That would be a good bet, odds are 100% in your favor!
	
	
		[QUOTE/] I'm willing to bet you aren't going to find VS at your party! Wouldn't LE just love to spring a trap on the Seniors of the Orlando Forum. [QUOTE/]
I'm with W.O.F. on this issue. I also would love to have a beer with a few diverse mongers, WOF for instance we have Pm'd and I've told him some personal stuff, we've shared some providers etc. but we are just two guys on the computer sharing whatever, neither of us has any way of finding out about the other and so we can be honest with no worry's. We all operate with screen names, what if you showed at one of these events and saw someone there that could damage you or vice-versa. THEN WHAT?
 Now you would have to be concerned about something blowing up in your face that you could have prevented easily just by not participating.
 So why set yourself up to be kicked in the balls, what is your payoff, see a few girls, tell a few lies.
 You must remember that the longer you do something and nothing happens the more confident you get and the more you believe you're not doing anything wrong. This hobby is unlawful, it does not matter that you think the law is wrong bla,bla,bla.
 You can go to jail for participating in this hobby, yes only a misdemeanor but an embarrassing one, you could end up on OCSO's website.
Anyone who goes to a M&G is nuts in my opinion, if you have nothing to lose, go, solicit one of the girls, smoke some 420, pop some pills, get plastered on martini's, why not, WTF, they aren't gonna catch me, I'm to smart for those dumb cops. Emm Hmm.
I have provider friends that have been asked about me, what's he like? How old is he ? etc.etc. most just make up a story and say what comes to their mind and we laugh about it later. Nobody knows the real me, some have suspicions but nobody really knows and that is how it should be. Some providers have shared their lives with me and that is a sacred trust and I would never run my mouth about them. And I trust them to return the favor.
Going and exposing myself (not literally) to a room full of people just seems insane to me.
What is the risk benefit ratio? I see a lot of risk and very little, if any benefit.----VS
	 
 
	
	
	
		Ten reasons why golf is better than a classical monogamous sex relation:
	
	
		1. Choice of public or private courses
2. Lessons are available in all languages
3. If you’re good you can turn pro and do it full time
4. Balls get into the hole
5. Choice of wood, aluminium or graphite
6. The less strokes the better
7. If you lose a ball, you still have two left
8. Threesomes and foursomes happen all the time
9. Can pick the size of your shaft
10. Every hole is well groomed and manicured
 and the other ten
1. A below par performance is considered good.
2. You can stop in the middle and have a cheeseburger and a couple of beers.
3. It's much easier to find the sweet spot.
4. Foursomes are encouraged.
5. You can still make money doing it as a senior.
6. More than three times in a sequence is possible.
7. Your partner doesn't hire a lawyer if you do it with someone else,
8. If you live in a sunny City, you can do it every day.
9. You don't have to cuddle with your partner when you're finished.
.........and best of all
10. If your equipment gets old and rusty, you can replace it.
[url]http://www.break.com/movies_nsfw/topless-wii.html?ref=track19[/url]
	 
 
	
	
	
		Re: CL Provider Murdered in Boston, Possible CL Killer
	
	
		Hey
Just came across these articles about a CL provider who was murdered in Boston....LEO believes there maybe a CL Killer on the loose....say other CL crimes maybe linked to him.
Shame for the girl she was very pretty.
Here are some links on the stories:
[url]http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2009/04/16/2009-04-16_craigslists_masseuse_julissa_brisman_found_dead_in_posh_boston_hotel_second_kill.html[/url]
[url]http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=7358206[/url]
	 
 
	
	
	
		Supreme court ruling............ after arrest searches
	
	
		Now, Justice John Paul Stevens' majority opinion limits post-arrest vehicle searches to two circumstances: when the officer has reason to believe the car contains evidence related to the crime the person is being arrested for; and when the person being arrested is within reach of weapons or evidence inside the passenger compartment.
Until now, traffic stops have been a leading way for officers to find evidence of other crimes.
For example, someone stopped for rolling through a stop sign might end up getting arrested for driving with a suspended license. But while the person is sitting in the back of a police cruiser, the officer might also search the car and find a bag of cocaine and a stolen gun.
Under the new ruling, such a search would be prohibitive on its own merit, because driving with a suspended license involves no physical evidence that might be hidden in the car.
"My main reason for posting this is the talk of searches finding condoms in the car etc. Upon the initial stop unless there is evidence in plain sight that indicates evidence of a crime( grenades on seat ,Kilo of white powder, bag of what looks like marijuana, bloody knife.) There is no probable cause for a search and the only one that can or will give permission for said search is YOU." They will intimidate you with "If you have nothing to hide why not let us search the vehicle then you can be on your way otherwise we'll have to impound your car etc.etc.."
The new ruling prohibits them from searching your car for evidence of other crimes if your stop was for speeding etc. ,etc. if they arrest you.
Bottom line: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS AND DEMAND THEM.---VS
	 
 
	
	
	
		Orlando J - you got some balls staying around
	
	
		[QUOTE=Orlando J]Do not trust the police! Not your friend! Be always on the safe side. Assume the worse.
Here's one experience that speaks loud:
A while ago, one of the girls called her big black pimp and I got into a fight with both of them. I called 911 and I told them where I am and that I am in danger. They both ran once I called 911. Few minutes later, the police shows up. I direct them to where I have last seen the guy. Another police car shows up and the idiot officer starts to interrogate me and accuse me. I said "I am the victim and I am the one who called you. You should serve and protect the people. Your attitude intimidates people to call for help and could aggravate the situations." The first officer apologized to me and said his colleagues did not know. Man! It's in their blood you are guilty evenif you are the victim.
On the other hand, things won't get better if officer(s) keep on crossing the lines without consequences.
I called a couple of human rights' lawyers to see if I can press charges for the damages without even telling them any details other than that I believe the officer crossed the line. That's for a case with two charges 1 was dropped and the other was nolo persec. Wonder what they say!
We have to be able to stop this behavior of Law Enforcement.[/QUOTE]
I probably would have split once the immediate danger had passed.  Sticking around to talk to the cops about a HO and her pimp shows some balls.