The latest and greatest from our elected officials who have better things to worry about in this state!
[url]http://www.projo.com/news/content/PROSTITUTION_DIGEST24_06-24-09_08EQTKR_v9.396a73a.html[/url]
Printable View
The latest and greatest from our elected officials who have better things to worry about in this state!
[url]http://www.projo.com/news/content/PROSTITUTION_DIGEST24_06-24-09_08EQTKR_v9.396a73a.html[/url]
Went to Lily yesterday afternoon and drew Hannah. She seems to have been promoted to the room closest to the front office, which is where Jenny used to hang out. Anyone seen Jenny lately?
Anyway, all was ordinary: Awesome massage, sexy release. She did this sweet move at the end where she straddled my thighs and rubbed her hot-pants-covered self against the boys until I popped. Damn. Been a while since I saw a new move out of one of these girls ... and I liked it.
After searching the Forum, I wasn't able to get a location for OS. Can one of you Gentlemen please tell me where it is located? I am visiting, and OS sounds like just the ticket...
Thanks in advance
SM
On a recent visit, I drew Blue. Pretty enough girl, but about a 6 on the friendliness / attitude (at first). (reports about her being a little heavy are correct, but I like that) Table shower was good, not great, no real teasing. Sauna wasn't warm when I went in, and Blue didn't stay in the sauna with me as one other did.
Back in the room, she tried to ask me for $20 more than the standard tip of $1.4, which I refused to agree to. (That was a bit of a turnoff). I was almost afraid I wasn't going to get what I expected, because she kept saying "nice massageee". My fears were eliminated and I did get what I expected, but it seemed over too quick. She gave me another massage at the end and helped me dress which brought up her attitude score to a 7. I guess what was missing was the fantasy in my mind that she was having a good time. She didn't really make me feel like she was enjoying herself.
I realize that all visits won't be really enjoyable experiences, and I guess it was just my turn to take an "ok" with the other good times I've had (OS and other places. CH). Like Gen. MacArthur I shall return, but now that I know what see looks like, I think I will politely ask for another if I happen to draw her again.
Johnny
55 Bradford St., just off Atwells Ave. (1 block west from 95).
3rd floor, above Dunkin' Donuts and what used to be Ronzio Pizza.
Good luck (but you won't need it!).
J
[QUOTE=Service Man]After searching the Forum, I wasn't able to get a location for OS. Can one of you Gentlemen please tell me where it is located? I am visiting, and OS sounds like just the ticket...
Thanks in advance
SM[/QUOTE]
OK - kind of off topic but directly related to the hobby.
H 5044:05/13/2009 House passed Sub A as amended (floor amendment)
05/28/2009 Referred to Senate Judiciary
S 0596:06/25/2009 Senate passed Sub A
06/26/2009 Referred to House Judiciary
Now what?
[QUOTE=Newday53]OK - kind of off topic but directly related to the hobby.
H 5044:05/13/2009 House passed Sub A as amended (floor amendment)
05/28/2009 Referred to Senate Judiciary
S 0596:06/25/2009 Senate passed Sub A
06/26/2009 Referred to House Judiciary
Now what?[/QUOTE]
to put it in simple words we're fu**ed. I like the fact that no one had the balls to vote against. Basically it all means everything goes underground. Here is a link:
[url]http://newsblog.projo.com/2009/06/senate-prostitu.html[/url]
Hello everyone.
Havnt posted in a while so decided I would Chime in on my visit to CH today. Have not been here in a while, I was going to go for connie but I decided to try someone new so I asked the Mama for someone like connie but differant., (she laughed and said OK I know what you mean).
It was busy so I had to wait in the waiting room (really its behind a curtain). This is the first time I had to wait but I did not mind.
Mama made sure I was happy the whole time and I fealt that she would somehow make up for the wait time.
So in comes Rose, who is probobly the hottest girl that CH has had since Cindy about 2 years or so ago. Beautiful D cups, bolt ons but they look almost real, Nice ass, and young (around 24).
Great Massage with teasing, Lots of kissing, GFE Material, Nice smile oh and did I mention Hot as hell. Session was long, I held out as long as possible to savre the moment. Went for full service but I decided to finish with HR to free the gallon or so I had built up.
I will definately repeat with Rose
Looks 9.5
Attitude 9.5
Technique-9. O
Mickey mouse sure delivered last Tuesday afternoon at OS. Seemed kind of busy, had to wait 10 minutes for a room. But sort of helped my heart get back to a normal beat. Only my second Spa visit. First one was at the short Lived spa in Ansonia, CT. Anyways had a great table shower with the 40 yr oldish lady (not the really old lady thank god) and she was kind of cute looking in her dress. Then Mickey came in and she sure was a blast. Very sweet girl. Can't wait to visit again.
Not screwed yet. In fact, this bill probably isn't getting done this session. House has to approve an identical bill and its not yet on the legislative calendar. Also according to this getting "busted" is basically like getting a traffic ticket.
[url]http://newsblog.projo.com/2009/06/rhode-islands-s.html[/url]
State Police, Atty. General oppose Senate prostitution bill
6:08 PM Fri, Jun 26, 2009 | Permalink
Lynn Arditi Email
Rhode Island's State Police and the State Attorney General say a bill approved by the Senate Thursday night that seeks to outlaw indoor prostitution actually would weaken, rather than strengthen, the current law.
Officials from both law enforcement agencies say that the Senate bill (S-596 Sub A), introduced by Sen. Paul V. Jabour, D-Providence, lacks the criminal penalties necessary to prosecute offenders and removes key language in the existing laws against loitering, pandering and solicitation.
Both agencies are supporting a separate bill (H-5044 Sub A) introduced by Rep. Joanne M. Giannini, D-Providence, approved by the House last May.
"Rhode Island State Police cannot support civil sanctions for such reprehensible acts,'' State Police Superintendent Col. Brendan P. Doherty wrote in a letter Friday to Rep. Donald J. Lally Jr., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, where the bill awaits a hearing.
"By reducing the seriousness of the enforcement of these acts,'' Col. Doherty continued, "we will actually be placing the women this bill intends to protect in a dangerous environment where they will be further targeted for exploitation."
Doherty said he also is concerned that the Senate bill would repeal sections of the current statute -- including harboring, pandering, and "loitering for indecent purposes near schools.''
State Atty. Gen. Patrick Lynch's spokesman, Michael Healy, said the Senate bill "actually makes things murkier'' with respect to pandering and solicitation outdoors.
In addition, Healy said, allowing for a penalty for a first offense is treating prostitutes as though they were getting a "speeding ticket."
"A fine does not equal a conviction,'' Healy said. "So if you're not convicted of a crime the first time, the second offense actually becomes the first offense. You see the sort of twisted logic there?"
The result, he said, is that the Senate bill "doesn't fully criminalize indoor prostitution."
In order to move forward, Rep. Jabour's bill must get a hearing in the House Judiciary Committee in order to be voted on the House floor. So far, no hearing has been scheduled.
Rep. Giannini's bill, approved by the House last May, has so far failed to move forward in the Senate.
[url]http://newsblog.projo.com/2009/06/house-goes-into.html[/url]
Law fails to pass for now.
Just what we need to do, piss the cops off all the more now that their bill didnt pass. Probably would start playing it on the more cautious side.
[QUOTE=Mxbs345]Not screwed yet. In fact, this bill probably isn't getting done this session. House has to approve an identical bill and its not yet on the legislative calendar. Also according to this getting "busted" is basically like getting a traffic ticket.
[url]http://newsblog.projo.com/2009/06/rhode-islands-s.html[/url]
State Police, Atty. General oppose Senate prostitution bill
6:08 PM Fri, Jun 26, 2009 | Permalink
Lynn Arditi Email
Rhode Island's State Police and the State Attorney General say a bill approved by the Senate Thursday night that seeks to outlaw indoor prostitution actually would weaken, rather than strengthen, the current law.
Officials from both law enforcement agencies say that the Senate bill (S-596 Sub A), introduced by Sen. Paul V. Jabour, D-Providence, lacks the criminal penalties necessary to prosecute offenders and removes key language in the existing laws against loitering, pandering and solicitation.
Both agencies are supporting a separate bill (H-5044 Sub A) introduced by Rep. Joanne M. Giannini, D-Providence, approved by the House last May.
"Rhode Island State Police cannot support civil sanctions for such reprehensible acts,'' State Police Superintendent Col. Brendan P. Doherty wrote in a letter Friday to Rep. Donald J. Lally Jr., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, where the bill awaits a hearing.
"By reducing the seriousness of the enforcement of these acts,'' Col. Doherty continued, "we will actually be placing the women this bill intends to protect in a dangerous environment where they will be further targeted for exploitation."
Doherty said he also is concerned that the Senate bill would repeal sections of the current statute -- including harboring, pandering, and "loitering for indecent purposes near schools.''
State Atty. Gen. Patrick Lynch's spokesman, Michael Healy, said the Senate bill "actually makes things murkier'' with respect to pandering and solicitation outdoors.
In addition, Healy said, allowing for a penalty for a first offense is treating prostitutes as though they were getting a "speeding ticket."
"A fine does not equal a conviction,'' Healy said. "So if you're not convicted of a crime the first time, the second offense actually becomes the first offense. You see the sort of twisted logic there?"
The result, he said, is that the Senate bill "doesn't fully criminalize indoor prostitution."
In order to move forward, Rep. Jabour's bill must get a hearing in the House Judiciary Committee in order to be voted on the House floor. So far, no hearing has been scheduled.
Rep. Giannini's bill, approved by the House last May, has so far failed to move forward in the Senate.[/QUOTE]
Went for another doubleheader last week. Went to OS 1st. Drew Hannah (mid 20s)- New from NYC this week. She was tall 5'7" and had nice bolt on Cs. Very friendly and happy to please. TS was nice with nice teasing. No discussion of $ until very end. She was new to OS but still knew the condom in mouth trick to start things. I always think for a second that it is a BBJ. Did every position I asked for. Not really GFE but I did not really try.
Looks 9
Personality 9
Performance 9
Cost 1.4
I then was intrigued by the idea of a non-AMP MP and sought out 81 Richmond. The person before who said it is too exposed left out the fact that it is right next to all of the courthouses and there is LE everywhere. If it wasn't raining I wouldn't have gone.
MP is on 2nd floor, you have to buzz in. Once buzzed, they take the house fee.6 and show you what is available by opening doors to massage rooms to show the girl inside. There were 3 on at the time but one was working already. The two I had to choose from where 1 short white with large Cs (looks 6) and 1 short hispanic with Bs (looks 5/6). I chose the Cs thinking they were real, they weren't.
Room was much smaller than at OS and table as well. Shower was offered for after. Short massage followed by price list for HR.6, BJ 1.0 and FS 1.8. I took FS as I wanted to compare the two places. Table was really too small for CG and they curiously did not use any lube so wore out two condoms. Ended in doggy as it allowed for actual movement.
Music playing was light rap and did not block out outside noise. Very distracting to hear people in hallway whole time.
Odd vibe there and it seemed like someone could come in at anytime.
Not sure I would repeat.
Anyone else know any other non-AMP MPs?
I also stopped at CH on way to 81 but the area scared the hell out of me.
By CH, were you refering to Central Health? I wasn't sure because they aren't a non-AMP MP and for me personally, I've always thought they had the best location around. It's totally discrete. If it's a different CH that is non-AMP MP, then I'd like to give it a try.
[QUOTE=Doltah]Went for another doubleheader last week. Went to OS 1st. Drew Hannah (mid 20s)- New from NYC this week. She was tall 5'7" and had nice bolt on Cs. Very friendly and happy to please. TS was nice with nice teasing. No discussion of $ until very end. She was new to OS but still knew the condom in mouth trick to start things. I always think for a second that it is a BBJ. Did every position I asked for. Not really GFE but I did not really try.
Looks 9
Personality 9
Performance 9
Cost 1.4
I then was intrigued by the idea of a non-AMP MP and sought out 81 Richmond. The person before who said it is too exposed left out the fact that it is right next to all of the courthouses and there is LE everywhere. If it wasn't raining I wouldn't have gone.
MP is on 2nd floor, you have to buzz in. Once buzzed, they take the house fee.6 and show you what is available by opening doors to massage rooms to show the girl inside. There were 3 on at the time but one was working already. The two I had to choose from where 1 short white with large Cs (looks 6) and 1 short hispanic with Bs (looks 5/6). I chose the Cs thinking they were real, they weren't.
Room was much smaller than at OS and table as well. Shower was offered for after. Short massage followed by price list for HR.6, BJ 1.0 and FS 1.8. I took FS as I wanted to compare the two places. Table was really too small for CG and they curiously did not use any lube so wore out two condoms. Ended in doggy as it allowed for actual movement.
Music playing was light rap and did not block out outside noise. Very distracting to hear people in hallway whole time.
Odd vibe there and it seemed like someone could come in at anytime.
Not sure I would repeat.
Anyone else know any other non-AMP MPs?
I also stopped at CH on way to 81 but the area scared the hell out of me.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Don Marco12]One Spa had a bachelor party for 9 people. I can't believe people are throwing bachelor's party in a Spa.[/QUOTE]
Sounds Nice. Why get married if you are going to spend your cash at an amp anyway. -Charlie Sheen