rippa;2480691]Ahhh, the rich imagery of a thieving SW, soaked down with a sticky soft drink, standing in the street, bathed in the soft light of an early Orlando morning, all the while screaming obscenities. Could only happen in THIS hobby. Good for a Sunday morning chuckle.
Have a Happy Holiday everyone.[/QUOTE]Thanks Brother Rippa. That could have been one of my best pics yet. Here again why you hide your shit. I keep an extra "monger wallet" with my old DL in it with just a P O Box # on it and the pic is so old it don't even look like me. That's the 1st that's happened to me and she was so fast like she knew it was there she popped open the lid grabbed it and tried to unlock the door and jump out at maybe 15 mph and the fucked up thing was she could have easily gotten $20 more when I coated her face instead she got her whole fucking body coated and her wet Jackson. I aim to please Brothers. Take care. SJ.
I do not think that (case) means what you think it means
[QUOTE=MrKim0927;2480608]I really hate to break it to you but someone has to shed a little more light on the subject.
[URL]http://www.thenewspaper.com/rlc/docs/2014/us-goodposture.pdf[/URL]
That was a court case in which a circuit court judge ruled probably cause was justified on the grounds that her hands were at the 10 and 2 position and was therefore suspicious.
"As Ms. Westhoven drove past him, Agent Semmerling noticed she had a "stiff posture" and her arms were "straight and locked out" at a "ten-and-two position on the steering wheel". ".
Goes on to say; "Although Ms. Westhoven did not appear to be speeding, Agent Semmerling decided to turn around to follow her and run a registration check. ".
Unfortunately the 4th amendment doesn't really do anything anymore.[/QUOTE]The case doesn't speak to probable cause for an arrest, rather it addresses whether there was reasonable suspicion to detain the suspect for an investigative stop. The appeals court specifically notes that the standard for these kinds of stops "reasonable suspicion," is much lower than probable cause. The behavior was hinky enough to justify a stop, the stop was short enough to not be an arrest, and the marijuana they found provided probable cause for the arrest.