[QUOTE=Will008;5661996]JW spa or Moon spa. Just tell them you want the Korean flavor.[/QUOTE]Thank you, brother. I will check them out.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Will008;5661996]JW spa or Moon spa. Just tell them you want the Korean flavor.[/QUOTE]Thank you, brother. I will check them out.
[QUOTE=WarpFactor69;5662164]Thank you, brother. I will check them out.[/QUOTE]Pine and Know Knots are the Korean places in San Diego.
[QUOTE=InstinctGoku;5656800]Thank you SB for letting us know.
I may skip out on this one.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SirBishop;5656202]Don't know how this one slipped by me when she joined that other site. But thankfully someone in the OC started asking about her. Just so I don't have to describe the possible deliciousness of her, the pic is attached. She clearly states she has management and is open about that. Quick research shows a previous girl held the handle "PrincessVienna". I've sent a PM asking for the standard info and I'll share when she replies. If that pic is accurate and properly managed, she's going to be very popular.
https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/PrincessVienna[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SirBishop;5656597]SMH these bookers must think with a hot body, young age and near model looks with NO PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE they can ask for high donations. She's starting in the OC for 300/ HHR 350/45 M 400/ HR.
HX is not PD nor would I pay above market scale of 200/300 for a first timer. No matter how hot she may be. Get some excellent reviews to ask for those donation levels. Sorry guys, she's above my pay grade to ask for that GPS rate.[/QUOTE]IDK, but maybe it was a good thing you all passed on her. Her most recent pictures with braces and pimples does not make her look attractive at all IMO. Yes, nice body in the picture SB's original post, but the current ones she added from November 30th and today to her HX profile not so attractive.
The new girl Momo at FEC looks hot.
Anyone find any info on her?
Reverse image search has drawn a blank.
[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5665104]IDK, but maybe it was a good thing you all passed on her. Her most recent pictures with braces and pimples does not make her look attractive at all IMO. Yes, nice body in the picture SB's original post, but the current ones she added from November 30th and today to her HX profile not so attractive.[/QUOTE]When I saw those braces and latest pics I took her off my TDL. I'm with RCDK, those latest pics are not complimentary to her. Hard pass regardless of the hot body.
[QUOTE=SirBishop;5665827]When I saw those braces and latest pics I took her off my TDL. I'm with RCDK, those latest pics are not complimentary to her. Hard pass regardless of the hot body.[/QUOTE]That initial pic drew a lot of interest, but the more recent pics make it look like she's had a rough 18 years.
On a lighter note, this gave me a good laugh (from her profile).
"Interests.
Finding someone that really knows what to do with me. " <- That would be her management, no?
[QUOTE=Gbrand;5665741]The new girl Momo at FEC looks hot.
Anyone find any info on her?
Reverse image search has drawn a blank.[/QUOTE]I know 100% I've seen her advertised by the same agency in either LA or OC (I like to browse up there just for fun, and in case I'm ever in the mood for a road trip). I'm fairly certain it was under the same name, but the only reviews I could find were.
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2134479396-363187[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2135054270-361446[/URL]
Same provider, just the second one was a random one off.
They both are for this Momo.
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EB%A3%A8%EC%8B%9C[/URL]
And though it's a completely separate set of pics, I can somewhat see the resemblance, assuming two different Photoshoppers did the respective sets of pics.
Candygirlla has other ladies on the CA-kdolls roster on their site as well, and it's showing "back Dec 10th", so it's quite plausible that they're the same person.
With that said, her reviews are really solid, pretty much across the board.
Rating 8. 51.
Looks 7. 96 / Performance 8. 26.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5666028]I know 100% I've seen her advertised by the same agency in either LA or OC (I like to browse up there just for fun, and in case I'm ever in the mood for a road trip). I'm fairly certain it was under the same name, but the only reviews I could find were.
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2134479396-363187[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2135054270-361446[/URL]
Same provider, just the second one was a random one off.
They both are for this Momo.
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EB%A3%A8%EC%8B%9C[/URL]
And though it's a completely separate set of pics, I can somewhat see the resemblance, assuming two different Photoshoppers did the respective sets of pics.
Candygirlla has other ladies on the CA-kdolls roster on their site as well, and it's showing "back Dec 10th", so it's quite plausible that they're the same person.
With that said, her reviews are really solid, pretty much across the board.
Rating 8. 51.
Looks 7. 96 / Performance 8. 26.[/QUOTE]Mom seems to have many good reviews on the LA / OC board for those that can't see T e are. Overall she's good with the two exceptions of no MSOG and guys calling her thighs "thicc" or a Latina figure. It's all opinion on looks but I don't see any real negs in looks, body or performance. No option on her per reviews and ca-kdolls. If I didn't have to buy those damn Christmas gifts I'd be there several times!
I don't know if anyone saw Ice or remember from this agency. It was back in 2012/2013.
She used to be my favorite. Solid natural B+/ C. Nice complexion and very nice ass and prefect waist. I would hold her waist and doggy. She could ride you from the top and moaned.
She stopped having sex and just gave me HJ. I then decided to end the session. I liked her so much that I even brought a coffee for her on that day. It's the first appointment of the day.
This is her review: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-6504999829-360430](Click here)[/URL]. Momo might also had reviews in OC and LA forums.
You should recognize her face and body from photoshopped pics. I thought she looked younger and hotter than pics. Beautiful big tits, thicc body, and nice booty. English has accent but felt like talking to a young Korean American. Great BBBJ. I recommended in LA.
The other Momo you found does not look as close or young as pics but still hot.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5666028]I know 100% I've seen her advertised by the same agency in either LA or OC (I like to browse up there just for fun, and in case I'm ever in the mood for a road trip). I'm fairly certain it was under the same name, but the only reviews I could find were.
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2134479396-363187[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2135054270-361446[/URL]...[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SirBishop;5666229]Mom seems to have many good reviews on the LA / OC board for those that can't see T e are. Overall she's good with the two exceptions of no MSOG and guys calling her thighs "thicc" or a Latina figure. It's all opinion on looks but I don't see any real negs in looks, body or performance. No option on her per reviews and ca-kdolls. If I didn't have to buy those damn Christmas gifts I'd be there several times![/QUOTE]I saw Momo when she had a short stay with CAKD OC, didn't realize she would come visit SD. She is legit on the younger side for k-girls. I didn't ask her age (they always lie anyway) but I would believe her if she said she's in her 20's and looked younger than most providers, especially the ones we get here in SD. Face and body are more full / round than pics. I personally think the pics look better but I prefer thinner girls. A lot of the extra weight went straight to her tits and ass. Definitely not a spinner. As mentioned in other reviews, her tits are all natural and they're great. The downside is that her service isn't the best. The session was quite scripted and she was a bit "cold" at the start. She spent a lot of time in the shower with no preview and as you said MSOG was a definite no go. She also wants you to go slow and gentle. Her BBBJ and BLS was probably the highlight of the session. She's a nice girl but not sure I'd repeat. If you like them young and curvy she fits the bill.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5666854]This is her review: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-6504999829-360430](Click here)[/URL]. Momo might also had reviews in OC and LA forums.
You should recognize her face and body from photoshopped pics. I thought she looked younger and hotter than pics. Beautiful big tits, thicc body, and nice booty. English has accent but felt like talking to a young Korean American. Great BBBJ. I recommended in LA.
The other Momo you found does not look as close or young as pics but still hot.[/QUOTE]Thanks for clearing that up BA. The pics seemed a little bit of a stretch, but other things lined up such that it seemed plausible. This one, currently in SD, appears to have a solidly lower rating than the other one.
I can't see rating on TER but my guess it's because LA Momo is more experienced and more willing to please. I prefer young looking girl so I like SD Momo more. LA Momo could be a hit in SD.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5667683]Thanks for clearing that up BA. The pics seemed a little bit of a stretch, but other things lined up such that it seemed plausible. This one, currently in SD, appears to have a solidly lower rating than the other one.[/QUOTE]
Thought this was kind hilarious.
[URL]https://www.jsonline.com/story/communities/south/news/franklin/2021/12/07/masseuse-nurture-spa-franklin-facing-sexual-assault-charges/6414163001/[/URL]
An employee at a Franklin spa has been charged with having nonconsensual sexual contact with clients.
Yingfeng Huang, 58, of Chicago, is facing two counts of fourth-degree sexual assault, according to a criminal complaint filed in Milwaukee County Circuit Court.
If convicted, Huang could face up to $20,000 in fines and 18 months in prison.
A Franklin police log entry from May 10 said a man, then 19 years old, requested a 45-minute massage and said a masseuse, later identified as Huang, touched his genitals without consent at Nurture Massage Spa, 6564 S. LoversLane Road.
According to the criminal complaint:
An undercover police officer went to the same spa on June 29, where Huang also touched his genitals without consent. Both the 19-year-old and undercover officer said they stopped Huang from any further sexual contact.
Huang admitted to touching both the officer and the 19-year-old and said she did so to earn extra money to send to her family. Police noted that multiple online reviews discussed the sexual contact offered at the spa.
Ms. Evon at SDAG looks pretty good.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/1653[/URL]