IT's as EASY as One, Two, Buckle My Shoe!
[QUOTE=Bucks97;2068229]Could someone just put a straightforward review that you could glean info from quickly on the * * * Escort Classified Ads-Member Discussions threads without commentary on what their numerical scales are? * * * Or whatever it is SecretAgent007 is talking about, which I don't know, because I stopped reading a long time ago? And can SecretAgent007 just write a review that doesn't sound like someone trying to sell me a used car or a life insurance policy? End of rant.[/QUOTE][B]IT's as EASY as One, Two, Buckle My Shoe![/B] [I]([b]1.[/b] [u]please[/u] Add Me to your Ignore List; and, [b]2.[/b] problem solved! -- see below for further instructions. . .)[/I].
[QUOTE=Admin2;2067834][BLUE]Business; add him to your ignore list, problem solved. The ignore list solves all problems like this.
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]
It's just how dumb I guess I really am. . .I thought the Thread, "Escort Classified Ads-Member Discussions," was for [b][i][u]Member Discussions[/u][/i][/b] of Escort Classified Ads, [b][i]NOT Reviews[/i][/b] of Escort Classified Ads?
"Discussion" defined: the act of talking about something with another person or a group of people.
"Review" defined: to consider retrospectively, look back on; to examine with an eye to criticism or correction; to write or give a critical report on.
Even after looking up the definitions of "discussion" and "review," I still cannot figure out what part of the definition of "review" preempts or otherwise viscerates the definition of "discussion."
Somebody splain something to me
Do guys that say "She got on top of me and rode me like a stallion" not know that stallions are the horses with cocks? I laugh my ass off every time I read it.
The difference between review and discussion
[QUOTE=SecretAgent007;2068313][B]IT's as EASY as One, Two, Buckle My Shoe![/B] [I]([b]1.[/b] [u]please[/u] Add Me to your Ignore List; and, [b]2.[/b] problem solved! -- see below for further instructions. . .)[/I].
It's just how dumb I guess I really am. . .I thought the Thread, "Escort Classified Ads-Member Discussions," was for [b][i][u]Member Discussions[/u][/i][/b] of Escort Classified Ads, [b][i]NOT Reviews[/i][/b] of Escort Classified Ads?
"Discussion" defined: the act of talking about something with another person or a group of people.
"Review" defined: to consider retrospectively, look back on; to examine with an eye to criticism or correction; to write or give a critical report on.
Even after looking up the definitions of "discussion" and "review," I still cannot figure out what part of the definition of "review" preempts or otherwise viscerates the definition of "discussion."[/QUOTE]Not you. The problem is the mental sloth of the readership. Probably conditioned to looking at the star ratings on amazon, yelp or the like. Can't be troubled or intellectually challenged to actually read a detailed, articulate, well-reasoned review or discussion.
Keep up the good work. Let them use the ignore button.
mmmm not quite there brother
[QUOTE=DNut;2068614]Makes perfect sense. The horse (stallion) is underneath the rider. So when she gets on top, the stallion with the cock is below. There's a reason they call it the "Cowgirl position".
Now, if he said, "I got on top and rode her like a stallion.", then it would be weird.[/QUOTE]Perhaps you should reread my post. The reference has nothing to do with the position, I know why they call it cowgirl. They are referring to the chick as "a Stallion." As in "she's a 10," or "she's a great girl." They are IDENTIFYING her as a stallion. The chicks do it as well, "I'm a Stallion with a bootie that won't quit." I find it funny that they don't know what the word stallion means.
This site is like Brute Force Cybernetics, it creates a need and fills it...
[QUOTE=Admin2;2068666][BLUE]I don't want to identify who suggested it because I just want opinions uncolored by personality. Somebody suggested adding a "Help Wanted" thread. Essentially this would be a thread for guys to post specific stuff they are looking for and the ladies who wish to provide it could respond either in the thread or through PM's.
Way back when Jax started this forum there weren't any chicks on it and most requests like this were from lonely guys looking for girlfriends so he disallowed it. You can still kind of do it by saying "does anybody know a provider that does X?" But you're soliciting info from the guys that know the providers not just the chicks.
This would be different in the sense that you could just post "I'm looking for three chicks over 6' tall that like water sports." And if, there were three chicks over six feet tall that liked being pissed on they could say "Hey we are three chicks over six feet tall that like being pissed on. Call us" Or perhaps a partial, "I'm a chick that is 5'10" and have two tall friends, would we do?"
We would probably restrict it to guys posting what they were looking for, and chicks who did it answering. Commentary from other guys about the request beyond "Call Martha, she's an amputee and is a provider" wouldn't be allowed. Everybody has some kind of kink and if the behavior involved is done between consenting adults who they fuck are we to judge.
Obviously all of the rules regarding age and consent would apply.
Would you guys be interested? Ladies would you scan it and respond?
To the guy who suggested it, please remain mute about that for now, I really don't want replies colored by personal feelings.
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE](yes the old WEBN commercials from my youth).
It would be a useful addition to the site.
The guys could post just what they are looking for (with a ban on any comments from anyone else) and if a lady is looking for a doubles partner, traveling companion, or has a gig to fill she's got a place to post.
At best it's a used area of the forum, at worst it's dead like truck stops.
And BTW, my favourite product of Brute Force Cybernetics was the "Cherry Replacement Kit" for those ladies that needed to get it back.
Who knew that it would actually become an accepted surgical procedure in many parts of the world..