News and Media Reports

[QUOTE=Mjzco4;5615057]But they weren't telling the people they were under 18 unless you asked them. In the interview you can tell that they didn't, because the reporter said they all of them were atleast charged with solicitation of a prostitution. Not minor charges. So they got the guys that didn't ask about age as well but without the minor charges. And they grabbed them at the door so goes to show you, you don't even have to exchange money. You show up at a sting and they will get you as soon as you knock on the door.[/QUOTE]It's called "intent".

Charges may get lowered / reduced. But by then your name and photo is already archived on the internet Forever with the mugshot and allegation.

[QUOTE=Keith2012;5614729]Someone told me about this a few weeks ago I'm sorry I didn't say anything about it here in situations when you get clues to this bullshit it's good to let people know.[/QUOTE]Someone told you meaning you knew CPD was setting up a sting?

[QUOTE=BlkPaper;5614713][URL]https://www.wric.com/video/20-men-arrested-for-seeking-sex-with-minors-in-chesterfield-county-online-sting-operation/6468365/[/URL][/QUOTE]Daaang they posted all the mugshot photos how embarrassing.

But isn't this entrapment? They made up a fake ad and then arrested someone for something that doesn't exist.

[URL]https://www.nbc12.com/app/2021/11/01/chesterfield-police-arrest-17-men-online-child-sex-sting/[/URL]

Reading this will make it difficult for me to meet non reviewed women. These guys got hit with a felony.

[QUOTE=BlkPaper;5614713][URL]https://www.wric.com/video/20-men-arrested-for-seeking-sex-with-minors-in-chesterfield-county-online-sting-operation/6468365/[/URL][/QUOTE]This link above is 7 months old.

The recent sting link.

https://www.wric.com/news/local-news/chesterfield-county/17-men-head-to-chesterfield-motel-expecting-to-have-sex-with-minors-met-with-police-instead/

[URL]https://www.nbc12.com/app/2021/11/01/chesterfield-police-arrest-17-men-online-child-sex-sting/[/URL]

[QUOTE=RobELee20;5615641][URL]https://www.nbc12.com/app/2021/11/01/chesterfield-police-arrest-17-men-online-child-sex-sting/[/URL]

Reading this will make it difficult for me to meet non reviewed women. These guys got hit with a felony.[/QUOTE]Yes because they were trying to solicit minors.

[QUOTE=EasyGuy69;5615696]This link above is 7 months old.

The recent sting link.

https://www.wric.com/news/local-news/chesterfield-county/17-men-head-to-chesterfield-motel-expecting-to-have-sex-with-minors-met-with-police-instead/

[URL]https://www.nbc12.com/app/2021/11/01/chesterfield-police-arrest-17-men-online-child-sex-sting/[/URL][/QUOTE]Honestly it feels bit like 17 idiots got caught. They have to be Intentionally explicit in order to get you. So if they are avoid at all costs.

[QUOTE=RoughRider63;5615209]Someone told you meaning you knew CPD was setting up a sting?[/QUOTE]Yes someone did mention it to me I dropped the ball on not putting it out there, it's usually Henrico doing it but this time it was arrestafield, we all have to keep in mind that any of these agencies can do these at any time.

[QUOTE=EasyGuy69;5615696]This link above is 7 months old.

The recent sting link.

https://www.wric.com/news/local-news/chesterfield-county/17-men-head-to-chesterfield-motel-expecting-to-have-sex-with-minors-met-with-police-instead/

[URL]https://www.nbc12.com/app/2021/11/01/chesterfield-police-arrest-17-men-online-child-sex-sting/[/URL][/QUOTE]Thanks for the correct link. Glad these child predators are off the streets.

[QUOTE=Keith2012;5615790]Yes because they were trying to solicit minors.[/QUOTE]Exactly! Guys yall have to use the bigger head. I like them young BUT LEGALLY YOUNG! I WOULD HAVE TOLD THEM HELL NAW. Even though I feel it was entrapment because that ad listed the girl as 19. With the right lawyer they all could beat them charges. But they're reputation will suffer the Same!

[QUOTE=TwistedMetal;5615474]Daaang they posted all the mugshot photos how embarrassing.

But isn't this entrapment? They made up a fake ad and then arrested someone for something that doesn't exist.[/QUOTE]Yep, seems like borderline entrapment but it depends what was said during the initial contact.

[QUOTE=Playboy717;5615876]Exactly! Guys yall have to use the bigger head. I like them young BUT LEGALLY YOUNG! I WOULD HAVE TOLD THEM HELL NAW. Even though I feel it was entrapment because that ad listed the girl as 19. With the right lawyer they all could beat them charges. But they're reputation will suffer the Same![/QUOTE]If entrapment is argued, a good attorney will get the solicitation charges reduced from felony to worst case class 1 misdemeanor.

[QUOTE=Wysiwug;5615893]If entrapment is argued, a good attorney will get the solicitation charges reduced from felony to worst case class 1 misdemeanor.[/QUOTE]No attorney will get your picture out of the paper.

Sorry to burst your bubble guys but in Virginia "entrapment" as a defense is extremely difficult to sustain. Do you imagine the police constructed their operation w / o a Commonwealth's Attorney helping to design how they ran it? But seriously, talk to a criminal defense attorney licensed in The Commonwealth; not your cousin the cop, not your neighbor the tax attorney. A criminal defense attorney. The guys who stepped on their own dick chasing under age snatch are in for a rough ride and shouting "Entrapment!" is not going to help them. Also, fuck them.

[QUOTE=JayBird76;5615825]Thanks for the correct link. Glad these child predators are off the streets.[/QUOTE]One of the guys that got caught is a pastor at a church in Virginia Beach.