Kgirls Rebrands

[QUOTE=ResilientJohn;7003733]I do disagree with your take on girls that suck and not reviewing them though. In my estimation, yelling from the rafters about a girl who rocked your world versus denouncing a poor performer (even if it could be due to a bad day) has the same merit. In both instance, what transpired really did happen and is both objectively and subjectively true. You hear stars that didn't measure up to the hype (could be due to her being in a good mood that time, especially clicked with that monger, she had a good night's rest, etc.) and you find contradicting posts of a girl that shows she's not bad at all (she improved her game, she just had a bad day, that particular monger had horrible BO / hygiene, etc.). If we don't put effort to pointing out the bad along with the good, we're going to end up with a lopsided perspective of Kgirls: those are really good, those are that Ok, but None are bad. No one in their right mind would agree with assessment.[/QUOTE]I don't question the value of bashing a girl. I just hate doing it. I really do.

Half the reason I write about girls is I enjoy women by writing about what we did so I will remember it even 20 years later, the way Klingons sing about a great battle they just had. And I also want my brothers to help me gang up on her. My reward is Bona stays another week as we compete to repeatedly impregnate her.

I would bring her a pregnancy test next time but she does not share my sense of humor. One time from a misunderstanding I pissed her off and she berated me for 15 minutes straight while giving me sexual orders so she could finish me her way. I think I apologized to her 10 times, before cumming, in the shower with her, and as I got dressed. I will tell the full story some day but I need some time to process it still. But we were good after that and banged many times happily.

The first five visits having sex with Bona was like a sexual battle. I didn't understand her yet. I was trying to fuck her, but she was also trying to fuck me. I even told her no it's cool I'll do the work. She still fucked me furiously. I remember that ridiculous scene in 300 Rise of an Empire, the sex on the boat scene. It was a non-sensical sexual battle playing out just like that. I thought it was unbelievable but here I was engaged in just such a struggle with her, changing positions all around the room in crazy ways using the furniture - no idea who had the upper hand. All this as she tried to make me cum sooner while I was trying to cum later - just trying to worship her with my normal routine. Neither of us knew who would win this cum timing fight but she was determined and at the end I wanted to yield but couldn't finish it as she demanded. But I eventually did. It's not the only reason but she soon went off on me in frustration. The other reason is too embarrassing to say. I say five visits because we fucked 11 times by that point.

Here's a surprise for everyone. Bona is back in SD. Imagine that, the tiniest market has managed to keep Bona for a 5th week instead of LA. I know several guys have seen her more than 5 times. I told her soon after laying eyes on her I'd be seeing her very often. Her reply was to ask me if I was married. Hot damn.

The shower for that place is good for fucking. It never occurred to me until she made me fuck her then and there. She could put her hands on three walls (counting the door) to brace herself different ways for what I was giving her. Just crouch low if you're tall, or bend Bona over if you're not.

She demanded I dump my cum in her then and there in the shower but I refused. I pulled out so we could continue our sexual battle in the bedroom like normal people do.

[QUOTE=Christophe1;6995529]This is Sumatra and / or Eve from the East Coast or Up North. This person may be trying to stay incognito from a predator so I will send a message of who I think she is.[/QUOTE]Who knows? I read this but saw her touring so maybe she was a) hiding from someone b) practicing the arts of deception c) didn't want to be know for MFM. Out of my interpretation of respect I passed on other recent aliases. I could also be wrong and she has already moved on.

[QUOTE=Moodyz;6946235]According to sources, she has gone back to Korea. For those who were interested, the window to tag team Miso is most likely closed for good.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=FreeWally;7004226]I don't question the value of bashing a girl. I just hate doing it. I really do.[/QUOTE]How does grading a girl poorly turn into "bashing" though?

I never get that. Does a professor / teacher who gives a C+ to a student "bash" them? Or is it simply product evaluation that is supposed to be objective?

Most distributions are normal distributions so you are going to have most girls being average at the top of the bell curve. Somehow though there are some who try to perpetuate the illusion that all kgirls are somehow only on the far right of the curve. It doesn't really work that way.

I think using words like "bash" when describing rating something or someone lower on the scale, is often done deliberately to create a false dichotomy and discourage public low ratings.

Its presented as choice between "bashing the girl" and not writing a review / recap at all. Whereas it really should be about giving an honest recap regardless of quality of the session vs not doing so.

As far as "bad day" goes, consider the following scenario.

A girl who is subpar is visited by mongers. Each monger thinks "oh shit this was bad but maybe she had a bad day" and doesn't write a review / mini. How long will this continue? Well until someone actually mans up and posts about it and others realize oh it's not really a bad day, it's an actual MO.

Is it good for mongers? No. The best case scenario is to nip it in the bud, not to keep quiet until someone says it. It's literally against the monger interest to keep quiet IMO.

The Boner is bored today so The Boner decides to impart some Boner Sense (BS) to people.
Don't hate The Boner, hate the game.

CG Ellie = Rebrand?

CG Suji2 = Natti? = BG Suji4 / Suji5 = SAG Sooji.

BG Sharon1 = BG Carina3.

BG Heart2 = BG Adela.

BG Mina7 = BG Jiyoung.

BG Paige2 = BG Becky3, BG Becky2 may also be her.

BG Yomi = BG Miko.

BG Bona2 = Daphne / Ring / .

BG Siena = BG Balkan = BG Cloud.

BG BabySoso = BG Soda2 = BG Sodium?

BG Tammy = BG Terry.

BG Holly2 = BG Hongin.

BG Mango = BG Swiri.

BG Milky2 = BG SexyCherry.

BG Jiwoo = BG Melody4?

BG Dain2 = Lovely / Carol (the pretty one, not the MILF+ PSE one).

SAG Cutie = SAG Naty.

TopAngel Kassia = Arina.

CAK Baby Dalli = CAK Lizza.

CAK Olivia = CAK Soy.

Someone said Baby Mango = Baby Winter / Baby Blue.

Gangnam Diane = Big tits CG Stella?

CG Hari may be CG Woori.

BG Ellie2, Yuna6, BG Barbara, CG Avery, CG Aloe, GKS Masera felt like rebrand, not sure who yet.

I can remember some girls cause of their pics like BG LVCherry, BG Jenny8/ CG Luna2, BG DopeJene, BG Nancy4/ Orange / Sky, BG Lucky, BG Niya, BG Seven3, BG Adie / Arabica, BG Cosmo / CG Olivia / SAG Hannah / CAK Soy / Onion, BG Torii, BG Cola, BG Miu3/ Baby Koko J, BG JeongA, CG Simona, CG Ivy, CG Tiny / Capri, GKS Everly / Luna, GKS Danbi, GKS Genna, TopAngel Elle, TopAngel Leila, TopAngel Tanya, CAK Zoe, Baby Gold, Itzel, Kira, Baby Peach. There are more but may not be in SoCal.

Some girls almost fooled me with new fake pics like SexyVivian / Glamour. Stop baiting The Boner. I don't have loads to spare. Even Viagra won't save me from losing the Boner Appetite if I don't use Boner Sense.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;7026563]The Boner is bored today so The Boner decides to impart some Boner Sense (BS) to people. Don't hate The Boner, hate the game. loads to spare.[/QUOTE]Seems like the takeaway is to avoid using BG / Tom if you can help it.

Lv Cherry = Romi.

I heard about the long nipples and it triggered some memory. LoveRosie was in OC and LA before.

I heard Aloe had toys and Kiss / Alice also had toys.

BG Sumatra, BG Prada2, BG Baby Gold are rebrands.

BG Sky2 = BG Adie.

BG Lucy5 = BG Bona2

I am only speculating about rebrands cause I ain't coming when I smell MILFs or rebrands.

[QUOTE=ResilientJohn;7026655]Seems like the takeaway is to avoid using BG / Tom if you can help it.[/QUOTE]Yup, I wholeheartedly agree with that statement. I like to maintain good relations with all of the bookers. If someday the a-hole attitude and the shoddy customer service improves, I would reconsider my position. But that appears highly unlikely. So I just refuse to book with Tom.

Would also be nice to see fewer rebrands and fewer fake profile pics, but that's a problem across the board.

[QUOTE=Taliesin92;7034206]Yup, I wholeheartedly agree with that statement. I like to maintain good relations with all of the bookers. If someday the a-hole attitude and the shoddy customer service improves, I would reconsider my position. But that appears highly unlikely. So I just refuse to book with Tom.

Would also be nice to see fewer rebrands and fewer fake profile pics, but that's a problem across the board.[/QUOTE]You guys have caught on.

What ever happen to that guy? He seemed difficult to work with like BG.

[QUOTE=Taliesin92;7034206]Yup, I wholeheartedly agree with that statement. I like to maintain good relations with all of the bookers. If someday the a-hole attitude and the shoddy customer service improves, I would reconsider my position. But that appears highly unlikely. So I just refuse to book with Tom.

Would also be nice to see fewer rebrands and fewer fake profile pics, but that's a problem across the board.[/QUOTE]I used to book with Tom back in the day when he ran his own stable. Not sure how he got to absorb booker gray site but whatever. There's so many bookers here in LA that have the same girls. I give my business to those who keep it professional and courteous. The booker at sag is idiotic as well. Again, there's so many bookers that it doesn't matter.

[QUOTE=Pyhan83;7034405]I used to book with Tom back in the day when he ran his own stable. Not sure how he got to absorb booker gray site but whatever. There's so many bookers here in LA that have the same girls. I give my business to those who keep it professional and courteous. The booker at sag is idiotic as well. Again, there's so many bookers that it doesn't matter.[/QUOTE]True that. That's one benefit of the Korean booker reorganization over the past few years. Each individual booker no longer has the power they used to have over our ability to see whoever we want to see. There are also a few drawbacks, but there's no question that the multiple-booker system has diminished the power of bookers to F with us.

I remember one incident several years ago when a booker initially refused to schedule me with a certain well-known k-girl, despite the fact that she texted him telling him I was "safe" and it was OK to go ahead and book the appointment. But he kept saying, "No, can't do it unless you send photo and identification. " I think he literally just wanted to F with me for a while and see how pissed off I would get. Eventually, later that day, he relented and agreed to make the appointment. But what an a-hole! He works for the girl, not the other way around. Her text should have been immediately good enough to let me in the door.

[QUOTE=Taliesin92;7034533]True that. That's one benefit of the Korean booker reorganization over the past few years. Each individual booker no longer has the power they used to have over our ability to see whoever we want to see. There are also a few drawbacks, but there's no question that the multiple-booker system has diminished the power of bookers to F with us.

I remember one incident several years ago when a booker initially refused to schedule me with a certain well-known k-girl, despite the fact that she texted him telling him I was "safe" and it was OK to go ahead and book the appointment. But he kept saying, "No, can't do it unless you send photo and identification. " I think he literally just wanted to F with me for a while and see how pissed off I would get. Eventually, later that day, he relented and agreed to make the appointment. But what an a-hole! He works for the girl, not the other way around. Her text should have been immediately good enough to let me in the door.[/QUOTE]That's still happening now actually. Couple months back or so, I go to a booker I don't often use but still want to let her now I'm active and say is X available at a certain time. Response comes back that she's fully booked for the day. Fair enough, I thought, but the girls fairly new and there's wasn't anything too outstanding about her ad that IMO would merit the rush (I think there was one review out at the time, good review but nothing that would stand out). Something just didn't sit well with me so I contacted a booker I use most often and sure enough she's open for a couple slots. There's no way that within a span of several minutes that slots open up that fast unless fate wanted to fuck around with me on that particular day with those particular bookers. Take that anecdote however you want.

[QUOTE=Taliesin92;7034206]Yup, I wholeheartedly agree with that statement. I like to maintain good relations with all of the bookers. If someday the a-hole attitude and the shoddy customer service improves, I would reconsider my position. But that appears highly unlikely. So I just refuse to book with Tom.

Would also be nice to see fewer rebrands and fewer fake profile pics, but that's a problem across the board.[/QUOTE]+1 to this, BG is weirdly rude to me half the time even though I'm never late, never cancel, always communicate well. It's bizarre. One time I prebooked a girl a couple days in advance. She ended up taking that day off and they never told me. Two hours before the appt I asked if it was confirmed and BG acted annoyed and told me to pick someone else. CG is 1000% better.

[QUOTE=Gruyere;7034861]+1 to this, BG is weirdly rude to me half the time even though I'm never late, never cancel, always communicate well. It's bizarre. One time I prebooked a girl a couple days in advance. She ended up taking that day off and they never told me. Two hours before the appt I asked if it was confirmed and BG acted annoyed and told me to pick someone else. CG is 1000% better.[/QUOTE]LOL BG and SAG are newb bookers. They are basically stepping stones for newbs to get references. Those 2 bookers are the only ones that have bait and switched me.

[QUOTE=Taliesin92;7034533]I remember one incident several years ago when a booker initially refused to schedule me with a certain well-known k-girl, despite the fact that she texted him telling him I was "safe" and it was OK to go ahead and book the appointment. But he kept saying, "No, can't do it unless you send photo and identification. " I think he literally just wanted to F with me for a while and see how pissed off I would get. Eventually, later that day, he relented and agreed to make the appointment. But what an a-hole! He works for the girl, not the other way around. Her text should have been immediately good enough to let me in the door.[/QUOTE]A girl's word is the gold standard. If a girl says I can see her, that's as good as it gets. She sends my number to the booker and all I was asked for was my basic info for future bookings, did not need further screening. Same as a solid HX network.

I was literally dropping the girl off at her apartment when I was making one booking (her place is a dorm and not for banging). Had just spent earlier in the day helping her pack to move, then a full day date around town. Yes I know, I am a simp. But I got what I wanted, I made her day. I don't expect anyone else to understand.

The point is the few times a girl moved agencies and vouched for me with a new booker, I was her long-time regular. She was bringing new business to the booker, and I've used them since. But don't tell the booker that, keep it business only. The less they know the better.

One time a booker asked me if I was XXX online (they guessed my ID wrong). I said sorry no, I'm not good with computers and don't post online. The less they know the better.

The girls I dated had no say on their rebrand. In one case they didn't even know, but the reason was a different girl at the agency already had her exact name. In other cases it was the agency's policy. But they used her recent selfies with minimal PS, so people recognized her.

[QUOTE=FreeWally;7034939]A girl's word is the gold standard. If a girl says I can see her, that's as good as it gets. She sends my number to the booker and all I was asked for was my basic info for future bookings, did not need further screening. Same as a solid HX network.

I was literally dropping the girl off at her apartment when I was making one booking (her place is a dorm and not for banging). Had just spent earlier in the day helping her pack to move, then a full day date around town. Yes I know, I am a simp. But I got what I wanted, I made her day. I don't expect anyone else to understand.

The point is the few times a girl moved agencies and vouched for me with a new booker, I was her long-time regular. She was bringing new business to the booker, and I've used them since. But don't tell the booker that, keep it business only. The less they know the better.

One time a booker asked me if I was XXX online (they guessed my ID wrong). I said sorry no, I'm not good with computers and don't post online. The less they know the better.

The girls I dated had no say on their rebrand. In one case they didn't even know, but the reason was a different girl at the agency already had her exact name. In other cases it was the agency's policy. But they used her recent selfies with minimal PS, so people recognized her.[/QUOTE]Yup, the easiest way to get verified in another agency is if you ask a girl you regularly see (that use multiple bookers) to get you in. I've done it multiple times in the past. Some of these bookers hate each other and won't give reference lmao.

[QUOTE=Stonkz;7035431]Yup, the easiest way to get verified in another agency is if you ask a girl you regularly see (that use multiple bookers) to get you in. I've done it multiple times in the past. Some of these bookers hate each other and won't give reference lmao.[/QUOTE]I've used SDAG 11 years now. They forgot me after Covid. Told me I needed one more reference (they require TWO). So I had to go to the thai booker for 6 months, get their HX network, and then SDAG let me back in. Since no other korgs would do it. I even had CAKD in my HX network for 10 years but SDAG didn't even care, they wanted new network even though I was still using CAKD. They refuse to just ask CAKD of course.

So as a result, I was forced to repeatedly BBFSCIP these three thai girls shown below, over and over again, just to ever see the SDAG exclusive roster of kgirls again. All three thai girls were only half thai. Two of them weren't even bb menu, one let me UTR cuz she liked me I guess, and the other on the 2nd visit the condom broke. So she just went with it from then on for a tip, the next 5 visits. She was not even on birth control so told me to never cum inside her. She made me solemnly promise three times in a row, it was intense.

All three girls allowed triple fuck without a word. One was on birth control as I said, but I managed to dump my cum into the other two dozens of times thanks to averaging triple shot msog sessions. Most kgirls don't even allow it, some look at me funny when I try. Thai girls may not have a kgirl routine, but the young ones tend to be really DTF and get into it no holds barred. All this so I could eventually dip into some exclusive kpussy again. DTB

The other thing about thai girls is these all used real photos, no PS. They don't need it.

One is now a model, another a restaurant hostess for a high end restaurant in WLA for celebrities. Emily still working. For the two UTR bb girls I check their IG just in case, and no babies came out. The reason I even check is because of Pink from COI, that girl is crazy offering bb while popping out babies. I saved the proof on my encrypted drive, it is haunting and I will die with that near miss secret. Okay here's that story:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?34485-Kgirls-Rebrands&p=6979475#post6979475[/URL]

After that wild 6 months of thai girls and almost impregnating a COI girl, finally I got back in SDAG. I then reminded SDAG that I've now used them almost 10 years to that point, so they better add me to their HX network or it'll just happen again. They finally added me, after almost TEN YEARS of using them. Reluctantly.

So to your point, they really don't want to.

BG LoveRosie = FirstAsians / Asianworld Ms. Daphne. Not to be confused with Bona / Daphne / Ring, very tall and skinny gal, good service from what little details I can remember.

BG Suji4 = BG Choa = TA Choa = Natti = Somsom. She's been bouncing around a long time now, cute baby-ish face, good English, and average service.

CGLA Kiki = TA Kiki = Apple. I left a review of her not that long ago, refer to that.

Damn, I love Thai girls. Wish there were more in LA. If I found one who allowed BBFS with CIP I'd be in heaven.

[QUOTE=FreeWally;7035464]I've used SDAG 11 years now. They forgot me after Covid. Told me I needed one more reference (they require TWO). So I had to go to the thai booker for 6 months, get their HX network, and then SDAG let me back in. Since no other korgs would do it. I even had CAKD in my HX network for 10 years but SDAG didn't even care, they wanted new network even though I was still using CAKD. They refuse to just ask CAKD of course.

So as a result, I was forced to repeatedly BBFSCIP these three thai girls shown below, over and over again, just to ever see the SDAG exclusive roster of kgirls again. All three thai girls were only half thai. Two of them weren't even bb menu, one let me UTR cuz she liked me I guess, and the other on the 2nd visit the condom broke. So she just went with it from then on for a tip, the next 5 visits. She was not even on birth control so told me to never cum inside her. She made me solemnly promise three times in a row, it was intense.

All three girls allowed triple fuck without a word. One was on birth control as I said, but I managed to dump my cum into the other two dozens of times thanks to averaging triple shot msog sessions. Most kgirls don't even allow it, some look at me funny when I try. Thai girls may not have a kgirl routine, but the young ones tend to be really DTF and get into it no holds barred. All this so I could eventually dip into some exclusive kpussy again. DTB

The other thing about thai girls is these all used real photos, no PS. They don't need it.

One is now a model, another a restaurant hostess for a high end restaurant in WLA for celebrities. Emily still working. For the two UTR bb girls I check their IG just in case, and no babies came out. The reason I even check is because of Pink from COI, that girl is crazy offering bb while popping out babies. I saved the proof on my encrypted drive, it is haunting and I will die with that near miss secret. Okay here's that story:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?34485-Kgirls-Rebrands&p=6979475#post6979475[/URL]

After that wild 6 months of thai girls and almost impregnating a COI girl, finally I got back in SDAG. I then reminded SDAG that I've now used them almost 10 years to that point, so they better add me to their HX network or it'll just happen again. They finally added me, after almost TEN YEARS of using them. Reluctantly.

So to your point, they really don't want to.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MadderMax;7044466]Damn, I love Thai girls. Wish there were more in LA. If I found one who allowed BBFS with CIP I'd be in heaven.[/QUOTE]Does anyone remember the Thai girl that CGLA booked a while back? I believe her name was Thalia. I saw her once, and she was amazing. Eye contact, passionate, exotic looking. I would love to know where she went.

Linda = Amber / AmberDD / Lovely.

[QUOTE=Christophe1;6995529]This is Sumatra and / or Eve from the East Coast or Up North. This person may be trying to stay incognito from a predator so I will send a message of who I think she is.[/QUOTE]If you saw her, you must remember her face right? The pictures are indeed her and if what you say is true, who you saw was not Audrey. She's young and quite sexy and I'll share some of her other, more normal pictures with you if you would like more proof.

So the other day I paid a visit to Roa / Road DT LA. I'm not sure, so if anyone else has had the experience of both these ladies, please chime in. I think Roa is Vicki of WLA and MW. The service was very similar at least in my opinion, but the face and body also matched. It's been awhile since I've seen Vicki, but I'm pretty sure. Anyway, thought I would post.

[QUOTE=JustALil;7072621]So the other day I paid a visit to Roa / Road DT LA. I'm not sure, so if anyone else has had the experience of both these ladies, please chime in. I think Roa is Vicki of WLA and MW. The service was very similar at least in my opinion, but the face and body also matched. It's been awhile since I've seen Vicki, but I'm pretty sure. Anyway, thought I would post.[/QUOTE]Forgive me if my memory is not the best, but from what I can remember. Roa seemed younger than WLA Vicki. When I saw Roa, I did not get that 'I have seen you before' feeling, but it has been years since I have seen Vicki, so shrugs, sorry this helped zero LOL.

[QUOTE=ResilientJohn;7048067]Linda = Amber / AmberDD / Lovely.[/QUOTE]Wow I've seen her several times and didn't pick up on that. Now studying the face pics it could be her. Ambers menu runs deeper than most know.

I think you are right but I avoid MILFs and won't remember all the name changes. All rebrands hope we don't remember them. I don't pay attention to MILFs but thanks for the post.

[QUOTE=JustALil;7072621]So the other day I paid a visit to Roa / Road DT LA. I'm not sure, so if anyone else has had the experience of both these ladies, please chime in. I think Roa is Vicki of WLA and MW. The service was very similar at least in my opinion, but the face and body also matched. It's been awhile since I've seen Vicki, but I'm pretty sure. Anyway, thought I would post.[/QUOTE]

She's back: [URL=https://topangels.ch/topangel/leticia/](Click here for Leticia / Thalia)[/URL].

[QUOTE=GhtTwentyK;7045143]Does anyone remember the Thai girl that CGLA booked a while back? I believe her name was Thalia. I saw her once, and she was amazing. Eye contact, passionate, exotic looking. I would love to know where she went.[/QUOTE]

I believe Sohee was Hu. [URL=https://orangecuties.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=1&product_id=1055](Click here for Sohee)[/URL].

Dewy = Doris.

Apink = Sori.

Nari may be LG.

Heri2 may be Dorothy / Baby yoyo / etc.

Sadie = Jennie / Amy / etc.

Lydia = Alice.

Remi = Nuri.

Aloe2 = Kiss (new Kiss).

Honey, Olivia, Jeong-a, Sharon, Candy, Heidi have been in SoCal before. I don't remember their old name(s).

I am guessing she's a rebrand too: [URL=https://k-kitten.us/index.php?route=product/product&path=2&product_id=1165](click here)[/URL].

Anna was here before. Tifa looked like a rebrand MILF when I saw her pics, and someone confirmed she was LA Nicole from the moon of Endor. LA Candy and OC Baby Candy also rebrand.

Doris changes name to Dewy with other bookers [URL=https://www.sweetasiangem.com](click here)[/URL].

The man asked about 5 girls and I knew 4 of them as rebrands, 2 seem to be gone already, and Juicy was clearly an MILF who turned out to be a rebrand of Yuffie from NorCal. So, basically 5 / 5 are rebrands. But wait, there's more.

BG Kim3 = BG Kimmin = CAK Dina K [URL=https://www.bookergray.com/la/Kim3/?sca=MW](click here)[/URL].

Ling2 gives me that Ring / Bona / Daphne / Crystal feeling. [URL=https://www.bookergray.com/la/Ling2/?sca=MW](click here)[/URL].

Baby Blue = Baby Mango. [URL=https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-blue](click here)[/URL]

That's not all. I marked a lot of girls in my head as rebrands or MILFs already. [URL=https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/melody]Melody[/URL] too. No clue who she was before yet. I frown on rebrands but what can I do if the girl wants to trick the boner.

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;7068317]All these girls pretty much book from almost every booker, so yeah.

Juicy: 5', 105 lbs with 34 C but pix looks D, what is it? 350 all in. Hot Aunty?

Prada: 5'6. 116 lbs with 34 Double D!! 350 all in. HYA?

Henna: 5'2, 103 lbs with 34 D 350 all in. HYA?

Aria: 5'5, 115 lbs with 34 D 350 all in. HYA?

Sammy: 5'2, 100 lbs with D 350 all in. HYA? (not new but barley any intel, some suggested Linda was better and I thought Linda was just ok).

Thanks![/QUOTE]

Appreciate the hard work, BA. We need to keep the girls and owners on the straight and narrow here.

It sucks when I take time off work or an off day that I could otherwise use for something else, make the drive to the incall, and go "Oh. It's you. " I now let the booker know why I'm walking out and in effect waste everyone's time. The crazy thing is that bookers will often understand without much fuss.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;7073041]The man asked about 5 girls and I knew 4 of them as rebrands, 2 seem to be gone already, and Juicy was clearly an MILF who turned out to be a rebrand of Yuffie from NorCal. So, basically 5 / 5 are rebrands. But wait, there's more.

BG Kim3 = BG Kimmin = CAK Dina K [URL=https://www.bookergray.com/la/Kim3/?sca=MW](click here)[/URL].

Ling2 gives me that Ring / Bona / Daphne / Crystal feeling. [URL=https://www.bookergray.com/la/Ling2/?sca=MW](click here)[/URL].

Baby Blue = Baby Mango. [URL=https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-blue](click here)[/URL]

That's not all. I marked a lot of girls in my head as rebrands or MILFs already. [URL=https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/melody]Melody[/URL] too. No clue who she was before yet. I frown on rebrands but what can I do if the girl wants to trick the boner.[/QUOTE]Ling2 is not Bona; I have met both of them. Ling is slightly older than Bona, Early 30's, about 5. 2, 110 lb, nature C+, average service, good looking like Minji's level.

CG Dain and Ally felt like rebrand. I definitely saw Ally pics before.

CG Shinee = Scarlet.

CG Baby Su = CG Baby Hana?

BG Miyuki (real pics, JAV) = BG Suzume.

BG Lucy5 may be the return of the Bona.

Jiji in San Diego = Aria in LA.

Enjoy = Melody and disappeared quickly.

CAK Desi = CAK Willa?

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;7080471]BG Lucy5 may be the return of the Bona.[/QUOTE]Can anyone confirm that Lucy5 is Bona? And is she available anywhere besides Booker Gray? I took a quick glance at some of the other popular k-girl sites and didn't see Lucy5.

CGLA Rose = BG Dain (and a bunch of other sites) = LKS (LoveKSweetie) Lucy from the Bay Area.

I don't know why these girls rebrand when they had a long list of reviewers. I might have tried to certify LKS Lucy sooner if she didn't change name and used fake pics. I certainly remember LKS Lucy pics. Thanks.

[QUOTE=Bbaka10;7086437]CGLA Rose = BG Dain (and a bunch of other sites) = LKS (LoveKSweetie) Lucy from the Bay Area.[/QUOTE]