Printable View
[QUOTE=Merovingian2;6854912]Natalie (goes by Lili). Highly recommend. Late 20's regular girl. Nurse. Drives a Tesla. Was DTF after a coffee meet up. A bit shy and maybe neurotic but opened up in private. Took 3 shots CIP with a smile over 3 hours. Even offered to cook me dinner LOL. She was happy with $300.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5bed838c-88da-40c8-8b59-951d8d27726f[/URL][/QUOTE]Brazilian right? A little bit funny pronunciation? She was decent.
[QUOTE=Mamouna;6855253]Wow. Less than 12 hours and the profile is deactivated. I see this pretty regularly on verified leads, does anyone have actual information on what's going on?
Mero?
(Please no red pill hypotheticals).[/QUOTE]Excellent example of why I don't post here. Things don't last more than 30 min before dudes do stupid things. Won't post again for this reason.
[QUOTE=PriceIsRight39;6846050]I said kind of ghost um. These are not typically LTR's. And I'm not the only one seeing them for sure. If they get weird you sometimes just have to drop them. They will do the same to me if they find a better situation. I don't take it personally. Well not any longer. Hehe.[/QUOTE]I dunno. Ghosting is just. Feels so disrespectful? Not even a 'bye'? For someone you've been supporting and fucking for months or even years? The specific one that started the thread. She did break it off once when she found someone to date IRL and once that ended, she came back. This time it was just. Single checkmark / unread. "Wonderful to see you as always. " were the last messages exchanged.
Only thing I can think of that was any different was during our last date I said I wanted to get back to exploring new places together again? Maybe she took that to mean a rutt. I was simply meaning to go back to what we use to do. I dunno.
Baaah. Don't want to take it personally but I have never ghosted someone. Perhaps I need to get into being more 'hype' or modern. LOL. Just accept it. Ignore it. Be done with it.
Think the other thing is that I'm simply tired of trying to find someone new. I really like having a few on rotation and regular meetings. All of that has stopped and the current girls from the site don't level up to the same. Very disappointing. And the search is just so much effort for the gems.
Might be a time for a break from SA and a few trips to Germany.
Has anyone seen her recently? Does she allow MSOG and what would be the $? I have found reports in this forum, but they are pretty old. Looking for any recent experiences.
[QUOTE=WetBlanketMan;6857648]Has anyone seen her recently? Does she allow MSOG and what would be the $? I have found reports in this forum, but they are pretty old. Looking for any recent experiences.[/QUOTE]Haven't seen her recently, but when I did a while ago msog was very much encouraged. I don't think you'll have to worry about that with her. She'll happily take as many nuts as you can give her.
Report back if you do end up doing l seeing her? I've been curious to know if she's still as much fun as she was.
[QUOTE=Arfq84;6856333]She's real but kind of ugly in real life. Same girl as pics but camera angles and filters do a lot. She's got a small forehead and acne.[/QUOTE]Yea I won't even bother with pics like that. She's for sure rough as guys. You'll be disappointed. And I have even see her. Those are a sold pass. Also, they All look worse than the posted pic. All use BS filters.
Hey gents,
I'm heading to DT Seattle for work at the end of month and have reached out to a few SA girls to see if I can line up a fun time while I'm there. Here are a few I've reached out to but not seeing any reviews yet. If there's any intel out there on these girls, I'd appreciate it (DM's open as well). Cheers!
Scarlett / spoiledsugarbaby: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2df98a4d-6a07-4b26-b20b-54924d63e283[/URL].
Have initiated conversation and she seems DTF, but waiting on the donation.
Kiki37: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/35f07125-c01a-4f81-86e9-1da00e6db019[/URL].
She's straight to the point, DTF, asking for $500 for CFS.
Lalalalaila: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1a1e52ce-13d3-466c-818c-3f0e2adc5582[/URL].
Apparently a hotwife, DTF, but waiting on the donation.
[QUOTE=JwSalem336;6868300]Hey gents,
I'm heading to DT Seattle for work at the end of month and have reached out to a few SA girls to see if I can line up a fun time while I'm there. Here are a few I've reached out to but not seeing any reviews yet. If there's any intel out there on these girls, I'd appreciate it (DM's open as well). Cheers!
Scarlett / spoiledsugarbaby: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2df98a4d-6a07-4b26-b20b-54924d63e283[/URL].
Have initiated conversation and she seems DTF, but waiting on the donation.
Kiki37: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/35f07125-c01a-4f81-86e9-1da00e6db019[/URL].
She's straight to the point, DTF, asking for $500 for CFS.
Lalalalaila: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1a1e52ce-13d3-466c-818c-3f0e2adc5582[/URL].
Apparently a hotwife, DTF, but waiting on the donation.[/QUOTE]The only chic here who might be okay is spoiledsugarbaby. The other two look like cat fishes to me. Take a look at the pic of Kiki37 in the black dress. She looks like a big girl. She's using angles in all of them except that one. Hard pass for me. The Asian chic also has a gut / pouch, you also have to assume she'll be even fatter in person cause these are probably old pics. Look at how broad her shoulders are in her profile picture. She's huge. It's all angles and super zoomed out photos in her standing up. If you zoom in on her bikini photo you can see her bikini is not flush and its bulging out from all her fat. Also take note she photoshopped in a fake iphone over her phone. Which is really weird not sure why. She's a cat fish don't do it man. Guarantee she's even fatter in person probably by a lot in my experience. Definitely not worth $500 for CFS LOL.
If a girl doesn't have multiple photos of herself clearly showing her body without it being super zoomed out / filters / angles etc then I don't even entertain.
[QUOTE=PyroJinx;6869758]The only chic here who might be okay is spoiledsugarbaby. The other two look like cat fishes to me. Take a look at the pic of Kiki37 in the black dress. She looks like a big girl. She's using angles in all of them except that one. Hard pass for me. The Asian chic also has a gut / pouch, you also have to assume she'll be even fatter in person cause these are probably old pics. Look at how broad her shoulders are in her profile picture. She's huge. It's all angles and super zoomed out photos in her standing up. If you zoom in on her bikini photo you can see her bikini is not flush and its bulging out from all her fat. Also take note she photoshopped in a fake iphone over her phone. Which is really weird not sure why. She's a cat fish don't do it man. Guarantee she's even fatter in person probably by a lot in my experience. Definitely not worth $500 for CFS LOL.
If a girl doesn't have multiple photos of herself clearly showing her body without it being super zoomed out / filters / angles etc then I don't even entertain.[/QUOTE]Catfish means when she's pretending to be someone else. Those pics are real. I agree with your observation but seems like OP is down with chubby girls..
Nothing wrong with that except the price. Last week I had a cute 25 yo latina with a huge ass go from 600 to 300. Be like Nancy Reagan, just say no. If you're ok with curvy girls you have LOTS of options. Those girls should be happy to take $300 or less. Except #1 she is a lifestyle SB and will probably ask 600 or more.
[QUOTE=Mamouna;6870663]Catfish means when she's pretending to be someone else. Those pics are real. I agree with your observation but seems like OP is down with chubby girls..
Nothing wrong with that except the price. Last week I had a cute 25 yo latina with a huge ass go from 600 to 300. Be like Nancy Reagan, just say no. If you're ok with curvy girls you have LOTS of options. Those girls should be happy to take $300 or less. Except #1 she is a lifestyle SB and will probably ask 600 or more.[/QUOTE]As they say, chubby girls are like scooters, they are fun to ride but you don't tell your friends.
Chubby girls can be a lot of fun, as many try hard to compensate and really try to please. I usually have one on my regular rotation, that being said Kiki37 did have a bit of an attitude on our interactions and then $500 for CFS, no ducking way.
[QUOTE=DelToro;6872311]As they say, chubby girls are like scooters, they are fun to ride but you don't tell your friends.
[/QUOTE]That made me laugh, so true!
This one says she was an ex-pornstar. Does anyone know her? Insane GPS with an attitude for something you'd get for less than 150 bucks in Germany so be aware if you plan to talk to her:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8a488cc8-21d9-4d87-b888-3de8f47557ae[/URL]
[QUOTE=Eymeux267;6875867]This one says she was an ex-pornstar. Does anyone know her? Insane GPS with an attitude for something you'd get for less than 150 bucks in Germany so be aware if you plan to talk to her:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8a488cc8-21d9-4d87-b888-3de8f47557ae[/URL][/QUOTE]The pornstar's name is literally Britt Blair, it's all over her profile.
[QUOTE=Eymeux267;6875867]This one says she was an ex-pornstar. Does anyone know her? Insane GPS with an attitude for something you'd get for less than 150 bucks in Germany so be aware if you plan to talk to her:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8a488cc8-21d9-4d87-b888-3de8f47557ae[/URL][/QUOTE]What is she asking?
[QUOTE=Eymeux267;6875867]This one says she was an ex-pornstar. Does anyone know her? Insane GPS with an attitude for something you'd get for less than 150 bucks in Germany so be aware if you plan to talk to her:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8a488cc8-21d9-4d87-b888-3de8f47557ae[/URL][/QUOTE]What were her rates quoted? I'm familiar with her and her friend's work, surprised she's in the Seattle area. Her profile says photo, Facebook, and IG verified. Her IG says Coeur d'Alene so she must come out west often.
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/britt_blairxo[/URL]
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/theodoraday/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Eymeux267;6875867]This one says she was an ex-pornstar. Does anyone know her? Insane GPS with an attitude for something you'd get for less than 150 bucks in Germany so be aware if you plan to talk to her:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8a488cc8-21d9-4d87-b888-3de8f47557ae[/URL][/QUOTE]Germany LOL.
[QUOTE=PoonHound1969;6876280]Germany LOL.[/QUOTE]I got to go to Germany. The FKk (sound interesting. They have high rise strip / fuck joints in Spain.
[QUOTE=SeaBurner;6875928]What were her rates quoted? I'm familiar with her and her friend's work, surprised she's in the Seattle area. Her profile says photo, Facebook, and IG verified. Her IG says Coeur d'Alene so she must come out west often.
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/britt_blairxo[/URL]
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/theodoraday/[/URL][/QUOTE]So they don't make enough in porn so they go on seeking? One told me she was going to make 600 k / year in fuck films. LOL must spend a bunch cause she was always broke. Haha.
Was going to try a meet with this one. Looks cute enough on her profile, right? Yes you can see a bit if a tummy (my go to has a slight tummy but it's a nice little pot and fits her well) hey no biggie. I've started at ask for a non filtered selfie via txt (they all lie). Most send the same filtered BS. She actually sent a full body pic from her bedroom (it was a mess). She's much larger than those cute pics on her profile. Much! And not as attractive, not close. Wanted $$ I don't know, a lot of guys say they are paying 3-400 but is this the quality at that price. I don't want to drive up rates, just a honest assessment.
She may work for someone. She was cool via txt. Super ready to hook up. You'd be shocked at the difference in her profile. Again, some minor thickness is quit nice actually.
Got a hold of a flat back white girl and that's my new type. Haha.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9aee251e-bc20-4206-8ac6-fbc0f514dbf3[/URL]
[QUOTE=PriceIsRight39;6876628]Was going to try a meet with this one. Looks cute enough on her profile, right? Yes you can see a bit if a tummy (my go to has a slight tummy but it's a nice little pot and fits her well) hey no biggie. I've started at ask for a non filtered selfie via txt (they all lie). Most send the same filtered BS. She actually sent a full body pic from her bedroom (it was a mess). She's much larger than those cute pics on her profile. Much! And not as attractive, not close. Wanted $$ I don't know, a lot of guys say they are paying 3-400 but is this the quality at that price. I don't want to drive up rates, just a honest assessment.
She may work for someone. She was cool via txt. Super ready to hook up. You'd be shocked at the difference in her profile. Again, some minor thickness is quit nice actually.
Got a hold of a flat back white girl and that's my new type. Haha.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9aee251e-bc20-4206-8ac6-fbc0f514dbf3[/URL][/QUOTE]Yeah I met up with this one. She is bigger than her pics lead you to believe but she's enthusiastic with head and she has some nice meat curtains that drag on your piece. She's submissive. We worked out a manageable deal between me and her that will have me seeing her fairly regularly. Not managed from what I can tell. She drove herself to my place. From Carnation area and drove to me in Everett.
[QUOTE=SocratesRvng;6876826]Yeah I met up with this one. She is bigger than her pics lead you to believe but she's enthusiastic with head and she has some nice meat curtains that drag on your piece. She's submissive. We worked out a manageable deal between me and her that will have me seeing her fairly regularly. Not managed from what I can tell. She drove herself to my place. From Carnation area and drove to me in Everett.[/QUOTE]Thank you. The pics just didn't do it for me. She was honest with it and didn't seem to be gaming. Refreshing.
[QUOTE=PriceIsRight39;6876617]So they don't make enough in porn so they go on seeking? One told me she was going to make 600 k / year in fuck films. LOL must spend a bunch cause she was always broke. Haha.[/QUOTE]Unless you're a megastar, I don't feel like girls are making a ton working with the traditional porn studios. That's why so many go indie with OF and escorting or go more extreme with the fetish content studios. I've seen a few more other psudeo pornstars post ads in the other board. If they're always broke, there's a reason why they're in porn and not finance.
[QUOTE=PopItFank69;6776015]Damn, don't any of you have vasectomies? Visiting Dr. Snip was the best thing I ever did.[/QUOTE]Wondering if any of you have used Malefromhome to get your sperm tested? I ordered a kit and wondering if they wrap it in discreet packing or do I need to make sure I intercept it? I'd think it is in like brown plain paper but I've searched and can't find a thing. Thanks VA.
[QUOTE=SeaBurner;6878104]Unless you're a megastar, I don't feel like girls are making a ton working with the traditional porn studios. That's why so many go indie with OF and escorting or go more extreme with the fetish content studios. I've seen a few more other psudeo pornstars post ads in the other board. If they're always broke, there's a reason why they're in porn and not finance.[/QUOTE]I've been friends / situationships / arrangements with porn girls in the past, when I lived in LA. What used to happen is a new girl got a lot of attention from the studios and got a lot of shoots early in her career. So it was easy for a girl to go "whoa I can make hundreds of thousands of dollars doing this! But the problem was that the market is focused on being new. A girl will get a lot of attention as a new girl, do the rounds with the major studios, but then won't get many calls after that.
To get repeat gigs in porn you have to be particularly hot in a way that stands out and be consistent in performance that translates on camera. Otherwise you are just going to get the occasional gig for $1-2 k, depending on what you can demand. It's why porn girls will do escorting or sugar on the side. Their shoots will effectively be advertising that lets them get above escort market prices for their time.
Now things have shifted since the pandemic and OnlyFans effectively took over. Mainstream porn shoots drive subs to a girl's OnlyFans and maybe discreet escorting too. If you look at someone like Riley Reid you have someone who at the beginning of her career was doing shoot-by-shoot hustling, but was popular enough to get consistent repeat requests from studios. Which has translated to her now making a few million dollars a year on OnlyFans.
So it's totally possible for the right girl to make 600 k a year in this environment. But it's a lot of work, and the market is only going to support so many girls at that level. I don't know if the girls linked earlier in the thread, Britt and Theodora, could get to that level. They seem to be basically "generically hot" porn girls who don't stand out that much.
Just a thought, can any of these women on sugar sites really still be considered not professional? The only difference is they're not on TNA etc. I'm all for GND types but the posts here are mainly commentary on how to get a PPM arrangement with a sugar baby and who got burned. I dropped seeking 5 months ago. & most of the "non-pros" I've mentioned recently were from other apps. They don't even bother hiding it anymore.
[QUOTE=Mamouna;6879156]Just a thought, can any of these women on sugar sites really still be considered not professional? The only difference is they're not on TNA etc. I'm all for GND types but the posts here are mainly commentary on how to get a PPM arrangement with a sugar baby and who got burned. I dropped seeking 5 months ago. & most of the "non-pros" I've mentioned recently were from other apps. They don't even bother hiding it anymore.[/QUOTE]For me the difference between a non pro and the pro is how they view there time. If they charge by the hour they are a pro. The non pro exists on a spectrum. Most of them are really just semi-pros. A pro does this full time as a career and has no expectation of ever stopping. A non pro is working on a degree and / or in between jobs and / or just needs some extra help and wants to be self sufficient some day and actually has a past history of doing that. The semi-pro to pro chic does this as a career and has no real life skills other then ho'ing. A semi pro while may do this as a career doesn't charge by the hour and you will get at least 3 hours + with her and doesn't clock watch your time like a hooker. More or less like a relationship and there is an effort on both sides to get to know each other. With a pro it's just strictly by the hour and they are not trying to get to know you on a personal level. It's a blow and go type operation.
[QUOTE=Mamouna;6879156]Just a thought, can any of these women on sugar sites really still be considered not professional? [/QUOTE]If you take a strict definition of accepting some kind of financial benefit in exchange for use of their body, they are obviously pros. The problem with that strict definition is that it probably also makes 99 percent of vanilla relationships "pro" as well. Because even if you are just buying them dinner and flowers they are getting [I]something[/I] out of it. And if you were supporting a lifestyle or opportunities they couldn't otherwise afford it sure sounds "pro" to me. It also sounds like most serious relationships.
So to my mind a strict definition is friggin' useless because it catches so much. Human behavior is inevitably messy and black-and-white distinctions are piss poor.
Usually the "non pros" on the sugar sites are exercising a lot more discrimination in who they bang than the typical TNA whale. And of course, on the average, the typical SA girl is seeing fewer clients than the typical druggie on STG. That's enough of a distinction to me to be relevant.
[QUOTE=MarkoRamius;6880057]If you take a strict definition of accepting some kind of financial benefit in exchange for use of their body, they are obviously pros. The problem with that strict definition is that it probably also makes 99 percent of vanilla relationships "pro" as well. Because even if you are just buying them dinner and flowers they are getting [I]something[/I] out of it. And if you were supporting a lifestyle or opportunities they couldn't otherwise afford it sure sounds "pro" to me. It also sounds like most serious relationships.
So to my mind a strict definition is friggin' useless because it catches so much. Human behavior is inevitably messy and black-and-white distinctions are piss poor.
Usually the "non pros" on the sugar sites are exercising a lot more discrimination in who they bang than the typical TNA whale. And of course, on the average, the typical SA girl is seeing fewer clients than the typical druggie on STG. That's enough of a distinction to me to be relevant.[/QUOTE]Reminds me of the saying 'everyone has a price.' If you offered someone a million bucks and all they had to do was sleep with you once, a very large majority, including the ones touting ethics would say yes if it were guaranteed and their safety was ensured.
There comes a price to where it becomes financially and practically irresponsible to not take the offer because the alternative for most people is decades of work and life being taken away to make the equivalent. You can read up on any social media thread where this question is asked and you'd see most of the responses saying they'd do it.
So essentially everyone is a provider, woman and guys alike, and most definitions, arguments, labels, etc are entirely meaningless. The only exceptions would be those who are already well off or have super strict morals (i.e. would need to talk to their SO first), but even then the price just needs to be adjusted and/or they'd be in the minority.
[QUOTE=MarkoRamius;6880057]If you take a strict definition of accepting some kind of financial benefit in exchange for use of their body, they are obviously pros. The problem with that strict definition is that it probably also makes 99 percent of vanilla relationships "pro" as well. Because even if you are just buying them dinner and flowers they are getting [I]something[/I] out of it. And if you were supporting a lifestyle or opportunities they couldn't otherwise afford it sure sounds "pro" to me. It also sounds like most serious relationships.
So to my mind a strict definition is friggin' useless because it catches so much. Human behavior is inevitably messy and black-and-white distinctions are piss poor.
Usually the "non pros" on the sugar sites are exercising a lot more discrimination in who they bang than the typical TNA whale. And of course, on the average, the typical SA girl is seeing fewer clients than the typical druggie on STG. That's enough of a distinction to me to be relevant.[/QUOTE]Are they salaried or hourly? Like, if they sleep over do I have to pay them overtime? That's how I distinguish them. I'm not looking for a woman who needs to punch a clock.
Since 2019 I've had five SA relationships evolve into real dating relationships not involving explicit exchange of money. We caught feelings, etc. These were all between 19 and 27 years old when I met them and the relationships lasted from a few months to a couple years. There are still women on seeking who are looking for $$$ but also have a side motive of just looking for an older guy to date who isn't a creepy loser. Those are the ones I'm looking for.
At the end of the day every guy pays for pussy. If they have a GF they are paying for it. Buying her clothes. Paying for her meals. If she lives with him he's probably the only one paying rent. If you got a wife then you are paying for all of her shit and you may still not even be getting laid! A lot of marriages these days are sexless. So at the end of the day. It doesn't matter if its a hooker or your GF. You still paid for it.
Any intel on this one?
She keeps sneaking around. Last week I was this close to get her for 400 but she stopped texting right before meeting.
From the texts she seems legit, I noticed she keeps creating accounts every 1 or 2 weeks, for me that is a huge red flag.
I'm debating, seems a high risk high reward situation.
[QUOTE=Papicho;6880672]Any intel on this one?
She keeps sneaking around. Last week I was this close to get her for 400 but she stopped texting right before meeting.
From the texts she seems legit, I noticed she keeps creating accounts every 1 or 2 weeks, for me that is a huge red flag.
I'm debating, seems a high risk high reward situation.[/QUOTE]LOL. She seemed the same to me!
She won't meet. At least not me. Someone reported her as a time waster. She sent me a long azz WhatsApp about her whole life story and how she's raising her siblings son her own or some BS. These girls really don't need us for sex. Well 1 out if 500 can be legit SBs. The rest don't know the meaning of the word. Time wasters, scammers and escorts at this point. There are a few still, but seeking is the new tender. I have another in Vegas that says, " you won't ghost me, right?" Now she wants a " good faith " via cash app!
I'll get right on that babe. LOL.
Total mess.
[QUOTE=Rjx1234;6880238]Are they salaried or hourly? Like, if they sleep over do I have to pay them overtime? That's how I distinguish them. I'm not looking for a woman who needs to punch a clock.
Since 2019 I've had five SA relationships evolve into real dating relationships not involving explicit exchange of money. We caught feelings, etc. These were all between 19 and 27 years old when I met them and the relationships lasted from a few months to a couple years. There are still women on seeking who are looking for $$$ but also have a side motive of just looking for an older guy to date who isn't a creepy loser. Those are the ones I'm looking for.[/QUOTE]2019. This 2024 and the game has changed. A lot! Seeking is tender now but with more scammers and fake pics. Your odds are 1:75 ro higher. They don't want to date older men unless we're buying. It s fun to pretend and play pretty woman with the few hood ones. Is they need dick, Tyrone goes for free.
My experience anyway. Again there are a few good ones. I just don't need them to like me anymore. LOL.
[QUOTE=PyroJinx;6879434]For me the difference between a non pro and the pro is how they view there time. If they charge by the hour they are a pro. The non pro exists on a spectrum. Most of them are really just semi-pros. A pro does this full time as a career and has no expectation of ever stopping. A non pro is working on a degree and / or in between jobs and / or just needs some extra help and wants to be self sufficient some day and actually has a past history of doing that. The semi-pro to pro chic does this as a career and has no real life skills other then ho'ing. A semi pro while may do this as a career doesn't charge by the hour and you will get at least 3 hours + with her and doesn't clock watch your time like a hooker. More or less like a relationship and there is an effort on both sides to get to know each other. With a pro it's just strictly by the hour and they are not trying to get to know you on a personal level. It's a blow and go type operation.[/QUOTE]I'd agree, but the issue is on seeking is more and more of the pro types with zero future and less and less of the gnd that's trying to level up with arrangements (they mostly fail). They have zero interest in marriage and being cared for (but they'll serve 50 men at work) and more and more men are seeing you'd be a fool to marry anymore.
Yikes.
[QUOTE=PriceIsRight39;6881402]2019. This 2024 and the game has changed. A lot! Seeking is tender now but with more scammers and fake pics. Your odds are 1:75 ro higher. They don't want to date older men unless we're buying. It s fun to pretend and play pretty woman with the few hood ones. Is they need dick, Tyrone goes for free.
My experience anyway. Again there are a few good ones. I just don't need them to like me anymore. LOL.[/QUOTE]I've had so many bad experiences on SA when they've caught feelings too. One or two were likely my fault on not being very clear on expectations, while the others just didn't end well.
Also led me to realize that the majority of women on there have issues, and I don't think I could ever date an SA chick seriously.
It's also likely my direct approach scaring off the flakes and newbies, but I rarely came across a true nonpro. Also, I'm pretty sure most of the easier SBs are just being rotated around guys in this forum.
[QUOTE=HelloThar;6881472]I've had so many bad experiences on SA when they've caught feelings too. One or two were likely my fault on not being very clear on expectations, while the others just didn't end well.
Also led me to realize that the majority of women on there have issues, and I don't think I could ever date an SA chick seriously.
It's also likely my direct approach scaring off the flakes and newbies, but I rarely came across a true nonpro. Also, I'm pretty sure most of the easier SBs are just being rotated around guys in this forum.[/QUOTE]I'm pretty direct too and I have slow luck on SA. I refuse to simp on SBs (anymore haha). I agree. There's a few we're all fucking. The rest are fake or okay in the four figure playground. Which can be rewarding. There are levels to the chit!
[QUOTE=PyroJinx;6880563]At the end of the day every guy pays for pussy. If they have a GF they are paying for it. Buying her clothes. Paying for her meals. If she lives with him he's probably the only one paying rent. If you got a wife then you are paying for all of her shit and you may still not even be getting laid! A lot of marriages these days are sexless. So at the end of the day. It doesn't matter if its a hooker or your GF. You still paid for it.[/QUOTE]CGA covers this. Give him cred. LOL.
I got this message from "EducatedInfluencer":
"Hello! I hope your day is going well. My name is Anna, I live in Los Angeles and have a unique opportunity that could save you time in the dаting world. I specialize in mаtchmaking, reрresenting Ukrainian women living in the US. To be quick, I have girls in Washington and would be glad to show them to you. These women are interested in various types of relationships, from casual encounters and travel рartnerships to long-term commitments like marriage. I believe in transparency and encourage both parties to be youрfront about their desires for the best mаtch possible. Here's how it works: 1. I send you pictures and detailed information about potentiаl mаtches. 2. You select women you are interested in. 3. I forwаrd your info and interest to them. 4. If they are interested, I fаcilitate initial messaging. 5. Once both parties want to рroceed, my fе1077; of $300 becomes due, and I рrovide all сontact details. If this piques your interest, feel free to reach out via email or WhatsА1088;1088;, and I'll fоrward the рrofiles of women that fit your criteria. Websitе — [URL]UtopiaDate.com[/URL] Еmail — xxxx at xxxxxxxxx WhatsА1088;1088; — (310) 706-xxxx Kind regards, Anna Xxxxxx P.S. If you're not interested, please reply 'unsubscribе' to opt-out of future messages. ".
Thoughts?
SA has def changed. I've been on the site for a few weeks and here are my experiences:
Blockchain scams?
SultryFan and Charming lady. Poof. Just like that these two vanished from the site after trying to claim to be crypto traders. Sultry slipped up and told me that "she" was a frenchman who grew up in Malaysia. LOL.
Pic sellers and time waster -.
HotCutie - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d05f7025-325a-4861-9330-83623573fca4[/URL] pic and vid seller.
ClassyMiz - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1b59726b-bfeb-4172-86ae-1d43d42bc433[/URL] Only Fans.
AmazingSoul - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/48eb461c-40fd-4586-8719-eaae4a5c481e[/URL] time waster.
Requires deposit and GPS -.
Petitebaby04 - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/debfaf93-5f79-402f-9990-f27ddce43eeb[/URL] wants deposit and 500 for 2 hr no anal or bare; I passed.
Sunseeker - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/88594d8b-fb88-4c33-91a9-a8f8cc945400[/URL] she's been on the site for a long time and thinks that she's a 4 digital gal.
Real SBs. I was lucky to meet four people for in person meets and beyond. I'm keeping three but will share this one:
EverythingChanges - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c023252f-1612-4b73-8253-6d0d0daf4543[/URL] She's in town for a few days and wants to get her groove on with strangers. DM me for details, but I will say that she checks most if not all the boxes for you mongers.
HotCutie - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d05f7025-325a-4861-9330-83623573fca4[/URL] pic and vid seller.
The pics are of porn star Demi Hawks.
[URL]https://twitter.com/demihawks1?lang=en[/URL]