General Reports

[QUOTE=Andir;6541045]Many names found on her client list were made public by the local PD. When you live in a small town like Kennebunk in Maine, it would screw up your life big time. Not sure about the legality of publishing the names, but they just did it.

[URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/list-of-maine-zumba-instructors-alleged-prostitution-clients-still-under-wraps/[/URL]

As a side note, Alexis is a totally normal woman now.[/QUOTE]I see that the judge unconstitutionally let this illegal libel stand. It can be appealled and an appellate judge might even award damages for libel on appeal, and might also sanction the police that did this. I suspect, also, that there are probably some young turk lawyers that would jump at the chance, pro bono, to make a name for themselves by filing a suit against the police department and / or the police officers individually, for libel. As I said, I'm no lawyer, but there was definitely an expectatation of privacy here. Clearly, there is not enough evidence to charge these dudes with anything. So doing this sort of evil shit and publicizing what could very well be destructive total lies about someone without any additional evidence, is indeed, by lights, in conjuncion with the 4th Amendment, nothing less than straight-up libel.

And let me make this crystal clear: In general, I SUPPORT the police, and do NOT want to de-fund them. But any police officer who would participate in these kinds of unethical, unconstitutional, and downright EVIL activities, by smearing and making trouble for legal adults for fully consensual sex acts, deserve nothing less for themselves than what they did to others. Because that is indeed the dividing line between a protective, useful, and necessary police force in a civilized society, and a full-blown Nazi Gestapo.

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6541009]But I'd like to know EXACTLY HOW cops can possibly fuck with anybody, just by using notes confiscated from a hoe? I'm no lawyer, but I HAVE read the Constitution, and if the only evidence is a list composed by a hoe, even with real names, I just don't see how that can happen. So, could you (or anyone?) please explain?[/QUOTE]Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't they also find a bunch of videos she was taking without clients knowledge? Names on the list matching the faces in the video can be pretty damning. Especially if the monetary transaction was on video or talked about.

[QUOTE=MajorJohnson;6541675]She's gorgeous for sure. I'd book if she came out of retirement.[/QUOTE]I don't often get to Maine, but I remember this story. A beautiful, fit, in-shape, toned, shapely, drug-free, disease-free, demon-free lady offering sex for money.

Talk about an idea that never caught on.

[QUOTE=NHughty;6543695]Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't they also find a bunch of videos she was taking without clients knowledge? Names on the list matching the faces in the video can be pretty damning. Especially if the monetary transaction was on video or talked about.[/QUOTE]In some states (RI and ME), it is legal to record someone without their permission. But in MA, there is a two-party law: It is a felony to record another person without their permission. Again, I'm not a lawyer. But good luck trying use such recordings in a court proceeding for evidence, that could only have been obtained by committing a felony. And good luck trying to legally make those tapes available publically. Indeed, if one is fucking someone behind closed doors, even if money were exchanged, and even in one-party states like RI and ME , there is surely still a "reasonable expectation of privacy" , yes? So in ANY state, surreptitiously recording an adult fucking other adult(s), consensually, behind closed doors, such recordings would be illegal, by my lights, and therefore inadmissible.

Maybe some lawyer-mongers could step up to the plate here, and add their $0. 02?

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6545981]In some states (RI and ME), it is legal to record someone without their permission. But in MA, there is a two-party law: It is a felony to record another person without their permission. Again, I'm not a lawyer. But good luck trying use such recordings in a court proceeding for evidence, that could only have been obtained by committing a felony. And good luck trying to legally make those tapes available publically. Indeed, if one is fucking someone behind closed doors, even if money were exchanged, and even in one-party states like RI and ME , there is surely still a "reasonable expectation of privacy" , yes? So in ANY state, surreptitiously recording an adult fucking other adult(s), consensually, behind closed doors, such recordings would be illegal, by my lights, and therefore inadmissible.

Maybe some lawyer-mongers could step up to the plate here, and add their $0. 02?[/QUOTE]IANAL but I believe the law in MA only applies to recording of audio. If there's no sound it's allowed. I am not sure if they allow a video with audio, but with the audio stripped.

They were all charged. The police didn't just release a list. There were charge with a crime, which is public information. I think the woman or her handler were cooperating because of the completeness as to record keeping. Videos, as well as details and payments.

Plus, maybe you are correct that there was some chance some of the info could be tossed out on appeal, but your name would have been thoroughly taken to the cleaners.

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6543387]I see that the judge unconstitutionally let this illegal libel stand. It can be appealled and an appellate judge might even award damages for libel on appeal, and might also sanction the police that did this. I suspect, also, that there are probably some young turk lawyers that would jump at the chance, pro bono, to make a name for themselves by filing a suit against the police department and / or the police officers individually, for libel. As I said, I'm no lawyer, but there was definitely an expectatation of privacy here. Clearly, there is not enough evidence to charge these dudes with anything. So doing this sort of evil shit and publicizing what could very well be destructive total lies about someone without any additional evidence, is indeed, by lights, in conjuncion with the 4th Amendment, nothing less than straight-up libel.

And let me make this crystal clear: In general, I SUPPORT the police, and do NOT want to de-fund them. But any police officer who would participate in these kinds of unethical, unconstitutional, and downright EVIL activities, by smearing and making trouble for legal adults for fully consensual sex acts, deserve nothing less for themselves than what they did to others. Because that is indeed the dividing line between a protective, useful, and necessary police force in a civilized society, and a full-blown Nazi Gestapo.[/QUOTE]

And you can still easily find the porn vids they made with clients online.

[QUOTE=John2375;6521497]Are there any raunchy xxx theaters in the Boston or Providence or Worcester areas?? I've got a civilian **** who wants me to take her to one so she can have some fun.[/QUOTE]Yes the art cinema in Hartford or the booths in providence.

Take her one of the booths. Guys will either come in or stick their dick thru the glory hole.

[QUOTE=John2375;6521497]Are there any raunchy xxx theaters in the Boston or Providence or Worcester areas?? I've got a civilian **** who wants me to take her to one so she can have some fun.[/QUOTE]I saw on fetlife that main st video in Somerville had some action like this, but it seems super sketchy whenever I drive by it.

[QUOTE=Mfp79;6546526]I saw on fetlife that main st video in Somerville had some action like this, but it seems super sketchy whenever I drive by it.[/QUOTE]It's a gay place, basically.

Apologies if this seems like a dumb question. What's the difference between skipthegames and MegaPersonals? Is MegaPersonals like the new CL? I've barely looked at it, but I see more and more reviews coming from women that post on there.

[URL]https://www.xnxx.com/videooke11b9/hot_couple_get_caught_on_hidden_cam_having_sex_for_1st_without_knowing_thy_was_on_a_hidden_cam_amazing_orgasm_from_young_milf[/URL]

Yes, we've all had to visit hookers with a dirty and disgusting apartment. I believe the worst one was a SW way back that took me to her place in Dorchester. Three dudes was in the house, mattress with no sheets on the floor. Door was off the hinges and she just moved it from left to right. Needles everywhere. House smelled like trash. It was a good fuck. But, I'd fuck her in the car rather than that.

How best to use google translate to indicate that I want a lot of teasing face-down during massage? Is 'teasing' the right word?

[QUOTE=Eligrn101;6586073]How best to use google translate to indicate that I want a lot of teasing face-down during massage? Is 'teasing' the right word?[/QUOTE]Not sure but you could try telling her soft.

[QUOTE=Woody32;6586100]Not sure but you could try telling her soft.[/QUOTE]When I get undressed. I just stay seated naked. Have my phone in hand. I use apple translator for conversation with woman to tell them what I want. I then lie down and hold my phone while still using apple translator to have a conversation of where she is from. Some nice stuff about her. Get her engaged and more friendly. I then start laying on my side to talk with translator and cut the face down massage in half. I flip over and tell her it is good but here is what I want. We continue to use translator unless there is much more than HE and OTC. Works for me.