Printable View
I saw Adrea today, with many many thanks to thelovemuscle for her digits. He was right, she is pretty cute. Tall and nice ass and little tits. I picked her up, but her place wasn't available, so we took a quick ride someplace I had that was safe. In the dream that followed she did a good job with her oral skills, but I had to sample her kitty.
What a great name for a ho.
[blue][Actual Personal Name deleted by Admin][/blue]
[size=-2][u][b]EDITOR's NOTE[/b][/u]: [blue]This report was edited to [u]remove Real Personal Names[/u] in the text. Please do not post anyone's actual personal name in the Forum. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue][/size]
[QUOTE=R Consultant]Thanks brother!! I see they are busy sweeping the girls off the street. Well they must have some extra time on their hands. So its time to clean up the riff-raff a little.
Happy Hunting..[/QUOTE]Were so busy with their useless sting, but take a look at the results of their screw up last year arresting the wrong lady with a little help from the Pasco knuckleheads:
[url]http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/civil/pasco-sheriff-clearwater-police-reach-deal-in-mistaken-arrest/1051333[/url]
Looks like 2 sets of Keystone Cops are even worse than 1!!
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because it was a completely pointless report regarding an individual who was [u]arrested[/u] for engaging in commercial sex activities.
The "report" was completely un-newsworthy, and was apparently posted with the sole intention of embarrassing and humiliating this individual.
I want to say this carefully so no one gets the wrong idea here, but if you think about it, posting the names of people who have been arrested is [u]somewhat heartless[/u] and really just helping the police in their efforts to embarrass these people.
Since this website is all about assisting people in obtaining commercial sex services, we don't want to add to the problems of the unfortunate people who have been arrested by publishing their names and/or photographs.
[i]Thanks![/i][/blue]
Had to hit SP late this morning, so I took the long route via Clearwater. Did see only 1 lady on NFH, but won't say where or her name to avoid censorship.
GTB was very quiet, but saw an old friend ***** near M**** ** who looked very nice! One other lady seen near the chicken place. Clr/Largo Road was dead except for *** who was walking near ************ and looking very nice for her age.
Park Blvd had nothing, so nothing to redact here!
On 34th street saw ladies on both sides of the hump (hope I can say that?) in 2 main areas. Nothing spotted on Haines Road at all. 4th street also had one lady north (*****) and a couple further south. Don't want to post any more details so as to avoid redaction, but I hope this post was helpful? Dreamt I actually scooped a cutie, but I forget her name or where?
Still a very good board here all in all. Adios amigos!
[QUOTE=The Lovemuscle]I was going to post this on the old Park thread but sitings have been so infrequent that I hate to revive it and the HO moves around.
Yesterday afternoon I was driving down Park with no intention of dipping the dickie, when I spotted a 21 year old Adrea, 5'9" red hair, 125 lbs and looking too good to pass up. Pulled into one of the business parking lots just east of the RR tracks and waited for her. She looked at me quickly and walked past, so I figure she's not working but just in case, pulled out and drove bye her again and pulled into the next lot. Sge looked more intently this time so I waved to her and she does the "who me?" look. I nod yes and she comes over to the car. Since she doesn't hesitate to get in instead of coming to the driver's side, I know that I'm in good shape.
Tells me that she really wasn't working but not adverse to making money.
After the quick LM Pussy test, I offer her 20 for a BJ and a tip for good service. She tells me that she gets 30 for "oral sex" and I tell her that I usually only pay 10 but thought she was 100% prettier than the competition and worth more. She laughs and agrees to the 20 and off we go to find a suitable spot as I don't have long before my next appointment. We get to the spot and I pull out the love muscle and she starts going to town. Like many yound and beautiful girls, the bj is nothing spectacular but getting the job done. Then I figure; what the hell? If I'm going to TOFTT, I'll see what she's all about. Tell her that I need to upgrade and she says "fine, I'm very flexible". She then drops drawers to reveal the shaved kitty and climbs over on top of me and slides down the shaft. Good girl, good kitty.
I'm not usually a fan of body jewelery and tats but this chick looked so damn good I was able to forgive the pierced nipples and she started riding with so much gusto and obviously enjoying the ride that I thought I'd pop fast but it didn't happen. After about 10 minutes of good pussy, I had to stop her and get ready for my next meeting. She was actually disappointed that I had to stop, so I guess she was liking something about the ride. I pulled out another 20 and told her that I was in a hurry but if she had good digits, I'd be happy to call when I had more time. She said she had a safe incall from 9-3 mon-fri and a real bed. I promised to call to set something up and will sure repeat.
Here's my scorecard. Sorry I forgot to get a pic but like I said, I was in a hurry and not really trolling.
ADREA age 21
Hair red
eyes hazel
5'9"
125 lbs
really nice azz
face 8
body 9
attitude 9
skills 6
tits nicely shaped full a or small b
This one is a doll, so get her before she gets used up on the streets.
Digits available to trusted posters.
Happy HOing,
LM[/QUOTE]Andrea sounds like my kind of girl. This is the type I enjoy, young, firm and fresh looking. If anyone has any additional information on where to find this honey, please let me know. I'm from up in Pasco, but can make the ride down. She definitely sounds worth it!
The arrest of these woman have been splattered all over the local papers. You can go to the ST Pete Times web page and see the names and faces of these woman. I think more people read the St Pete times than read this forum. Guys like P Rammer have made your web site succssful. I think you were too harsh on him when you deleted his post.
Just my 2 cents.
[QUOTE=Lolligagger]The arrest of these woman have been splattered all over the local papers...you can go to the ST Pete Times web page and see the names and faces of these woman. I think more people read the St Pete times than read this forum.guys like P Rammer have made your web site succssful.I think you were too harsh on him when you deleted his post.
Just my 2 cents[/QUOTE]I have to agree. I've used mug shots to help me determine whether or not I want to contact a provider. Knowing more about providers helps us all figure out whether we want to use their services. I didn't see any of the deleted posts but unless they were salacious, what's the big deal?
[QUOTE=Lolligagger]The arrest of these woman have been splattered all over the local papers...you can go to the ST Pete Times web page and see the names and faces of these woman. I think more people read the St Pete times than read this forum.guys like P Rammer. Have made your web site succssful.I think you were too harsh on him when you deleted his post.
Just my 2 cents[/QUOTE]I have to agree about not posting links for mug shots here or posting names of who got arrested. For those of you who post pics of girls here in various states of undress or action shots, I have NEVER seen one pic where the mongers face is visable. Why not? Are you trying to protect your privacy? And what if YOU got arrested for soliciting? Would you want a link to your arrest report and mug shot posted here? I don`t think you would. If a girl agrees to pose for pictures for you, fine, but I would be willing to bet no girl ever said to you "hey, if I get busted paste the info all over the internet"
Getting off my soapbox now
[QUOTE=Fla Monger II]I have to agree. I've used mug shots to help me determine whether or not I want to contact a provider. Knowing more about providers helps us all figure out whether we want to use their services. I didn't see any of the deleted posts but unless they were salacious, what's the big deal?[/QUOTE]We all know where to find info for arrest reports. If you really want that info, check the arrest reports everyday instead of looking for a short cut here. I read the arrest info for HCSO everyday. Why? If there are multiple arrests for prostitution in a single day, that alerts to me where a sting was set up. And if that location proves to be successful, the cops will continue to use that location. I also keep up to date on any AMP being busted. Finally, and most important: I look to see if any of my neighbors were arrested. You would be surprised at how many people in your own neighborhood get arrested on any given day, weather its a DUI,domestic violence, or drug related.
[QUOTE=SpeedRacer29]We all know where to find info for arrest reports. If you really want that info, check the arrest reports everyday instead of looking for a short cut here. I read the arrest info for HCSO everyday. Why? If there are multiple arrests for prostitution in a single day, that alerts to me where a sting was set up. And if that location proves to be successful, the cops will continue to use that location. I also keep up to date on any AMP being busted. Finally, and most important: I look to see if any of my neighbors were arrested. You would be surprised at how many people in your own neighborhood get arrested on any given day, weather its a DUI,domestic violence, or drug related.[/QUOTE]Many of us don't take that much time in this, and if it's in the newspaper (as all of these girls were), then what's wrong with posting their names here? This forum is not exactly a place where non-mongers congregate. I guarantee you that the St Pete Times is a lot more read than USASG.
Hmmm. I really didn't even realize I had broken the rules when posting this information. I want to respect Jackson's wishes but I need some clarification on where the line is being drawn. Is the rule that we can name names as long as it's not related to an arrest report? Or are we not supposed to name names at all? What about pictures taken from the street along with a name and a provider review?
To me, the best information is a review of services along with a picture. We all know where the strolls are, so the only thing left is provider reviews.
Also, I know Jackson's note below is a "canned" comment, but I want to make sure everyone understands that any information I provide is NEVER posted with the intent of embarassing or humiliating anyone.
If the purpose of this website is to provide meaningful information that will assist it's members to hook up with sex providers, then all information is usefull. I'm not sure where Jackson is attempting to draw an imaginary line.
I thought I knew, understood and followed the guidelines of this forum. Now I'm not so sure.
Happy Hoing,
LM
[blue]Greetings everyone,
I'm not going to debate this issue in the forum because I've learned from past experience that my detractors will ignore my arguments and instead will simply repost their objections again and again and again. Therefor, this post will end the discussion.
==========================================================
[quote=Member #1658]I want to respect Jackson's wishes but I need some clarification on where the line is being drawn. Is the rule that we can name names as long as it's not related to an arrest report? Or are we not supposed to name names at all? What about pictures taken from the street along with a name and a provider review?[/quote]This is straight from the Forum's Rules page:
[indent][i]As itemized in the Forum's Rules, the following information constitutes [u]Personally[/u] [u]Identifying[/u] [u] Information[/u] and will be deleted:
• First and Last Name together
• First Name with Last Initial
• First Initial with Last Name
• Arrest / Booking Numbers
• Criminal or Civil Case Numbers
• Driver's License or other ID Numbers
• Street Address
• Hotel Room Number
• Vehicle License Plate
• Company Name from Vehicle Signage
• Telephone Number from Vehicle Signage
The following information [u]DOES[/u] [u]NOT[/u] constitute [u]Personally[/u] [u]Identifying[/u] [u] Information[/u] and thus does not require any moderator action:
• First Name Only
• Initials Only
• City / County / State Locations
• Street Name
• Street Intersection / Street Corner
• Hotel Name
• Apartment Complex Name
• Subdivision Name
• Public Building/Stadium/Monument Name
• Vehicle Make / Model / Color / Year[/i][/indent]==========================================================
[quote=Member #1658]What about pictures taken from the street along with a name and a provider review?[/quote]Police mugshots are unique in that they imply that the subject of the photos was arrested and is facing possible prosecution for alleged involvement in criminal activity.
==========================================================
[quote=The Lovemuscle]I'm not sure where Jackson is attempting to draw an imaginary line.[/quote]Please see the Forum Policy enumerated above, which I believe clearly removes any uncertainties regarding an "imaginary line".
==========================================================
[QUOTE=Lolligagger]The arrest of these woman have been splattered all over the local papers. You can go to the ST Pete Times web page and see the names and faces of these woman. I think more people read the St Pete times than read this forum.[/QUOTE][quote=Fla Monger II]Many of us don't take that much time in this, and if it's in the newspaper (as all of these girls were), then what's wrong with posting their names here? This forum is not exactly a place where non-mongers congregate. I guarantee you that the St Pete Times is a lot more read than USASG.[/quote]This is stated in the forum's rules and repeated on many occasions here, but I'll repeat it again for your benefit:
[indent][i]I want to say this carefully so no one gets the wrong idea here, but if you think about it, posting the names of people who have been arrested is [u]somewhat heartless[/u] and really just helping the police in their efforts to embarrass these people.
Since this website is all about assisting people in obtaining commercial sex services, we don't want to add to the problems of the unfortunate people who have been arrested by publishing their names and/or photographs.[/i][/indent]If this explanation is too complicated for you to understand, then I'll simplify it for you: You can't post the names and/or mugshots of persons who have been arrested for engaging in commercial sex activities because [u]I don't want you to[/u].
==========================================================
[quote=Fla Monger II]I have to agree. I've used mug shots to help me determine whether or not I want to contact a provider. Knowing more about providers helps us all figure out whether we want to use their services. I didn't see any of the deleted posts but unless they were salacious, what's the big deal?[/quote]Then go to your favorite police website and read to your heart's content, but please don't ask me to use my website to assist the police in their goal of embarrassing these unfortunate people, because that is most definitely NOT what this forum is about.
==========================================================
[QUOTE=Lolligagger]Guys like P Rammer have made your web site successful. I think you were too harsh on him when you deleted his post.
Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]Peter Rammer did not make my website successful, I did. Peter Rammer is a cancerous tumor who I wish would leave the forum and never return.
This report ends this discussion.
Thanks,
Jackson[/blue]
Thank you for an intelligent and comprehensive response - also one that seems to make sense. (feel free to delete my post from a couple of minutes ago regarding asking for clarification)