Bona and Rose from BlackPink
[QUOTE=FreeWally;6978790]Hi, I have seen her this week. If I google random photos of Rose from Blackpink, then no. But the one photo someone posted for comparison is close, same body type. Face is 1 tier down from Rose but still very cute. I will post two comparison photos below, one of Princess in SD and another of the Rose from BP. Bona is better than Princess but not quite Rose in face and body. But again, very similar body to Rose's reference photo.[/QUOTE]I do think Bona looks like that second photo. That's why I posted it here a while back. I also showed it to her after one of our sessions. She got all excited and asked me to text it to her, so clearly she thinks it looks like her too. LOL! Then again, I'm old and my eyes are fading, so pretty much all beautiful young girls look even more beautiful to me. Like a painting by Claude Monet.
The only other thing I would add is: Of course she likes the money above all else. That's true for pretty much every working girl. The key question, after that, is: Does she also love to fuck? After seeing Bona a bunch of times, I say yes she does. We all know some girls just go through the motions. Bona has never been like that with me. She always gets into it, and that's what I like most about her. I always leave with that feeling of, "Damn, she's real good. " And that doesn't always happen with every girl. Only the top-notch ones.
SAG Aspyn = Lehan = Sexy Angel Lisa
I saw Aspyn before. She's pretty attractive, not quite MILF eventho she's probably in MILF age range. All those pics are fake. I posted her real pics before as Sexy Angel Lisa, IIRC.
[URL=https://www.sweetasiangem.com/aspyn](Starting 8/5)[/URL]
Gate keepers and rebrands
The Boner would launch immediately if he thought these GFE girls Sexy Vivian, Star Six and Nine are new and hot. Unfortunately The Boner Sense was tingling. It's only tingling for rebrands, MILFs, and new HYAs. They for sure don't feel like new HYAs. I could be wrong. I would still investigate if I don't feel the tingling for any potential new HYAs.
Quick reviews would help The Boner Decision.
[QUOTE=RockItAllNite;6989876]Why are there no GFE reviews for these new girls? GFE clients don't "fuck and tell"? It's very quiet here in comparison to the BB forums.[/QUOTE]
Possible WLA Rebrand in OC?
Hey guys,
I was browsing around cakdolls in OC and saw this ad.
[URL]https://www.cakdolls.cr/product/sydney-new-to-area-options-avail-copy/[/URL]
Her pics look like one of the WLA girls but I can't put my finger on it. Anyone care to chime in?
Freaking excellent post sir
Wow if I could give this post a "like" or "love" I certainly would.
It basically illustrates the problem of rebranding practice and how it hurts us and helps the kgirls / agencies.
I would also add that often the rebranding is defended by some saying it because of a stalker. Yeah sometimes there is that, but it's not really common. Most of the rebrands run from old reviews or just want to create an illusion of "new pussy". The stalker thing is just an excuse employed by many who don't want to hear criticism of rebranding.
With prices rising (in the bay area it was 220 all included pre covid and now it's 300) I find myself doing toftt less and less. Most of my toftts aren't particularly good either.
[QUOTE=ResilientJohn;7002549]I look at things from a monger's perspective, first and foremost. It's simple for me to do, benefits me, and most of the bros here too. I don't like rebranding mainly because of two reasons, it artificially inflates an already large number of kgirls in the LA / OC area and it requires extensive knowledge of past kgirls to pin down truly new talent.
Having a large number of kgirls might sound good on paper but IMHO it's actually degrading our ability to get good intel right now. Because it is straining an already scarce resource of reliable and honest reviews. Having a lot of kgirls available is nice and all but if we don't have an increase of good reviews commensurate with the larger kgirl roster then in reality we are slowly receding into a no man's land of information scarcity. Rebrands contribute to this travesty: potential gems being sidelined.
You perfectly highlighted my second point. Without extensive knowledge of past kgirls, we can easily fall prey to why certain owners / girls intentionally rebrand: tap into the market of ignorant or uninformed mongers. Say a monger decides they don't want to see girl X because of intel, feedback, and / or reviews. If girl X then rebrand to Z, the monger is SOL if he likes the new pictures, stats, whatnot and decides to see her. In your case, Bona was a winner but the opposite can just be as likely.
To your point on TOFTT, I don't think any here dislikes the idea. On the contrary, we wholeheartedly praise and encourage the practice. It's just that, IMHO, most don't because of limited hard earned funds and a strong aversion and fear of seeing a dud leaving them poorer and dissatisfied for it. Not all of us have the wherewithal to take that plunge. I get that. So they heavily rely on info here and elsewhere to make their choice for them. Hence, we get this spiral of chasing the newest revealed star while a supernova is veiled on the fringes.[/QUOTE]