Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=QuestBMuffin;4503578]New booker verified me: they asked for mugshot claiming no response so I asked my reference to text them back, and somehow it worked out??

Still creeped out though might wait for more reports from seniors.

No offense meant Tomatillo just being cautious.[/QUOTE]Hmmmm. Didn't work out with the 3 Booker's I mentioned. They said they didn't recognize Booker number. Sorry can't help you even if you loyal customer. Which Booker did you ask for you to be verified? I'm just surprised all 3 prominent Booker's didn't confirm me. That's a first! That why I reported as red flag. I'm willing to delete my posts if I stand / sitting down corrected.

[QUOTE=RickZey;4503601]Hmmmm. Didn't work out with the 3 Booker's I mentioned. They said they didn't recognize Booker number. Sorry can't help you even if you loyal customer. Which Booker did you ask for you to be verified? I'm just surprised all 3 prominent Booker's didn't confirm me. That's a first! That why I reported as red flag. I'm willing to delete my posts if I stand / sitting down corrected.[/QUOTE]I'll PM you.

Edit nvm your inbox is full

[QUOTE=QuestBMuffin;4503578]New booker verified me: they asked for mugshot claiming no response so I asked my reference to text them back, and somehow it worked out??

Still creeped out though might wait for more reports from seniors.


No offense meant Tomatillo just being cautious.[/QUOTE]None taken, better to be safe than sorry!

[QUOTE=QuestBMuffin;4503605]I'll PM you.

Edit nvm your inbox is full but its a pretty old agency famous in Ktown. Some dedicated lovers of this places gals.[/QUOTE]Cleared my inbox. Please pm me again.

[QUOTE=RickZey;4503485]Red flag fellas. New agency might be LE. Texted 3 bookers M, J and Legend Amber booker at humaniplex to verify me. This new agency told me they didn't respond back. Told me to send my mug shot pic or screen shot text of my conversations with M, J or Amber booker. Also M and J respond to me saying they don't vouch for that agency since unknown. Be very wary fellas! https://sexyangels.site/sexy-angels[/QUOTE]Funny how downgrading to lower agencies takes this much work.

To get in with the newb sexyangels, I'd have to get in with a lower agency that M responds to, which is rare. M never responds to reference calls, I heard.

Any recommendations for good service in Boston? I know it's an LA. Board, but you guys do get around.

[QUOTE=MadderMax;4503676]Any recommendations for good service in Boston? I know it's an LA. Board, but you guys do get around.[/QUOTE]Just search kgirlfriend Boston on google. Should be the 1st one that comes up.

But, the korg in Boston that shows up first has one of the strictest ref checks or screening. Sometimes that booker will not accept LA, BA or OC refs.

I got in cause I used 4 of girls who've toured out of the Boston that are from LA, OC, LV, and Dallas.

The Boston org / house is "not BBFS!

[QUOTE=RickZey;4503536]Uhmmm I'm not lying. All 3 Booker's told me they can't vouch for that new Booker. Also, I'm a veteran monger here already. Been posting since 2014. That's a first for me that all 3 Booker's said they don't recognize number. Also, this agency would white list me for sending them a mugshot. Don't think so! For those who want to try, you've been warned. Also, I don't usually text red flags like this so I'm surprised myself.[/QUOTE]I'm planning to see Nina soonish. If the booker's new then it would make sense that other agencies won't vouch for unknowns. I appreciate that they take that stance as that means, whether intentional or not, they have my back to not provide a false sense of security regarding new agencies that pop up. On the other hand, a new agency has to start from somewhere and the least common denominator is usually proof of identity until reviews from reputable sources start trickling in.

My experience with them was similar to others: sent M and Kay as references, KC says no reply and asks for copy of I'd, I replied with four other agencies to try, after 15 minutes came back saying I was verified. One thing that helped their case was that I tried to see Nina on Monday but they were having issues with the door. Moved to option B which was in WLA and booker told me the lock isn't working but the door is open. While that doesn't make them legit, the facts did line up with what they said so I'll give them points for that.

Hi guys,

So I just got verified from the new booker in town. I provided them with number of ROK (I think it's the M you guys referring to?) and also EUK. I believe EUK helped me to finish verification. I'll probably see Nina tomorrow and will provide update.

[QUOTE=RickZey;4503601]Hmmmm. Didn't work out with the 3 Booker's I mentioned. They said they didn't recognize Booker number. Sorry can't help you even if you loyal customer. Which Booker did you ask for you to be verified? I'm just surprised all 3 prominent Booker's didn't confirm me. That's a first! That why I reported as red flag. I'm willing to delete my posts if I stand / sitting down corrected.[/QUOTE]

At RickZey: Just so you know that "M", "J" and Amber Booker do not verify their customers. I hobby a lot and I say maybe too fucking muchI have used "J" and "M" so much last year that I would not want to admit it and I can book a week in advance with "J" or "M" but these two always give me an excuse like: "We don't know the booker".

My gut feeling is that if you are a SOLID customer, "J" and "M" will most likely won't verify you for fear of losing REVENUE. I have asked "J" & "M" three times for LA bookers and on each occasion, it was "we don't know the booker" story. But GUESS what, both of them verified me for my trip to SJ twice in less than 10 minutes!

[QUOTE=RickZey;4503601]Hmmmm. Didn't work out with the 3 Booker's I mentioned. They said they didn't recognize Booker number. Sorry can't help you even if you loyal customer. Which Booker did you ask for you to be verified? I'm just surprised all 3 prominent Booker's didn't confirm me. That's a first! That why I reported as red flag. I'm willing to delete my posts if I stand / sitting down corrected.[/QUOTE]I sent references of two girls from the same agency (Pepsi and Jenny O of The Palace) and booker texted me back within ten minutes telling me I'm verified and I could see Nina.

Thanks to all those responded. I'll try the palace as reference this time. Am customer for long time so should be no problem. I'll delete my red flag post.

M.
Chanel........................ PV.
Katie, Fox, Nikki. ....................WLA.
Angel (she's back)............................ WLA.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/angel-escort-los-angeles-431063[/URL]

Sunny.
Glow, Lyn...................WLA

[QUOTE=RickZey;4503601]Hmmmm. Didn't work out with the 3 Booker's I mentioned. They said they didn't recognize Booker number. Sorry can't help you even if you loyal customer. Which Booker did you ask for you to be verified? I'm just surprised all 3 prominent Booker's didn't confirm me. That's a first! That why I reported as red flag. I'm willing to delete my posts if I stand / sitting down corrected.[/QUOTE]Neither J nor M would reply to text as reference. I asked M in text if she would act as reference and she said she would only act as reference for bookers that she knew. Also, for a newer LA booker I gave J and M phone numbers and the reply I got right away was they wouldn't act as reference for them so I'd need to provide pic of ID but would be OK to block out personal info on the I'd. It sounds like more are starting to ask for this to act as reference unless you have references from other bookers. Not a complaint because you have to do what you think is best for your biz, or comply with word from higher ups, just an observation.

[QUOTE=LoveEm;4504549]Neither J nor M would reply to text as reference. I asked M in text if she would act as reference and she said she would only act as reference for bookers that she knew. Also, for a newer LA booker I gave J and M phone numbers and the reply I got right away was they wouldn't act as reference for them so I'd need to provide pic of ID but would be OK to block out personal info on the I'd. It sounds like more are starting to ask for this to act as reference unless you have references from other bookers. Not a complaint because you have to do what you think is best for your biz, or comply with word from higher ups, just an observation.[/QUOTE]Are you talking about Sexyangels? Didn't seem like a problem. I texted them and just told them who I was and mentioned M and Sunny. No I'd's or deep scrutiny. About five minutes later I got a text that I was verified and could make my appointment.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4504298]M.
Chanel........................ PV.
Katie, Fox, Nikki. ....................WLA.
Angel (she's back)............................ WLA.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/angel-escort-los-angeles-431063[/URL]

Sunny.
Glow, Lyn...................WLA[/QUOTE]Angel, she was the one who aka dom perignon.

Anyone remember if she was also a bb upsell?

[QUOTE=RickZey;4503549]I responded back to new Booker telling them the other Bookers can't confirm the number so please reverify. I also advised I'm not comfortable with a mug shot. New Booker didn't reply back. Definitely shady if you ask me![/QUOTE]Flew in on Monday, TOFFT on this new provider. So their ways of verifications are similar to KTE. An I'd and photo of you. I crossed all my person info on the driver license and left my name and face. Very easy and no hassle. It took booker a bit to respond but nothing too bad. So yeah I'll vouch for them being legitimate.

I have an appointment with Nina today, will update everyone once I'm done. First one for this visit so let's hope she at least decent LOL.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4504580]Are you talking about Sexyangels? Didn't seem like a problem. I texted them and just told them who I was and mentioned M and Sunny. No I'd's or deep scrutiny. About five minutes later I got a text that I was verified and could make my appointment.[/QUOTE]Could be the booker already has your number from a previous agency they were booking for. Screening for me was easy as well as I mentioned some of the companies I visited. But I think they already had my number as the response I got was super fast.

[QUOTE=LoveEm;4504549]Neither J nor M would reply to text as reference. I asked M in text if she would act as reference and she said she would only act as reference for bookers that she knew. Also, for a newer LA booker I gave J and M phone numbers and the reply I got right away was they wouldn't act as reference for them so I'd need to provide pic of ID but would be OK to block out personal info on the I'd. It sounds like more are starting to ask for this to act as reference unless you have references from other bookers. Not a complaint because you have to do what you think is best for your biz, or comply with word from higher ups, just an observation.[/QUOTE]As a customer, I still would not incriminate myself by sending my mug shot to a Booker specially with new FOSTA laws in place. Say what you will about me being extra cautious but when shit hits the fan, my luck not all that great.
So why risk it? Anyway, I got verified by Nina Booker using palace as the reference.

[QUOTE=LoveEm;4504549]Neither J nor M would reply to text as reference. I asked M in text if she would act as reference and she said she would only act as reference for bookers that she knew. Also, for a newer LA booker I gave J and M phone numbers and the reply I got right away was they wouldn't act as reference for them so I'd need to provide pic of ID but would be OK to block out personal info on the I'd. It sounds like more are starting to ask for this to act as reference unless you have references from other bookers. Not a complaint because you have to do what you think is best for your biz, or comply with word from higher ups, just an observation.[/QUOTE]Were you trying to book Shannon and Amora in the OC? I tried but they wanted a picture I'd and my workplace information. That's a no for me.

[QUOTE=RickZey;4504799]As a customer, I still would not incriminate myself by sending my mug shot to a Booker specially with new FOSTA laws in place. Say what you will about me being extra cautious but when shit hits the fan, my luck not all that great.
So why risk it? Anyway, I got verified by Nina Booker using palace as the reference.[/QUOTE]People don't seem to know what FOSTA / SESTA actually is about. It is a federal law that makes it illegal to assist / facilitate sex trafficking. Basically, it is intended to target websites that advertise or discuss sex work. That is why many websites voluntarily shutdown or moved their domain offshore. It has nothing to do with an individual's personal "hobby" activities. So whether you give your picture or personal info to a booker isn't relevant to a FOSTA prosecution (it may be for something else, but I'm not commenting on that).

[QUOTE=KKW2019;4503785]Hi guys,

So I just got verified from the new booker in town. I provided them with number of ROK (I think it's the M you guys referring to?) and also EUK. I believe EUK helped me to finish verification. I'll probably see Nina tomorrow and will provide update.[/QUOTE]Probably Tom with Eukgirls verified you with them. It appears that this new agency is affiliated with Lovely Angels in SJ where Vixen / Sally is currently at. So it doesn't take much to connect the dots. As others have mentioned, M probably would not provide a reference.

Don't know if I'm allowed to post this but if any of you are familiar with sawtelle location and you happen to go to the room on the corner facing Starbucks. Kindly let them know to use blackout drapes on their window. I was just there and their window glows bright red through the blinds at night. I would think that makes it very odd and suspicious to the residents there. I would tell them myself but I don't know who operates there.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to [u]discourage members from posting information[/u]. If you have a concern about information posted by another member, then please contact them privately by PM. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.[/blue]

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to [u]discourage members from posting information[/u]. If you have a concern about information posted by another member, then please contact them privately by PM. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

Tungstons right, not a one of you guys has ever posted anything that the cops didn't know a long, long, LONG time ago.

A2[/blue]

Ever notice a post that complains about a review that describes things that the poster didn't experience? Ever wonder how two mongers could have such disparate experiences? Now I know that looks can be very subjective. Some like them thin or chubby, tall or short, natural or enhanced and thus the term YMMV. However, when it comes to performance that is a different story. Great sex is great sex. There may be different levels of great but we all know a great fuck when we have one. That's why I don't make a choice on who to see based on one or even two reviews and I virtually never TOFTT. I always wait for a good number of great reviews and consistent ones. By the time I make my choice I'm pretty sure it will be a good one. That being said why the disparity in experiences? It's usually not the girl but the customer who is knocking on their door. I've been doing this for a long time and more than one girl has told me that they can tell after only a few minutes alone with a customer whether they want to give him everything they offer or not. It's like a sixth sense that they develop that enables them to spot the ones that they don't feel are worth the effort and it's usually the attitude even though the monger may not even realize it. It's just there. These girls want to be treated respectfully regardless of the profession that they are in and if the least amount of disrespect or disdain is there the customer is cooked. So if one customer gets BBFS and another one doesn't and if one gets a freak in bed and the other doesn't it's not the girl. If she's a great fuck for a good number of reviewers then she plainly is a great fuck and if she's not a great fuck for the one who didn't get it the onus is on him. Treat them right and BBFS will be available more often than some would imagine. That has been my personal experience.

Very first post.

Contact booker at 8 AM and got reply in 5 min.

Provide 2 ref but none was able to verify at that time.

Finally got verify by sending screenshots.

Pic not her but she's 7 to me.

Age might be early 30's.

BBFFSCIP, service is great and very nice all the time.

220 hhr,260 hr.

Will repeat.

[QUOTE=NooGooGee81;4505617]Yeah I wasn't sure whether I should post or not but I do agree with Toungsen that LE knows more than we think. We really want to avoid the residents there catching wind to what's going on. Once they start complaining is when LE has a reason to come in.[/QUOTE]Three girls have been busted in that complex in the last year and half.

That is why certain bookers have no new people policy.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4505479]I think the reality is that LE knows much more about these locations than we may think they do. The other reality is that there is virtually nothing they can do about it or it would have been done long ago. There is not much they can do about a red light in a window. To do anything they would have to be in the room and observe money being exchanged for sexual favors and that can't happen without a warrant which would never be served based on a red light. If not in the room there is nothing they can to to a monger entering an apartment building and looking for an apartment. This is why these agencies have been operating for years and years and not being touched. Remember the troll who was posting pics of the MW building and threatening LE busts? Everyone was bent out of shape and nothing ever came of it. If that didn't teach us that there is nothing to worry about then nothing will. Bottom line. Let's not worry about something that shouldn't give us cause for worry.[/QUOTE]I can speak this on experience: CA in general has some of the worst criminal activities out of all the states I've been to for businesses. With that said, LE will categorize on what is more important to focus on. Been here for almost a week and I can tell you traffic law is almost non-existent in LA compare to my state. My state is very quiet and conservative that not much happens, which led to more strict law on the petty stuff. Any way, I wouldn't worry too much about it like you said. One agency leave, two more will pop up to take it's place.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4505946]Treat them right and BBFS will be available more often than some would imagine. That has been my personal experience.[/QUOTE]Pretty much agree with 99% of your post (the 1% I disagree with is the BBFS), but you definitely get the big picture. The BBFS? That scares the ever living crap out of me (I work in the medical industry & know way too much about STDs / HIV). My goal is an epic, 10/10 hot, energetic romp with a smoking hot young K-girl (with condom). But then again, this is the BB forum, so I am the outlier.

As for Toungsten. He is spot on. Treat these girls nice. Show respect, etc. Yes, they are getting paid for an hour of their time, but how they perform within that hour is completely up to them. Act like an ass, and they will give a bad performance in the hopes that you don't come back. Be the perfect client, and they will try to blow your mind (among other things) in an effort to earn your repeat business.

I am not going all "white knight" here. I have been mongering for a few decades, with a bit of wisdom accumulated during that time. Coast to coast & a few other continents under my belt. Have spent enough OTC time with the ladies to get a good idea of what makes them tic. Maybe not all, but certainly most. Treat them right, bring treats (not just a generic Hersey bar from the 7/11) that they don't get to enjoy every day. Every Asian grocery store in LA has a few options. If you plan to return for a second helping, find out what they like and bring it next time. Not Gucci hand bags, but simple things like organic almonds, peaches, or a favorite brand of Saki. These girls are humans, and probably pretty lonely (on an emotional level). I guarantee that a few extra dollars at a grocery store, or just listening to their story for a few minutes, will earn benefits that the normal house fee will never unlock.

Oh. You guys don't know how good you have it in LA. The only other city with the quality and quantity of LA providers is probably SF. Not Dallas, not NYC, not Chicago, Not Miami, etc. For those of us trapped in other parts of the country. We envy your options.

[QUOTE=KalaChakra;4506019]Three girls have been busted in that complex in the last year and half.

That is why certain bookers have no new people policy.[/QUOTE]I don't think they were busted in the apartments for selling sex. It was the bookers who got busted. If it was in the apartment the customer would have been busted also. The only way a bust can occur in the apartment is for a booker not to screen and for LE to be in the apartment and handing the provider money for sex. That wouldn't affect the customers.

This probably sounds weird, but I'm not going to put my dick inside that nasty cum hole filled by other juice.

[QUOTE=Danny5170;4506006]Very first post.

Contact booker at 8 AM and got reply in 5 min.

Provide 2 ref but none was able to verify at that time.

Finally got verify by sending screenshots.

Pic not her but she's 7 to me.

Age might be early 30's.

BBFFSCIP, service is great and very nice all the time.

220 hhr,260 hr.

Will repeat.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=AsianBaller1;4506343]This probably sounds weird, but I'm not going to put my dick inside that nasty cum hole filled by other juice.[/QUOTE]Isn't that what we're here for?

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4506384]Isn't that what we're here for?[/QUOTE]So I've always have this question. How do you make sure you don't get any sexual disease if you keep doing BBFS?

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4506384]Isn't that what we're here for?[/QUOTE]I prefer BBFS over bbfscip everyone.

Seen EJ several times now over the past few weeks and always give her a solid tip. I saw that one other poster wrote that he got BBFS from her so I wanted to chime in and share that I was able to as well. She seems to be very YMMV. So far only BBFS with finish on her stomach but hoping for CIP in the future.

Holy shit that was fucking amazing! We were both exhausted, breathing heavily, drenched in sweat and completely spent after I finally pumped my cream deep inside of her incredibly wet honey hole. I haven't fucked like that in a long time, and when I say fuck I mean FUCK. This woman is very friendly and she does incorporate a bit of sensuality during BBBJ, but her obvious forte isn't some kind of sweet and loving GFE type thang, it's fucking you like a sexually insatiable succubus. It's fitting only one letter makes the difference between Nina and Nana as that's who she reminded me of, yet with less of the over the top aggressiveness Nana is well known for. Also, whereas Nana somehow maintains this GND kinda innocence (thanking you each time you shoot a load inside one of her pleasure openings), Nina has more of a cute yet somewhat wicked mistress type vibe. 5 feet, obvious man mades but nicely proportioned to her small frame. Her body is tight but really sturdy looking, similar again to Nana about 4 or 5 years ago, before she put on some weight. Someone said they thought her face wasn't as cute as the girl in the ad (which ain't her) yet I beg to differ: I thought Nina's face was really cute and sexy af when moaning in ecstasy saying things like "Oh shit! Oh fuck!" (obviously picked up from things guys fucking her frequently exclaim) "So good Oppa, please fuck me!" I'm not one to kid myself about providers having orgasms but I'm certain she came at least three times: first when she was lying on her tummy giving me some heavenly head and I leaned up and over her back and began fingering her pussy and asshole as she sensuously sucked my dick. She gets so wet so fast and had to stop giving me head as her entire body shuddered and she practically shrieked as she O'd from my finger stimulation. The second was during DATY and it was an incredible turn on to see her little body shudder as she loudly moaned while her already super wet pussy flooded my mouth with her warm and sweet cum juice. The third was while I was fucking the shit out of her really really hard fast and deep in mish (after a variety of positions, CG, RCG, DS, I had her stand up at one point and lifted her up by the back of her legs with her arms around my neck and furiously pumped my cock inside of her unbelievably wet pussy with her back up against the wall / mirror) and she was almost violently rubbing her clit and writhing around on her back moaning and seemingly speaking in tongue like a woman possessed by a semen demon as my hard as it can get throbbing cock thrusted in and out like a jackhammer. She loves to fuck and will use you to get off as much you'll use her for the same purpose. Was hesitant at first for DFK but as things heated up she was all in on it. Her ass looked plump and sexy af in DS. Did I mention she gets REALLY wet? Needless to say: I highly recumend!

When I got to the location the booker sent me this confusing text about how to get inside the building and to Nina's room. I was literally parked right in front of the main entrance and she told me to park around the corner on an adjacent street then mentioned a different addy and had me thinking I should be looking for that instead of the original addy she'd texted me after booking. I eventually realized she'd tried to fix something that wasn't broke and that, like I said, I had been parked right outside of where you enter the complex. Just a heads up in case she sends you the same WTF text upon your arrival.

[QUOTE=AsianBaller1;4506467]I prefer BBFS over bbfscip everyone.[/QUOTE]Well they're both BBFS aren't they. Where do you want to drop your load?

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4505946]Ever notice a post that complains about a review that describes things that the poster didn't experience? Ever wonder how two mongers could have such disparate experiences? Now I know that looks can be very subjective. Some like them thin or chubby, tall or short, natural or enhanced and thus the term YMMV. However, when it comes to performance that is a different story. Great sex is great sex. There may be different levels of great but we all know a great fuck when we have one. That's why I don't make a choice on who to see based on one or even two reviews and I virtually never TOFTT. I always wait for a good number of great reviews and consistent ones. By the time I make my choice I'm pretty sure it will be a good one. That being said why the disparity in experiences? It's usually not the girl but the customer who is knocking on their door. I've been doing this for a long time and more than one girl has told me that they can tell after only a few minutes alone with a customer whether they want to give him everything they offer or not. It's like a sixth sense that they develop that enables them to spot the ones that they don't feel are worth the effort and it's usually the attitude even though the monger may not even realize it. It's just there. These girls want to be treated respectfully regardless of the profession that they are in and if the least amount of disrespect or disdain is there the customer is cooked. So if one customer gets BBFS and another one doesn't and if one gets a freak in bed and the other doesn't it's not the girl. If she's a great fuck for a good number of reviewers then she plainly is a great fuck and if she's not a great fuck for the one who didn't get it the onus is on him. Treat them right and BBFS will be available more often than some would imagine. That has been my personal experience.[/QUOTE]And then some fool sends a PM not liking what you post here. Probably the same kind of fool who complains that he didn't get the same kind of service that some reviewer got. There's one (and more than one) in every crowd.